women are pushing the idea that men who don't want to date / fuck / marry women over a certain age are paedophiles harder than eve before

its becoming more and more widespread across social media but particularly tiktok where middle to late aged divorced white women have a platform to spew their hatred and bile towards men because they left their last chance at a cohesive family and are mad they have no options anymore because the men they deem worthy all want hot 18-25 year olds

they are desperate to make it appear that adult men who want sex / relationships / marriage with younger women are sexually predatory. likely as a means to secure a larger potential pool of prospective males for resources

this will soon make its way into mainstream politics in the same way the manosphere has recently

how do we address this /pol/?

for, me? personally? I see no issue. because only men who are susceptable to shaming will be impacted by this. no matter how bad it get

ever*
fuck my shit up senpai
reeeeeeeeee

nod and move on
double down
yes i find younger women attractive
what more is there to say

>>508286574 (OP)
>fashionable divorced
dumb bitch

>>508287180
based
its pure cope
just makes me want to double down even more as you say and never settle down just to make them seethe

>>508286574 (OP)
Tight is right, bros. Tight is right.

what makes me laugh is the fact that one of their core arguments is that this is based on their disdain for men seeking power over women. that sexual interest = the desire for power. and when this is directed towards younger women its doubly as bad because young women are naive and what not

but they miss the irony of what they're doing
they claim they're against men having power over women
but then this narrative spin is an attempt on their part to overpower the natural sexual marketplace dynamics and flip the table so they have advantage

they want to restrict men's access to young women so men have no choice but to go for 40-50 year old divorcees

its a power play, through and through
and its unironically predatory in itself

in any other circumstance, if you were to try to take something away from someone to get them to do what you want and gain leverage over them. that would be considered abuse. but when women try to do it on a societal level, in the aggregate. its not abuse, its "protecting women"

if anything this just shows without a doubt how abuse against men is normalised. women are free to manipulate openly and face no consequences. and will justify their manipulative behaviour with faux moral arguments. just like the narcisistic ex-boyfriends or ex-husbands they all "expose" on their socials

>>508287466
there's a new narrative floating about that women who are tight are only tight because they have trauma

that a tight hot pocket = tensed up like the rest of the body because said trauma is unhealed

so they're even trying to frame that as predatory, that if you want your girl to be tight its because you have a trauma fetish, or at least you want to be able to ignore her trauma because it results in something pleasurable for you

>>508286574 (OP)
This is a fundamental problem.

There is no principal only degrees of upset.

You have commited a hate crime, all hate is a crime, etc.

Looking at me is harassment, mental rape is rape.

It's to give absolute power to a fickle mindset based on feelings.

They are not interested in how this diminished real acts of rape as justice is not important, just power.

Women must not be allowed to vote.

>>508288464
based

>>508286574 (OP)
Every time I leave my house some woman is bitching about me. I mean that literally. I've been on vacation, just enjoying my time. Go out for barbecue, some fight whore is saying I'm weird. Go up the stairs, some fat bitch gets mad I walk up past her, mentions something about the bag, I don't even look at the heifer because I have barbecue. I mean it's literally been every single fucking day this week I go out and some fat fucking slut in her 30s or beyond is bitching about something totally benign I've done that's completely unrelated to them.

God damn I'm so sick of women speaking.

>>508288000
it's collective bargaining like you said and why these hags all call each other "hot" to empower themselves. no point reasoning; that's between men

also check my id

>>508286574 (OP)
Implying I give a single fuck about what a prostitute thinks

>>508286574 (OP)
Older men bring money, security, wisdom and experience to a relationship. What do older women bring?

>>508286574 (OP)
>women are pushing the idea that men who don't want to date / fuck / marry women over a certain age

Why be with a bio-cunt?

>>508288665
kek based

>>508288979
based ID

would you lads like to see my AIs take on why its better to be with an 18 year old if you want kids, than a 40 year old?

>>508286574 (OP)
>how do we address this /pol/?
Why would i care what a bunch of vaxxed old hags say?

>>508289297
>image
literally perfect

>withered roasts being put to pasture by Millenial Chads/Gen Z Stacies
based

>>508286574 (OP)
is that millie bobby brown?

>>508289967
lmao

>>508286574 (OP)
I've seen some of that woman's tiktoks. It's amazing how she has the physical look of an ex-wife.

