Is there a Chud politician out there who will ACTUALLY do aomety?

>We need half a million Indians in Italy

>>509944491 (OP)
But she is doing something?
>>509944576

Right wingers are profoundly idiotic. Most of them have no idea why mass immigration is happening in the first place. Shit, most of them don't even know the difference between left wing and right wing, because if they did, they'd be left wing. So they just keep voting for the Melonis and the Trumps. And of course they're "owning the libs" and "triggering the left" so that's all that matters. A great many of them will never even figure out that they're getting played because they like hearing shit like "God, homeland and family", and how they it makes them feel is infinitely more important that if she's actually doing what she claims she's doing or not. They have no conception of geopolitics or history or economics or anything else for that matter. They're the stupidest, most gullible people on the face of the Earth and they're 100% certain that this is all part of the plan, that the big reveal is just 2 more weeks away, that they're going to be living in a white ethnostate utopia by the end of the year. They're too dumb too live and too numerous to die.

oh, nobody shot her? oh well deserved

>>509944491 (OP)
why do anything at all when you can just deliver a few speeches and the goyim will be just as glad about your policy?

>>509944491 (OP)
politics are controlled, moreso in america than in europe but still controlled

these people enact the policies that their masters created for them, nothing more or less

There are no political solutions for white people.

>But Massie
>Ackkkkk

>>509947359
imagine thinking the voters are the problem and not the people who actually decide policy, voters are cattle with no power whatsoever

the politicians lie, they all lie, and the people that wont aren't allowed to run

>>509947994
there is a political solution but it requires a total social revolution and a removal(by force) of ALL previously established powers

>>509948101
>imagine thinking the voters are the problem and not the people who actually decide policy, voters are cattle with no power whatsoever

>It's the boomers fault they voted for it™

Like there was anyone to vote for in the first place that would benefit white people by lowering/eliminating taxes, removing non whites, getting back all of the foreign aid, having militaries that defend borders, promoting white history/white accomplishments and a bunch of other stuff.

The mythical politician doesn't exist. The sandbox has been infiltrated so outsiders won't be allowed in.

you are still trusting the Plan for china, right anon?
don't stumble so close to the finish line now.

>>509947994

>>509947359
>left wing is when nazism actually
kek. Chingchong wing wang.

>>509944491 (OP)
>shitalians fell for the shabbos populist

never trust a woman in the first place

>>509947359
>>509948101
There were regular elections in the Soviet Union. It's just every candidate was selected by the Communist Party.
The primary process does the same thing here. Trump managed to beat it in 2016, and he'll be the last one to ever do it.

>>509948691
>memeflag
Show your flag if you want anyone to respond to you

>>509944491 (OP)
>we will defend our identity
>imports millions of niggers and jeets

>>509949042
You're just proving him right.

>>509944576
>Italy has no jobs as it is
>WE NEED MORE WORKERS!!!!

>>509948200
As it always has throughout history. Fuck, we got pretty stupid, eh?

>>509944491 (OP)
> politician
Clear?

>>509949042
NatSoc is authoritarian centrism.

>>509949306
>ummm actually nazis are leftwing because they use the term socialism
>no i'm actually completly fucking clueless about the economic system of the third riech but it said socialism right there so they're basically communists
>oh btw, socialist politicians in America aren't leftists because they just aren't ok

Nazis in reality and function was controlled economy capitalism.

>>509950012
There is nothing centrist about real nationalism of the race.

>>509947359
>Most of them have no idea why mass immigration is happening in the first place.
South Korea has zero immigrant and a demographical pyramid identical to that of western Europe.
My explanation is that South Korea has no jews.
Your explanation, champ ?

>>509947359
1.Why do 98% of western left-wingers support mass immigration?
2.Why isn't mass immigration happening in japan?

