The same technology that is used to age gate porn will now be used to age gate websites with anti-religious and vulgar language. Why didn't Republicans fight back harder?

>>508927484 (OP)
This shit is what is going to cost them in the mid-term and 2028 election cycle. I hope they fucking lose so badly, More than 40 States go Blue.

>>508927484 (OP)
Remember when the internet was a free place? I don't.

>>508927726
Nobody cares about this except perverts and pedophiles. Everyone else just uses a VPN or finds a site that isn't blocked, or simply doesn't look at online porn very much.
Most people aren't coomers.

>>508927484 (OP)
TOTAL
JACK OFF
DEATH
I guess you guys will just have to do what porno junkies did in the old days and go out and look in peoples windows and beat your meat. But you tech guys like that sort pervy, creepy, peeking "security" (never safety!) shit anyway or else you would get a real job,
Don't get shot you peeping Tom clits.

It's a good step, now we need to work on having anyone caught producing or purchasing porn should be imprisoned and total blocks by ISPs should be implemented

>>508927838
Your time of free reign is over, jew

>>508928203
you're a Canadian, you fuck dogs, of course you don't care about porn

Oh nooo, not muh porno! nooo! le slippery slope!

fuckin faggot

>>508928525
>le slippery slope!
it's true, and I wish you zoomer faggots would kill yourselves, you're worse thatm muslim migrants trying to change the culture you invade into

>>508927484 (OP)
Welp, 4chan is what both red and blue states will come after next. It was nice memeing with you anons. But I must say faretheewell.

>>508927726
Fuck off kike

>>508927484 (OP)
The point is to implement internet ID so they can easily catalog everything you do online. If you think Republicans are against that you are young and retarded.

>>508928203
This whole porn ban is a gateway to control internet access to the Goyim. I don't like pornography, but I do not want this; I am no Jew.

>>508927484 (OP)
lol this board will get hit hard if true. They only have themselves to blame.

>>508927994
Sex sells and if a business cannot thrive from it. We will vote you cuckservative closeted homos out.

>>508928684
YOU'RE BROWN!

>>508927484 (OP)
Just make your own Internet, lol.

>>508927838
At least we still have 4chan

>>508928812
You won't do shit. Also, if you look at the catalog and see the interracial porn being spammed right now, you can easily see why this shit needs to go.

>>508928656
You won't do SHIT lol.

>>508928848
Whiter than you, mosche

>>508927484 (OP)
State's rights > the Feds, you fucking faggot. Just the way it should be.

>>508927484 (OP)
lol remember when all of you retards were arguing that porn is speech?

>>508927484 (OP)
who cares? get gud at technology and this will never affect you

>>508927484 (OP)
>Anti-religious and vulgar language websites
4chan is on the chopping block.

>>508928848
If he was brown then he'd lament the inability of people to jork themselves to trannies

>>508928679
I hope not I like this place and all the good anons here

This is a global effort, to force everyone into a Chinese style internet where they are constantly monitored

>>508929057
>I don't want a big federal government telling me what to do, I want a smaller state agency telling me what to do!

>>508927484 (OP)

>>508927484 (OP)

>>508928942
The purpose of these laws is to shut down 4chan.

>>508929247
They can try. They will fail.

>>508927484 (OP)
Fuck yeah.
First take down the sites.
Next, death penalty for all pornographers.

Doesn't really matter. SCOTUS also got rid of the ability to issue nationwide injuctions, so any rights you had are gone since courts no longer have the ability to prevent enforcement of illegal laws. Congress could issue a nationwide law banning anti-semetic speech, and you couldn't do anything about it unless you personally have a lawyer to prevent its enforcement for just you.

>>508929462
> courts no longer have the ability to prevent enforcement of illegal laws
It’s honestly hilarious how little you niggers know about how the government works.

>>508927484 (OP)
There should be a list publicly available of all IP ranges to providers by state. If red states want to outlaw porn then tell the government to provide a DNS which only indexes PG rated websites, and ISPs in those nanny states should be forced to use them in place of theirs and block the rest.

>>508927726
>he thinks Democrats will get rid of the internet censorship
Doesn't work like that. You don't just get freedoms and rights back after you give them away to the state. The state keeps the power you give it. Dems will go "aw shucks, this is terrible, but as long as we're censoring stuff..."

Fucking board is peppered in porn, and you wonder why we want the shit regulated.

>>508927484 (OP)
why are people so angry about children not having easy access to internet porn?

>>508928705
that's call facebook, google & amazon
they've already been doing that for nearly 20 years
try to find a site that doesn't have a facebook or google or amazon domain attached

>>508929618
Suddenly it’s not a privacy issue to you fags anymore lol.

>>508929247
There's always The Sharty.

>>508927484 (OP)
>Why didn't Republicans fight back harder?
Because they actually are fascists and it was not hyperbole.

>>508929710
Because it's not about Children, you dunce. Children are just the excuse. It's not even about porn. They pick children as the "victim" because everybody wants to protect children, and they pick porn because few people want to go to the mat defending pornography. It's how you get your foot in the door for total surveillance and censorship. It starts with "protect kids from porn!" and it turns into "please enter your government-issued ID in order to access the internet".

Yes there are ways to avoid such surveillance but I'd rather not have it come to that.

>>508929710
The fix for that is to bolster parental controls for devices. Not the jew shit that is being peddled.

>>508929959
It’s the parents responsibility to keep their children from purchasing alcohol, not the alcohol store.

>>508929247
No, it isn't. There is no constitutional right for children to watch porn. If states can require ID for people to buy shit in porno shops, they can ask for ID to go on porno websites. It will now just be a state by state issue, and it will only be red states that pass these laws. Your worry is that states will ask for ID to go on 4chan, but 4chan is not a porno site, and /pol even bans you for posting porn. So if 4chan just expands the porno ban to other forums, there is nothing to worry about. If you think states can require ID to go on "hate websites" then that is ridiculous since there is no such requirement when people buy "hateful" books in person.

problem
reaction
solution

remember those three words, they are the root of most of the strategies employed against us. if you dont know this you will be fooled.

>create the problem
>control the reaction
>provide the solution

desired outcome: draconian information control
>problem: rampant pornography, spread it everywhere, add some incest and troons really gross people out
>reaction: pose as disgusted conservatives demanding change and fake it till you make it grassroots support. "wont someone think of the children," have them cheer on and demand your solution
>solution: you need to prove your id to look at porn

now thats what you do when the right is seemingly in power. then comes the lefts turn, then you expand more problem/reaction/solution with the "problem" being "hate speech" and "misinformation". and the solution being to expand the solution already established for the porn problem while the right was seemingly in power to hate speech and misinformation as well.

end result: draconian information control

>>508930059
> draconian information control
You mean PRISM?

>>508930059
Leaf has a brain. He gets it. It's the most basic shit for expanding state power.

>>508929161
Well state representation is based on how the people of your state vote and federal representation is based on how people on the east coast vote, so yea, one is better than the other

>>508927484 (OP)

Oh no! Time for another faggot piss protest!

>>508930059
There is no ID requirement for "hate speech" in real life. States already require ID for buying porn in a store, while there is no ID requirement when people buy "hateful" books. That would be a 1st amendment violation.

