Thread 507644411

Europe must restore its monarchies if it wants to be great again.

European monarchies sucked ass

Monsrchies are cringe

>>507644411 (OP)
That's why protests are called "no kings", those revolutions toppling the monarchs were orchestrated by them

>>507644534
>ID
>tp
Appropriate

>>507644411 (OP)
Based, jews and masons overthrew monarchies to set up Jew-run debt slave (((democracies))).

read the protocols newfags

>>507644871
Why would you want to have someone have absolute control over you simply because he had been born to a certain family?

>>507645121
Better than being ruled by foreigners

>>507645552
You do realize most monarchs in Europe have always been foreigners? Do you have any idea what dynasties ruled Spain, Britain etc.?

>>507644411 (OP)
>the most successful countries are generally those which haven't changed
Interesting

>>507645121
>Why would you want to have someone have absolute control over you simply because he had been born to a certain family?

Why on earth do you think anyone would want that??

>>507645692
Don't care only French monarchy was good also stop with your bullshit "absolute power" you are more enslaved today and you have no voice, kings weren't powerful tyrans, pretty much the opposite in too many cases.

>>507644411 (OP)
Couldn't you have made that map with an earlier date? Like, 1919 or something?
Please note, I'm not on a VPN, I'm an actual American, born and bred, so I don't know what any of those countries are. Are they all countries?

>>507644411 (OP)
the british monarchy are reptilian aliens who eat children, but frankly the reptilians are in charge anyway so it's irrelevant, even if those specific reptilians aren't

>>507644411 (OP)
Notice how the most cucked countries in Europe happens to be monarchies

>>507644411 (OP)
monarchies are fucking cringe bro

>>507646129
>>507646131
Social rejects...

>>507644411 (OP)
>1914
>Map of Europe goes only up to mid Turkey
>2023
>Map of Europe encompasses all of Twerkiye and then some

>>507646243
Retard

>>507644411 (OP)
Britain needs a Jew hating Scottish king again. No more German kings.

>>507645121
That's literal democracy, though, people are retarded. Monarchs are far more accountable than dual citizenship billionaires and politicians how can blame it all on the last guy.
>"The best argument against democracy is a chat with the average voter"
Truer words have never been spoken, universal suffrage is undoubtedly worse than absolutely monarchism. I'm sure there's some better middle ground, but who gives a fuck.

The king is utterly powerless these days. It hardly matters

>>507646243
Don’t deflect, just answer the question!

>>507644411 (OP)
I'm a lolcow joke king AMA. yes I want a harem of underage girls.

>>507644534
You're brown.

>>507645692
>Stoned teenager talking points
Who the fuck cares? Since the 12th century monarchs were beholden to their host populations, not their ancestry.

>>507646647
>Monarchs are far more accountable
In what way are they accountable?

>>507646419
Current Jacobite contender is a sodomite from Germany.

>>507646243
Moron...

>>507645692
Most monarchies in Europe were of Germanic origin because their royal ancestors were violent bloody barbarians who seized the throne by force(Might makes right, Based.)

>>507646705
He can't he is a fucking retard who don't even know his country owe its independance to a monarchy.

>>507644411 (OP)
Based and true. I wish the United Kingdom and its Commonwealth was solely ruled by an autocratic dynastic monarchy.

>>507646917
In the way that they're a single figure head that people can easily indetify and hold accountable as opposed to the faceless bureaucrats and dual citizenship billionaires we have today, who went they are singled out can just pass the blame onto the next guy. Name one example of beneficial social reform that has came by way of a democratic system.

I agree (although there are nuances) that monarchy is better than republicanism, there's nothing worse than a republican

>>507647289
When"

>>507647289
>hold accountable
How?

>>507647147
He has absolutely revealed himself as a retard, and even as a liar - extremely embarrassing!

>>507644534
>>507644558
>t. masons constantly refreshing "monarch" in the search bar so they could instantly be faggots on this post
>>507644644
>>507645053
Impressed at these posts. Rare based leaf.

>>507644411 (OP)
>country gets taken over by muslims, africans and jeets
>does nothing

>>507644411 (OP)
Spoons ,i agree. yiu are right we are weak without them

>>507645121
That family got there by fighting when it was necessary and is locked into a life of etiquette and protocol. While they do have the perk of never having to worry about money, they also don't get to have their own life as they directly serve the crown.
Meanwhile our Republic elects the most jewed out retards imaginable constantly.

>>507646129
Americoons actually believe that monarchs can just order a city to give up all it's goods and women then drop a nuke on what's left without consequence. Their understanding of monarchy has been psyopped by Hollywood

>>507647437
>What is the magna carta, peoples charter, war of the roses, deposition of Charles, glorious revolution
Read a fucking book, I'm not here to explain centuries of history to, paco.

>>507647897
All of those things have been ways of undermining the institute of monarchy. They very thing you are advocating for here.

>>507647897
>getting conquered by the dutch is being held accountable
glad to be of service

>>507647897
You*, kek. Ready for bed.