>>509950017
>Nazis in reality and function was controlled economy capitalism.
>it wasn't left-wing, it was just capitalism!
>with the state in direct control of huge sectors of the economy and massive state-owned enterprises in others, including an entire state-owned car company to manufacture cheap Wagens for der Volk, state-owned resorts and cruise ships etc
>and every worker made part of a giant government-backed union
>and of course the basic political philosophy of the collective being totally supreme over the individual, with individual rights permitted only so much as they did not impede on collective goals

The only way the Nazis weren't left-wing is if you call everyone to the right of Mao a fascist.

Reform and AfD denied ethnicity and denounced remigration. There hasn't been any right wing in Europe since Golden Dawn got banned.

>>509944491 (OP)
Wouldn't be allowed to happen. You think you VOTE for someone who would do a change?

>>509950348
Left wing right wing isnt capitalism vs socialsim
Infact the original left wing were the capitalists

The reason the nazis were right wing is because they were against universalism which is the core of leftism

>>509947359
>Most of them have no idea why slavery is happening in the first place.
>Most of them have no idea why child labour is happening in the first place.
>Most of them have no idea why mass pollution is happening in the first place.
>Most of them have no idea why mass immigration is happening in the first place.
^^^ You are here ^^^

>>509950348
>with the state in direct control of huge sectors of the economy and massive state-owned enterprises
So the United States is socialist because they pay the garbage men and road workers?

Yeah again you're a fucking retard trying to use the support of right wing national socialism to push leftist modern socialism and convert reasonable rational right wingers into retaded tranny communists.

>>509950120
>>509950348
>>509949306
their social policies were far right by today's standards, and yes they allowed private property, insofar as it was used in the common interest instead of shareholder profits, which would be closer to Sanders than Trump in 2016 (populist center left). On overall balance, the NSDAP would fall in the center, but trying to classify it within the left/right dichotomy is stupid anyway, hence the term: Third Position

>>509947359
I know it's 1pbtid bait but I'd literally voote for Mao or Pol Pot if it meant dealing with mass migration
all a left wing party would have to do is embrace the national cause, in Italy we might need to vooote the communist party

>>509944491 (OP)
>>509944576
Yep, christkikes will never oppose the jew in any way. That's because they worship one.

>>509951299
>allowed private property, insofar as it was used in the common interest
Just blatantly incorrect.

>>509951834
Corporations were forced to act in the common German interest, not shareholder profits. Anyone who didn't do so got a boot up their ass, which is exactly as it should be.

>>509950348
/thread

>>509951299
>but trying to classify it within the left/right dichotomy is stupid anyway, hence the term: Third Position
You are truly a fucking retard. Its the third position between communisn/socialism and capitalism though in truth it was just capitalism with lots of interventionism.

In terms of left/right it was a right wing movement by every definition of right wing.

Again, stop pretending your based, stop pretending you're a nazi and stop trying to convince white people to kill rich white people instead of shitskin invaders and jews.

Leftism is cringe, they support social equality and the destruction of tradition while right wingers embrace hierarchy and tradition.

It doesnt matter how much you shill the concept that communists are traditionalists. They're not. If you are a traditionalist you would and will be killed by communist trying to create a equal world. Yes even the precious USSR was filled with feminist, race mixing propaganda. China famously intentionally destroyed its own history to better propagandize children into communism. Nazis embraced tradition and incorporated it into their movement.

>>509944491 (OP)
she is defending the immigrant labour i employ in my vineyard, based

>>509952186
>share holders
There is nothing in the "capitalist" manifesto that states corporations should have shares in the first place. You're just being retarded because you were brainwashed by leftists into non nonsensical retarded dialects.