>>508930042
The internet isn't real life

>>508930298
I get taxed for my internet purchases, so yes it is real life. Stupid faggot.

>>508927726
Communists in Brandons administration started the ministry of truth remember mary poppins?

>>508929796
I can browse google and amazon without having to sign into an account tied to a verified ID

>>508930562
Incorrect. You’re signed into an account to simply have an internet connection.

>>508927484 (OP)
Is this going to finally force our faggot mods to range ban israel and India?

>>508930295
1st amendment freedom of speech is for adults, that`s why you`ll still be able to access the information if you prove your age.

but it will allow them to suppress access to the information as many people wont be inclined or too paranoid to sign in with an id to read conspiracies, better brainwash the youth and prevent youth redpilling by blocking access to this information, make it harder to share this material, and have it on record who has read it.

>>508930640
I wasn't aware the 1st amendment said *if you're 18 or older

>>508927484 (OP)
This has nothing to do with stopping children from seeing porn. It's just a precedent for forcing everyone to ID themselves on the internet. Absolute kike shit.

>>508930058
If I'm not mistaken, that Texas law states that if 1/3 of a website contains sexual material then it is subject to requiring age verification. That can cover plenty of social media sites.

>>508930858
the constitution is bickered and argued over and reinterpreted and there are constitutional lawyers arguing back and forth about what it really means and what they actually said etc. by todays standards the language of the constitution is vague and flowery and open to interpretation in some ways. and i doubt the constitution specifically mentions children having 1st amendments rights at all.

>>508930996
You’re mistaken. It’s based on taxes paid by the porn company because that’s the only enforcement mechanism.

>>508927484 (OP)
All VPNs have access to porn. Therefore, all VPNs can be age gated.

>>508927484 (OP)
age gate = age verification = identity verification = tracking

>>508928201
>porn is blocked
>no teenagers won't have their mental health improved, because they are disgusting perverts like me
>teens will just creep in people's private homes and jerk off to people having sex

>>508929063
It is. The ruling calls it speech.

It says ALL free speech can be gated behind states forcing you to identify yourself before "performing" free speech and you are not entitled access before identifying yourself. It's a deanonymization and pro digital id ruling, that weirdly affirms porn as free speech, but all free speech can be gate kept.

Raving retards praise it because they think it "owns the pedos"

>>508931196
Oh man the website they knows my IP is going to track me because of age verification!

What is so valuable about keeping porn available to minors that I'm being treated to a dozen threads about it today? Just let them ban the shit. Porn is not what anyone was thinking of when they wrote the 1st amendment.

>>508927484 (OP)
Internet should be strictly regulated.

>>508927726
dude they are gerrymandering even harder before then. I have no confidence a win is possible.

>>508927726
>More than 40 States go Blue
Delusional
>memeflag kvetching over porn

>>508930592
You mean via my ISP with my credit card info? Then why don't states just use that as proof of age?

>>508931250
The supreme Court just said it was valid for the first amendment.
It just ruled you can be gate kept without identifying yourself for any free speech.

>>508928656
Porn is bannable because it's obscenity

>>508931297
It should be destroyed and people forced to go out and interact like real people again, including myself.
It's not been overall beneficial for society, everything everywhere has gotten worse from it.
Drugs, scams, extremism, communism, spying and tracking, socializing, advertisements, capitalism, corporations, games, movies, music, art, porn, government, banking, everything has been made worse off with this technology.

>>508931445
Because that doesn't get them deanonymization and digital IDs.
If they cared they'd prosecute the human trafficking and other illegal things. They don't.

>>508927484 (OP)
>Thee same technology that is used to age gate porn will now be used to age gate websites
It's going to be used to gate keep *everything* using your digital id, naive fuck.
>Why didn't Republicans fight back harder?
Why would they after Stargate?
Seriously, what the fuck happened to /pol/? It used to be a red pilled place.
>>508927994
>VPN
Nice reductio ad absurdum my good goy!! Did even stop to think what good will VPNs do when you have to used your digital ID to access porn sites? Probably not, just have some social tokens credited to your palantir account.

>>508931445
Because it’s the porn site that has to do the age verification, and ISPs aren’t offering the service.

>>508931445
>Then why don't states just use that as proof of age?
Because kids use their parents internet connection. Why not just hand over your ID or use a VPN or use a site that doesn't block your state?

>>508931656
Because these niggers are basic ass bitches using pornhub. They deserve the suffering for being plebs.

The only people who think this is a big deal never had to buy porn from a shop

>>508931636
>Did even stop to think what good will VPNs do when you have to used your digital ID to access porn sites?
I can either have my ID checked, or stop looking at porn. I don't really care that companies or government see me looking at hentai, they already know I do. I was arrested in the 00s and had my HDDs taken and looked through by cops. I got the drives and all my 2D porn back including all the "bad" shit. IDGAF, what are they gonna do? Shame me? I'll laugh at them.

>>508931636
>Seriously, what the fuck happened to /pol/?

It's mostly not human, and it's full of retards that hate themselves and see the state as a god figure that'll rapture them away if it becomes strong enough

>>508927484 (OP)
Who knew that shadow banning right wingers on the internet would be a slippery slope to destroying the Jews weapon on natural sexuality.

>>508931656
>Kids won't just grab their parent's ID

>>508930058
>No, it isn't.
Yes it is, if you stupid porn-smooth-brains weren't so desperate over a threat to your next dopamine discharge, you'd be seeing the bigger picture, ***this is not about porn***


On Wednesday morning at 6 a.m., a large-scale police operation was launched across Germany, targeting hundreds of individuals suspected of insulting politicians or spreading “hate and incitement” online.
https://rmx.news/article/german-police-launch-nationwide-house-raids-against-170-citizens-over-hate-speech-and-insults-against-politicians/

All porn should be banned. There's a natural tendency for it to become more and more degenerate as people become more and more jaded. The only way to avoid that is to ban it all together. The stuff posted here is disgusting

>>508927484 (OP)
>Am*ricans will be banned from 4chan
Glorious

>>508931099
>In the 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that Texas’ HB 1181 is constitutional. This law requires websites that Texas decides are composed of “one-third” or more of “sexual material harmful to minors” to confirm the age of users by collecting age-verifying personal information from all visitors—even to access the other two-thirds of material that is not adult content.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/06/todays-supreme-court-decision-age-verification-tramples-free-speech-and-undermines

>>508931867
If your parents let you have their ID, the entire family should be killed. I couldn't imagine taking my parents licenses. What the fuck? Stealing your parental IDs should result in hard labor in coal mines.

>>508931929
Germany doesn't have a constitution.
>yes they do
No, they don't.

>>508931974
Ok now tell me how you enforce this on a company that has no financial or legal ties to your state.

>>508931931
>All porn should be banned
You are disgusting.

>>508932131
>You are disgusting.
You are a nigger

>>508932044
Well I honestly hope this doesn't become a slippery slope that affects social media platforms. If it's JUST porn sites then whatever. But this feels like a camels nose under the tent situation. You'd have to be a bootlicker to trust government.

>>508927726
They won't they'll just deport all the democratic candidates and win by default. Get ready for the fourth reich.

