>>513404372 (OP)
I have many.
>we have reached the end of the era of great accords and international treaties, which began in 1945. Peace between nation states now rely only on the balance of power (including alliances) between the nation states, hence why Pakistan and India almost dragged 3 billion people to war but luckily the pakistani showed to be better warriors and spooked India into peace. This also means that globalization and US and Russian power projection has weakened. Hence why wars sparked in Armenia, Cambodja, India and Syria
>Europe is in a prime position to try a war with Russia (it is always Europe invading Russia, not the opposite), which is very counter-productive for themselves but europeans do not listen to economic advantages
>Zelensky will not surrender his power over Ukraine, so do not expect him to disappear from the news soon. He'll continue trying to start WW3
>this war was a pyrrhic victory for Russia, as the US and West cannot be relied upon to re-integrate Russia into what it was before the war. Nordstream2 is not being renewed, german economy will flush down the toilet as it currently is
In the end, NATO achieved its goal: keep USA in, Germany down, and Russia out. And only hohols had to be killed, displaced, prostituted and kidnapped.
Zelensky wins by retaining power (his goal). Putin wins by gaining new land (his goal) and ambiguous security guarantees that should protect him as well as Ukraine. USA wins by appearing strong.
Europe loses on all accounts, and turns even more into an USA vassal.