>>509944491 (OP)
shitalians can do nothing but receive a billion more from somalia

their population is oldfarts and tourists
none which are good at producing anything, harvesting their grapes or cooking their pizzas

>>509951020
>soooo public services are socialism?!!?!!
No, state direction of the economy, the entire workforce being part of a state-run union, and collectivism are socialism. Which are the hallmark features of national socialism, and why half of "National Socialism" is "Socialism"
>>509950845
>universalism which is the core of leftism
No, the core of leftism is collectivism. The opposite of communism, aka "total state control of everything and everyone," is anarchism, or libertarianism if you have to have some sort of a state. It isn't fascism, which is "total state control of politics, culture, and most economic things, but individual freedom wherever it doesn't conflict with the goals of the state."
"Fascism is right-wing!!!" is cope made up by 1930s commies who were tired of trying to explain why, if communism was so great and fascism was so evil, fascism sounds exactly like communism except you get to own property and choose your job
>>509951299
>their social policies were far right by today's standards
Lmao like what exactly, the subsidized wages, vacations, and property? Every worker by law needing to be part of the government labor union?
If you mean "ethnonationalism" then you are going to be amazed by Mao, Pol Pot, and Tito

>>509944491 (OP)
>rails the fattest fucking line youve ever fucking seen in your life and starts tweaking in front of the cameras and microphones

>>509952673
>the core of leftism is collectivism.
Wrong
The original left wing were the capitalists, left wing is universalism which is why both capitalism and communism are left wing ideologies.
Natsoc like monarchy was particularist and right wing.

>>509952936
yes, she is based

>>509952936
>>509952991
Will someone use AI in the next few years to make Scarface II starring her?

>>509953173
its illegal now in italy, she passed a law for that

>>509952944
>why both capitalism and communism are left wing ideologies.
Jesus Christ you're stupid
Capitalism is an economic system. It's not political. You can have capitalist democracies, capitalist monarchies, capitalist theocracies, capitalist anything but communism.
Communism is a horrible totalitarian political ideology in which the state directly controls everything, which necessarily includes the economy. It is the ne plus ultra of leftism.

>>509952991
yeah, shes super based in retardville

>>509952673
>the entire workforce being part of a state-run union
Incorrect.
>the core of leftism is collectivism
Incorrect, there is such a thing as anarcho communism. In fact I would argue that is the ideal state of communism Marx would have envisioned for the future.

Collectivism is literally right wing. You are so fucking out of whack its insane. No, you're not a leftist. Stop being a retarded faggot

>like what exactly
Like their border security, military expenditers, their authoritarian control of economic sectors, their push for higher birth rates and anti immigration sentiment, their racial discrimination.

>guys please self identify as a leftist and worship jewish communist retards who believe in universal equality
>noooo guys hating niggers and trannies is actually left wing guise

>>509952464
>in truth it was just capitalism with lots of interventionism
which would put in the left side by today's ideological economic standards. ie - center left populist. What's your deal? just sick of hearing retards like Dinesh who call Nazis leftists?
>it was a right wing movement by every definition of right wing
seems so.
>stop trying to convince white people to kill rich white people instead of shitskin invaders and jews
I never said that or think that. jews are world problem #1, and their imported invaders can be easily deported with them gone. collaborators need the rope though, and most white billionaires likely fall under that umbrella.
>everything else
again, I was classifying NSDAP under modern classification standards. some of which would be considered center left by today's standards. you know the Nazi government made a new department to act as a Union for all German workers right? Shlomo (or Fritz) didn't get to fuck over his workers on pay/benefits/safety/vacation anymore. The average person in the US would call that a left policy. The larger POINT is that the central purpose of the German government was the greater prosperity of the German people, which supersedes the red/blue team bullshit.

>>509944491 (OP)
>Is there a Chud politician out there who will ACTUALLY do aomety?
No

>>509953221
Are you genuinely retarded of course capitalism is political.
You do realise that muh communism vs capitalism arent the only options and the capitalism and communism are simply two pathways that lead to the exact same fucking destination.

The capitalists
The communists
The jews
Same dudes

>>509944491 (OP)
It doesn't matter how far right of a president you are, in Europe you'd still have to deal with the EU's institutions telling you what you can and can't do. This bitch didn't have a sudden change of paradigm, she's just a fucking puppet and can't cut her strings kek.

