>>514827286
If you print money, then yes, there is inflation, but Andrew Yang never even suggested we print money.
I mean, there is no convincing the lot of you. The government could print billions to trillions for Boeing or anything big corp or entity, but even suggesting we cut beaucracy sends the bootlickers into an incoherent rage.

For the last time, UBI doesn't call for printing money
There are many ways to pay for it, like a VAT, cutting the military budget, and of course money generated from new tax receipts
Whoever immediately pukes about imaginary "inflation" on the topic of UBI has no idea what they're talking about

>>512715148
>as opposed to a system that has failed everywhere and every time.
We've never tried Universal Basic Income on a large scale. You blunders always call any and everything different from your clown world communism.
Doesn't matter though.
Either we listen to guys like Yang, or society collapses.
This circus isn't sustainable in the slightest.