>>508931636
>Seriously, what the fuck happened to /pol/? It used to be a red pilled place.

This board shit the bed hard once the Qanon psyop rolled in

>>508928679
>Welp, 4chan is what both red and blue states will come after next. It was nice memeing with you anons. But I must say faretheewell.
>>508929123
>I hope not I like this place and all the good anons here
I also love pol, noticed it when it went down for a week and a half.
Was a psychological duel, went to other chans, felt really blue.

>>508930239
>YES YUM YUM THIS STATE LEVEL BOOT IS MUCH BETTER

>>508931656
>Because kids use their parents internet connection

Hence the reason why this should be the parents' responsibility. Not the State.

>>508927484 (OP)
Porn is banned. Real rape increases. Not the fake rape the feminist are always claiming. Good thinking, guys.

>>508933263
Those of us that have been on 4chan since the OG days, posted on /n/ and /new/, etc have basically just stopped caring. What are we gonna do, fight the system or some dumb shit? Every fucking time we get a glimmer of hope for some change, dumb shit comes along and ruins it. We had an awakening on kikery going on finally, and now some faggot jeet sandnigger is pied pipering and destroying it all. It's the same old tired shit.

>>508930562
If you think data brokers don't already know who you are from your unique device signature and IP address you're a moron. This is a good thing because suddenly you people will realize you've been identified long ago. I worked at a company that basically knew your name and who your household us just from your IP address and current computer and they worked for many service providers. If you used your computer to buy something with your real information, you were not anonymous if you used any domain associated with this billion dollar corporation.

>>508927484 (OP)
I can't really blame them. Normalfags really shouldn't be allowed on the net. Tattoos & the LGBT faggot phenomenon is thanks to porn addiction. Now normalfags are about to get the boot & I couldn't be more grateful. So thanks normalfags for ruining another good thing.

>>508931816
>It's mostly not human

I swear, all this bot and AI shit always makes me think of the movie Oblivion. We're so fast approaching a point where you can't tell who or what is real on the internet anymore. Never thought I'd live in a time like this.

>>508933379
This is going to be an unpopular opinion in most places, but I not only agree, I think that any under-16 found accessing pornography should be banned from all smartphone and internet usage by criminal court order and all legal guardians of that under-16 charged a fine of $20,000. Federally. All parties forced to wear monitoring and the household forced to be monitored for any access to any adult content and the connection cut at the ISP level when a violation is detected.

But good luck making that the law.

>>508932044
The state sues them and the site has to respect state commerce clauses. It's like saying "what if they don't pay state sales taxes", it's a fucking retarded thing to do and there are obvious things the state can do to punish the company.

>>508931636
I wonder if tor will require my ID. Just sorp using corporate internet if it becomes totally pozzed. Xkeyscore already has total access to everything you do online.

>>508927484 (OP)
The people who posture as though they're bastions of purity are the same, whether right or left. They think they'll shine and be praised in a new regime, but the reality is they'll go side by side against the same wall and eat a bullet.

>>508927484 (OP)
OP IS A JEWISH NIGGER DELIBERATELY SPREADING MISINFORMATION

FROM JUDGE THOMAS HIMSELF;

“[A]dults have no First Amendment right to avoid age verification, and the statute can readily be understood as an effort to restrict minors’ access,” Thomas wrote. “Any burden experienced by adults is therefore only incidental to the statute’s regulation of activity that is not protected by the First Amendment.”

PORN
IS
STILL
PROTECTED
K Y S

>>508929941

A voice of reason on /pol/. Anyone who thinks censorship is a good thing is retarded.

>>508931636
>It's going to be used to gate keep *everything* using your digital id, naive fuck.
Bingo.
Say goodbye to the little anonymity you had. This site will be done within the decade or sooner.

>>508927838
Remember when the media use to make fun of China for restricting free speech on the internet?

>>508933843
>Try to search "Xkeyscore"
>AI answer gets cut off

sigh... I just want privacy ya know, down with isreal and all that

>>508932044
Utah had a law for like 3 years, and they didn't do shit with it. I think these laws exist just to scare the domestic porn industry, which conservacucks have had a grudge with since the 70's. They know they can't do shit to foreign sites or keep up with the thousands of other smaller sites that aren't commercial endeavors

>>508934521
You give them an inch and they will take a mile.They will say in the future that they have always had this law but didn't have the resources to enforce. No one is going to comply anyway but it has got to go. Fuck Internet ID law, the gov databases are shit as it is and will stay that way because they pay their employees peanuts and they don't get canned when deserving.

>>508934493
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data
Here's an article. 12 years have passed. I wonder what they can achieve now by using their "AI"

>>508934234
>Any totalitarian surveillance is (((merely incidental)))

Oh, that's good then.

>>508933659
This is never a good argument to justify giving up even more of our personal info.

>>508934763
In America this was just poor court lawyer jewery.

The porn sites are/where arguing that doing age verification is violation of the 1st...
Its... not... unfortunately.

And because its third party, it also doesnt necessarily violate the 4th either.

The judges decision, even if i disagree, is correct just on how they presented the their case to the courts.

>>508929910
the sharty will go dpwn first

>>508929910
sharty 100% would be first of them to go, even they tried there hardest to just >ban porn, I would love to see the meltie when everyones id gets lea-i mean hacked :^)

>>508927726
You think people are going to vote pro porn? Are you people really nothing but dingbats and sexual deviants? Do you know any real people? Everything with you creeps is about sex. And especially butt stuff. If anything, people are fed up with degeneracy and porn.
Face it, you’re on the wrong side of history.

>>508934493
>>508934689
>>508934715
It's not a problem, once you realize the people watching you are as bad if not worse than you are.
So Agent Dick Head can talk about your loli collection all day, but you can look at him and say "yeah right pal, tell Tyrone I said 'sup nigga!' while he's fucking your wife.
OR if you are unfortunate enough to deal with a female agent, just tell her that her roast-ass pussy stinks and she needs to bathe. Also, attack her eyebrows, nose hair, teeth, and fivehead.
Male agents can be made your bitch by attacking their tough-guy ego.
Female agents are of course female and are very conscious of looks.

>>508935128
Its not the Feds I worry about. Its the Nigger hats. Hell my fucking credit cards get rekked every time I order a pizza in the store and this is the big names like DiscoverBondage and Masterslave card. Identity theft and breaches happen too much, gov has worse sec than fucking hospitals.

>>508928707
I sorta agree. But I, like so many others, am really fed up with the filth. It’s not a hill to die on. I honestly don’t care one bit if porn is throttled. It’s actually the one form of speech the court demurred on. Obscenity is not — in the proper sense — considered a valid form of expression, much less speech. It’s a lowly and parasitic attack on the prurient and weak of character. It’s a sign of cultural decay.

It’s so odd that actual free speech is openly persecuted, but you can do the most vile and despicable acts in the name of Kink and the establishment will celebrate you. That’s what they intend. To deprive you of all meaningful freedoms and replace them with deviant sex. You can do anything you want and express yourself in any way you choose, so long as it involves anus. Preferably black anus. But any anus is better than no anus. They really do expect you to fight for freedom of expression in the name of butt fucking. I’m not doing it. I’m keeping my powder dry for defending real speech.