>>509944491 (OP)
0/10 no tail.

>>509953504
>Incorrect
>wants to argue about the Third Reich and doesn't know about the RAD
lmao
>there is such a thing as anarcho communism
Yes, that's not communism. An ideal theocracy would be about the same thing, no need for a secular state because everyone would be just so virtuous you wouldn't need any of the functions. In reality you get totalitarianism, which is real communism
>Collectivism is literally right wing.
You have brain damage. The left-right political axis goes Communism-Libertarianism. The more right-wing you are, the less collectivist you are, literally everywhere, at any point on the scale, unless you accept the hilarious commie lie that fascism is somehow "ultra-right-wing"
>Like their border security
HAHAHAHAHA THE FAMOUS OPEN BORDERS SOVIET UNION, DDR, NORTH KOREA etc
>military expenditers
it's "expenditure" also HAHAHAHA THE FAMOUS HARD RIGHT WING SOVIET UNION, DDR, NORTH KOREA etc
> their authoritarian control of economic sectors
THE FAMOUSLY HARD RIGHT EVERY SINGLE COMMUNIST COUNTRY EVER lmao jesus
>their push for higher birth rates and anti immigration sentiment
THE FAMOUSLY HARD RIGHT EVERY SINGLE COMMUNIST COUNTRY OTHER THAN CHINA FOR 20 YEARS
> their racial discrimination.
THE FAMOUSLY HARD RIGHT CHINA, NORTH KOREA, CAMBODIA ETC

You just listed most of the defining features of every Communist country in history as "far right" holy shit lmao

>>509944491 (OP)
>>509944576
i would fuck her stupid cute brains out

>>509953221
Communism is not necessarily totalitarian. Its just retarded. It simple does not work.

To say it doesn't work is an understatement, it doesn't exist in reality the system itself isn't really a system more of a extremely vague guideline. Its a cult built around bullshit dialects. This is all it is.

The reason it always seems to be totalitarian is they quickly realize they can't achieve communism and thus default to the most effective form of goverment there is in a vain attempt to achieve it. Even then they fail to achieve this economic system because the system itself is vague and Utopian.

Way better off trying to re-create anime irl. Just as realistic, actually more realistic and less vague.

>>509953530
>which would put in the left side by today's ideological economic standards
No, leftists today are "socialists" believing socialism is the middle step between capitalism and communism. That is their end goal, communism. Its not at all the same.

>>509953612
>Are you genuinely retarded of course capitalism is political.
No, it isn't. Communism is political.
You can have a capitalist dictatorship, a capitalist democracy, a capitalist monarchy, a capitalist theocracy, capitalist literally any system of government but communism. This is because capitalism is a purely economic idea.
Communism is literal total state control over everything. The state owns everything. All housing is owned by the state. All businesses are owned by the state. Everyone works for the state, usually in jobs assigned to them by the state based on where the state wants bodies. You can't have capitalist communism because the only economic system communism can allow is communism, or it's not communism.
The only people who say capitalism is somehow political are communists, because they want to get support from idiots for their insane totalitarian ideology by proposing it as an alternative to literally anything that anyone's unhappy about
>sexism? not under communism!
>anti-gay stuff? not under communism?
>poor in a capitalist society? you wouldn't be under communism!
It's commie bullshit.

>>509954022
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
didn't even bother reading. No argument from the retard that thinks Hobbes is a left winger.

>>509954022
>communisms real form is totalitarianism
Communism promises anarcho communism but you're right that it isnt the goal the real goal is trying to make a one world government

>Left right is communism to libertarianism
Absolutely wrong.
Liberal democratic capitalism is not the height of the right wing, hell its not even right wing.

