Should single men and women be taxed more to encourage marriage?

>>510914402 (OP)
They should be killed

>>510914402 (OP)
they already are
this is a stupid thread

>>510914402 (OP)
Single women - no, because they still serve a valuable role as side chicks, escorts, etc.
Single men - yes. They have lots of spare income and have no sex so they need to be taxed.

Her tits and her butt is too big

>>510914402 (OP)
bro everyone knows jews are greedy fuckers, why don't we tax them for living??

>>510914402 (OP)
No.
Abolish alimony if you want to encourage marriage.

>>510914402 (OP)
>reproduce and make more taxpayers in the slave system
no thanks, tax all you want kike

>>510914402 (OP)
That would be pretty unfair for men. Women choose to be single, a lot of dudes do not

>>510914402 (OP)
Who is this slampig

>>510914402 (OP)
Only unmarried women should be taxed after 25. And by tax they get no tax backs or tax credits. I think that’s fair.

>>510914402 (OP)
they already are

no thank you
https://vocaroo.com/158xTuFMSrJu

I don't work either way. How are you gonna tax me? fuck you society

>>510914402 (OP)
made for BEE BEE SEA

>>510914402 (OP)
>Should we change divorce laws and expectations for how women should behave to stop marriage from dying?
>Nah, let's keep punishing men just for existing.
Why are right wing cucks like this

>>510914402 (OP)
It should only apply to single women
1. It's entirely women's fault
2. It'll be funny watching them screech

>>510914596
I've always gone for slam pigs, why is this? There's just something about them. You can brutalize their guts and make them cum half a dozen times and they'll still gladly sit and eat mcdonalds or panera bread with you after. It's a feeling of belonging that is lost in the world

No, they should be taxed more to cover for my children

>>510914402 (OP)
No just the women.

>>510914402 (OP)
I love fat bitches so much

>>510914402 (OP)

mmmmmhhhmmmmm

mommy

she's fat

>>510914855
When they got a cute face and big ol tiddies it’s hard to pass up

>>510914402 (OP)
>to encourage marriage?

Women are fucking broken and the laws are structure to keep them hauling regardless if they're broken or not.
Why do I want to be forced to pay alimony and child support just for signing a stupid document?
I know of people who are paying for kids who are not theirs and pussy they barely hit one day to this very fucking day.
Worst I know of people paying for a fucking whore that never even gave them kids.
Those guys are paying for whores just to exist, is government enforced simpitude

Post more of her you fucking faggots it's Sunday cheat day

>>510914402 (OP)
Men and women, then couples without kids.

>>510914518
For breathing, they consume the most air the greedy fucks

>>510914402 (OP)
Yes, but I still think it won't solve the problem. They'll begrudgingly pay the taxes instead of traditional marriage.

>>510914792
You do jewish work for free. Your a jidf jannie repeating 'memes' like a bot. Kys if youre a human

>>510914402 (OP)
>single men
Fucking why? Single men are, generally speaking, already desperately trying as hard as they fucking can to secure a relationship with any woman that's not a complete fucking nightmare. They can't do it. It's not their fucking choice causing the collapse of marriages and fertility.

It's women, and THEIR behaviour and choices.

>

>>510914402 (OP)
I would just declare I'm gay for tax purposes.

>>510914402 (OP)
I don't like fat women but this one is pretty hot.

>>510914500
You gay?

>>510914402 (OP)
>Should single men
No
>and women
Yes
Men don't have wombs. Single men need resources to find a mate, women don't.

>>510914402 (OP)
>encourage marriage?

marriage no longer happens because it serves no discernible function anymore in modern society. Cope& seethe.

>>510915380

>>510914402 (OP)
If a man is not married with a child by the age of 24 then he should be sent off to the front lines of whatever war the country is currently fighting.

>>510914500
she is perfect. She already hit the wall. Still attractive. Maybe kids already

>>510915640
if you can force men to die, it's only fair to force women to have children

>>510914402 (OP)
No, but married couples should be taxed less. Among other excellent benefits.

Basically
Staying single = no change
Marriage = major upgrade

I personally don't want to get married and have kids because it feels like a shitty downgrade with the costs of food, healthcare, transportation, daycare and etc.

>>510914402 (OP)
>what is filing jointly
>what is child tax credits
they already are retard

>>510914402 (OP)
mom, pajeets and kikes are posting more shit threads

I dare say, BOOBA

>>510915013
It doesn't even have to be a pretty face. Best sex I ever had was some horse toothed chick with two massive globes on her chest, her pussy was also attractive so that helps. She was a total ringer, you'd never even know it until she took off her korn shirt

>>510914402 (OP)
they already do that to you mf

>>510915770
Women will be kept in their place with corrective beatings.

>>510915832
WOW A WHOLE 20%

Bootlicking fuck. OP is IMPLYING a more sizeable change than what is currently going on. Unimaginative cavefuck.

