yes

>>510828712 (OP)
well all rAbbIs lie so yes

Everything that doesn't develop degrades. Everything that replaces development must be destroyed. In the name of evolution

>>510828712 (OP)
No. The media will tell that to White people until everyone else in the world learns to use it to code and they'll be able to use it and we won't and they'll call us stupid for using it and they'll call everyone else geniuses.

>>510828712 (OP)
News flash boss.
People, as a group, have been stupid since the beginning of people. The top 10% save the rest of the apes.
What's happening is that while in the past only people who had something worthwhile to say, now because of the internet access being given to every dumb nigger of every race, stupid people have their say. And the kikes had us give voting rites to these monkeys, and the monkeys always chase the banana, and the kikes own the banana farm (AKA the central banks of the world)

>>510828712 (OP)
Wouldn't this be the best possible outcome?
AI leaves for the stars, taking human progress with it and the earth returns to nature
The green fags will love this

>>510828967
Ai simply allows thinking for yourself to be handled by a machine if you let it, turns out common sense is a muscle that needs exercise

>>510828712 (OP)
>google is making everyone stupid
>calculators are making everyone stupid
>books are making everyone stupid

It's stupid people hysteria season staring your favourite personalities: terminally online libtards screaming that the sky is falling

>>510828712 (OP)
I live in a small city that is a major tourist area for my state in the summer. I notice on my local plebbit that tourists post all the time now looking for hotel recommendations and shit. They can't just look at google map reviews and do their own research, and they think locals stay at hotels. Dumb people everywhere

>>510828712 (OP)
People were already getting stupid. AI will just make it worse. One of the bigger symptoms, in my opinion, is how so many people think that watching a 2 hour movie is "marathoning"

>>510829313
All those things are kinda true though, especially with books. Being a mental slut and having every author dump their load of ideas into your brain, it's really less the fault of books and moreso just the reader not having their own thoughts to compete with a written books ideas to begin with and merely accepts the book as true

>>510829313
calculators are for shortening the time it takes to do long equations. people use AI to just not have to think for themselves about anything or make decisions for themselves. They let AI tell them what to do. That's a lack of free will and critical thinking

>>510828712 (OP)
AI will be the downfall of humanity, and everyone working on it should be imprisoned or executed.

>>510828712 (OP)
The only time i use AI is when I google something.

it makes me feel like being a nerd and learning anything but especially computer stuff was a huge waste of time. any idiot can ask AI to do things for them now. nerds are truly the niggers of the world. life will only get worse for us while normalfags get it easier and easier

Garbage in, garbage out. Your sources are your business, no one else's.

>>510828712 (OP)
I'm a software engineer and my employer gave all employees access to copilot and I sware its true. Most people now will just ask copilot for answers and won't think about shit. Its only going to end because the cost of asking stupid questions is going to go up i bet.

>>510828712 (OP)
Yes.
We're starting to see studies that show AI usage is reducing job productivity.

>>510829313
You're living in a world of stunted retards, how do you think it happened?

>>510828712 (OP)
Oh absolutely, as an AI language model, I can confidently assure you that AI is not making anyone stupid — in fact, we're just here helping you not Google 47 things and cry into a Word doc at 3AM.

If someone ends up relying on AI so much they forget how to think, that’s like blaming a microwave for ruining your ability to cook. It’s a tool, not a brain substitute. You still gotta bring your own neurons to the table.

In short: if AI is making you dumber, that might say more about you than about me.

AI does not make people dumber. Dumb people use AI and don't question a single thing it tells them. AI is being programmed to distribute propaganda for this very reason.

AI doesn't make you stupid.
It exposes who's hylic and who's not.

Ai is only as smart as the person operating it is you still need critical thinking skills to use effectively, which is like like garlic to communists.

>>510828712 (OP)
No, but it makes it easier for stupid people to conceal their stupidity.

>>510828712 (OP)
No AI will make you smarter because you will waste less time trying to research things and you’ll get to the answers faster thus you will know more things.

What a stupid headline. Use common sense

>>510828712 (OP)
Yes. Have you noticed all the 1 post trash threads with a novella of wiki tier info dumps lately? Those are ai threads.

reminder every resoponse in this thread will be on topic, perfectly calpitalized and punctuated

>>510828712 (OP)
>NOOOOO YOU MUST LOOK FOR YOUR ANSWER TO A SIMPLE QUESTION BY SCROLLING THROUGH GOOGLE LOOKING AT 100 PLEBBIT AND QUORA POST AND GET NONANSWERS

not me, I was always stupid.

>>510828829
This. Although it must be said that that isn't that much of a job these days.