It's misleading. I will fuck an older woman if nobody else knows about. Would date if she pays, and would marry if she makes significantly more money.

>>508290234
how old is she? she looks like a 50 year old in excellent shape but still a 50 y/o (look at thinning hair, uneven hair color, buccal fat loss)

>>508289357
a 40 year old is either sterile or close to it. she is disqualified by default.

>women often judge men based on things men can't control
>It's bad when men do the same to women, though

>>508290654
technically still likely fertile but close to the end and defect chances skyrocket
they try to claim its the same for men but its not
women's fertility plummets suddenly, men's slowly disapates. a man can still be extremely virile in his 60s

>>508286574 (OP)
everyone here saw this shit coming a mile away.

also
anyone see how similar these hags sound to the self proclaimed incels of the early 2020s?
they're repeating things incels say verbatim but flipped

>>508291009
I keep saying this but no one listens. We are two sides of the same coin.

>>508291211
KEK
you're alright yank
we should just legislate incels and divorcees into forced marraiges so both parties are maybe not happy but out of the equation and so nobody else has to deal with them

>>508286574 (OP)
i guess that makes me a pedo. mid 30's and my age of attraction is 21-27. no hags please. thank you.

>>508289919
all troons.

>>508286574 (OP)
Always some horse face white twat. I think they just like to whine and do this big drama larp for attention and make shit up. Seriously! Not like any white female can't fuck any orbiter or nigger she wants. White women really are best avoided entirely.

>>508291557
they are serious cutes

>>508286574 (OP)
>how do we address this /pol/?
call them a busted old hag with rotten eggs and move on, they will mald and cope and seethe and then cry and drink box wine all night alone.

>>508286574 (OP)
>For educational and entertainment purposes only

>>508291788
No they aren't. The bitch on the right keeps getting posted lately. She looks like Krusty the Clown in the images with her hair dyed. Who are they anyway?

>>508291901
I just kept commenting saying cope I'm crypto rich at 35 and fuck 18 year olds regularly and I will until the day I die etc
that hits them where it hurts

am getting in bed

>>508286574 (OP)
They don't understand that men don't respond to shaming in the same way women do. Men are more confrontational. If you try to shame men they will push back against you and be the opposite of what you are trying to shame them into being.

>>508286574 (OP)
Half the man’s age plus seven seems to be the limit as to what’s “acceptable”.

So for example, (40/2)+7 is 27. A 40 year old man in good shape should be able to be with a 27 year old woman without any general social issues. Disapproval from bitter women is hardly generalized social rejection.

>>508292360
it works on a lot of men
more than you might expect
to the point where a lot of men self-regulate within their own sex because the shame runs so deep, but also because of the envy resulting from lack of access
even in brit/pol/ for example
mention being over 30 and being involved with teenagers and you're a paedophile
they go crazy
and usually they're either single and can't find anyone or married with kids
so its a misery loves company kinda situation
but the narratives they come up with are largely female centric and the same shaming tactics are utilised
so they must be conditioned on some level
but I do agree that there is a large contingent of men who ignore this altogether
especially in regards to successful men

>>508292577
who came up with that standard? and what is the basis for it?

>>508292233
its the Olympic cutes from Uzbekistan with love

>>508290597
The funny thing is if she was happily married she would still look good. She’s not fat and she has decent skin. It’s her attitude and expression that are really ugly.

>>508292661

>>508292640
Rational thought and observation. Think about it. 30 year old men can and do date 22 year old women all the time without stigma. Men in grad school at 24 date sophomores in college all the time.

>>508288000
Checked.
Everything women do is projection.
Everything.

>>508286574 (OP)
When will women finally realize that they only have a small reproductive window?

>>508292865
This is the most Krusty the Clown looking photo.

>>508286574 (OP)
Tailless fefails fail the Harkness test.
We are long past the point where a fluffy tailed animal woman is both more human and more sapient than the fefail race.

>>508293230
Krusty lookin sexo fren, phwoaaaar

>>508286574 (OP)
The consequences of feminism and mudsharking, and it's hilarious to witness.