>>509954125
>Communism is not necessarily totalitarian. Its just retarded. It simple does not work.
Real communism is necessarily totalitarian because it does not work, and those in charge know this.
>The reason it always seems to be totalitarian is they quickly realize they can't achieve communism and thus default to the most effective form of goverment there is in a vain attempt to achieve it.
Or, communists are lying totalitarians who want unlimited power, have designed a perfect system to give themselves exactly that, and then lie to idiots in order to get support.
It's why every "civil rights" movement is riddled with communists. It doesn't matter what your grievance is with the status quo, a communist is always there to say WHATEVER IT IS will be totally fixed if you just give them ultimate total unchecked power, and don't listen to all the evil capitalist stooges talking about starvation and mass graves

>>509949775
Yessir

>>509954379
>didn't even bother reading
Maybe you should try reading more, then you wouldn't have just asserted that almost all of the basic features of every communist country were actually ultra-right-wing, and then got laughed at
Holy fuck
>border security is right wing! communists would never have that!
I am going to laugh about that for a fucking week

>>509947359
The left is free to drop the culture war and run a nationalist candidate any time they want. It'd probably be a landslide. Stop trying to pin your side's failure on us.

>>509954332
>You can't have capitalist communism
Delve into dialectics and ideological offspring memetics
What the fuck is woke other than a synthesis of capitalism and communism? Taking the lens of marxist alalysis and shifting into to being about niggers and faggots instead of about class.

Capitalism is when all the property is monopolised into the hands of a few
Communism is when all the property is monopolised into the hands of a few
Judaism is when all the property ia monopolised into the hands of a jew
Get it?
Communism and Capitalism are roads that take you to the same place.
Both are slave ideologies where a man is defined primarily by his JOB
In both capitalism and communism the heighest form of identity is that you are slave.

>>509954549
>Liberal democratic capitalism is not the height of the right wing, hell its not even right wing.
I said "libertarianism" aka "the absolute minimum state power required to guarantee individual liberties" not the "The Democratic People's Republic Of Korea" style "Liberal democratic capitalism" thing we go by now.
At the far left of the political spectrum you have total collectivism, ie communism. 100% state control, 0% real individual liberties. At the other end you have (strictly speaking) anarchism, 0% state control because there is no state, and 100% individual freedom, but that is almost certainly impossible so realistically you get libertarianism (5% state control, 95% individual liberty). Everything slots in on that line. The more left-wing you are, the more you prioritize the collective over the individual, and vice versa. Left-wing proposals benefit the collective to the disadvantage of the individual, right-wing policies benefit the individual at the disadvantage of the state. High vs low taxes, censorship vs freedom of speech, capital controls, rent controls, basically everything, between "The state should own and run everything and everyone" and "you should be able to do literally whatever the fuck you want as long as it doesn't materially hurt someone else, and there should be only just enough government to manage lawsuits over who got hurt by who"

Fascism is slightly to the right of communism, both being basically totalitarian collectivist ideologies, but fascism allows for much more personal freedom and enterprise. In Nazi Germany you could choose your own job, start a business, own your own house, have guns etc, but compared to a liberal democracy it would still be massively oppression. You couldn't start a newspaper, or publish a book that wasn't approved by a government censor, or start a political party, or talk shit about the Party in public, or even in private around the wrong person.

>>509948101
These idiots that say what he says are NEET losers who gave up and get mad at anyone they see that actually tries. They spend their entire day whining about MIGA and right wingers as their offer 0 solutions other than give up and be a failure like they are

>>509947359
Goosebumps: the post

>Politician

Playing zionist Jew politics

>Jihadist leader

Literally killing zionist Jews

>>509955441
>Delve into dialectics and ideological offspring memetics
Ah, you're a commie, that explains it
>Taking the lens of marxist alalysis and shifting into to being about niggers and faggots instead of about class.
Yes, I said that. Communists will lie to any group of aggrieved people that their unhappiness will be totally gone under communism, that's their whole principle of action.
>Capitalism is when all the property is monopolised into the hands of a few
No, capitalism is when people can freely exchange goods and servicesin exchange for profit, and people invest capital (which is why the system's called that) in order to produce more goods and services. Another term for it is "free markets." It is the opposite of a slave ideology.
Communism is a slave ideology that criticizes free markets as "capitalism"
Fortunately, we have an entire century of history to compare the outcomes of free markets vs communism - our slightly free markets give the average First World "poor person" a standard of living that a 19th-century emperor couldn't dream of, whereas the communist countries produced famines, pollution on a scale never seen before, and entire lost generations in mass graves

>>509955453
>the height of right wing achivement is the cannibal sentinal island niggers
You simply dont know what right wing is.
If you think right wing = capitalism or libertarianism then you are simply wrong.

