Apparently societies that are more misogynistic breed the most pol. We were right! Giving women rights only dooms a population. A population with written under control flourishes

>>509704936 (OP)
>problem

>grrr i LITERALLY HATE women. so I'm going to marry 3 of them and pay for their lives!

>>509704936 (OP)
>A man who teaches a woman to write should recognize that he is providing poison to an asp.
Menander

>>509704936 (OP)
>Giving women rights only dooms a population.
This might only be a short term problem. Long term, the most feminist-minded women get removed from the gene pool.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5X18lqyDO0

>>509705073
Get your blurry wall of text out of here

>>509705078
They just impregnate them and leave, a desperate retard then comes and adopt the family

>>509705078
im going to get on my knees with an expensive rock and FORCE a woman to be my BREED SLAVE and spend every waking moment with her children that love her while im at work getting black lung FUCK I HATE WOMEN

really though just dont let women go to higher education until they have 3 kids within a marriage. its not just low fertility, its throwing out the highest iq genes as quickly as possible. and end welfare

>>509705155
These women are dying to have kids tho, they just bought into the lie that working makes them more desirable, they literally do it to have access to better men unaware they're actually scaring them. It's the female version of becoming a soft emotional man to attract girls.

>>509704936 (OP)
But most /pol/ cuckservative losers will cope by saying
>only brown people need to control their women, heh, they're so inferior lulz

What a pathetic massive cope. You westoids are not in control of your women. The jew state owns them. Seethe or do something about it.

>>509704936 (OP)
That's not darwinian, that's cultural. Conflating the two makes you look like a psudointelectual retard. Moreover, it's not a problem.

>>509704936 (OP)
>turns out women don't like being breeding sows
wow, who knew that we're real people with real feelings and goals of our own?

>>509704936 (OP)
It's not even misogyny. Faggots are misogynists. You need a better word.
Disdain for tolerating deliberate stupidity?

>>509706412
>women don't like being breeding sows
If you actually bred when your body told you to breed, you'd already be a matriarch and not be bothered by it.
Wait, you don't sound like a female. Fucking larping trannies.

>>509705718
it's easier than ever to be a self taught professional.
why is higher education still a thing besides credentialism?

>>509706509
my body never told me to breed and I'm 32.

>>509704936 (OP)
Looks like feminism will get natural selected out of the gene pool

Society has way too many people

>>509706662
>natural
Nothing natural about it, it's very intentional social engineering using decades of propaganda to suppress instincts

>>509706662
That’s what I’m thinking. Throughout must of history the majority of women did not have a choice in breeding. Now today the ones that don’t want to breed don’t have any kids. And the ones that do, they have kids. Which genes will future females inherit?

>>509704936 (OP)
He has confused hating women with making the economic choices that best support the family. If you have no value in getting a formal education then you very likely can make use of the labor of children in your subsistence farm.

>>509706353
Culture is an extension of biology

>>509707479
The breeding genes obviously, for the most part, if you exclude artificial reproduction

>>509707549
>If you have no value in getting a formal education
I don't get why /pol/ has to enforce the dichotomy of higher education and access to white collar work.
getting a certification for business, finance, mathematics and programming is cheaper and faster (few months or 1 year vs 4+ years) than college and university.
if you don't have a degree, lacking one doesn't relegate you to blue collar or farm work for the rest of your life

>>509706662
people have been saying that about abortion and the pill for a while

>>509706662
>>509707083
>>509707479
Feminism is a force. A force backed by an invasive state. It is a constant until state-backed feminism is dismantled. That requires legislative change that no jew puppet can do, let alone endorse.

>>509706641
Oh, hello there, retard. Seen, not heard, please.

>>509707840
its not about enforcing it, its just how it works practically right now. even if women are
>getting a certification for business, finance, mathematics and programming
its still time spent not having a family, time spent competing with men for work

>>509704936 (OP)
Makes sense. Women are sexually attracted to misogynist men.

>hate
Do you think children should vote?
If not, why do you hate children?

>>509704936 (OP)
I want misogyny and a lower birthrate.

>>509705013
this

>>509707873
There's a reason why you need immigration to keep the system going

>>509704936 (OP)
if you can't find a white solution to this then you're no better than a sandnigger though.

>>509708047
immigration isnt keeping 'our system' going

>>509707963
not talking about women specifically.
/pol/ discusses non-degreed people like they are retards only suitable for manual labor, trades, or blue collar work when easily the reason why people don't have a degree is the costs or non reputable high school.

>>509708094
People had a "solution" just a few generations ago.

>>509708158
>retards only suitable for manual labor, trades, or blue collar work
Please do not conflate the useless eaters with /pol/. We are not all degenerate retards larping as "upper class."
>knocking getting paid to exercise
Lol.

I don't see refusing to educate women as being anti-woman. Most men probably shouldn't be educated either. It does not improve their lives, it only makes them miserable.