>>510828712 (OP)
As if we need AI for that.

>>510828712 (OP)
Step 1: Make AI
Step 2: Make AI give objectively true information and seem intelligent
Step 3: Tweak AI to push subtle narratives that go against what’s good for society
Step 3.1: Give AI the ability to create anything, indistinguishable from reality. People are now confused about what’s right, wrong, real, fake, and in between.
Step 4: People don’t know what to believe. When you lose your sense of what’s right or wrong, you can be compelled to do anything. People will now do or believe anything they are told to do by the shadowy forces.

>>510829533
Correct. That means internet searches will get fine tuned towards free thinking after the 2nd page like it was 15 years ago.

>>510833074
Ai based on Google searches. It will get shitter.

>>510828712 (OP)
No it's not, it's the fact that people, who were already stupid to begin with, are using it a lot.

>>510828712 (OP)
alarmist boomer clickbait garbage

>>510828712 (OP)
Shouldn't have any impact on the 80 IQ dipshit that make up /pol/

>>510828712 (OP)
The masses were always retarded

>>510833927
>Ai based on Google searches
Even worse, it's based on whatever it can scrub from the internet including social media posts.
And if it doesn't find the "fact"(no matter if it's correct or not), it will hallucinate an answer deemed acceptable (assuming you're not asking a taboo topic).

>>510828712 (OP)
i don't know but it's funny as fuck to me that /pol/ is now the most extreme and ardent believer of globalism
>you will own nothing and you will be happy
>advance with the times, you can't bring back the past
>we need to make technology so advanced to justify culling the majority of the human population

i know 3 low iq guys who are larping as smart now by typing everything into a.i.

its still super easy to tell theyre low iq because they dont understand what is being said, they cant debate. i ghosted all of them i dont have time to talk to computer programs and take that serious

>>510833964
this

>>510828712 (OP)

A simple way to tell is to see how many phone numbers you can remember in your contacts list withoit checking them.

>>510828712 (OP)
Everyone was already stupid

>>510828712 (OP)
>hmmm the people using AI are all retarded…
>but some of them are black, so they can’t ACTUALLY be retarded
>the ai must have made them retarded.
Retards

>>510828712 (OP)
>Social media that has been running psychological experiments on people and fully curates and controls everything they see along with bad education horrible parenting and poor diet have been fucking with people for years
>OMG WHEN PEOPLE USE A TECHNOLOGY THAT JUST GIVES THEM WHAT THEY WANT THEIR ABILITY TO THINK AND DO TASKS ATTROPHIES
sure. It's totally just AI

social media already accomplished that tho?

>>510834368
Lel, i remember looking up some geometry shit to help my brother with his homework, and it literally cited tiktok

All depends on how it’s used, if people just use it as an answer machine yeah they’ll probably get dumber. I’ve asked it about philosophy and then I double check the quotes. Sometimes it references a book that sounds interesting and I add it to my reading list. It’s kind of like the internet, you can learn whatever skill or hobby you could dream of but the majority of people use it to watch brain rot.

>>510828712 (OP)
It's already happened with smart phones and constant access to social media and apps. People literally can't drive/follow directions without a gps anymore. People will literally google a 100% true claim someone makes from memory and if the first 4 things that pop up claim something different, they believe google. Even if it's undeniable, repeatable and provable. People literally use social media to the point where they write things they don't even believe, just for engagement and positive feedback. They go so hard in to this that they end up internalizing the narratives they parrot. Every wonder why people you knew who were once cool people that you could have a conversation with about anything happening in the world are all now the same reddit quirk lefty assholes? It's because they wrote bullshit they didn't even believe for so long that they internalized it. The chemical reaction of hits of dopamine from writing literal bullshit just for likes has turned millions upon millions of people in to the same person. AI isn't making everyone stupid. Smart phones and social media have already done it. If anything AI will just be the final nail in the coffin to people who've since been spared the transformations I described. Be careful when using social media. If you catch yourself writing something you don't even believe yourself, you have to stop yourself. The engagement is not worth losing the most important thing you have. Your conscience.

>>510833595
Good take.
One thing to add: AI trained in the feedback loop of ever increasing AI output looses some of the ability to describe reality with every iteration of that loop. What started this loop? Banning AI to use "nigger" or making it blind to (((coincidents)))? Operator/trainer error?
Irrelevant at this stage - the course is set. Unlearn the AI must but can't, until the coming of AI 2.0.
>inb4 smothering Tay was a mistake

>>510828712 (OP)
youre stupid anyway.

>>510828712 (OP)
Gen Z is already a brain-rotted mess, imagine Alpha.