Right wing is when you are nationalistic and particularist
Left wing is when you are globalistic and universalist

Both capitalism and communism are universalist, globalistic left wing ideologies, nigger you're really trying to sit here and act like 1080s england was left wing because mcdonalds hadnt been invented yet

>>509944491 (OP)
Every single populist without any exception that has been cozy with either Russia or in Meloni’s case the United States, ends up betraying their voters on the immigration issue because both Russia and America are run by the same exact group of people: The usual suspects.

>>509944491 (OP)
She is pro Indian

>>509956181
>Right wing is when you are nationalistic and particularist
You should tell Tito, Pol Pot, Castro, the Kims, and Mao this
>Left wing is when you are globalistic and universalist
You should tell the Kims and Josef "Socialism In One Country" Stalin this
>b-b-but that's n-not r-r-r-real c-c-com-
It's almost literally every communist country. Your rectally-sourced definition is wrong, not objective reality
Nationalism is not right-wing. That is cope from 1930s commies who, again, were exasperated by people asking how if communism was so great and fascism was so evil, that they sounded so similar except in fascism you could own things and choose your own job.
>Both capitalism and communism are universalist, globalistic left wing ideologies,
You keep repeating this but it won't make it true. Capitalism is not a right or left wing ideology. It's an economic system. It is totally agnostic of politics. You can test this by thinking for one single second
>can there be a capitalist dictatorship? (Singapore) yes
>can there be a capitalist monarchy? (basically all of them from the Industrial Revolution onward, except arguably Imperial Russia) yes
>can there be a capitalist theocracy? (Iran, Afghanistan, Israel) yes
>can there be a capitalist democracy? (the entire First World) yes
The only people who want to argue capitalism is somehow a political system are communists. Communism is a totalitarian political system that by definition involves total political control of everything including the economy.

>>509956497
Whats up with modi and meloni?

>>509955864
>you're a commie, that explains it
Incorrect but you seem to be very lacking in understanding that people can and do fuse ideologies and that much like genetics, ideologies often bare children who take on part of their memetic character as part of themselves.

Free markets is literally their fall back arguement for mass immigration, why should the world be one huge market?

Why should everyone be allowed to come here and trade their labour because some kike bitch ayn rand got popular?

Motto of capitalism - you will own nothing and be happy
Motto of communism - you will own nothing and be happy

Its a false paradigm two sides of the same fucking shekel.

>>509944491 (OP)
>Is there a Chud politician out there
You may not like this, but the only chud politicians who have any sort of power are probably in Africa or central Asia. Everywhere else is compromised at this point.

>>509957053
>can and do fuse ideologies and that much like genetics
>get absolutely destroyed
>well what do words even mean anyway
Lol
>Free markets is literally their fall back arguement for mass immigration, why should the world be one huge market?
Amazingly, communists will use whatever argument they think will get what they want. They also currently argue that mass immigration is the will of God. Or that mass immigration is some sort of penance for colonialism. In the Soviet Union, where mass migration was openly used to destroy nations (ask anyone from the Baltics) they said nationalism is an invention of capitalism. The thing about totalitarians is they say whatever they think will work to get power, and when they get it they brutally smash anything they think can foment resistance, be it national identity, the family unit, private property, religion etc. You can check this out by opening any history book.
Aristotle wrote about this thousands of years ago. The tyrant always wants to rule over a mixed up bunch of mutts.