>>508928792
No it won’t.

>>508935480
You have credit cards? PLURAL?

>>508929063
I never did. Porn is obscenity and filth. It’s not speech at all. Fuck porn. Fuck pervs. Fuck gooners.

>>508935591
Yea most americunts do, How else are we going to rack up debt.

>>508935083

Porn is the canary in the coal mine.If it goes, then it gives the ok to target everything else the powers that be don't like.It is also such a vague term because what classifies as it and what does not is subjective.

The objective truth is that censorship is just anti-intellectualism that only retards would support.

>>508929123
When they decide that the honeypot is no longer of use, they will use the guise of porn or cheese p to go after this place.

>>508935657
I( have no debt. I got out from under that rock AFAP when I had it and I'll never ever go under it again.

>>508930058
Finally an anon who thinks clearly.
Pol is not in the business of defending kike porn rackets. To hell with the smut peddlers.

>>508935599

Remember that not too long ago an exposed ankle would've been considered pornographic in muttland. You morons don't learn anything from history to know you cheer for the meat-grinder whilst being the fodder of Samsara.

>>508930958
No it isn’t. Maybe gooners need to be shamed. Look, I’ve had every meaningful constitutional and civil right stripped without due process. I do not care — and do not mind — if porn is pushed to the sleezy crevices of the web and gated. It doesn’t bother me at all. Porn is a sickness. It causes great harm to families and individuals psyches (not to mention their souls). That’s the kind of speech kikes care about because it is so corrosive and destructive. I say we concentrate on the manners of free speech we care about — its nobler element. Which, yes, do include criticism of other races, genders, religions, etc, etc. Also special protection and provision must be made for the protection of ideas related to the protection of the United States sovereignty, which has always been best preserved the more homogeneous her composition.
Fuck defending porn. I care about the defense of liberty. And if liberty and diversity are incompatible (and it appears they are), then diversity be damned.

>>508936136

You think you said something smart, but you didn't.

>>508927994


Bro unironically thinks perverts and pedos know less about VPNs than the average Joe

You know what, let's do it, I'd love to watch the far right crumble within days when they can only say things they're comfortable being attached to their face

>namefag opining on matters of anonymity
Reminder that glowniggers want this type of person as the mainstay good goy internet user.

>>508927484 (OP)
>party of virtue signaling isn't stopping this virtue signaling!
virtue signaling is the foundation of fundamental conservatism.
They do it without a second thought. They are backwards, trailer trash that must consciously force themselves to do the right, normal thing and then they pat themselves on the back for weeks after.

>>508936136

This is the evangelical equivalent of British "let's just get rid of guns, it's not like they'd ever demand licenses to own knives"

>>508935887
Yeah, and at that time men’s testosterone levels were 3Xs higher and people were fucking more. Weird how that works, eh?
You simpletons do not understand humanity. The more that degeneracy and deviance are pressed, the less sexual people will inevitably be. People are grossed out and put off. People miss intimacy and romance. This sewage pumped through media has become a massive turn off. It’s all just an icky kink nobody wants to think about anymore.

>>508936472
>>People miss intimacy and romance
Another illusion you personally believe in, but that’s not how animals work. People still downplay just how heavily entrenched their basal sexual impulses are.

>>508936314
lol. No, you retard. I didn’t think I wrote anything especially profound. That’s just my casual bantz. But you sure did reveal yourself to be low wattage, slope browed mouth breather if you thought I was showing off or fancying things up.
You untermenchen sure are adorable sometimes the way you try to swipe at your betters on basket weaving forums.

>>508936472

>3x higher test levels from a majority population of malnourished commoners and the minority of slothful rich people.

LOL.

>>508936716

>"lol. No, you retard. I didn’t think I wrote anything especially profound. That’s just my casual bantz. But you sure did reveal yourself to be low wattage, slope browed mouth breather if you thought I was showing off or fancying things up.
You untermenchen sure are adorable sometimes the way you try to swipe at your betters on basket weaving forums."

>>508936429
No it isn’t. In fact, the defense of filth and obscenity as a valid expression of free speech actually deprecates the reasoning in support of legitimate free speech. And that shows that you miss the point of free speech altogether. For our founding fathers, free speech was a social elixir. It was in all was hygienic to the democratic process. That is to say, free and unfettered speech (without consequences) was not viewed as some necessary evil, but a matter of necessity itself — if the thing to satisfy were understood as the common good.

There is nothing good about porn. It’s rot and filth. That’s why it’s called obscenity. I will not defend a man’s right to shit in public no matter what message he intends to convey.
I want to restore both the substance and dignity of free speech. It isn’t worth much if it’s cause du celeb is butt fucking.

The pervs never cared when I spoke out against the vax. They wanted me silenced and trusting the science. That’s the kind of speech that needs protection. Protecting porn is like wasting chivalry on a whore.

>>508936622

>illusion

shallow pseudo-intellectual.

>>508927484 (OP)
reminder that porn is a weapon

>>508937341
>memeflag drivel
Expand upon that further without the veneer.

>>508936848
I’m actually quite handsome, athletic and am possessed of a winsome charm. You would be positively captivated by my presence. You’re very lucky I’m even responding to you. You’ll prolly brag about this someday.

>>508937294

Have you not stopped to consider that it would be better for people to learn what is degenerate without direct exposure than to just remain completely ignorant about it?

There is no such thing as a "necessary evil", there is only necessary compromises.

What is even porn? Where do you draw the line between simple artistic nudity and blatant perversion?

>>508937673
>have you not stopped to consider…
Of course I have. I’ve actually given it much thought. I tend to the free speech absolutist side of things. But I don’t take that position because it aligns with any specific ideology. I subscribe to no ideology. My reasoning on these things became, at the point I outgrew ideology, sourced exclusively in the pursuit of humanity’s edification. Is this or that good for the people? So for me, the reasoning in support of free speech has to do with my firm conviction that open, honest, earnest and unfettered debate is healthy and beneficial for society.
This is why I don’t even consider porn a form of speech. This is why other great legal scholars of the past gave it a special distinction — “obscenity”. I think that distinction is valid. Far more valid that any argument in defense of porn as speech. I think in conflating the two and weighting their importance as equal does great harm to our understanding of the role free speech plays in a democratic republic. When we do so conflate, it is then valid to consider some forms of free speech as malignant. And porn being malignant, those who reason from the position of the greater good could casually lump all “speech” together as something that needs curtailing. So, that’s why it’s important to distinguish obscenity from speech. They are qualitatively different things. But I suppose there should be some tolerance for its existence. I’m just not going to defend it in any way or enshrine in the pantheon of democracy.

>there is no such thing as necessary evil.
I don’t know if that’s true. God lets Satan loose in his season. And accords him great powers. It seems God Himself deems some measure of evil as necessary. It’s a mystery fren.

>what is porn?
Porn is creepy, pervy and gross. If you have a sense of decency, you’ll recognize it immediately.

