Thread 514825322

Daily reminder you're all cattle and Andrew Yang was your very last hope.

>>514825322 (OP)
>$1000 per month to everybody
>except the antisemites
Truly our last hope

>>514825588
Why do you retards always make shit up about not receiving UBI for no reason?
It's not even UBI at that point wth

>>514825322 (OP)
Where would the money come from?
>Well the people who work would pay for it.

>>514825700
>stop having logical conclusions!
Lol

>>514825700
Even if you make a transphobic remark on the internet? People goes in jail for that.

>>514825799
Literally this

When is we getting

>>514825926
VAT, money generated from new tax receipts, shrinking the overgrown military, etc

>>514826118
>the mic is gonna bend over so you can get tenddies
Lmao

>>514826265
What are you talking about?

>>514825799
has this ever actually been debunked or is the give cash to everybody thing literally just vibes. Stimulus cheques seemed to work to a point so it can't be ALL bad.

>>514826588
The stimulus checks were a one time thing, they only gave them out so people wouldnt complain about the corporate stimulus'. If everyone got 1k every month, utilities would eventually just raise prices and absorb it.

>>514825799
>using a kids movie as an argument against UBI
I mean it's both sad and funny you, truly, don't want to be freed from your wagey cagey. They really brainwashed you all.

>>514826937
>>514826961
Yeah so I mean what is the counter argument to prices just increasing to match the new demand. I personally would take a free $1000 a month no problem but some people genuinely seem to believe in UBI so they can't be that stupid... Unless they are?

>>514826961
You're the one who believes in the fairy tales of fiat currency and keynesianism.

>>514827286
PRICE CONTROLS!
kek

>>514827286
If you print money, then yes, there is inflation, but Andrew Yang never even suggested we print money.
I mean, there is no convincing the lot of you. The government could print billions to trillions for Boeing or anything big corp or entity, but even suggesting we cut beaucracy sends the bootlickers into an incoherent rage.

>>514827943
Maybe I just dont want niggers to have nice things

>>514827943
it might not be "inflation" if it's some kind of redistribution that's being imagined. But if consumers individually have their net currency available increased by X the price will just simply adjust by X no? Bailouts cause inflation because of a net addition to the currency supply but that addition does still make its way to consumers somehow. If it was just sitting in a vault somewhere there wouldn't be inflation. I personally would be quite happy to get wealth away from some of the bad people in this country I just don't see how one individual economic reform could do that.

>>514825322 (OP)
>Tax you 5x harder
>Give you a small portion of that back as "free gibs"
>Turns only the poorest into government dependents to almost everyone
FUCK OFF GOOK

>>514827943
>One guy who couldn't even fathom that the US would ever let in anyone who wasn't English or French
>A bunch of jews and jew stooges
Wow great list.

>>514825322 (OP)
The spreadsheet economist people always seem to be decent candidates at worst, but they're rarely charismatic enough to rise above the state level

>>514828424
They already get welfare, which is more expensive and rewards bad behavior
You're making your own life harder to "own" people you don't like

>>514828972
My bad, I forgot the plan was to remove welfare

This is one of those situations where the unga bunga retards that think the free money might be a secret hidden trick are half right.
If you pulled all the money that went into welfare and disability and gutted all of those agencies (give the people doling out welfare $1,000,000,000,000 and they'll make sure $500,000,000 goes to people in need), and redirected those funds into some much more streamlined - UBI - then you would have such an efficient net positive for everyone that the program would do wonders for the economy, like miracles. The current system is incredibly wasteful, but of course the welfare bureaucrats themselves are really just welfare recipients in their own special way.
But back to the first point, any practical implementation of UBI wouldn't be a whole radical reform of welfare (society isn't desperate enough for radical reform yet) but instead would just be another expense tacked on in a shitty way that just jacks up inflation and bureaucracy even more.

>>514825322 (OP)
>Andrew "uh actually I have Jewish friends" Yang
>Not zog