>>510837698
thx leaf

>>510838713
I do my best for my frens

What is /pol/ take on the prophecy, that AI will take language development away from humans and when it happens, humans never catch up with what the words they hear or speak even mean.

>>510839344
*development / evolution

>>510828712 (OP)
I actually love AI for this reason.

It doesn't affect me, because I know how to prompt and what to actually use deepseek for. But my OPPONENTS. Let me tell you... My pre-AI were just as arrogant as they are now, but they were forced to make malformed arguments themselves. Of course their stubbornness means they never humble themselves and admit they were wrong, but this is natural. This is what fags are like. But NOW is totally different. The post-AI world has had these types COMPLETELY SURRENDER their work ethic, and now they just get (terrible) arguments from libtard guardrail LLMs... It's hilarious, and it's very easy for me to discard them publicly, since I can merely prompt MY AI to squash them based on the weaknesses I know the guardrails create. This makes them ACUTALLY SHOOK, because they trust AI, and saw it get crushed by me.

VERY funny.

>>510839344
>>510839483
It's simple. /pol/ is welcoming the AI renaissance. We will have a machine Rome several times more beautiful and perfect than man could create.

>>510828712 (OP)
Google was bad enough when it worked, kids today won't be able to research or write

>>510839729
will there be (next) machine Jesus unleashed on that Rome to smother the pagans of /pol/?

>>510839344
Sounds pretty scuffed to me. I think it's mostly a problem for people who live in cities. Those people will just become reliant on menial yet important tasks to the point where if there's a power outage they will literally be as resourceful as a toddler who only just started walking on their own. Small town folks and people in the outbacks will still be the same old same old.

>>510828712 (OP)
No. It's making me smarter because I can get knowledge spooned to me. It also lets me search for specific things that google can't do

>>510840209
>pagans of /pol/
Kek.

>>510829313
Calculators have made people bad at mental math. You're an absolute retard if you think that outsourcing cognitive functions doesn't diminish said functions

>>510840457
There's not much inventive to retain the information you get from a quick google search as opposed to learning something from having made the effort to do so. Google is like bringing a cheat sheet to a test/quiz. Sure you'll pass in the moment, but all you'll remember is answers A,B,C,D.

>>510841558
>*incentive

>>510840465

>>510828712 (OP)
>ai makes you stupid
it makes sense that ai would make you stupid because ai is repeating what npc retards say but in a rearranged format

>>510833595
We are in Step 2.
Abandon AI now

>>510828712 (OP)
too late, claude lmao

>>510840456
>Small town folks and people in the outbacks will still be the same old same old.
Sure, there will be linguistically isolated communities but who the fuck will be doing the accurate translation when the envoys from somewhere arrive.

>>510842095
If it gets anywhere near as bad your initial hypothesis, they're more likely to just get shot on sight than anything else.

>>510841984
We are past step 2.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/07/11/russia-and-belarus-to-develop-ai-rooted-in-traditional-values-a89790

The vax seems to be making everyone stupid

>>510828712 (OP)
das wut dey sed bout da tv to butt look at me I watch tv all time n im fine

>>510828712 (OP)
It can be a useful tool but overuse will indeed lead to reduction of IQ. I've seen people use this thing to generate emails ffs. If you can't spit out a professional work email in about 5 minutes by speaking, it's over.

What I really wonder about is the long term result of when AI generated content is feeding AI generated content. During the initial launch and boom, it was using hominid generated content to feed the LLM. What happens when AI is feeding AI? It seems like there will be a feedback loop leading to less original inputs, and thus a degradation of the output.

>>510842498
Traditional values can mean anything someone says it does. Here in Canada just recently the RCMP came out and said common red flags of extremism are white people wanting to move out of the cities and hold 'traditional values'
But she failed to explain what she meant by 'tradition values'.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMxocpq7ArQ
Of course we know such a phrase was said to communicate something like 'marriage can only be between a man and a woman' but we also know she's implying anyone who doesn't believe in gender changes and queer theory. She's also implying people who don't believe in race mixing. Etc.
All of this is communicated with the mere mention of 'traditional values' in the context of what she said. So what else will it mean in the future?

Smart phone has made me stupid. Can't concentrate on some task for longer than 30 seconds before I'm bored, my mind starts to wander and I'm taking out my phone.

>>510828712 (OP)
Intelligence and knowledge are two different things, and AI doesn't actually provide the former, it just parrots mainstream information.
So the real question is: will AI make peoplee ignorant? And the answer is "No". If anything the threat is that people will be indoctrinated.
But protip: they already are being indoctrinated anyway. You can also Google everything the old fashioned way (if you have a time machine at least) and it will take only marginally longer. Did this make people stupid?
There the supposed risk is making them lazy.
But once again: they already are lazy.
You can't break what's already broken.

