>>515095944
J.P. Morgan, as a towering figure in early 20th-century finance, serves as a potential thread linking the sinking of the Titanic, the establishment of the Federal Reserve, and the later financial misconduct associated with Jeffrey Epstein through J.P. Morgan Chase. The argument begins with Morgan’s significant influence over the White Star Line, which owned the Titanic. Through his control of the International Mercantile Marine Company (IMM) since 1902, Morgan held a substantial stake in the shipping industry, including the Titanic’s sister ship, the Olympic. Conspiracy theories suggest that Morgan, who canceled his trip on the Titanic’s maiden voyage in 1912 due to health concerns and business in Europe, may have had a vested interest in orchestrating a disaster to eliminate key opponents to his financial ambitions, notably the creation of a centralized banking system.
Among the prominent figures who perished on the Titanic were John Jacob Astor IV, Benjamin Guggenheim, and Isidor Straus—wealthy individuals whose opposition to a central bank could have threatened Morgan’s plans. While historical records, including New York Times articles from 1911, show Straus supported the Federal Reserve concept, the theory posits that their collective influence and potential private resistance to Morgan’s monopolistic tendencies made them targets. The sinking, if intentional (e.g., through sabotage like a staged collision with an iceberg), could have been a strategic move to clear the path for the Federal Reserve Act, which was passed in 1913. This timeline—less than a year after the Titanic disaster—fuels speculation that Morgan’s absence from the ship was no coincidence but a calculated step to avoid scrutiny while advancing his agenda.