Thread 514916874

Is Trump really planning to ban gun sales to trannies?

If so why not ban gun sales to other violent groups like Muslims and other joggers?

No, there's no way of doing that legally or practically.

>>514918580

Yeah that's what I thought

>>514916874 (OP)
We live in a simulation.

>>514918580
>No, there's no way of doing that legally


Of course there is. It's already a law banning mentally ill from firearms, it's just a matter of some red tape with wording.

>>514919106
Which law exactly are you referring to?

>>514919219
GCA 68 also several state laws that duplicate it. as well as 93 law.

>>514919468
AFAIK this refers to individuals either adjudicated to be mentally ill or having been committed. That obviously wouldn't work for people who don't fit either category like most trannies.

>>514916874 (OP)
AWOOGA

>>514919710
will be blanket adjudications, similar to felons yo

ever said you were a tranny, or images of you cross dressing ever online or in surveillance video, etc., proof you are mentally ill.

>>514919468
>Question 21.g. Adjudicated as a Mental Defective: A determination by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority that a person, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease: (1) is a danger to himself or to others; or (2) lacks the mental capacity to contract or manage his own affairs. This term shall include: (1) a finding of insanity by a court in a criminal case; and (2) those persons found incompetent to stand trial or found not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility.
>Committed to a Mental Institution: A formal commitment of a person to a mental institution by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority. The term includes a commitment to a mental institution involuntarily. The term includes commitment for mental defectiveness or mental illness. It also includes commitments for other reasons, such as for drug use. The term does not include a person in a mental institution for observation or a voluntary admission to a mental institution.
you need to be mentally ill according to a court of law

>>514919819
already answered. its happening.

>>514918580
common sense will win.
DISARM ALL TROONS AND NIGGERS!
guns are for straight whites. even
democrats know this.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KZWpwC2xvuEg

>>514916874 (OP)
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!

>>514919106
miga is for gun control now. hilarious

>>514916874 (OP)
The only reason I oppose this ban is because it will set a precedent that Democrats will use to ban guns for groups they seem "violent and harmful". And we all know that will be white males.

>>514919819
> you need to be mentally ill according to a court of
>trust the jews goy


lol

>>514919816
>blanket adjudications, similar to felons
No, people receive felon status after having been convicted of a felony, though a legal process. Classes of people who have never been to a court can't be considered felons nor mentally ill, legally speaking.
>ever said you were a tranny, or images of you cross dressing ever online or in surveillance video, etc., proof you are mentally ill.
Even if you interpreted the law that way it would still have to be adjudicated.

>>514919848
it's absolutely not happening. the only thing comparable is the prohibition on drug users which is already dubious.

>>514918580
We need common sense gun control and that means ttrannies can't have them

>>514916874 (OP)
saved pic OP, nice!

>>514919940
You already can't buy a firearm if you're a stoner.. why shouldn't hrt be denied

>>514919923
For our enemies yes
Why would we want them armed?

>>514919910
For thee but not for me!

>>514919106
>>514920223
Miga supports gun bans for enemies of Israel as well as anyone with a record of woke rightism, 4chan posting, failure to agree with the government in general, etc.

>>514920223
For the same reason you’re armed: to protect themselves against enemies.

>>514920175
Stoners shouldn't be denied guns either. No one should. And yes, I realize that I'm saying dangerous people should be allowed to have firearms. However, as the saying goes:

"Dangerous freedom is preferable to peaceful slavery."

>>514920223
I’ve never seen anyone so whiny like the Right about having to face the opposition on a level playing field whether it’s voting or weapon ownership.

>>514920447
Freedom is preferable to slavery

>>514920853
Exactly. Which is why no one should be denied access to firearms.

>>514916874 (OP)
>why not ban gun sales to other violent groups like Muslims and other joggers?
One thing at a time. He shouldn't ban a gun to anyone because once you start it will only end with the government owning all guns.

>>514919923
Not gun control, just troon control.

It's not banning guns, it's banning mental defectives comrade.

>>514919940
I guess it’s up to White males to show they aren’t the most violent people while carry weapons. Most white males have proven themselves to be both capable and safe while handling weapons. The ones that prove otherwise probably shouldn’t be allowed ownership. Same applies to anyone that has proven themselves to more of a societal menace when carrying a weapon.

>>514921098
>because once you start
That line was crossed over a century ago.

Either it is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and ALL CURRENT GUN CONTROL IS VOID AND NULL.

OR

Troons lose their rights.

PICK.

>>514916874 (OP)
Shit, I'm an armpit

>>514921220
Not infringed, it's one reason why there's a "neigborhood" agreement that those of us with guns (quite a few) would "share" if shit were to hit the fan.

>>514921220
Wow new basedjak just dropped

>>514920325
Says the jew

>>514916874 (OP)
No one is going to throw earth chan's head on her?

