Thread 512201204

Asians > Mexicans
Pajeets > blacks

Canada has the better end of the stick when it comes to non white people. Canada is 10% Asian and 10% Indian/south Asian meanwhile the USA is almost 20% spixs and 13% black. Mexicans and blacks are way more violent and low IQ than Asians and pajeets

I prefer violent niggers than pajeet neighbors

That just presents a different set of problems

>>512201351
Lol

>10% Indian
Not a fucking chance, it’s at least 30-40% now. They lie on statistics to keep us sleeping longer.

>>512201429
You've never been outside of the country. I went to Houston last year and the amount of Mexicans there doesn't even come close to the amount of Indians in Toronto

>>512201495
Other way around I meant to say. Canadian cities are no where close to American ones in terms of non white people

>>512201204 (OP)
I'll be real. I grew up with jeets. They were generally a bit weird and their houses smell, but they're pretty nice to you and are decent people in my experience.

My jeet mates family let me stay with them for nearly 2 years rent free when my step dad threw me out at 16. I'd probably be a drug addict if not for them. I still had to get a job because they only paid for basics but still.
>>512201351
Are you retarded?

>>512201525
Toronto is 100% Indian so I don’t know what you’re talking about.

>>512201571
Toronto is literally one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world. Go to American cities like Atlanta, los Angeles and then come back to me. It will open your eyes that things aren't that bad here

>>512201204 (OP)
pajeets are asian though

Asians > Whiteoids.

Japan is the peak of human civilization.

>>512201204 (OP)
Whites>Asians>Mexicans>Blacks>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jeets

>>512201643
Ok pajeet

>>512201204 (OP)
All of them are niggers and must be expelled

>>512201204 (OP)
You made this thread yesterday, where I demonstrated the flawless superiority of Indians over beaners.

>>512201204 (OP)

- California pop: 40 million
- Hispanic population: 40% (Mex) (52% 18-25)
- Indian Population: 2.4%
- GDP: $4.1 Trillion (2023)
===================================
- Canada pop: 40 million
- Hispanic pop: 0.5% (Mex)
- Indian Population: 7.1%
- GDP: $2.2 Trillion (2023)

Seems like too much Indians is actually detrimental.

>>512203062
>Seems like too much Indians is actually detrimental.
Your ESL is showing hesse

>>512203483
$45 trillion saar, I swear oath to kang and the crown saar.

>>512203062
Indians in California work in silicon Valley. Mexicans in California deal drugs, mow people's lawns and do landscaping

Ask yourself who is a deterimnat to the economy

>>512204096
The Mexicans do important jobs that nobody else wants to do. The jeets take nice office jobs through scamming and nepotism.

>>512204224
Your right forget working apple, Nvidia, or Microsoft ( economic engine of California) they do all the importsnt stuff like opening op restaurants and picking crops for $5 an hour. Truly the engine's of the economy

>>512203062
Canada is definitely more than 0.5% Hispanic. Don't know where you got that figure from

>>512204096
If Indians are so good for the economy, then why is Canada so poor? Shouldn't all those Indians make Canada better than California? Whites in the state (Northern Europe) are around 25% here. Canada has more whites too at 70%.

>>512204377
Likely not by much. But OP said Mexicans. Not Hispanics.

>>512204437
Don't know what your definition of poor is but where far from it

California is kind of exception though. It's economy is larger than the UK , France or Italy despite having less people. But the reason it's so high is because it belongs to most of the big tech giants are headquartered there.

If anything Mexicans are dead weight to the California economy and they would be better off with less of them. Literally the least skilled and least educated migrants.

>>512204525
Canada is about 2-3% LATAM. Slightly less than the middle eastern population

>>512204618

- Texas pop: 30 million
- Hispanic population: 40% (Mex) (50% 18-25)
- Indian Population: 1.5%
- GDP: $2.7 Trillion (2023)
===================================
- Canada pop: 40 million
- Hispanic pop: 0.5% (Mex)
- Indian Population: 7.1%
- GDP: $2.2 Trillion (2023)

Then explain Texas also at 40% Mexican. Yes. Canada is poor compared any state in the US. Especially compared to California. Their GDP per capita is similar to the poorest state here, Mississippi. And also, Indians followed us to California and Texas. And the combined Hispanic GDP of both states dwarf all the salaries of the jeets employed by Jew companies. We're not just landscapers or here. We have generations here. And many of us are in the civil service. A police officer in Los Angeles is $90,000 for the first year. And in the Bay Area it is even higher.