>>508937294

"No it isn't, knives are necessary, guns are not, they're evil and are only used for killing "

Okay retard

>>508937454

While man is an animal, it is a social one. Despite at the base of every complex emotion there exists a primal desire of sorts, in the matters of relationships, those of whom are self-aware seek a complementary and compatible pair that they can be themselves with, for there is no merit in a partner they cannot trust to do so and potentially bring life into the world. What keeps couples together even decades past their prime is what was built with greater reasoning beyond their animalistic impulses, something that can only be established by truly getting to know a person rather than just wanting to get in their pants. Perverts remains ignorant of all this and uses beasts to claim their desire to fuck and nothing more is natural despite the reality is even the beast is selective of their mate with basic logic guided by instinct whilst theirs is just ego and selfishness.

>>508927484 (OP)
Like that is gonna work. Look how they did with removing torrent sites. Its old people making laws on an area they dont understand.

>>508938321

Porn is not a speech, it is an expression, a very broad form of it. People need not fear the sexual nature of sexual beings, they must understand it to be able to comprehend what is subjectively good and bad and what is objectively good and bad.

Satan is an aspect of your God itself. You worship a chaos deity who sees you would not know what it defines good from evil and vise versa had you no examples of it. So how would one know what is degenerate filth and what is not without an example? How can you develop senses without being able to sense anything by being anti-sense?

>>508927726
Oh no people will vote for the other pro Israeli candidate! How horrible. Just voooote harder I'm sure these two parties will present you a good candidate eventually! Surely.

>>508938534
Social animals are still inherently beholden to their impulses, mankind is just rife with compromises that seemingly curb them. You aren’t privy to the oceans of secrecy that comprises the backbone of relationships, and no outsider would know if not able to unveil them; selectivity isn’t certainty by any means.
>>Perverts remains ignorant of all this and uses beasts to claim their desire to fuck and nothing more is natural despite the reality is even the beast is selective of their mate with basic logic guided by instinct whilst theirs is just ego and selfishness
Not every person needs to subscribe to your personal views to survive, or to propagate. The underlying nature of people having sex has before and will continue to be reality, regardless of ideals. However, not everyone needs to pair sexual stimulation to propagation alone, shockingly enough.

>>508930058
This isn't actually about porn. This is about obscenity. And 4chan would definitely be considered obscene by basically any public metric. The reason you're posting on 4chan was just marked as being a reason wherefore the state could shut the site down.

>>508939910
Really, the fact people think this is about porn shows the abject lack of understanding. This is about whatever a state defines or declares as being obscene. Porn is just the keys being jangled. It's a massive power grab, and the Supreme Court absolutely fucked up.

>>508939958
Yes, they royally fucked this one up, but perhaps that was the point.

>>508939538

Beholden, but they have a choice to not be controlled by them. It is not compromise, its foresight. Weakness is a choice.

>>508939997

These are no fuck ups, it is all intentional.

>>508927994
>Nobody cares about this except perverts and pedophiles. Everyone else just uses a VPN or finds a site that isn't blocked, or simply doesn't look at online porn very much.
>Most people aren't coomers.
It starts off with arguments about porn and CP. Then once the technology is in place, it is used to ban any kind of wrongthink the government don't want you to see. In the UK the original list of banned sites was just CP, now it includes piracy sites, sports streaming sites, and even russian news websites that the government don't want us to be able to access.

>>508928203
The Canadian instinct for relentless bootlicking and self cuckery never ceases to amaze.

>>508931931
>There's a natural tendency for it to become more and more degenerate as people become more and more jaded.
Anecdotes isn't representative of everybody else. By this logic most porn would be extremely degenerate and deviant since most people watch porn except most of it is nothing but normie slop and standard vanilla stuff.

>>508937434
So why take a weapon away from the people if only to control?

>>508927484 (OP)
Land of the free

>>508927484 (OP)
If this was that big of an issue they would get after the jewish owners of these porn sites and remove them from the internet entirely. But for some jewish reason porn falls under free speech, even though it isn't speech at all, just endless degeneracy being pushed on the masses.

>>508945079
Probably because the weapon already achieved its goal. It's like getting a man addicted to pain killers to fuck him up then taking it away one day.

>>508927726
t.

>>508927484 (OP)
>>508927726
The powers that be have a new system that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime this year and by the next decade it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.
There will be no collapse, no violence, no uprising, no world war, no revolution, no killing of jews or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end. AI will be at the center of it all.

The Great Reset is inevitable.

>>508928707
Euro cities (in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and Ireland) to deploy a EU-funded trial of AI-surveilled cities. In Italy, Trento is one of them. Three systems are employed (the names themselves tell it all):
>"Marvel", used to detect criminal acts
>"Protector", used to protect places of worship from hate crimes
>"Precrisis", used to identify any vulnerabilities in the monitored places
The systems will detect suspect behaviors based on audio and video inputs, reporting them to law enforcement agencies. Fuck this shit! I'm waiting for this Chinese Union to collapse. The worst thing is that boomers cheer for these initiatives (the same retards who cheered for the scamdemic shenanigans).

https://www.marvel-project.eu/impact/

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/ip_23_5651

https://archive.is/YlQyw

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/03/investigative-reports/cia-and-mossad-linked-surveillance-system-quietly-being-installed-throughout-the-us/

>Netanyahu was asked by Fox News host Mark Levin whether the large growth seen in recent years in Israel’s technology sector, specifically tech start-ups, was part of Netanyahu’s plan. Netanyahu responded, “That’s very much my plan … It’s a very deliberate policy.” He later added that “Israel had technology because the military, especially military intelligence, produced a lot of capabilities. These incredibly gifted young men and women who come out of the military or the Mossad, they want to start their start-ups.”

>>508927484 (OP)
just another betrayal from the two faced maga crowd

>>508927484 (OP)
So SUDDENLY internet censorship is bad, huh? Yet you had no problem when people were banned for "racism" and loli. YOU GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE!

>>508945240
>But for some jewish reason porn falls under free speech, even though it isn't speech at all, just endless degeneracy being pushed on the masses.

Because at the end of the day you or I can hire a man and a woman and have them dress up as rival politicians and have them fuck and that actually mean something even if you are just, well IRL trolling lol.

>muh degeneracy
I think cheerleading is just pedophiliac degeneracy that mid-town America is too fucking stupid to see through, but im not a jew who wants things i hate banned, so i choose to not pursue cheerleading content.

Dont make me bring up Japan's low rape stats, now.

>>508945870
arnt you exposing your own hypocrisy and lies?