>>507647897
That is akin to saying communism is being held accountable through the collapse of USSR, which is why its a good system.

>>507648161
No they weren't, not one of these events ever declared that they wanted to be a Republic, except for a brief time after the deposition of Charles which was quickly reversed because it was so massively unpopular.

>>507648163
It was simply replacing an inept ruler with a better one. Holding a monarch accountable. It's absolutely impossible to even pretend that Europe would the absolute state it is today if we were still ruled by monarchs who actually has power, imagine how many would've been beheaded.

>>507648313
No, it's not, because none of those movements were about getting rid of monarchy, just about replacing inept and useless monarchs with better ones. As I said, read a book.

>>507646948
>Current Jacobite contender is a sodomite from Germany.
WHAT?!? Can't have that. Needs to be a good strong bloodthirsty Scot.

>>507645946
Except we did change, we were a republic until 1795 and then the monarchy got reinstated.

>>507648520
>a better one
yes, this is what being dutch means compared to being english lmao

>>507647070
>Most monarchies in Europe were of Germanic origin because their royal ancestors were violent bloody barbarians who seized the throne by force(Might makes right, Based.)
That's most monarchies everywhere.

>>507647070
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2BdSekxzy0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WXsdApQIY4&list=RD9WXsdApQIY4&start_radio=1

>>507647892
In that case they would be thankful when anons from kingdoms correct their false ‘understanding’ and make them knowledgeable - the retard in this thread instead deflect and LIE!

>>507648893
It's the outright pragmatic nature of anglos that led to being the undisputed masters of the milennia long crucible that was western Europe, you were simply a tool along that path.

>>507648520
>It's absolutely impossible to even pretend that Europe would the absolute state it is today if we were still ruled by monarchs who actually has power, imagine how many would've been beheaded.
It makes me smile to think about all the heads being chopped off.

>>507649041
The jewish zeitgeist is all the mutt mind can really fathom after a lifetime of hollywood indoctrination

>>507648520
>>507648683
Ok, we are getting somewhere here now. Does the institute of monarchy entail the monarch being violently deposed for a better one if they do not rule the country well?

>>507644411 (OP)
One of the goals of the Freemasons in Europe was the destruction of all the monarchies in Europe. The British royal family only survived because they bent the knee to the jews.

>>507649169
Simply wouldn't have needed to happen more than once or twice. Now we just get politicians (who all go to the same schools, synagogues and masonic lodges before being elected, by the way) blaming each other whilst robbing everyone blind and enacting civilizational wide ethnocide. God bless demon-ocracy

>>507649293
What happened in every event I listed and many more peasants revolts throughout the years?

>>507646419
The current one will be the last German. William is English through Diana’s bloodline.

>>507649555
But is this a part of the institute of monarchy by design?

>>507649700
See
>>507649555

>>507644411 (OP)
If the king does a dumb thing then monarchy ends and you get a republic
It doesn't work the other way - if the republic does a dumb thing you don't get a monarchy - you just get another republic
(France has been though 3 in living memory)
So yeah, over time republics will tend to become more numerous than monarchies

>>507648942
True. This is why monarchy is timeless and will return some day when everything today is all but forgotten, a distant legend, a myth remembered by only a few if at all. Might makes right. You can not change the laws of nature with the vain constructs of corrupt men. The Gods will always choose a victor in battle. He is their chosen ruler. He is King.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1NFg9njuYQ&list=RDW1NFg9njuYQ&start_radio=1

>>507649781
This does not answer my question. You are just avoiding it.

>>507645908
>that shnozzle tho

>>507644411 (OP)
Monarchies are friends with the Rothschilds

>>507649669
>English through Diana’s bloodline.
They are not Norman?

>>507649864
https://youtu.be/UbJIntnncb4&t=473

>>507650046
I'm allowing you to come to your own conclusion based on the historical events I listed. We're talking in real pragmatic terms backed by actual historical events, not your hollykike hypothetical.

>>507649835
But we did get a monarchy after the (first) revolution.

>>507650251
No. The plantagients were French, after them the Tudors were Welsh, the Stuarts were Scottish and then it's been Germans ever since

>>507649209
I’m aware jews live in either Israel or USA, but I didn’t know it has anything to do with Hollywood - and as I never watch films from USA, and Denmark has no jews but a million Muslims, my immediate thought of such a retard AND liar is: “100% Muslim tier!”.

>>507650724
>Not sure of the connection between Hollywood and jews
Ok, chatjewpt

>>507650688
but you are talking about his moms side of the family

>>507644411 (OP)
our monarchies were dismantled by the satanic trinity of freemasons, protestants and jews and replaced by (((democratic republics)))
>>507647621
he has no power, little better than a mascot, like all monarchs in Europe today. they are allowed to keep their positions so long as they play along to the globalist's tune
democracy is the tool used to control our nations, make people think that voting matters. anybody who thinks any serious change can be acheived in a 4/5 year period is deluded, any changes are immediately rolled back when the next party comes into power. except for the changes that actually matter of course, such as demographic change. that cannot be undone by any politician.

