← Home ← Back to /p/

Thread 4474453

15 posts 6 images /p/
Anonymous No.4474453 [Report] >>4474458 >>4474517 >>4476144
Did porn look better on film?
Should industry switch back to film for better skin tones?
Anonymous No.4474454 [Report] >>4475007
What is /p/'s opinion?
Anonymous No.4474455 [Report] >>4474559
Cum on, don't be shy
Anonymous No.4474458 [Report] >>4474474
>>4474453 (OP)
As if any porn addict cares for skin tones
Anonymous No.4474474 [Report]
>>4474458
/thread
Anonymous No.4474517 [Report] >>4475953
>>4474453 (OP)
actually intersting in another way:
how does one light porn.
full frontal no shadows soft lighting seems amateur.
three point setup does hide too much and is too moody i would argue.
Anonymous No.4474559 [Report] >>4474948
>>4474455
>hair like and old hag that just wake up
>dress them in sailor uniforms
What did they mean by this
Anonymous No.4474948 [Report]
>>4474559
What were the '90s, you zoomie retard?
Anonymous No.4475007 [Report]
>>4474454
Not sure if I have a weirdly short tongue or what, but this looks bizarre
Anonymous No.4475953 [Report]
>>4474517
all depends on the style of your video.

The light bar things used by ryan madison seem to be good.
Anonymous No.4476045 [Report] >>4476055
I noticed this too the other day while looking at some german vhs tape boxes...
Anonymous No.4476055 [Report] >>4476063
>>4476045
>implying VHS is film
Anonymous No.4476063 [Report]
>>4476055
No, but photos used on cover box of VHS tapes were shot on film.
Anonymous No.4476144 [Report]
>>4474453 (OP)
I can imagine that "the industry" would rather switch to HDR or render the same film in multiple color gradings.

Like you get a little option if you want the film to look "lifelike", "vibrant" or "retro"
Anonymous No.4477515 [Report]
yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0