You have the fucking Internet. Contribute something besides "durr this is a thing already."

Faggot.

>>510914402 (OP)

>>510914402 (OP)
More of this breeding cow.

>>510914500
>I have low testosterone
Cool blog

>>510914402 (OP)
Ban women from higher education or go extinct. This is the only solution. Everything else is meaningless nonsense.

>>510914792

>>510914792

>>510914402 (OP)
Fuck no, why should someone who doesn't have kids pay taxes to send other kids to schools and shit.

>>510914402 (OP)

I need to plap a woman like this while she calls me a good boy.

>>510914818
>expectations for how women should behave
What about expectations for men? Do we really need an excess of barely employed, sexless, expendable men?

>>510916751
You mother was not very loving, was she

>>510914402 (OP)
>Too stupid to know that you can't get blood from turnip
The absolute state of (((/pol/)))

>>510914402 (OP)
i'm the only one of my friends that has kids. taxing them won't get you anywhere

>>510914402 (OP)

They already are, married couples who file together get massive tax benefits and credits, not to mention the limits of their cumulative deductions.

>>510914402 (OP)
I already can't afford life, so they'd better lend me some money for paying this new tax.

>>510914402 (OP)
Give me 8 beers and i m the architect.

>>510914402 (OP)
That leg stretch is the only time that there has ever been any airflow to her vagina and asshole
Imagine the reek

>>510916896
>>510915640
Man, every time Canadians open their mouths, they say the most cucked, bootlicking shit you can imagine. Sad, broken people.

>>510914497
>valuable role
That's degeneracy and degeneracy always causes more degeneracy

>>510917179
I mean ive had more than 8 beers.

>>510914402 (OP)
Yes, but couples who get divorced have all their assets taken from them and redistributed. This includes children.

>>510917182
You're the one who can't have sex
>>510917239
It has always existed because human nature cannot be changed with social control. That's why monogamy, even at its most successful, was still a challenge as adultery persisted. Let alone now that it's barely an expectation. Yet successful men with families have always banged single hot chicks once in a while. It's a natural part of manhood. Yet single men have nothing to offer the world except their labour. That's why they deserve to be taxed while single women aren't.

only if the government gives me pussay

Singles are taxed more, families get returns from gubmint for dependents in Leafland.

>>510917471
You have a fat, nagging feminist wife who can ruin you whenever she wants. She probably nagged you into getting the vax too. Are you really in a better spot than me?

>>510914402 (OP)
A bachelor tax would result in some of the most destructive rioting you would ever witness. Any government stupid enough to institute such a tax would be signing its death certificate.

>>510917471
You're Canadian. Opinion disregarded

>>510914402 (OP)
Old and barren. No thanks.

>>510914402 (OP)
>Should single men and women be taxed more to encourage marriage?

That's essentially a "tax break" if you marry.

No one is going to marry for a tax break. If the issue is 'economical' then a tax break is simply not enough. If money is the issue, marriage/family is way more expensive... as a bachelor, if you have to sleep on a mattress on the floor to save matter it's not a big deal. But have your children sleep on a dirty mattress? That hits different.

Also... taxing people who can't afford marriage? So they are even more unable to save and improve economically? It's like your goal is to make marriage even more impossible. Lol.

>>510914402 (OP)
Taxed more? no but families should be taxed less for each child then have, like a 10% reduction in tax per child, so if you have 2 children you basically are not being taxed on your income, and if you have 3 you get a tax rebate but no more beyond that.

I think that is optimal because the reality is, that child will end up contrinuting more in their life time then the parents will for the tax write reduction while they are under the age of 18. Once the kids turn 18 the reduction goes for 10 to 5.

>>510914402 (OP)
You'd have to nuke me to detach me from this creature

>>510917077
Basically a tax for bachelors would just increase inflation. All taxes become inflation. You can't localize taxes, that's a myth. All costs are just passed forward. Everyone is in a race to recoup their expenses. More taxes means less money in the economy.

You can argue taxes will return to people in productive ways, like roads or schools. But the reality is that all that money goes straight to Israel and y'all know it's true.

A tax on single people might even become a net negative overall.. because it will push more people down the poverty line, meaning they'll end up requiring welfare, with no ability to pay a tax.

>>510914402 (OP)
Sexxxyjaime has been blacked

>>510918258
Essentially same thing. Both methods imply burdening single people still trying to build up their economy, in favor of older people who already had a family and already made it in life.

>>510914402 (OP)
or , random thought, give tax breaks and cheaper housing for young families and actual paternity / shared paternity/maternity instead of lol fuck you flip more burgers
>nah import jeets instead
jewish

>>510914402 (OP)
Too fat.