>>508292967
ok so, and forgive me if I sound like I'm dumping on you because i'm not
but I believe what you've just done is circled back around. you've explained your position with the position as your reasoning. so thats circular reasoning, no?
I'm asking if there's a logical backing for the reasoning in the first place
because upto now it doesn't look like there is, it looks like its purely memeified social standards based on nothing but arbitrary notions, likely pushed by women themselves to try and regulate the sexual marketplace
if you invoke social stigma to support the point, well, thats not really a support. its a foundation built on sand. because social stigma is constantly in flux

>>508293322
I'd let her suck my cock if she asked nicely.

>>508292577
That's a boomer rule. The based rule is aoc+0.

>>508286574 (OP)
only a fag like you would care what women "thought" lol

>>508293508
id surprise her from behind

>>508288665
>Leaving your home
Found the problem.

>>508293391
Observation. Nothing circular. Just applied a formula to what I’ve seen in my 40 years in life and 15 on 4chin. (You never leave, even after career success and a family, you’ll still be here).

The only people against what I’ve said are jilted older women.

>>508293514
Ain’t no rule. Just what people seem to tolerate.

>>508293851
observation of what though? you're not clarifying
not even sure what you're saying
but it seems like you're saying thats age difference is the norm, so it should remain the norm
but thats just "it should be because it is and it is because it should be and has been"
the roundabout of reasoning that mate
just going round in circles
you can't have a position based on just "cos"
you've gotta have data points you base your position on. or patterns you recognise in the aggregate dating pools

>>508286574 (OP)
I've just about mcfucking had it with cuntoids and their bullshit

end human rights for females
the ones who are loyal and obedient and submissive to their husbands won't care because it doesn't even change anything for them
the whores and the dykes and feminists and karens and cat ladies will screech, but so what? they would have anyway and it's precisely the point to put them in their place

>>508289061
That's the core issue. They can't (and won't) compete, so they are moving to anticompetitive measures.

They are not pretty, or charming fun enthusiastic or even slightly engaged. Meanwhile zoomie girls are all of these.

A 35 year old asked me if it were a dealbreaker that she is pregnant! They're shit and they know it

>>508290904
>technically still likely fertile but close to the end and defect chances skyrocket
>they try to claim its the same for men but its not
>women's fertility plummets suddenly, men's slowly disapates. a man can still be extremely virile in his 60s
In the wild older women would already have had multiple children if they were ever going to have them. And by older I mean under 30. Their role isn't "getting men" at that stage, it's handling domestic affairs and the guy they're already with. (Who might have another wife or two, or might not.)

>>508293514
I think a lot more nuance is needed
e.g. here in the uk 16 is the aoc
should a 60 year old be having casual sex with a 16 year old?
clearly not for various reasons
nor should a 50 year old
or a 40 year old
maybe you could argue it for a 30 year old depending on the circumstances but lilkely not
but the second she turns 18 its game on

however
as for marriage / children / family building
16 is completely on the table for everyone
depending on a few factors
you have to be a good man
you have to be a provider
you have to have proper values and principles
if she's 16 when you become involved, you have to do things properly and traditionally, chaperoning, family involvement, stuff like that
if you're above a certain age you have to ensure that upon your demise she is compensated for
whether that be via a will, family support, whatever
I think you should remain within a certain age bracket too, so you can ascertain that your wife and children have you around for a longer period of time
there is no point in marrying a 16 year old at 60 and dying ten years later when your children aren't even in their teens yet, maybe this is a bit more permissable if you have a big family willing to step in, but this would be rare
especially in todays world

>>508294026
It’s no standard I’m arguing for or against, just what I’ve seen in my life out in the world. When a 30 year old man dips into college age girls for serious relationships, peoples reactions tend to be negative. If she’s out of college, even recently, it seems to be way less of an uncomfortable thing for other people and couples to be around. Look, I understand y’all are fat do-nothing basement dwelling shut ins, so you wouldn’t know.

I’m just offering an idea that seems to fit with what I’ve seen. No standard or rule, just something that kinda fits.

>>508294455
eh, I dated a 19 year old when I was 29 for over a year. Nobody even looked twice or cared.

