>>511025575>Most "high end" careers require the fewest skills. Look at all these roasties and HR karensThis is not what I meant by 'high-end'. That's a soulless low-end job. I'm not merely speaking of salary; in any regard most of those foids are not making as much as an engineer, or a doctor, for example.
>they're getting paid more than a plumber, electricianI have my doubts about this claim, at least on average
>trades require great skillI agree, but it's a different type of skill with regards to what I mentioned.
>A liberal arts education is of prime importanceI agree in the general sense, and this used to be the case, but you and I both know what university for liberal arts amounts to today: Critical Race Theory and Faggotry. All that can be learned in these disciplines can in fact be learned autodidactically today. And we're discussing career prospects, of which liberal arts will not give you today relative to STEM.
You make a good point regarding influence. Teachers are without a doubt valuable, but the problem here is the curriculum. Women, for example, go into it and get brainwashed. How do you propose we fix this?
>They're importing jeets for white collar just as hard as they're importing spics for blue collarOf course. I have a feeling we're speaking past each other here. My position rests under the assumption of a world where we're not ZOGGED and we can actually have some resemblance of an ethnostate; in that case the trades should be promoted in the sense I argued. We don't live in that world, but I'm speaking from an ideal position I suppose. Under ZOG all bets are off, I have no practical solution to that, promotion of trades or not, we're fucked either way the way I see it.
Or are you arguing for a subversion of all HR positions, teaching positions, etc.?