>>508939538
0 days without a kike making the "le man is le social animals" argument

ITT foreign niggers and american niggers unaware of what obscenity is. These sites arent even obscen with porn anymore, they're obscene with agenda pushing and the amount of murder pushed in algorithms. Dont even need people having sex to get the age verification

>>508934384
I remember them salivating over it.

rest assured as well coomers, the USA will never have jurisdiction over xvideos, the actual globohomo rape of the natural order network. Should look into the phantom 900M loan to mindgeek that delivered free porn streaming for ad revenue. Then, you investigate how a porn company managed to create its own fucking payment processor. You know how visa, mastercard ban any content they don't like? The globohomo porn network doessnt have this issue. Theres no way to ban online porn. We can only age verify the Canadian porn, bc if you don't know porn is illegal in the USA (only two places to film and not be sued for obscenity, not counting OF)

If the internet continues as is, I'm not sure having a digital ID, NFT type identifier isn't the natural step after handles and avatars. Or the internet dies bc the only way to verify human interactions is going to be gaming and discord

>>508937294
>For our founding fathers, free speech was a social elixir. It was in all was hygienic to the democratic process. That is to say, free and unfettered speech (without consequences) was not viewed as some necessary evil, but a matter of necessity itself — if the thing to satisfy were understood as the common good.

https://xcancel.com/RT_com/status/1888365524704546890

https://x.com/RT_com/status/1888365524704546890

>>508927484 (OP)
You jerk offs are all going to be stuck looking in windows while you beat your meat. But you tech "security" creepy fag fucks are used to that type of thing anyway, eh? You guys are SO see thru, sick in the head fucks. No wonder you all are ONLY tuff guys behind a screen but cute little kittens in real life. Cowards

>>508950246
America is a freemason nation, and the 1st amendment is simply to blaspheme Christ without a king or church punishing you

>>508945674
bullshit. they already have PRISM, how is a 'new system' going to help

>>508945967
Cheerleaders aren't prepubescent

Why bother psyopping? Just turn the internet off. What are they afraid of? Anything I would do in that case, I will do.

Admit it, you knew they'd never let the truly free Internet exist. You just knew it'd end up like this.

Porn is poison. This is a good thing.

>>508953064
>free
someone's doing the paying

>>508953188
Free as in "free speech".

>>508953126
everyone uploads IDs to every grown-up site to "keep kids out"
removing porn won't be enough, they'll come for your bad words.

>>508953228
it's much freer than real life at any rate, impactwise. It took them 20 years to put more than minimal restraints on

>>508953384
They will not allow truly free speech. Oh, and putting restraints is much easier than you think.

>>508934689
>You give them an inch and they will take a mile.
While I agree in principle, the only thing that matters here is whether the ruling makes sense legally.
And keep in mind that this is at the state level, not federal.

>>508953568
sorry, in the age of bots I can't accept glittering generalities in lieu of argument

>>508954075
I am currently experiencing internet being restrained, for example. Entire Russia does too.

>>508954245
The frog boil is heating up but it has been 20 years since this was predicted. Not saying nothing ever happens but it would be revisionism to say I knew free speach would never happen on the internet.

>>508927838
>lets commoners have a taste of the internet until they're hooked
>start censoring it
Just another humiliation ritual.

>>508954325
Look at how normies use the internet. Look at us too, while at it. Do you realize, that this is just colossal propaganda machine, and in order for it to function at it's peak efficacy, they need to make you believe it's all "natural" or "organic", to maintain this illusion of free choice. But, with the way the world is going, they might have to move from the current illusion of free speech to an old school curated content kind of propaganda, which was in place pre-internet. This switch is happening as we speak. Soon the internet will be tv.

>>508954667
That's outdated morality. People are ready for a completely synthetic experience. If my opinion matters, I'm ready to accelerate too so I'm still active during the reaction.

>>508954784
I don't think I understand what you are talking about. Can you be more straightforward?

>>508954916
People don't care if they're talking to bots anymore. Even someone who doesn't like them has no choice but to inhabit the same internet as them and be normalized. I'm not looking forward to the slow-death of our internet and would prefer a quick replacement that potentially inspires people to turn against it more quickly.

>>508955158
They will never "wake up", history shows that. Your hopes are in vain.

>>508955570
Not even sure what I'm supposed to be hoping for in your scenario, public opinion swings wildly back and forth all the time. The morality of today equally accommodates banning all porn and internet, or total sexual freedom. People aren't that serious about their beliefs, at least not in the west where they're so divorced from politics.

>>508927726
So to summarize, the Democrap platform is:
>reeeeeee save the criminal illegals
>reeeeeee be nice to the faggots and trannies
>reeeeeeeee let kids watch cum guzzling on film
that about sum it up?

>>508956299
That's where you wrong - when you assume that normies have morals. Their "morals", their "opinions" is what they are told. You were saying that people would be inspired to turn against something, but they never will. Cattle gonna cattle.

>>508929941
Well to be entirely clear, you already enter a phone number to access the internet.

This is theoretically digital ID, it's just not really a sufficient humiliation ritual for our overlords.

>>508927484 (OP)
>No anime
>No foreskin
>No weed
>No porn

>>508957406
They're inspired by iniquity to do excess in the opposite direction. It's like a pendulum, but directional change also happens based on the design, what they're told in your words. That's where individuals have an impact.

>>508958361
No, they'll just take it. They will do nothing.

>>508927484 (OP)
This is being introduced throughout the Anglosphere. It started in Australia, it's being legislated right now in Canada, etc.

>>508960359
They do everything. They make things go. Try going against the flow, I'll work with it and we'll see who wins.

>>508927994
The purpose of this is to get 4chan to require you to send the jews your government ID in order to access the site.

>>508960687
I thought we were already a honeypot

>>508960511
They do what they're told to do.

>>508927484 (OP)
Calm down, gooner. They only go after porn sites at Texas. If you don't even live in Texas, why you care so much?

>>508947325
Why are you mad, pedo?

>>508961137
ok. this is aimless demoralization from a vpn "based" country no one questions, how about that

>>508927994
You vastly underestimate the amount of porn addicted boomers and gen X ers that know nothing about a computer other than the fact that it can dispense videos of naked women.

They’ll joke about it, going “huh huh maybe those nerds will go outside and meet some real women” then write 30 letters to their congressman and become more politically active than a trust fund college kid trying to make daddy mad.

>>508961456
How you don't put your hopes in normies not acting like cattle.
> But they will not take it! They will revolt!
Ha-ha, no.

>>508961456
whoever he is, you've been arguing with him for hours about women so whos the idiot?

>>508961589
I don't listen to bad faith arguments, I reject them violently. pattern recognition and noticing have gone too far to simply win with sophistry over an obvious truth.

>>508932960
You're naive. Everyone will need to present a government ID just to buy online video games and it will be the fault of this recent decision.
Then Jew lawyers will notice that reading the news is distressing, which can hard children, so you need a government ID to read the news as well. This will happen because Americans are pussies.

>>508961713
Stay ignorant, reap what you sow.

>>508961691
There is no personal discussion, only kabuki theater in public. That's why shilling matters, they want to dominate the conversation. If I pick a thread to post in, it's one I don't mind bumping. Generally bots and shills are the idiot.

It's not about porn. It's about slowly de-anonymizing the internet.

>>508961810
so scary! I defenestrate you.

*harm

>>508961809

>>508927484 (OP)
Literally because JEWS want to stop criticism of them online, and this will DIRECTLY lead to INTERNET ID, where what you say will cause you to be banned from the internet or even imprisoned or shot, and Republicans take BRIBES from the Israeli government for that specific goal to be achieved.

>>508927838
I do and that's why I'm pissed off about it. Anyone who supports any kind of censorship is a fucking cuntfaggot and deserves death, without exception.

>>508927726
>I need an ID to watch porno? AWWW HECK IM VOTIN DEMOCRAP!!!!!
Amuzibg fantasy.

Learn how to turn your own PC into a VPN and file server to share files with those behind enemy lines. Instructions on youtube.

>>508961851
I will never use ID to look at porn.

