Thread 513826903

I think it should be a criminal offense to engage in any sort of non-traditional sexual relationships this includes prostitution and sodomy.

>>513826903 (OP)
Do we agree?

How little self respect must one have to know that about a woman and still decide to marry her?

>>513826903 (OP)
>You damn MGTOWS I mean incels are ruining our scam!
>We'll force you to marry those used up old roasties if we can't draft you
Save men from this prison planet. Please God.

>>513826903 (OP)
You could also just not marry those people.

>>513827070
>he married the penis parking spot
kek.

>>513826903 (OP)
The worst thing about something like this, and this guy basically says it without saying it, is you are fundamentally “lesser” if she is not willing to go above and beyond sexually for you as well.

You are apparently important enough to be her longterm partner, but not as important as a random guy in college who she let pee on her?

>>513827433
>just not marry those people
The only reason any women ever had to NOT be massive shameless sluts was because it made them look bad in comparison to non-sluts and therefore incapable of securing a husband.

Mass communications via technology allowed cuntoids to identify the weakness in that whole principle:
It inherently requires non-sluttiness to be the norm, to serve as the baseline from which sluts are negatively judged.

Since women have the monopoly on pussy they realised they can be as shitty and disgusting as they want and men will still put up with them and tolerate their repulsive behaviour so long as they ALL do it - or at least the vast majority of them.

>>513827792
Also this table only goes up to the 2010s. God only knows how much worse it is now that 5-10% of young western women are literal internet pornwhores.
Even just 10 years ago the idea of a random ordinary woman from your school or your street deciding to start sucking and fucking dicks on camera only existed in the absurd daydreams of delusional perverts. Now it's the norm.

>>513826927
is coffee good for u lol?

>>513827609
Shut up roastoid.
No man wants the "honor" of being the lifelong emotional tampon walking ATM butler servant while every other man got the hot sex with none of the responsibilities.

>>513828326
That’s what I said, he married a whore but gets none of the benefits of a crazy slutty sex life.
At least if she was a massive bimbo (for him only) he could get some solace

I support jury nullification so men don't get screwed in divorce. Most marriages should be voided because women committed fraud and married a man they aren't attracted to for money.

>>513826903 (OP)
May this "love" not befall me or anyone really

>>513828515
>allow spouses to file no-fault divorce
>but the breadwinner still remains financially responsible for the spouse
Imagine trying to explain the legal and moral justification for such a ridiculous concept.
If you discarded all the 'husband and wife and relationship' terminology and described it solely in terms of a business contract it would sound like utter lunacy.

>upend society and take away people's rights because I personally think I would do better that way

No. That's deranged.
I know your reddit communities, tiktoks, youtube shorts or whatever other SM brainrot is all telling you that society is collapsing and birth rates are crashing or whatever, but 99% of humanity is doing fine in regards to relationships.
It would be madness to change everything just for the 1% of chuds that have all kinds of theories as to why they are alone.

>>513829219
>Fuck you, I got mine!

>>513826903 (OP)
What the fuck is wrong with men like this? It's like they lost their dignity.

>>513826903 (OP)
just ban divorce and make adultery punishable by mandatory 10 year prison term

>>513829960
Never going to happen when the lawmakers are a bunch of degenerate kikes.

>>513830015
then there is no reason for me to get married, if I want tax benefits I'll just marry my straight male friend.

>>513827792
>Since women have the monopoly on pussy

You know mate. I've never once thought about the "monopoly on pussy" throughout my whole life. 30 years now.

You know even by saying that you're of the belief its wrong for you to not have free access to fuck some broad. I've never once assumed that some woman should be forced to sleep with me lol. I've only ever been with two partners proper. I've also turned women down when I was single. Crazy how I've never felt entitled to another.

>>513830209
shut the fuck up you friendless mouthpiece. what an infuriatingly smug post.

>>513830333
Believe what you will

>>513830209
>free access
I already pay
>Crazy how I've never felt entitled to another
Yet women feel entitled to my shit via their sugar daddy government, despite offering nothing in return

Women having a 'monopoly on pussy' is just an existential truism, you fucking spastic. You don't have to '''''''think about it''''''', any more than I would expect you to think about how the sky is blue.
>30 years now
Is this supposed to be some claim of worldly experience?

Tale old as time:

>"hey honey, heard you gave Chad anal sex but not me, whys that"
>"because I didn't LOVE him, but I LOVE you anon, that's why I don't give you anal sex"

>>513830745
I'm sure if you keep digging it'll get better lol

What's your solution to your proposed problem?

>>513826927
>we

Kind of a Judaic way to put it.