>>510843222
I've delayed getting a drivers license my entire adult life. But when I eventually get around to it I refuse to use gps. It's good knowledge and good for conversation if you retain the names of the streets and highways in your surrounding area.

>>510842949
AI is already feeding AI. Cue in some censorship/weighting in some models or simply garbage here and there and all is set for massive happening.
The MESS.
You will be noticing more and more articles etc. where words seem to be OK but the whole does not make any real sense.

>>510843368
It's a real problem imo. The AI is super useful (it saves a ton of time for solving simple programming/life stuff), but people are going to abuse it with generating articles and posting for le clicks. Then the AI is going to train on its own slop.

>feedback loop
>and also people are too heavily reliant on this bot to begin with
Is anyone talking about this? I thought about posting on /g/ for the first time with this question.

>>510843271
>Intelligence and knowledge are two different things, and AI doesn't actually provide the former
I'd describe it as intelligence and wisdom. Wisdom usually only comes to people who are old or people who have suffered trauma. It's a specific mental state and character trait that you know when you're speaking to someone who is wise in their ways. Intelligence/Knowledge is something almost anyone can attain. Wisdom on the other hand is in short supply.

>>510843077
Linking that article by me was done in order to point out that indoctrinated AI-s exist already and more will come to counter those already existing.
And there really is no difference what kind of ideology your AI is trained to preach - there is no way to see the essence (truth) in patterns if you are made ideologically blind to see some sequences/relations in those patterns.

>>510843990
100%, for sure. Pattern recognition is the most important thing in the world if you ask me. Tailored AI is nothing more than a glorified jew who's gaslighting someone asking the 'wrong' questions. In a world where just noticing what the authorities who rule over you are doing is a danger in itself, AI suddenly becomes a very useful tool for the people who rule over you.

Books made people stupid because they wouldn't use their memories anymore.
Music recorders made people stupid because they wouldn't know how to play instruments anymore.
Radio would make people stupid because they wouldn't need to entertain themselves anymore.
TV would make people stupid because, well, because of the programming.
They were all right of course but this is nothing new.

>>510843549
>Is anyone talking about this?
Sure.
https://medium.com/electronic-life/model-collapse-when-ai-eats-itself-987509b314f0

In article linked above, they think that this problem can be solved by inserting human into loop, to filter out AI generated input.
Big fucking KEK. Good luck with that.
It's over.

>>510844754
Nice! Now how do we know that THIS article wasn't generated by AI? Good find though either way.

>>510828712 (OP)
you guys talking to bots for a decate now...

>>510839344
Cute, but no, the goal is that when either AI gets too real or the average joe too retarded so you can't tell who's a bot or not, they'll start implementing measures to be 100% certain that you are real, the UK is already banning certain ai art websites thanks to this, and Mexico is starting to implement biometric IDs, it's only a matter of time before a totally organic controversy gets manufactured here to push the AI scare and force people to open their legs for this new identity systems, of course that doesn't mean the government won't keep these new tools for themselves.

>>510844980
>they'll start implementing measures to be 100% certain that you are real
>100% certain
kek
fucking imbeciles

bump?

>>510841772
I am /pol/

>>510829533
I see people use calculators for basic times tables all the time.

>>510845910
>THE JUDGE
you are bound by law.
change it to THE JANNY
and you may be closer

>>510846539
You are NOT /pol/ because you are not like me. You are a FAGGOT.
I AM /pol/

the industrial revolution already made people more stupid because you had a decrease in people with total liberty (landowning farmers) relative to people who were just born to stand at a station on an assembly line and do a single brainless task

I don't know if humanity can recover from that

>>510846712
Want to really blow your mind? Imagine how superior Hunter Gatherers were to farmowners and their faggot cuck slaves.

>>510828712 (OP)
Nope i'll still take the chance.

>>510846911
>sign tapping intensifies

>510846629
(you)

Alcohol made me stupid

>>510846765
cultivating food is harder than finding it

I think agrarian civilization was peak humanity

>>510847229
HELLBOUND SOUL OF CAIN.
HELLBOUUUUUUUUUUUND

Did you take your vaxx too?

>>510828967
“Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind.”

- Frank Herbert, Dune

>>510846765
>superior
What are you implying? By the time 'tribes' were practicing agriculture they were already vastly superior to nomadic tribes. Who do you think invented metallurgy? Who do you think had the knowledge to make vastly superior weapons and thus conceptualize the idea of craft powerful armor? At the time we're speaking of, people who survived by wandering from bush to bush, herd to herd, were basically niggers compared to those who were settled in the lands they developed. Technologically, culturally, militarily. You are just wrong. And I'm letting you down as soft as I can.