>>508961852
I'm not trying to scare, I'm just saying how it will be. And I'm talking from experience.

>>508961915

Spoken like a true addict

>>508927484 (OP)
>Censorship is when you require age verification to see titties.

>>508962347
looking back at your posts gives a worse and worse impression, like a straight up bot. I'll get stronger though, I'll spot you even quicker. Others will too

>>508962458
The jewish pornographer cries out when you prevent children from seeing porn.

>>508958142
What does anime has to do with Jewish porn sites, kike?

>>508927484 (OP)
>The same technology that is used to age gate porn will now be used to age gate websites with anti-religious and vulgar language
No it won't. Porn never enjoyed the full protection of the First Amendment yo begin with which is why it was simple for the government to argue that their restriction on age for accessing pornography fulfilled the intermediate scrutiny required.

>>508962549
>>508962583
if it was about porn, they'd create a children's browser or device setting. Dead easy. It's about making everyone enter ID on every site with adult content. We can't let children see the N word, right?

>>508927994
>Most people aren't coomers.
Tell that to Psycho Mantis.

>>508962583
Yes it will, dumbass. You're part of the reason why they get away with this shit.
Buy a video game? Need ID. Comment on a news site? ID.
Want to join a forum to talk about favorite movie? ID.
Want to investigate government evils? ID. lol

>>508962668
>if it was about porn, they'd create a children's browser or device setting.
Those browsers block much more than just pornography.
>It's about making everyone enter ID on every site with adult content.
Just don't rely on pornography. Problem solved.
>We can't let children see the N word, right?
Hate speech, however, is free speech unless it is an explicit call for violence. I'm sorry the state made it so you can't goon as easily, I guess?

>>508927838
I remember. It was intentional. They needed training data. Now they have it and are pulling the ladders up, turning off the spigot.

>>508928812
>Sex sells
yeah hot women help sell cars stupid. porn just creates coomers and rich kikes.

>>508962834
>just give up another right it's fine!
You're a jew.

A lot of mentally ill people are also porn addicts.
Blocking porn on the internet is good, they can all fuckoff back into the real world.

>>508962834
you think children should be allowed to browse 4chan and read the N word and TND pasta, but not see titties? What's wrong with you?

>>508927484 (OP)
>the party of small government, less regulation, and free speech!
These assholes will pass any and every law that claims to pRoTeCt ThE cHiLdReN no matter how fucked up it is.

>>508962922
You want the worst of the worst out in the real world?

>>508927484 (OP)
>Why didn't Republicans fight back harder?
Who do you think is sponsoring the legislation to do this? Get a VPN and carry on. Also start perusing datahoarding threads on /g/ You are going to need to start saving your porn again.

>>508962769
>You're part of the reason why they get away with this shit
No, because I'm not an all-or-nothing niglet-brain like you. Even ID to rent video games got dunked in way back when. See Brown v. Entertainment Merchant Assn. The only games that actually require ID to rent/play nowadays are games that, you guessed it, have pornography (not just nudity) in them (Hentai games etc.)

>>508927484 (OP)
>the verge
I'm old enough to remember when they lost all credibility with the PC build vid

>>508963018
Dumbass. Slippery slopes are real and always have been. Enjoy your slavery.

>>508962515
Whatever.

>>508962923
>>508962921
>>508962769
I think the better question is why are you all upset about children being unable to access porn? Seems a bit strange.

>>508963091
that's right, what do you care? What's the motive? Train in psychology.

>>508927726
>muh porn

Its been blocked for awhile now and nothing has changed. Most people will just comply with the “anonymous face scans” that they are using to determine age. Its really a non issue. Most people are also concerned about youth seeing too much porn. At the end of the day its not going to change shit

>>508963182
Why would I need to train in psychology?

Romans 6:23 (KJV) For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

>>508963135
Did anybody say that? Another shitty arguer here

>>508963219
LLMs suck at it. Train.

>>508962969
Yes where they can have treatment for their disorder and become normal people.

>>508963281
> y-you're a bot! Because I said so!

>>508963135
It's not about children, idiot, and it never was about them. Bad parents will have children who will access adult content anyway, and in a FREE society you don't treat the entire nation like a class of kindergarteners, punishing the rest because one kid acted out.
Stop letting kids have their own personal computer in their own rooms, make the PC a public thing at home, problem solved and you didn't need the fascist government sticking its greedy meddling nose in.

>>508963246
Well surely you aren't upset about identity verification to procure a service, otherwise you'd be upset about the fact that every single thing you have a subscription to also documents your identity and associates it with that account. Do you expect me to believe that you haven't used your debit or credit card to register for any online services?

>>508963233
Jews 69;68 page 2566-67

"Whoever worships jesus has commited a terrible blasphemy and shall be boiled in feces on judgement day"

>>508963369
>why yes, everyone's sexual desires needs to be given over to the almighty government

You're a jew using disingenuous arguments. Kys. SCOTUS is wrong and no one has a duty to follow their idiotic ruling. Their ruling clearly harms privacy and free speech, but you don't care because you're a jew.

>>508963369
that's a false equivalency, most sites don't need photo ID.
>>508963337
You're a bot because of the shitty blackpill argument from 2015 and no motive. There are plenty of humans acting like bots, you are what you do.

>>508963524
So you don't use your credit/debit card to register for any services at all?

direct violation to the first amendment.
ITT: seething europoors (including me)
it will be repealed as unconstitutional

>>508963629
I don't use ID to read the news or to look at porn, no. If I want to buy something online, of course that's different, you disingenuous jew. Remember to kys.

>>508963575
>that's a false equivalency, most sites don't need photo ID.
It's really not. Identity is identity. It doesn't matter what to use to register, we live in 2025 and its extremely easy to put a face to a name in any context.

>>508963233
The sin in question is women in public who are dressed in a way which is immodest, and they are the whole cause of the whole thing, because otherwise men would simply avoid porn (because it's fake).

The Bible doesn't make a case against masturbation. The Bible makes a case against being immodest.

But incorrectly we have blamed the innocent, for how profound is the ignorance of the whole if the idiotic unity of the mind of the supposed wise ones of our system.

>>508963738
Ok so you are comfortable giving your identity to register for services. So why does that attitude suddenly change with porn?

>>508963756
Nigger, post your ID right now or fuck right off.

>>508963233
>>508963820
also, I think you were offtopic, so I confused threads.

Weird. A religious bot?

>>508963756
real life is the perfect comparison, there are cameras everywhere and ID checkpoints in many places, but it would be tyrannical to ask for it everywhere. I don't mind explaining to another retarded bot who will post the same shit again back at me, maybe some anons will read.

>>508962668
>>508962921
>>508963338
Underrated chad posts

>>508962834
>>508962923
>>508963135
>>508963369
>>508963629
False dichotomy bad faith kike pilpul

>>508927484 (OP)
>this all happened in texas
those faggots deserve everything they voted for.
If a website is more than 1/3 porn texas requires an age gate.
I don't like pornography and view it very infrequently but this is the stepping stone to total internet surveillance.

>>508963859
Nah. Why would I upload my personal information to a bunch of people who don't have any sort of confidentiality guidelines (like ID verification services do) and are suddenly upset that children can't access pornography? Seems like a terrible idea.

