Thread 4465067

Is digitally manipulating a photo a valid form of artistic expression? How does it differ in post production from other types of manipulation?

>>4465067 (OP)
Of course it is. In many ways it can be more artistic than pure photography.

>>4465067 (OP)
Holy kino. Whatever works, works. Art is total freedom. Do whatever you want.

Post moar

>>4465092
Thanks. Here’s a doctored selfie.

>>4465067 (OP)
Lynchian but not in a good way (remember the drawer knob?)

>>4465308
I was actually going for this aesthetic from the Twin Peaks The Return

>>4465365
Checkout early surreal photography from france.

>>4465369
This is cool

This is all hideous.

>>4465409
Show me better, cunt.

>>4465067 (OP)
>Is digitally manipulating a photo a valid form of artistic expression?
Sure
>Is digital manipulation photography?
No. It's graphic arts. Starting with a photo doesn't make graphic arts photography.
>>4465071
>Digital manipulation can be more artistic than pure photography.
Wrong. It art one medium does not negate another. Art is art regardless of medium.

>>4465453
>Is digital manipulation photography?
>No. It's graphic arts.
Lmao, fuck off you straight poographer. Pictorialism has solved this a century ago.

>>4465453
Poor fella doesn't know what can means.

>>4465455
>>4465458
>insufferably poor reading comprehension
>clearly lacking artistic education
Shameful. Posts disregarded.

>>4465459
>no u

At least you're based. A based retard, but still based.

>>4465420
nothing is better.

>>4465679
kino