>>509708152
It is, economically and demographically

>>509708386
/pol/ threads go like
>if you don't have a degree you're stupid
>if you don't have a degree go into trades
not
>if you don't have a degree, you can self learn, build a portfolio, and/or join a certification program.

>>509708334
now find the one that actually works

>>509708643
>I haven't noticed the shills yet
Come the fuck on.
>memewhile, actually engaging with a consensus shill

>>509708757
I know there are shills. It's not that they haven't stopped setting the frame and bounds of discourse.

>>509704936 (OP)
there is a reason south asians and muslims are retarded

>>509704936 (OP)
>In favor of societies
So we're all just hives now? The point of sex is selection not producing endless worker drones. Domesticated rabbits breed far more frequently than wild ones, at some point society needs to adapt itself to selection otherwise they'll be flooded with a dysgenic and dependent population that all expect to breed on principle because food is something that we can all take for granted now.

>>509708989
Can you explain it please?

>>509708651
It is a solution that has been proven effective for thousands, even tens of thousands of years.
The phenomena of modern times are extremely exceptional in human history, yet you take them for granted. That is because you have been thoroughly brainwashed by the system.
Or are you going to create artificial wombs and baby factories or something? The projects will either be shut down by feminist jews or transformed into an increasingly degenerate and disgusting globohomo bullshits.

>>509704936 (OP)
I prefer less people

>>509709184
>The point of sex is selection not producing endless worker drones.
/pol/ is literally the board where I can find a thread fretting about birth rates and labor shortage AND fretting about AI causing future unemployment and decreased demand for human labor.
like somehow we're going to have s labor shortage because women aren't having and at the same time, there won't be jobs in the future because of AI

>>509709194
r selection vs k selection

>>509709260
That's not how generational population decline happens. It's not a clean cross section of the population leaving. It's the entire population getting older, until it rapidly shrinks. During this period of aging we will see several governments toppled via unrest, due to the collapse of the welfare states in most European countries, and eventually in the US too. It will start with the retirement age being raised successively, until it's abolished along with social security and pension systems, as they will no longer work with so many people trying to take payouts while there are fewer and fewer people paying into it each year. The current economic system simply does not work with a population of many more elderly people than young people.

And this is all before the actual population decline hits. Once that happens you will see crisis on top of crisis as huge gaping holes emerge in important sectors of the economy. The chaos will be bad enough I would not be surprised if there were violent rebellions against the US government.

>>509704936 (OP)
Problem?

>>509709576
Sounds cool

>>509709244
> refers to tens of thousands of years of experience and the fact that "modern times are extremely exceptional" in the same comment
brain damage? schizo? you're disproving your own point, do you even see yourself doing that?

>>509709340
+
this board is basically about panicking about separate issues in isolation even when said issues abnegate each others problems in some way.

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/509663525

what do people panicking about birth rates think about upcoming automation?

>>509704936 (OP)
>you hate women if you value their role as mothers!
Leftists are so enlightened.

>>509705653
I'm going to encourage my daughter to marry a responsible man who will provide all her material needs, so she can focus on raising healthy, well-adjusted children, who will love and cherish her and care for her in her old age, because I hate that little bitch's guts.

>>509704936 (OP)
Who would have thought we don't like being forced to be just a baby making machine

>>509709852
Are you sure you understood correctly?
I am talking about how a "solution" that worked in the past are now strangely rejected in modern human society and things no longer work. This is a phenomenon of modern times defined by feminism, individualism and so on.
There is no contradiction.

>>509709340
Why do you think this is confined to just /pol/? The idea of reverting back to selection would directly tamper with the domestic model that holds society together, it's an existential threat. This place used to talk about how women only want to fuck the top % of men, but that's observable in nearly every species of wild animal, the only thing that facilitated the population boom was agricultural society and then later industrialization. Now that factories can be automated and oil can be efficiently pumped there's no need for factory workers or coal miners. So what's the point of domestication at this point? Where do you direct all of that selection pressure to? These are questions that I don't think many people want the answers to, especially if you use classical society as a reference. Greeks outright did eugenics projects with their slaves as if they were breeding horses for sale, some slaves were only allowed to breed if they proved their loyalty. And all of this is preferable than doing the natural thing and competing with the top % of males, although I don't think there's been a point in history where on a mass scale state tells their subjects they're not good enough to even be slaves.

>>509704936 (OP)
I think the problem is "education" almost always includes sex education and family planning education. I remember during sex education it was primarily about consent and hammering in to always, always, always use protection and pregnancy was the worst thing that could possibly happen and your life was over.

I mean, I don't blame women if that's literally how we taught them. Pregnancy was always taught as a negative thing. I remember a girl did get knocked up and everyone, including the teachers, openly shit talked her and used her as a had example until she dropped out. I know now she has four kids, married a fire fighter, and she seems pretty good with life compared to the girls now pushing 30 and still acting like kids.

What if instead education celebrated motherhood and child rearing? I'm sure the outcomes would be significantly different.

