Thread 4470128

I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire.
Which one are you hoping to score?
You are going to be getting one right /p/?
You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT

the whatnow?

>>4470128 (OP)
I bet you buy 7 of these and 4 of them are that gray one

also
>No IBIS

>>4470128 (OP)
Yes. I was considering it. The blue one or the clear one is pretty cool. A modern digishitter may be pretty fun. It's actually difficult to find old digishits with such low MP.

>>4470128 (OP)
I'll wait until one shows up at the thrift store.
Which is where I get all my cameras from.

>>4470131
>. It's actually difficult to find old digishits with such low MP
Agreed. The price is right too for a new snapshitter. Most of the old ones are busted/will be busted soon.
I had an old Fuji that was 3.1mp that was fun. Sold it when old snapshitters went up in price. Wished I hadn't sometimes. Saw one in a 2nd hand store recently for cheap. Bought it and found the sensor was cooked.
Few days later I saw an article about the Charmeras and decided to get one. They won't be actual vintage aesthetic but at least it will function correctly.

>>4470135
You'll be waiting a long time. Charmeras are gonna be big. Collecting them will likely be a thing.

Good luck, they sold out within 8 minutes.

Cruise eBay I'm sure a bunch were bought up by flippers and scalpers.

>>4470128 (OP)
I wasn’t keen until I saw it’s a keychain, that sold me.

>>4470137
I'm in no rush. I'm not chasing trends.
And if I need a tiny digishitter, I got my U20 in the meantime.

>>4470138
That was just the presale to build hype. BHPhoto says they'll have them in stock sometime in November. Kodak needs to get their name out their for sales and pump profits. Doubtful the company won't be flush with stock heading into the holidays. These are gonna be a hit for stocking stuffers. Kodak is probably making a killing on them. Profit margin on a Charmera has got to be huge with an msrp of $30. Having them produced can't cost more than a few bucks.

>>4470141
What's the pink one?

>>4470145
Shitty kids camera that started turning up a few years ago. They've since evolved to include thermal printers, and more polished versions are available at Target and such now.
Look up "kids camera" on your favorite China shopping site.

THEY DO ANYTHING BUT BRINGING KODACHROME BACK

>>4470152
Film is dead. Let it go.

>>4470152
Film is alive. Continue asking kodak to bring it back.

>>4470154
>>4470155
The duality of filman

>>4470152
bro just get a z50ii and install a picture control preset with the exact color timing

>>4470155
based
>>4470154
>>4470157
fuck off retard

>>4470158
Seethe filmlette.

>>4470158
>The manchild can't let go of his nostalgia toys
Film is gone homie. It exists soley because of hollywood and one day your freezer-stored collection will run dry

>>4470158
Film is here friend. Kodak, ilford, and other companies will continue making film in all sorts of formats. We will see a film resurgence!

>>4470131
>It's actually difficult to find old digishits with such low MP.
why not photoshop resize to 10% then resize back to 100%? same as shooting low MP

>>4470145
kid's toy. my son has a based dino-themed one. it's pretty fun to shoot those. they lack a flash but I guess you shouldn't give a flash to 4yolds

>>4470189
When most people goon over low MP what they normally mean is they want a CCD that caps out at ISO 1600. Also, resizing down then up can be extra destructive if you don't use the right methods.

>>4470189
I would rather not use photoshop. I don't think it would have the same look as this either lol.

>>4470128 (OP)

totally the opaque one and park my bicyckle on grass

With all the nostalgia stuff going on these days I have to wonder if anyone will ever be nostalgic for anything in our current era.

>>4470287
Depends what the future has to offer.

>>4470128 (OP)
OH NO NO NO NO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-SCkC74_VE

>>4470323
Image quality looks like something you'd get from a 2004 budget phone.

>>4470323
is this a fucking joke?

>>4470327
It is. They could have made something that was actually usable, but this is just a shameless cash grab trying to capitalize on the nostalgia/digicam craze. It is e-waste from the get go.

>>4470328
by OP's pic I had assumed they were the size of a classic 35mm point'n'shoot - maybe a little smaller. but fuck me - they really took that chink toy camera from above and put it in a kodak branded plastic case. it's literally the same. i even recognize the "filters/effects" from my kid's toy camera. this is a fucking webcam.

>>4470338
It's what the people want.

>>4470338
nah the chink toy camera its closer to 3MP so it give better and sharper images lmao.

It also comes with games like tetris!

