>>510509492>OH YEAH...VERY VERY EASILY..LIKE NO PROBLEM DUDE EASY.....I mean, yeah, pretty easily. The DF-21D is a glorified Pershing II MaRV.
>IT HAS, ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURERS TESTTests are done by the customer/client, which is whatever branch that missile defense system falls under.
>A 70-80 % SUCCESS RATE TOO BAD AGAINST MISSILES MADE PRE 1980...In this example, the SM-6 is tested against MRBMs with separating warheads, and MaRVs that are in the mach 10+ class. Though, just like the DF-21D's MaRV, they're only going around mach 4 in terminal phase. Even less if they're maneuvering.
>0% ON HYPERSONIC MISSILES They're all hypersonic, dipshit.
>IT'S AN IMPRESSIVE MISSILE...ON PAPER..It's an impressive missile in practice, too. As are SM-2, SM-3, THAAD, PAC-2 GEM, PAC-3, and PAC-3 MSE.
>SO IS THE USA ARMY...Yeah, and it's even better when you get to see them in practice.
>HELL SO WAS THE RUSSIAN ARMY (RANKED #2 IN TOE WORLD)......Nobody but people wanting to increase their budgets, convince people the weapon they want is really needed by exaggerating the attributes of Russian gear.
>BUT REAL LIFE IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY..Yeah, and in it, the US Army is proven to be what the paper says, and Russia's military being the hollowed out, bankrupt, alcoholic husk of a third rate military unable to invade a bordering shithole.
>I HAVE ZERO FAITH THAT IT WILL STOP TEH NEWER GENERATIONAL MISSILE .....What newer generation of missiles?
>HELL THADD FAILED AGAINST IRANIAN SHIT AND RUSSIAN CRAP IN UKRAINE...THAAD failed to intercept Iranian missiles? When? THAAD isn't in Ukraine, so how could it be failing to intercept Russian missiles? PAC-3s are doing a great job of intercepting Kinzhal missiles. Both THAAD and Patriot PAC-3 interceptors are made by Lockheed Martin.
>BUT SHHHHHH DON'T TELL TEH RYTHEON (90% ISRAELI OWNED) INVESTORS..I'm sure Raytheon would be ecstatic to hear Lockheed Martin's THAAD interceptor is failing left and right in combat.