>>513830209
>free access
I already pay
>Crazy how I've never felt entitled to another
Yet women feel entitled to my shit via their sugar daddy government, despite offering nothing in return

Women having a 'monopoly on pussy' is just an existential truism, you fucking spastic. You don't have to '''''''think about it''''''', any more than I would expect you to think about how the sky is blue.
>30 years now
Is this supposed to be some claim of worldly experience?

>>511990077
The economy is different now than it was then, far more capable of self sufficiency and requiring less varied inputs to function. We didn't have to worry about importing platinum and the effects not having it could have on manufacturing or even the service sector our economy is largely based around. Web services are services and we need copper and nickel and silver. Mines here have stagnated and efforts should have been put into onshoring commodity production, refining and manufacturing prior to initiating tariffs as they are. Now building plants becomes more expensive. Capital to invest in such plants is worried that the next president will fuck them over as both Biden and Trump have done to fuels and green projects respectively. Can't undo the future and trump should have let things funded in his absence continue to set precedence for the next decade. We should have overhauled permitting and power production likewise before fucking up inputs. If only you knew how bad things really are. There isn't enough power or water for many data centers so their telling proles to turn their AC down to prevent blackouts and in PJM increasing prices. Dominion just walked back some transmission projects and I don't blame them. You have faggots that don't do the work, don't spend their own money and understand neither dictating policy predominantly for their own selfish interests. We don't have what we need for right now. There are complex machines in incredibly tight supply such that we are one bad week away from a real emergency. There made all over the globe and only due to this global sourcing do we have enough to barely scrape by if nothing breaks or is sabotaged by the increasingly poor proles.

>>937509380
>no one can afford kids
Poor people the world over manage to ''''afford kids'''.
The problem is womens' education, job quotas, and career privileges convincing 90% of women they're too good for 90% of men.

It's should be obvious by now that when they're gifted everything they want for free, and their natural hormones are suppressed by industrial levels of birth control pills, women simply don't want to have kids.

So there's the choice. Go extinct, or be meansieweansies to the heckin femerinos (aka stop giving them billions of dollars of free stuff at mens' expense).

>>510499121
>be a parasitic subspecies literally incapable of keeping yourself alive
>constantly criticise and complain about the host creatures that keep your ass from freezing/starving to death on an ongoing basis and demand more from them
This shit is like a fucking tapeworm telling me I'm not giving them tasty enough food to eat.

Fucking women.
If they're not starving to death, they owe a man something for it.
If they're not shitting in a stream and drinking rainwater, they owe a man something for it.
If they're alive, they owe a man something for it.
Women do not fucking ''''''deserve'''''' anything. They're not ENTITLED to being kept alive at others' expense (though their beloved daddy government now deems that they are).
EVERYTHING they have is a gift sprinkled upon them by the labours and efforts of men.
NOTHING any woman has ever done is equivalent to what men do for them.
The one thing that came close is raising a man's children properly. But most of them aren't even doing that any more.

>>510361982
>anti-feminist terrorist bombings to become a common thing in the United States.
You're making a porn ban sound even better.

>Nor can you force women to have sex with men
You don't have to '''''force''''' them. No society ever did.
Just stop giving them so much free shit from daddy government at the taxpayer's expense.
You know, so the cunts actually have to find a husband and have kids if they want to be kept alive at anothers' expense. Which is what they always used to do.
Women have never been capable of keeping themselves alive at any point in human history.
Not even our modern empowered career whamynz with all the equality they've been undeservedly gifted.

The way things are now, the government is effectively *giving* women vast amounts of money - stolen from the male taxpayer - so those same women don't have to get married to secure their preferred lifestyle.
The whole thing is a fucking farcical joke. Men forced at gunpoint by daddy state to pay women to not marry them.

>>509534549
2 men can't keep 18 women alive

People have forgotten that women are fucking useless dependants who can't even keep themselves alive.
That's why subsistence farmers were always desperate to marry their daughters off and make them somebody else's problem. They'd even pay men dowries to take their daughters off them

>>508733180
Neofeudalism isn't necessarily a desire of these people, imagine margins lost having to run your own McDeath squads and security forces, having to South African your business from the huddled masses. Some will go this route out of necessity. Not every CEO is responsible for the government failing, but they all have to deal with the consequences. Imagine what, if any, foreign capital actually looks like in this time? I can appreciate in Newyorks case that some people that built or bought in the interim will lose their ass but this is partially the government's fault as well. Same as home price increases. They looked the other way at what monsters were doing to real estate so they could take in money off harry homeowners that became millionaires in the grift. They create endless red tape and permits to drive up cost, control and slow expansion for what they need. The government could have put the private sector on a leash to prevent the second coming of robber barons or tried to keep costs down, managed their own spending, balanced their budget so savings wouldn't be wiped away by QE. There will be days of rage for anyone and everyone not decimated by what's coming. Imagine the look of spending 1 billion to bomb a mountain with no effect on a country that is not a threat to you. Imagine the truths I could tell the angry poors to point them at you, so many truths I need never lie. If I can do this, anyone can. That's a nice Mcmansion you've got there, it'd be a shame if it got redistributed.

>>508066860
>>508067564
Here's one of men vs women.

The whole world is literally white people doing a good job and paying taxes so minorities can pretend to be as good.

>>507976509
Money is in play and generally isn't just cash, assets rapidly can rapidly change in value. This would amount to say an unrealized gains tax in equities. For the United States if the entirety of all wealth held by billionaires was somehow made liquid and seized without it causing economic strain, IE downward pressure due to mass selling stocks and real estate, it would be enough to cover Americas unfunded liabilities for a period of 18 months. In doing so you'd be selling the infrastructure to employee people as well. These are the lofty ideals made by people that don't understand how the world works. Increases in Taxes, a war on the rich if you will, is inevitable however it will not make a difference in our failing economies. Ironically high taxes on billionaires will also be paired with entitlement reform, like reducing retirement benefits and Medicaid first in novel terms via legislation and then in real terms via inflation. What will be levied on the rich will hit the poor twofold as atleast assets track with inflation.