>>507644411 (OP)
Oi

>>507650893
That wasn't me, and traditionally royal ancestry is recognised paternally, not maternally, in the UK at least, although there been a lot of exceptions.

>>507649083
romans conquered britain with dutch troops
anglo saxons were partly dutch
norman army was half dutch
glorious revolution was dutch
just believe your own lies m8, you've been ours to take for millenia

>>507647621
They're all shown a quick history of the French revolution and told to shut the fuck up, much the same as US presidents with JFK, one would imagine.

>>507645053

It was quite incredible how many European monarchies were destroyed by the end of WWI. I still don't know exactly how the two are related.

>>507651171
>Stars are formed out of proto-dutch elements
Kek. Fuck off.

>>507650319
The events you had listed are instances that show monarchy does not work at all and has to be put into place by violent uprisings. They are argument against monarchy, not in its favour.

>>507644411 (OP)
Based bong for once
Democracy is a mistake and never works for the populace, there was a reason it died in Athens and was never seriously tried again. Kikes thrive in systems like that but always get anally raped in monarchies .
>>507644534
>id RetardNormies
Kek fitting

>>507651267
Like that anon said, read the protocols of Zion, then you will know.

>>507644411 (OP)
Kang anons, how you holding up?

>>507644411 (OP)
Switzerland blue on both maps also best country.
>didnt fight two world wars because why would they
>didn't join NATO or Warsaw pact because fuck that
>didn't join EU because EU is gay
>so rich that other Europeans literally get scared when visiting their airports
>second best chocolate in all of Europe
So yeah no monarchy is not needed.

>>507651267
Of the 109 Jewish expulsions I'm sure you're aware of, at least 95% came by way of royal decree.

>>507651452
And being ethnocided and disenfranchised in your ancestral homeland is preferable, how exactly? No one is claiming monarchy is perfect.

>>507651606
There’s plenty that Switzerland has to be proud of, but honestly idk if not fighting in WW2 falls under that umbrella, just saying.

>>507651781
How exactly would a monarchy prevent that? Britain, Sweden, Netherlands are ethno states?

>>507651606
Switzerland is literally a royal favourite destination my friend, infinite money glitches and royal favour can keep any country going

>>507651362
you're just a dutch cum rag dude
times dutchmen conquered britain 4
times brrits conquered the netherlands 0

>>507644558
found the republikkkan nigger

>>507652021
None of them are monarchies in any real sense, don't act stupid, they're social democracies with universal suffrage as we're all aware, you disingenuous bellend..

>>507651606
It’s just a giant bank run by mountain jews, not a real country. It’s also full of globalist outfits like the UN and WHO.

>>507652021
fake puppet monarchs
divine right if kings or bust

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLr1GZ5oI2Y

>>507652107
>Conquered
>Invited in to rule because the English were fed up of their monarch
Pick one, we also held most of Dutch territory before you were even a country during the hundred years war.

>>507652258
So you want a monarchy that is limited by all kinds of things like magna carta and threats of rebellions, but at the same time absolutist and in full control of everything that happens in the kingdom?

>>507650873
Thanks for the link - will read it tomorrow, it’s far past bedtime here.

>>507644411 (OP)
Don't worry. By the time "peace" reigns. We will be back to monarchies. In one way or another.

>>507652596
Yes. Something similar to the cromwellian revolution times with an army that acts independently of parliament and the monarchy and vice versa, creating a decentralized power structure that can be leveraged against either of the other components that are lacking in their duty to the realm with an understanding that the monarch is the head of the Trinity to be given exclusive powers until they're identified to be damaging to the nation by way of parliamentary decree and social pressure.

>>507644411 (OP)
Monarchies are less likely to believe in liberalism even if the monarch is a tyrant.

That's why most states have been monarchies throughout history, because it's the best system for tribal survival (at the expense of rights and freedoms)

>>507645121
I would prefer that than letting all the women in my country decide what is best for me.

>>507651479

It was the Germans who smuggled Lenin and his thugs back into Russia.

>>507644411 (OP)
Yeah no.
Monarchies always end up with the nobility broke and willing to sell the country to kikes.
Could work but we would need TKD first.

Nah, monarchs were faggots and were selling the countries.

>>507653101
What you are describing practically invalidates the entire point of monarchy as an institution, effectively making the monarch a nominal figure with little to no real powers. While I am not against this, its rather distant practically from an actual monarchy and much closer to whatever Britain has right about now.

>>507651479
I'm sure you don't know this.
Back then in 1916 big Jewish groups asked WILLY II to push the roaches to promise them Palestine for a Jewish state and as a return they promised to give a favour aka bringing the USA on their side in the war with all their influence.
Willy II told them to shut up and no one especially no Jews can tell him what to do.
With that he lost the war but at least he was no coward and rat like the British who instantly accepted the proposal when the Jewish groups turned around and asked the entente.