Just get the Camp snap camera instead

>>4470342
>just get a huge coolie brick with a high resolution sensor and no rear view screen for more than twice the cost
Nah. I'll stick with the affordable tiny charm sized low rez full featured snapshitter that can hang from my keychain. Thanks anyway.

>>4470323
What an annoying bastard to listen to

>>4470340
>gearfagging over toy cameras
kek

>>4470323
This just seems like more garbage to pollute the Earth with. What a waste.

Let me guess, you need more?

>>4470130
KEK

>>4470128 (OP)
>I am going to buy one
How about you buy an ad?

>>4470435
WHAT ARE THOSE

>>4470128 (OP)
The marketing and design team did a great job.
It's also well priced, not in the sense that recycled plastic with a 2005 flip phone camera is a good deal, but in the sense that people don't mind $29.

I actually might pick one up for the pixel filters because the photos look like they were made with the photocopy degradation technique.

>>4470451
Forgot to add that it sucks absolute fucking ass that it has no internal memory.

>>4470338
>took that chink toy camera from above and put it in a kodak branded plastic case.

AND, they blind-boxed the things with one "rare" design

>>4470440
The Man Hole. I mean, the Manual Holo, a made in U.S.A. cameras built on american exceptionalism.

- 50MP resolution
- Photo & video capture
- 16x digital zoom
- Anti-shake technology
- USB-C charging
- Micro SD Card Slot
- Includes SD card reader for phone/laptop transfer

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

>>4470794
>The camera’s built-in flash is an LED, rather than a xenon flash.
Fucking dropped

>>4470128 (OP)
Buy an ad

>>4470794
>50MP
X doubt
Probably just some dumb interpolation algorithm

>>4470794
looks like literal SHIT with a sense stuck on it

>>4470813
Pleas understand anon, the extra five cents per unit would have made it untenable

>>4470866
Is that thing sporting an M43 sensor? Whaow!

>>4470128 (OP)
I just think they're neat
>>4470323
>>4470376
I like my e-m5 mk II, but man is he hideous and talks like he's held at gunpoint.

>>4470794
>>4470813
>The camera’s built-in flash is an LED, rather than a xenon flash.
Shameful. They had one job.

>>4470858
>>4470437
No. I don't think I will. I'm gonna buy a Charmera instead.
>>4470866
>Kodak Yellow 1987 Edition
Oh man. That's the one I want.
FUUUUUUUUK. I hope I don't have to buy more than one to get it. Thinking about buying the six pack just to be sure I get one. Could easily scalp the rest to cover the cost I bet.

>>4470152
Shoot Ektar at 50 and E6 that shit nigger.

>>4471135
it's just not the same. sigh...

>>4470376
INSULT MASTER WONG AND MEET SWIFT DEATH, PIG

I caved to the hype and bought three. Only received one for now.

>>4470128 (OP)
>cheap chinkoid e-waste
No wonder you fags are drooling over it.

>>4470128 (OP)
I've had one on backorder for a couple months, wish it would fucking get here. Don't care which one it is, either.

>>4480568
I keep checking BHphoto to see if charmeras are in stock. They still aren't. By the time Kodak gets off it's lazy ass and ships products the hype will be past. Kodak blew it. They shoild have gotten product ready to ship before rolling out media hype.

The chinks have already cloned it and for cheaper, saw picrel at Best Buy. The physical design is different sure but the specs sound more or less the same, and it’s only like 17usd lol.
>inb4 but the physical appearance is part of it

>>4481637
Wooops

>>4470152
Kodachrome legitimately sucked ass compared to E6 offerings.

t. oldfag that actually shot Kodachrome

>>4481644
>Kodachrome legitimately sucked ass compared to E6 offerings.

Sacrilege heathen!

>>4481637
>inb4 but the physical appearance is part of it
It really is.

>>4470323
I can't listen to that guy for more than a minute, tops. I wonder if he always talks in this extremely retarded way or if he fakes it for his channel.

>>4481684
So this is a fashion accessory that happens to take shit photos. Very woman like, fitting.

>>4481637
>>4481638
>no viewfinder

>>4481694
Most of the people buying it already have a camera, give it a rest.

>>4481638
Hah I saw these on sale at Best Buy for $15 CAD last week. These Vivitars are much worse than the Charmera, sadly. The native resolution on the Vivitar is 320x240, upscaled to 14MP. At least the Charmera has an honest resolution of 1.6MP (1440x1080).