>>509739981>A social contract would exist if all the societies participants were agreed on the matterthere is no such thing as full agreement on the social contract
women rarely agree with men on how they run things
which is why women need men to rule over them
because women never know what they want as they're primarily emotionally led
the social contract is downstream of the will of men, in accordance with what they think is best for how society should run
e.g. you follow the rules and contribute, and you get out what you put in
now its different
the social contract, because its downstream of the state, with women being secondary
is all about protection and provision, even at the cost of rights / privileges for everyone else
because we now live in a gynocentric, female based social system
so there is no social contract for men, or for society at large
it presents as one but in reality its a bill of goods
where an offer is made
nothing is provided that is beneficial
women are simply protected from the errors of their ways that they default to without men ruling over them individually
and this translates to abortion rights because women, without men ruling over them, because promiscuous and their hypergamy amplifies
which means they need to be able to legally kill their offspring should that offspring interfere with their ability to:
1 - provide for themselves by being a worker
2 - find a new, more suitable male with more status and wealth
what you're talking about is the abstract, conceptual social contract that most people have in their minds
what I'm talking about is the actual working social contract between each individual and the state