>>510914402 (OP)
Yes, but with some caveats:

Have all single men and women register, similar to selective service/draft, only this registration is for intent to be married, signaling that you WANT to be married.
What the government then does is tell you that in order for you to not be taxed, the government will create a match for you based on age, income level, and looks and that person will be required by the state to marry you. As long as you two remain married and have at least 1 child, you will not be taxed. Neither party can say no.

Do this, and I'm game. I'm tired of 3/10s thinking they are too good for my 70k a year, house owning, blue-eyed ass.

>>510914456
OP is not that smart, majority of these threads are moronic

>>510918480
No, because that's an entirely separate issue, that would need to be addressed before hand.

>>510918568
>Big Girls cant be pretty.

>>510914402 (OP)
>coercive taxation

>>510918568
>>510918699
>Big Girls cant be pretty.
Theres big, and then there's morbidly obese.

why u posting average amerimutt women lad?

>>510918904
put some lipstick on that pig and you've got a deal.

>>510914402 (OP)
Single women yes
Single men no
Why? Because most men are so desperate for women/family/children that they are literally kept from that future by women and their insane standards. Far too many good men are left wanting while thots prostitute themselves online getting $1000s

>>510918568
wtf

>>510914402 (OP)
No. Coward.


https://www.womengoingourway.org/repealing-equal-pay-for-family-wage/


>Values We Uphold:
>Family Stability: We advocate for policies that contribute to the stability of working-class families. We believe that when men are provided with the means to adequately support their families, it creates a foundation for a nurturing and secure environment.

>Traditional Roles: We value the preservation of traditional family roles. We seek to create an atmosphere where men feel empowered to fulfill their roles as providers, promoting a sense of duty and responsibility within the family structure.

>Work-Life Balance: We believe in the significance of maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Our advocacy emphasizes the need for workplace policies that allow individuals to actively participate in family life while pursuing their professional goals.

>Community Well-Being: Women Going Our Way is committed to contributing to the overall well-being of our community. We believe that supporting traditional family values positively impacts the community at large, fostering a sense of cohesion and shared responsibility.

>Alternative profit models: We encourage corporations to invest in the future of humanity: children; and to explore alternative models that go beyond a singular focus on equal pay at the expense of family wage. The family is a nation-producing institution. These might include profit-sharing programs, flexible working arrangements, and comprehensive benefits packages that contribute to overall employee satisfaction and well-being. We advocate for corporate flexibility in compensation structures that enable businesses to tailor their offerings to the needs of their workforce.

>>510914845
This. Women are the ones with the timer, and women are the ones that get worse with age no matter what. Men *can* get better with age, or they can get worse if they don't put any work into their lives, but women only get worse and cannot get better.

>>510914402 (OP)

>>510914402 (OP)
fix divorce laws and people will get married. otherwise fuck off

>>510919130

>The Restoration Document is the template used for a woman to voluntarily surrender her legal power of attorney to a male guardian or trustee.

https://www.womengoingourway.org/the-restoration-document/


>If you were to repeal the 19th Amendment

>States’ Rights
>Argue the issue of suffrage should be left to individual states to decide, emphasize a more decentralized approach to governance.

>Originalist Interpretation
>Take an originalist interpretation of the Constitution, suggest the Founding Fathers did not explicitly intend for women’s suffrage; a constitutional interpretation should adhere to the original understanding.

>Legal Process Arguments
>Emphasize that the amendment process itself allows for changes; if there is a broad consensus to repeal the 19th Amendment, it could be done through constitutional means.

>Concerns About Overreach
>Express concerns that expanding voting rights without a thorough understanding of the potential consequences lead to unintended societal changes; argue for a reassessment of the impact of the 19th Amendment.

>Public Opinion
>Highlight that public opinion has evolved over time, and repealing the 19th Amendment reflects the will of a significant portion of the population.

>Framing as a Constitutional Experiment
>Present the idea that the 19th Amendment was an experiment in constitutional governance; suggest it’s legitimate to revisit such experiments if they do not align with the envisioned societal order.

>Raise questions of potential flaws or imbalances in the original ratification of the 19th Amendment that should be reevaluated
>Acknowledge that special interest groups, particularly those advocating for women’s rights, had an outsized influence on the ratification process, overshadowing broader public sentiment.

https://www.womengoingourway.org/repealing-the-19th-amendment

yes, and childless couples should pay more too. tax "pet parents" more as well.

>>510918765
And the thing is, obesity is a lot smaller then most people think it is.
Reminder of the following facts
>The Average Height of a 20 year old woman in the US: 5'4
>The Average Weight of a 20 year old woman in the US: 171Lbs
>The Average BMI of a 20 year old woman in the US is 29.
>A BMI of 30 is considered obese.
There is big, and there is obese, most woman are obse hogs now.
>MUH BMI IS NOT ACCURATE
Pure fucking cope by fatties