They just fucked us and they know it and they are VULNERABLE.
https://x.com/ryanobles/status/1940093824212046118

>>509239752 (OP)
Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
>When you live in a privileged bubble for too long, it destroys you.

>>509239915
>Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
but not always
people forget that part

>>509239915
Power reveals the content of their character. They're shitty people and so power "corrupts" them.

>>509239915
Bla bla forced morality about meaningless nonsense basically you throwing a temper tantrum then telling people to respond

>>509240320
And what you're doing isnt corruption and you are the moral authority uh huh

>>509239752 (OP)

every tiny bit of ethics replaced with theater = feminism

>Senators acting like
>Senators
>plural
I only see one senator OP, where is the rest your are talking about?
>>509239752 (OP)

>>509239915
>>509240159
God bless Rand Paul. I'm convinced only him or his father could save this country economically.

I'm ashamed of Trump right now. I'd call him a faggot but he's done so much that I don't think I could ever call him one. Wrecked Roe v Wade, destroyed the trannt cult, defended Israel etc etc
but he's screwing up royally economically and fiscally. His greed is causing that.

>>509239752 (OP)
>>509241403
By the way, Trump just cost himself the midterms, I'm almost sure.

Here, listen to this red haired liberal explain how much Murkowski screwed over our country. She's only right about the cutes to SNAP and Medicaid. the other stuff about facism is nonsense

https://youtube.com/shorts/j6mH2oYn8Fk

>>509241403
>the Paul’s can save us!!1
Kek

>>509239752 (OP)
>bill will cut Medicaid and CHIP
>1/3 of all Alaskans are on Medicaid or CHIP
What kind of blackmail video do they have? Child rape? Child torture? Child cannibalism? It’s got to be child something…

>>509240159
>but not always
Cope
>No my career politicians are actually based

>>509239752 (OP)
lol at her mad, frowny face

>>509239752 (OP)
Democratic Senator Elections for '26 Midterms (* not seeking reelection)
John Hickenlooper (CO) - against
Chris Coons (DE) - against
Jon Ossoff (GA) - against
Dick Durban (IL)* - against
Ed Markey (MA) - against
Gary Peters (MI)* - against
Tina Smith (MN)* - against
Jeanne Shaheen (NH)* - against
Cory Booker (NJ) - against
Ben Ray Luján (NM) - against
Jeff Merkley (OR) - against
Jack Reed (RI) - against
Mark Warner (VA) - against

Republican Senator Elections for '26 Midterms (* not seeking reelection or likely to lose primary)
Tommy Tuberville (AL)* - for
Dan Sullivan (AK) - for
Tom Cotton (AR) - for
Ashley Moody (FL) - for
Jim Risch (ID) - for
Joni Ernst (IA) - for
Roger Marshall (KA) - for
Mitch McConnell (KY)* - for
Bill Cassidy (LA)* - for
Susan Collins (ME)* - against
Clyde Hyde-Smith (MS) - for
Steve Daines (MT) - for
Pete Ricketts (NE) - for
Thom Tillis (NC)* - against
Jon Husted (OH) - for
Markwayne Mullin (OK) - for
Lindsey Graham (SC) - for
Mike Rounds (SD) - for
Bill Hagerty (TN) - for
John Cornyn (TX)* - for
Shelley Capito (WV) - for
Cynthia Lummis (WY) - for

>>509241888
>cuts to snap and Medicaid
Good dude. Stop encouraging niggers and spics to breed

>>509239752 (OP)
>fuck you, i got mine
this is why we need fucking term limits and very strict association rules concerning political appointments.

>>509242783
It’s not going to stop it. It’s just going to cause them to steal more shit. As much as people don’t want to support niggers, those gibs keep them from chimping out and causing MORE problems.

I just crawled out from under a rock. Explain the BBB to me beyond "it bad/good cuz jews/niggers."

>>509242783
you obviously have no idea how many white people depend on these things

>>509243079
Also this. At a time when we should be expanding these programs due to layoffs from tariffs and AI job destruction, we're shutting them down. bad moves.

>>509243675
for many years, congress has budgeted using a 'continuing resolution' (not a budget) that establishes spending levels statutorily by department and delegates spending authority to department heads, subject to obligated spending levels specified in massive omnibus spending bills. this has all occurred without separate 'appropriates bills' which was typically the norm; the budget and appropriations bills process is the historical norm and defines 'congressional (house) control of the purse'.

the BBB is a budget bill, not a continuing spending resolution. it is the first step in a budget appropriations process that returns power of the purse to the house of representatives and more generally to congress. this is why the senate and democrats (and the media) fucking hate the BBB. they hate it because it represents the first step in a two-step process that will result in reigning in bloated federal budgets by establishing spending limits for programs that have grown well beyond their existing legally authorized (by statute) spending levels.

the CR process was mostly established and run by nancy pelosi. it has led to ballooning federal deficits, representing a quintupling of the national debt (from ~$8T to ~$40T) over 20 years. it is how they hide most of their 'pork spending'--not authorized by law, but enshrined by CR line items endowing typical lefty bullshit handouts and entitlements.

BBB reverse that trend. if the House Speaker follows through with his commitment to pass both Budget and Appropriations bills (which he made at the start of the term when Republicans secured control of all branches of government), it represents about half of the work required to restore control of federal spending to existing representative processes like house committees. these subsequent appropriations bills are enabled by the passage of the BBB budget bill--without the budget, you cannot have appropriations processes, and are stuck with CR spending line items.

>>509241888
>I'm almost sure
And you're always wrong

>>509242783
>He thinks it'll hurt Niggers and Spics
>It'll actually hurt old and disabled whites instead

>>509244239
A huge amount of them shouldn't be. There are exceptions for the disabled and whatnot, but there are far too many on welfare that are capable of supporting themselves.

>>509244892
Thanks, boss.

>>509240320
I don't think these senators are in control of anything.
They are 70 and 80 year old nursing home residents who dimly sign papers placed next to their medication by staffers. The younger ones are just as bad. I think the whole crew is treated as a rubber stamp act by whoever owns the most metrosexual staffers on the hill.

>>509239752 (OP)
wow, democracy being exposed as a joke again, so amazing