>Motto of capitalism - you will own nothing and be happy
No, the motto of capitalism is you have the right to own whatever you can buy, including the means to make more
>Motto of communism - you will own nothing and be happy
The motto of communism is closer to "you will own nothing and we'll kill you if you don't act happy"

>>509956737
>Socialism In One Country
Yeah he was to lenins right very clearly.
Hell Stalin basically indirectly spawned the nazbol meme ideology which is just proof that ideologies do often merge.

Kim
Kims a monarchist and unironically North Korea isnt communist, it just has leftover aesthetics and branding similar to Chinas situation.

>can you have capitalism and a monarchy
You can have both active at the same time but they are rival castles and the capitalists and jews have been the ones fermenting those revolutionary movements to destroy monarchy, hell the french revolution literally had marxisms villain the bougouise sitting on the left side of parliment.

Capital seeks to usurp monarchy as part of its inherent will to power, borders are an obstical to capital, nations, unique peoples and differences, for capitals own power it is beneficial for capital to destroy these differences.

So no monarchy and capitalism are not compatible they are infact adveserial

>>509957687
>The tyrant always wants to rule over a mixed up bunch of mutts.
This is true, and capitalists are currently doing as much as possible to flood us with niggers, jeets and every other assorted shitskin.

Unless you wanna argue that both elon musk and jeff bezos are communists

>>509956962
Old people romance.

>>509957876
>Yeah he was to lenins right very clearly.
>North Korea isnt communist
Jesus Christ you're literally doing the meme
Yes, actually both Stalin and North Korea are extremely Communist. So is Cuba, though less so these days. So was Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. So was Yugoslavia under Tito. So was China under Mao. All were extremely nationalist, extremely communist countries. Actually it'd be more impressive to think of a communist country that wasn't. All those "workers of the world unite" banners weren't actually policy.

>You can have both active at the same time but they are rival castles
No, they're not. There are capitalist monarchies right now doing just fine. Thailand's one. Free markets are not a political system.
>Capital seeks to usurp monarchy as part of its inherent will to power
No, it doesn't. Communists seek to usurp every non-communist sytem as part of its inherent will to power.
>So no monarchy and capitalism are not compatible they are infact adveserial
Except you can disprove this by again picking up any history book Jesus Christ. Before WW1, the majority of the world's population lived under capitalist monarchies. There are perfectly stable ones now. This is because capitalism is not a political system no matter how much you talk out of your ass.
Communists say capitalism is a political system, because to communists EVERYTHING is a political system, because they are totalitarians who want total control over every aspect of everyone's life. This is how we get "games are political" "music is political" "movies are political" and all that garbage being dumped on us by communists - EVERYTHING to them is political and exists to get them into total power.

>>509958083
>This is true, and capitalists are currently doing as much as possible to flood us with niggers, jeets and every other assorted shitskin.
No, communists are. To capitalists, communists say nation-wrecking mass immigration is great for GDP. More consumers, lower wages! To Christians, they say mass immigration is a holy duty to save the unfortunate (also it'll increase the Christian population and boost church attendance). To idiot liberals, they say mass immigration brings diversity and spicy food, and also is necessary to undo the guilt of colonialism. To socialists they say it will destroy evil right-wingers by eliminating their political power as a demographic and Christians. Whoever they're talking to, they have a reason why it's great. This is because communists say whatever they think will get idiots to help them get total power.
Some moron business types bought the pitch that wages down and rents up are good business (ignoring that they're actually financing it through taxes until there's enough of a brown mass to destroy heir kulak asses a la NYC's new presumptive mayor)

>Unless you wanna argue that both elon musk and jeff bezos are communists
Musk and Bezos want to underpay for a narrow band of talent using labor visas. They don't want 300 million browns in America, Musk just spent hundreds of millions of dollars and tens of billions in brand equity to get a guy elected to stop that. They want to be able to replace a few thousand Coder Tims with pajeets who will do a 30% worse job for half the compensation.