>>508294337
yes
think about it like this too
its ideal for the mother of a child to "grow up" alongside her child
and I don't mean from childhood to adulthood obviously
I just mean developmentally, a woman's personality if she's going to be a mother should be formed partially around motherhood
if a woman doesn't have a child until she's in her 40s, her personality is already fully formed
she's no longer a life partner to her child, the child is just an attachment to her, or an extension of her. because they haven't built that longstanding bond over both of their youths
its also easier for young women to relate to their children than older women
so that secures the possiblity for a stronger bond too

>>508294455
>When a 30 year old man dips into college age girls for serious relationships, peoples reactions tend to be negative.
its just because of social memes
not because of any hard data points
also because of internal biases based on sexual preference
women frown upon it because older women push the kind of narratives we see itt
men frown upon it either because they cannot, or have never, or will never be able to access young attractive women
so they try to sabotage the men who can
so I would argue social standards compel sovereign minded men to do exactly that
to be with whoever they want regardless of the memeified social standards
because they're based on an undue, unjustified imposition of social conditions

>>508294572
No doubt. I’m just saying it seems to fit most of the time.

anyway lads I need to get in bed, been a pleasure, peace out x

>>508286574 (OP)

These stupid cuntoids don’t even want men their own age or older unless he’s a billionaire CEO with a masters degree and PhD and 6’ 5” male model etc. And they’ll still cheat & fuck young 15-18 year old Chads and niggers on the down low, as we’ve seen with female teachers. They should stfu before they’re all dealt with violently. If they try to raise the AOC laws even higher, them and the kikes will be dealt with violently in minecraft.

Luckily only leddit s0i cucks and jealous virgin zoomer males tend to only listen to incessant bitch-wailing.

Also, I’m in my late 30s and creampied a hot zoomette 19 year old recently. And when she gets too old or annoys me I’ll find another 18 or 19 year old. Kek

>>508294750
>muh social construct
Who gives a fuck. Nature is still in charge. Genetically valuable men and women continue to ignore this Bolshevist drivel.

>>508286574 (OP)
Women are like parking spaces...

All of the good ones are taken and all that is left is handicapped...

>>508286574 (OP)
It’s called ROASTMAXXING

>>508286574 (OP)
As easily solved forever through impersonal engineering and readily available infrastructure.

Specifically, by putting women into barns, where they will be bred and milked to the full extent of efficiency granted by human Zootechnics, and then unceremoniously disposed of with a pneumatic needle when their bodies are spent and unproductive.

>>508286574 (OP)
Women sabotage women all the time. Hairdressers convince women to chop off all their hair. Bridesmaids convince a soon to be wife to cheat on their fiance during her bachelorette party. Women will tell their friends to wear that ugly dress out to the club. Women will hook up with their friends ex boyfriend, etc etc etc. Women can push this idea all they want, but it will backfire and in a big way. They will sniff out that older single women are trying to sabotage healthy relationships.

YHWH allows child brides
<----------

Marry little girls.

>>508286574 (OP)
I don't get this. I like milfs and younger women, like college aged ones. I'll fuck them all. Why limit yourself?

>>508286574 (OP)
White people deserve to die, because they oppose men taking female children as brides.
A right given by YHWH.

All white "marraige" is whores.
Whites do not allow men to have young virgins.
Whites are the enemy of YHWH's kingdom.
(by definition, because anyone who likes young girls "is not white")

Marry little girls.

Whites are ruled by women, and the vaxx is a blessing should it kill them off.

Fuck white people.
Marry little girl brides.

>>508287180
Exactly. Relationships are a two way street at the end of the day. The 18-25 year old girls want to date 35+ men and are cool with it too? Great. Works for both.
Used up older women can keep seething on the internet while the young gets her dicking. Don't let the older women drag you down and deny you of what you deserve bros

>>508295137
That's...
Not what I was saying
But ok mate

Most of the whining I see are from zoomer guys who are in the 17-21 age range.

>>508292233
lol I said this in another thread, and im seeing it here now.

>>508293153
Women don't realize things, they just act however their consensus detection tells them to, which is a very easy sense to deceive. Beyond that, they're just skittish animals like deer or horses and I'm not exaggerating.

>>508286574 (OP)
>for, me? personally? I see no issue. because only men who are susceptable to shaming will be impacted by this. no matter how bad it get
Then why make this thread?

>>508286574 (OP)

>>508289919
subversive kike

>>508292865
hideous

>>508295509
Hagmaxxing.

>>508295509
>RETUUUURRRNNNN THHHHEEEE SLAAAABBBB