>>512704057 (OP)Okay I was an anti-natalist too but I changed my views and I will explain why.
Argument A:
1. Life is inevitable, just because you don't reproduce, won't stop others from reproducing.
2. Even if you kill all humans, some other species will achieve sentience.
3. Even if you kill all life, abiogenesis will just begin again and life will evolve yet again.
Conclusion: You reproducing or not makes no difference to anything, life is inevitable.
Argument B:
1. We're not all equal, this is self-evident just from simple observation.
2. Those who never question their own existence will reproduce without thinking.
3. If you're capable to even consider the question, you are above these people who don't.
4. If you have good genetics and fail to reproduce all the subhumans will still reproduce and take over the Earth.
Conclusion: Your genetic lineage will die out but you won't people being born, instead everyone will be born to abusive nigger-tier parents, addicts, criminals, etc. and denied a chance at life with parents who are loving, intelligent, etc.
Argument C:
1. If life is fundamentally a mistake it needs to eliminated completely.
2. The only people who could theoretically eliminate life completely would be the most intelligent and advanced people
Conclusion: We need to breed people smart enough to destroy the universe and all life in it and all potential of life in order to correct the mistake of life.
Argument D:
1. One can verify through personal experiences as well as studying anecdotal and scientific evidence the reality of astral projection / OBE.
2. One can see from this that life does not end with the death of the body.
Conclusion: Death is not a big deal, not something to be afraid of.
Oh and btw if you're just worried about "pain and suffering" most people have the option to commit suicide including you but you don't.