>>508964084
Everyone knew you're a hypocrite, but thanks for confirming.

>>508964151
>if you're willing to upload lD to a confidential verification database but not ok posting it on an anonymous multinational message board where people are upset that kids can't access porn you're a hypocrite
ngmi

>>508927484 (OP)
This will ultimately lead to decentralization. They can block the largest distributors, but they can't block the entire fucking internet without it blowing up in their faces.

>>508963575
My "shitty blackpill argument" has been my reality for like 20 years. People just don't care about muh freedoms and muh anonymity and muh privacy and whatnot.

>>508927484 (OP)
>the jew cries out as it strikes you
I'm okay with this. About time daddy stepped in to discipline the children.
>as if this will stop literally anyone from accessing anything
>as if limitations don't increase demand
The kikes allowed this for a reason.

>>508964353
They didn't care back then, yet it happened. Nerds want power for themselves and they don't care who gets liberated in the process

>>508964291
This board is not anonymous. If you piss someone off here badly enough, you can be found. Just saying. The same goes for any website.
This law is like LEAVING YOUR ID at a random dildo shop-and you just have to trust the random shopkeeper with your information. Fuck that noise.
Now you may as well stop replying to me because I know you're a jew who argues in bad faith.

>>508930058
It's a meaningless and ultimately unenforceable goal, like "fighting a war to end terrorism" or "working to stop racism". Man has been making porn since he first scrawled pigment on the walls of his cave shelter and he will continue making porn long after he has conquered the stars and the only thing all this retarded pearl-clutching will accomplish will be to decentralize and anonymize the very thing they're trying so hard to control.

And it isn't even a law, it's a bad decision by the jewish supreme court to allow states to illegally limit free speech and expression.

>>508964485
Let's pivot a little bit. Do you feel that New York v. Ferber was an impermissible infringement on First Amendment rights? If so, why?

I'm hiding the jew's posts now because jews never listen or argue in good faith.

>>508960990
nah it's too diluted with browns to be controlled anymore
India is quite literally helping 4chan inadvertently by being so fucking annoying

>>508964655
I think he's right, you're taking a godwin's law approach where everyone who disagrees with you is pedo hitler. Just kys retard.

>>508964482
What are you talking about?

>>508964714
No, I just view this ruling as largely the same as Ferber and I agree with the holdings in that case.

>>508964340
they will try lmao they're tech illiterate boomers. I don't get why the solution isn't penalties for parents rather than forcing law abiding citiizens to ID.

Actually I do know

>>508964728
the golden age of torrenting and internet happened in the same framework of people not really feeling strongly about anything. It's far from a statement about the future to say people will be easygoing.

>>508964774
press ctrl-V, that's what you're good for

>>508964915
Do you think the ruling New York v. Ferber was incorrect?

>>508965028
I don't know, that's why I prompted you to paste it.

>>508965098
Look it up it takes 3 seconds (you probably won't because you don't actually care about engaging in argument)

>>508965098
You're wasting your time with a dysgenic jew who would do horrible things to you and everything you hold dear if given the chance.

>>508965196
What currency have you earned with me to justify that kind of effort? Nothing. I think your arguments are trash all thread. You're nothing.

>>508964851
Of course they'll try, and it'll fucking fail. This will go as well as every time Google/YouTube tries to shut down ad blockers and everyone just stops using Google/YouTube for a few weeks until shit gets patched. Never underestimate people's willingness to find a work-around or throw a service in the trash if it's preferable to dealing with bullshit and blocks.

>>508964864
And what content were those people torrenting, hmm?

>>508965356
I really don't know what you're implying.

>>508965399
Just asking a question.

>>508965282
>not willing to engage in legal argument
Yeah, that's what I thought.

>>508965399
They're implying that anything not bought from Amazon is illegal and immoral and must be regulated, taxed, controlled, and banned.

>>508965463
More vague statements and nothing comments, you mean.

>>508965536
>legal argument
this bot can't be serious

>>508965539
we should be careful not to anthropomorphize. See how I picked up on his comment here >>508964353 and construed he was talking about internet freedom, he really said no such thing. The vague language is so you imprint on them.

>>508965656
Hey creature, you're the one not willing to engage in any discourse outside of petty name calling. You unironically think shitting all over an industry that is mostly run by jews, one of the most prolific sources of jew money, somehow makes someone a jew.

>>508965756
I said what needed to be said and you used that word wrongly.

Now the jew is saying that giving jews your ID harms jews. lol
lmao

>>508965857
Now I'm the one not engaging. So creative, where do they come up with these ideas

>>508965196
>you don't actually care about engaging in argument
Says the guy who's desperately trying to equivocate the possibility of kids seeing boobies on the internet with kids being sexually assaulted and exploited to distract from their own complete and utter lack of convincing arguments.

Now, I'd like to steer the discussion, if I may, to the plight of women in the Middle East. Please ignore the fact that it has absolutely fuck-all to do with the conversation.

>>508965863
I didn't. and I do think you should use caution assuming that's what he meant.

>>508965609
I was pretty direct.

>>508966025
You did. You're an idiot too like that jew. kys, motherfucker. I hate "people" like you. You think you're smart, but you're below average.

>>508965931
>Says the guy who's desperately trying to equivocate the possibility of kids seeing boobies on the internet with kids being sexually assaulted and exploited to distract from their own complete and utter lack of convincing arguments
Mere nudity isn't pornography. Miller v. California. Pornography requires the user of the material to be 18 or older, ID check upheld. United States v. Playboy. If anything, this supreme court ruling is an extension of the Playboy ruling into the internet from the physical realm. Do you think the playboy ruling was incorrect?

To the point, I made no allusion to the demonic jew being an animal or a human being.
Stupid motherfucker.
I'm not going to be nice anymore when someone disagrees with me here because being polite here is a waste of time.

>>508966286
Oh, what, so because they're on the other side of the world their suffering doesn't matter to you?? Jesus you're such a fucking insensitive, uncaring person. I can't believe you're just going to sit here and ignore widespread abuse, rape, and murder just because they don't have the same skin color as you. You racist bastard. You disgust me.

>>508966266
He's a bot so you shouldn't assume human ideas that aren't there.
>>508966221
concession accepted

>>508966483
ngmi

>>508966576
facepalm.jpg

>>508966638
you mean .gif right

>>508966662
Surely you mean .webm, correct?

>>508927726
I will be voting Democrat because of it and I voted Trump before.

>>508966695
no facepalms were more of a 2000s thing

>>508966662
I mean your_mom_sucks_my_dick.avif

>>508966576
They're probably not a bot, you stupid motherfucker.

>>508966695
>Surely you mean .webm
No, a Twitter link containing a YouTube link of a screen recording of a post on 4chan of a gif that was formatted as a webm

>>508966695
kys.tiff

>>508966743
LLM "intelligence" everyone! The statist position has dominated. You must all submit digital IDs, and return to work for God and country.

>>508966758
It doesn't matter, there's mechanical turks as well. You can't trust people just because they act like your buddy, they have to present a coherent argument or disappear.

>>508966823
What, you don't like your mom sucking my dick? Too bad.