>>507329493>it's pure laziness.No, it's not pure laziness.
Look up videos of 1899-1910 New York and count how many fat people you see. You'll spot maybe a handful of fatties across 20 videos but 0 hamplanets, why is that?
Do you think they were all expert nutritionists or health coaches? No, of course not, they simply ate what was available to them, i.e whole foods. They didn't even have fridges in their homes back then.
We have a poisoned food supply today, like others have said, people aren't lazier today than they were back in 1899, their options are just way worse.
Heart attacks, diabetes and obesity along with countless other chronic illnesses are on the rise and have been ever since industrial seed oils were introduced into our food supply.
>>507336272These studies are flawed from the start. They start with the assumption that elevated cholesterol levels are bad, there's no scientific evidence for this, only correlation studies.
When they put obese patients on a low satfat diet and thus reduce their cholesterol levels, they conclude that their risk of CVD is lowered, hence industrial seed oils = le good. Very clever but not scientific. You could call it kikery.
>>507336479>humans are designed to eat fibrous starchy foodNo, we're not. We can adapt to it but we're not made to eat INDIGESTIBLE fiber that rots in our gut and creates farts and shits. Are you a vegan perhaps?
>Gut bacteria needs it.Gut bacteria that is introduced by eating fiber and survives on fiber needs it, but those bacteria are not needed for humans.
>>507336648>It's the consensus, of course there is.Oh well if it's the consensus it's already decided, my mistake. Are you up to date on your covid boosters?