Thread 4478233

I need to see flat earth.

>>4478233 (OP)

i also love how stoked this guy is on the p1100

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9lZCHwWC0E

>>4478233 (OP)
honestly it's an alluring camera simply for the gigazoom even if the iq is cellphone tier.

>>4478239
>iq is cellphone tier
Factually wrong

>>4478318
I mean, it literally is using a cellphone sensor... so the IQ *is* cellphone-tier, not a problem though, this is the cheapest way to get yuuuge range other than Olympus DSLR + 500mm prime

>>4478319
>it literally is using a cellphone sensor
On a DSLR processor with digital format optimizations from the Mirrorless era.
IQ is not sensor only, you are black

>>4478319
With that aperture size it mogs any phone, lens matters more than sensor because muh equivalence

>>4478318
>>4478326
>>4478338
Retards. Just look at a photo taken with it and compare with the latest iPhone. It does not even reach phone tier.

>>4478338
>equivalence
>>4478342
>reach
Canon has raped the /p/ hivemind

>>4478338
??? It's slow as fuck
2.8 at the widest with an iPhone size sensor
Phones do f1.8 on 1" lol

>>4478354
Moron, you realise aperture ratio doesn't mean shit right? It's the iris opening diameter that matters. You can put f/1 on a phone sensor doesn't mean it's even remotely close to a 30 year old dslr f/2 lens

>>4478356
Yes except equivalency is a thing and they're both identical size sensors

>>4478362
>equivalency is a thing
>applies this to f/ stop but not focal length
cANON has infected your brain

>>4478233 (OP)

maybe shoot raw
tinker with lensfun database
type raw develop recipe for each pic

>>4478354
What iPhone has a 1 inch sensor

I think they're just reaching 2/3"

>>4478376
1/1.33" is common as fuck these days (3/4 of an inch). Pretty sure the 2021 Google Pixel had that so I'd be fuckin floored if the iPhone isn't doing better than it in 2025

>>4478382
Only the Japanese (Sony, Sharp) and Chinese (Xiaomi, Ulefone, vivo, Huawei) do 1" and above in smartphones, American and Korean brands do not care.