Wow what a shitty thread, OP.

>>514921220
Or troons lose gun rights and we keep ours

>>514923802
>and we keep ours
you barely have any gun rights left. why not get them all back again?

S H A L L
H
A
L
L

Reminder that the second amendment applies to:
>Trannies
>Schizos
>Felons
>All other citizens, even the ones you don't like
>Machine guns
>Grenades
>Tanks
>Nuclear weapons

They have the right to not sell to mentally ill people.
Trannies = mentally ill.

>>514924086
>Reminder that the second amendment applies to:
>>Trannies
>>Schizos
>>Felons
>>All other citizens, even the ones you don't like
>>Machine guns
>>Grenades
>>Tanks
>>Nuclear weapons

based and history fact pilled

>>514916874 (OP)
Nah it’s not possible no one noticed this until now. Did they change the globe again?

>>514916874 (OP)
Its not a tranny gun ban. Its literally just labeling trannies what they are: mentally ill. However on the Form 4473 that you fill out when you purchase a firearm there is a section that asks if you have ever been diagnosed with a mental illness. Saying yes on that precludes you from owning a firearm do to all the red flag laws passed. And saying no on the form when you do have a mental illness is a felony and prison time. So no its not a gun ban, but it would prevent them from purchasing firearms like all other mentally ill people.

>>514926757
What happens when democrats use that same legal process as precedent to push further gun laws? You see the problem here.

>>514916874 (OP)
My first thought was this was a litmus test for the real perpetrators of gun violence (blacks), but then i remembered that niggers are are a real voting bloc and that we live in a castrated AIPAC run fundraising focused society that hates the middle class. Also it’s unconstitutional. Not that it matters as much as my first point.

>>514926757
What it says is this:
>Have you ever been adjudicated as a mental defective OR have you ever been committed to a mental institution?
And it defines those:
>A determination by a court,
board, commission, or other lawful authority that a person, as a result of marked
subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease: (1) is
a danger to himself or to others; or (2) lacks the mental capacity to contract or
manage his own affairs.
>A formal commitment of a person to a mental
institution by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority.

So no the attorney general can't just declare that all people who eat cereal after 10 AM are crazy or anything else like that.

>>514916874 (OP)
those are fakeglobes

if you ever smoked weed you aren’t allowed to have a gun either, wonder how that is working out. Anyway they’re going to take the guns from anybody who doesn’t love the government so enjoy

>>514920447
No stoner was ever stopped from buying a gun since it’s easy enough to lie on Form 4473. If you ever injected one marijuana in your life then technically you’re not allowed to buy a gun. That’s how toothless it is. It will be the same for trannies without an act of congress, since they can just lie on the form as well. It would have to be adjudicated for the ban to have any real effect. The problem with trannyism is that it was allowed to get to this point without any real guardrails put on it by the authorities. Doctors and the amoral healthcare industry saw dollar signs, and convinced people this shit was for their own good. Anyone who attempted to speak out against it was silenced by Big Tech, or had his job threatened by HR gender studies majors who take marching orders from left-wing activist feds at the EEOC. People were allowed to get sucked into this radical lifestyle change and get prescribed personality-altering drugs and hormones with no real clinical vetting, since there’s no way to actually determine if someone is “really” trans other than the patient’s own testimony. Obviously troons are head cases. If you wanna put on women’s underwear and jack off into your bathroom sink, then fine, whatever. But if you want access to hormones, surgery, or legal name and sex changes on your birth certificate and drivers license, then you should be required to sign your gun rights away and be adjudicated as mentally incompetent. At that point, you’re in denial of reality and present a risk of self-harm. (Remember how troons tried to emotionally blackmail everyone by threatening suicide unless they were given carte blanche acceptance?) To be fair, I don’t think this should only apply to trannies. Anyone who gets prescribed mind-altering drugs like antidepressants and other SSRIs should also lose their gun rights. If they want their rights back, they can go before a judge who will determine if they’re sane after they get off the meds.

>>514916874 (OP)
Mother Earth is so damn hawt bros.

>>514916874 (OP)
If they can do it for trannies then next it'll be anti semites, then the Dems will go nuts with it. Terrible idea.

>>514919940
They've already been doing that for 15 years. Where have you been?

>>514916874 (OP)
You migger NPCs are unironically even worse traitors than biden voters

>>514926932
They already do. And anyways most niggers aren't allowed to own guns because they have felonies and they still carry anyways because you literally only get 3 years max for it and the DA typically gives you a deal that drops it down to just a year in prison.

>>514916874 (OP)
The mentally ill are not supposed to have guns already.

>>514927654
Not true. You just cant have a medical weed license or smoke marijuana and own a firearm at the same time. Which they really cant prove anyways.

>>514929104
No one cares about the mentally ill but anons.