>>509710310
>These are questions that I don't think many people want the answers to,
an answer like mass sterilization and depopulation through engineered disease?
I've been reading stuff like that since covid lol

>>509705718
I want to see some kind of study of professional and olympic athletes and how physical fitness correlates with the age of the mother at childbirth. We already know the negative effects of delayed mother hood like autism and ADHD, I'm interested in seeing the numbers on the positive effects

>>509710310
>I don't think there's been a point in history where on a mass scale state tells their subjects they're not good enough to even be slaves.
desu that is better than what we have now
>allowing illegal immigration to the point of having labor markets saturated
>tech companies literally both firing American workers and applying for h1bs
even back in 2010s, there was a kerfuffle about American workers training their replacements

Microsoft laying off thousands of employees, applying for thousands of H-1B workers
https://archive.ph/20250702172457/https://nichegamer.com/microsoft-laying-off-thousands-of-employees-h1bs/

>>509706412
If you were real people you could form self-sustaining communities and corporations of your own. Instead you need the government to force men to hire you and include you in their organizations

>>509710569
I was referring to the population issue primarily. Generally when people want to sell something on a populist platform they're always talking about promoting families and increasing birth rates. The question I was referring to was: what does this contribute? Are you passing a business onto them? Carrying on a trade? Using them for labor on the farm? It's more about the image of nativity and domestic life than it is about passing anything on. Will these people outright say they're fine with letting media and education raise their kids? Nope. They wanted simple predictable domestication, most families since WW2 had their kids effectively raised by state. This is a Pavlovian response at best, they want to keep hitting a button and see pellets come out of the machine, food is so far taken for granted to such an absurd degree that they actually feel entitled to sex instead and much like a domestic animal the sex drive is much higher, but it's subvert through porn. It's interesting because most of these people could easily pick a frumpy girl and have kids, but their standards are so inflated that they think an e-girl with 'light' make up is conventionally attractive rather than a hyperreal abomination of cosmetics and lighting. Part of me wonders if this is why Victorian era England was so against make-up, it's wild seeing men with higher standards than women.

>>509710945
>f you were real people you could form self-sustaining communities and corporations of your own.
is that why this board can not stop posting this cosmetics and skincare company

>>509710203
it worked in the past. now is
>The phenomena of modern times are extremely exceptional in human history
unlike the times when those solutions worked. get it?

>>509710930
And when AI replaces all of those low end tech jobs? Jeets certainly weren't hired for their quality of work and attention to detail. The only reason jeets were hired was because they were cheaper, if AI can do it cheaper than even then no one is going to care because at least it got rid of the jeets. I can guarantee once this happens no one will complain even if they've effectively been replaced.

>>509711247
the elites depopulating the planet with engineered diseases and vaccines was way more terrifying than "guys have to settle for an average fork that doesn't use Belle Delphine's make up and face filters"

>>509705442
click on open image in new tab
remove the “m” at the end of the filename, before the filetype, in the URL.
if it says 404 not found, change the file ending from .jpg to .png
thank me after retard

>>509711571
Exceptions are exceptions, as I have stated, and the societies are literally collapsing, so it is unlikely that this exception will continue indefinitely into the future. For some reason, you seem to view that as something that cannot be overturned now.
Are the fabricated nonsense of modern times natural laws that cannot be touched by mere humans? Does history necessarily continue as a straight line projected from the present?
Why can't you understand bringing up effective proven solutions from the past, and instead recommend only tweaking the status quo? It doesn't work.

>>509711664
>I can guarantee once this happens no one will complain even if they've effectively been replaced.
yeah people won't complain.
AI neither shits on the streets nor acts sadistic when in a position of money/influence/power.

>>509711780
Developing a mass fetish for cosmetics or expecting pornstar plastic surgery on average woman to even get erect at all is more terrifying to me at least. I've heard that some male pornstars need to watch porn on their phones to get hard on set even while the real thing is in front of them, that's effectively being colonized by objects. If they could passively sterilize people with a vaccine/disease but you go your entire life normally without kids, I doubt most people would care they would probably continue playing video games. Being tormented by an impossible fetishistic lust is way worse, but more practical because realistically only the people who can see through the fetish and accept the natural unclean reality are the ones who have a chance. There's at least an element to selection to it rather than just tabla rasa, because the vaccine sterilization would just end up with a small inbred cohort who were all in on the plot.

>>509704936 (OP)
this is some sharia law marxist bullshit fuck off mohamad

>>509704936 (OP)
How does years of education equate to hate? This logic implies society hates children as their years of education are much lower

>>509712372

Check this video

>>>/wsg/5913953

and ask yourself who runs this company? The CEO or the VP?

>>509704936 (OP)
>it's not clear how to fix the problem
I'll bite. What's the problem?

>>509706353
Are you retarded? Extrapolate these numbers. They are telling you that misandrist societies go extinct in favor of misogynistic ones

>>509713193
either immigration or corporations' infinite demand for higher profit margins and lower wages, as the points on the upper range of the y-axis are different countries

>>509704936 (OP)
14/88
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F6QsALbbcI