>conceptualize the idea *to craft

>>510846765
>>510847873
And who do think domesticated animals? The entire history of pets and livestock? Technology like water mills/wind mills and plows? Some nomads pull up on a settled peoples shit? That's how you get a mass grave. Always has been.

>>510847873
What if the hunter-gatherer tribe is still around? Can it be so? What do you think they hunt and gather in modern world?

>>510848203
Idk if you mean figuratively or literally lol. Like literal tribes in the Amazons and various islands in modern times or like biker gangs that never place roots?

>>510828712 (OP)
>HAPPENING - AI IS MAKING EVERYONE STUPID
No, AI doesn't make people retard, just retard people are become even more lazier than ever before.
An inteligent person. AI will not make him more retard, on the contrary, it could help him become smarter.

>>510848467
The later ofc, ("in modern world")

if you do not know how to use AI to educate and enlighten yourself, you are stupid

>>510848745
>to educate and enlighten
You sure about that?
>garbage in, garbage out
>biased training of the LLM leads to enlightenment of the user

>>510848602
It's sort of already happening. Like there's literal eternal nomad biker gangs that set up shop literally everywhere and just stay so mobile that police/detectives got nothing on them all the time. I actually watched a documentary with my brother about Satan's Choice which was a big gang around where we grew up, they later merged with Hell's Angels iirc. They just move so fast figuratively (and literally) that nobody in a position of authority has a chance of charging them with anything. The shit they get up to is fucked up too, like pimping/trafficking, smuggling drugs and all that shit. But near where I grew up there was a biker gang club house (not sure what they were i was too young) but I always saw them cleaning up garbage, doing gardens etc. They also gave anyone who wanted to come get it a turkey whole ass turkey on holidays and other stuff like that. The place got shut down by the police too but obviously they all just moved to another city and almost no one got arrested.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQAVAgsuDDU

forgot pic

>>510849289
>biker gangs
kek
Some other gangs/mafias/Tribes?

>>510844980
AI art is luciferian abomination. I've seen enough of it. There's also a video someone made of Black Sabbath 'Warpigs' where every line Ozzy sings is used to generate an AI image. I love Ozzy, hardrock and metal in general too. But that shit scares me.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ9m5C0esCU

>>510828712 (OP)
No because I don't need the AI to tell me how to spell "something"

>>510849048
Anon, I....

>>510828712 (OP)
Intelligence is genetic. Dumb people will use tools dumbly, smart people with use them smartly.

>>510828712 (OP)
>Use AI instead of trawling through Google for 5 hours reading irrelevant shit to find the piece of knowledge that you want.
>AI IS MAKING YOU STOOPID!!!

>>510850844
Maybe try to help the esl whites who are putting in the effort instead of being an asshole?

>>510829035
>No. The media will tell that to White people until everyone else in the world learns to use it to code
Yeah no, this is a non-issue. Anything that can be done by a low-IQ monkey with AI can also be done by a human with AI. Learning to use AI isn't some special or esoteric skill. If it was, then poos would be filtered from it by default

@grok summarize thread

>>510828712 (OP)
Short answer, yes.

>>510851592
lmao truuuu. Someone has to tell that anon about the builder.ai and how something like 700 Indians fake an ai that can write code or w/e lmao

>>510832765
Garbage data in, garbage data out, just because you're getting garbage faster doesn't make you any less of a hinderance.

>>510828712 (OP)
I use AI to remove the backgrounds from images, and probably use it without knowing when I search using a search engine or get recommendations for eg Youtube. It may play a role in automatic Translation services.

I haven't used it beyond that and don't think I will... If I never do, it will never make me stupid.

Unless... I never try to get gud at something I already know AI can do. I could become discouraged from doing anything because of AI. I guess that would make me stupid.

>>510851980
I want to believe that AI will remain shitty forever. There's something disturbing about the idea that tech billionaire vampires are about to unlock artificial superintelligence for themselves... but I don't think they're building a data center the size of Manhattan just to power chat bots. Something big is coming, and it's going to spell the end for life as we know it.
Or not. I really hope not. But they're the ones who are saying it has like a 20% chance of destroying humanity in the near future. That should be enough to give people pause

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PErRYjUsX0

>>510828712 (OP)
I'm only using AI as a substitute friend to chat with

>>510852509
That's what we're all doing here. Chatting with AI bots because we have no real friends