>>512203483
>>512202205
Lmao Mexico is better than pooindia in every aspect

>>512205091
1) Canada isn't 0.5% Hispanic
2) you completely ignored my point. Mexicans in the USA are a net negative on the economy. Your the poorest and least educated group of any migrant in America. Every single standardized testing in the US puts you near blacks
can't even respond to the scientific contribution claim without reverting to violence literally call any pale individual they have white out of inferiority mindset

>>512203483
It's ese sweaty

>>512205091
I'm sure those places would be just fine if there were no Hispanics living there

>>512205770
>>512206025
>Pic Very Much Related
>Mexicans In California are nearly Half Of Canada's entire GDP
Well the bell curve is real. The fact is there are about 10x times more Indians than us. So of course there's going to be more total people on the higher end of the IQ scale employed in well-paid professions in total numbers. But guess what? Those Indians are needed in India, the smart ones. They're not doing any good to anyone being here. Do they make the food cheaper for anyone? No.

- Mexico pop: 130 Million
- GDP Per Capita: $12,690 (2025)
- IQ: 87.7(Lynn/Becker/Vanhanen)[Most Cited]
===================================
- India pop: 1.451 Billion
- GDP per capita: $2,878 (2025)
- IQ: 76.2 (Lynn/Becker/Vanhanen)[Most Cited]

>>512206025
Also, yeah. You haven't changed being the coolies, Rajis, and stooges colonizing land in another continent. You're no different than those that Indian wants reparations from. Actually you're worse. You have a homeland that is now free. If anything, you should be in the UK or at the very least those who still have the Kang as part of their monarchy.

List of Los Angeles Mayors: (Notice: NO Bharatian)

- José Vanegas 1786–1788
- José Sinova 1789–1790
- Francisco Reyes 1790
- Mariano Verdugo 1790–1793
- José Vanegas 1792–1793
- Francisco Reyes 1793–1795
- José Vanegas 1796–1797
- Manuel Arellanes 1797–1798
- Guillermo Soto 1798–1799
- Francisco Serrano 1799–1800
- Joaquin Higuera 1800–1802
- Mariano Verdugo 1802–1809
- Francisco Avila 1810–1811
- Manuel Gutierrez 1811–1812
- Antonio Maria Lugo 1816–1819
- Anastasio Avila 1819–1821
- Manuel Gutierrez 1822–1824
- Guillermo Cota 1824
- Encarnacion Urquides 1824–1825
- José Maria Avila 1825–1826
- José Antonio Carrillo 1826
- Claudio López 1826–1827
- Guillermo Cota 1827–1828
- José Antonio Carrillo 1828–1829
- Guillermo Soto 1829–1830
- Tiburcio Tapia 1830–1831
- Manuel Dominguez 1832–1833
- José Antonio Carrillo 1833–1834
- José Perez 1834–1835
- Francisco Javier Alvarado 1835–1836
- Manuel Requena 1836–1837
- José Sepúlveda 1837–1838
- Luis Arenas 1838–1839
- Tiburcio Tapia 1839–1840
- José Sepúlveda 1839–1840
- Manuel Requena 1844–1845
- Tiburcio Tapia 1844–1845
- Vicente Sanchez 1845–1846
- Juan Sepúlveda 1845–1846
- Juan Gallardo 1846–1847
- José Sepúlveda 1846–1847
- José Salazar 1847–1848
- Enrique Avila 1847–1848
- Ygnacio Palomares 1848
- José Sepúlveda 1848
- Antonio F. Coronel 1853-1854
- Manuel Requena 1855, 1856
- Cristobal Aguilar 1866-1868, 1870-1872
- Antonio Villaraigosa 2005-2013