>>512417873>Instead of restricting access to everybody, you should just hold the people who engage in arson accountable.Instead of trying to enforce a forest wide ban, invest those same resources in increasing threat detection technology and bringing criminals to account.
The eternal problem with you people, and I use that term very loosely, is that you don't actually have the intelligence to understand how systems more complex than the centrelink self service phoneline actually work, you don't even know how to begin thinking about finding out, but despite this you still somehow think that your opinon matters to anyone, anywhere. Instead of your magical thinking "invest in technology to fix everything" retard suggestion, the first question is in fact "what are they already using?" Beyond local reporting, they use satellite imaging data to identify fires over the vast expanse of their woodlands, which is curated by scientists and techs daily to validate like removing manufacturing heat sources which give false positives, before publishing the data to the public.
https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/background/dsm/fm3
There are inherent limitations discussed such as cloud cover. Other sources indicate that problem areas can also be monitored with UAVs using similar detection principles. Now, how the fuck do you propose to improve this system? Let's skip to the part where your answer doesn't exist or is similarly retarded and cut to the main issue. Say you have absolutely perfect detection, minute by minute, you've minority reported the perp just like your mkultra movies, great. Now, let's hold him to account. He owes several hundred million, if not billions, in damages, 5 people have died, including 2 firefighters, because he forgot a coke bottle which focused sunlight and started a fire in extremely dry conditons, which could have been prevented by following the recommendations of the fire prediction system. What accountability is going to undo that?