>>516707671
>How do you account for epistemology in your worldview?
Who should I believe more? Something that gave us cars, is able to replace hearts and almost all other organs except for the brain, is able to make you communicate with people throughout the world or something that can't proof itself, that is based on belief and becomes weaker the more we know about this world?
>>516707522
>Evolution is as much a religion as religion itself. They find incomplete puzzles and fill up the empty spaces with their own imagination.
What doesn't fit into your worldview has to be untrue. Do you also believe in geocentrism?
That's my main problem that I have with almost all religions. You don't care about the truth. The truth has to bend towards your religion or else you will deny it.
>There's actually only 3 categories of humans on earth that descended from Noah's 3 sons. Caucasoids, Negroids and Mongoloids. All other subraces are a combination of those 3.
There are four categories that were known as since the 18th century and still exist in modern genetics under euphemisms. Caucasoids (euphemism western eurasians: white people, middle easterners), negroids (sub-saharans: all black africans), mongoloids (euphemism eastern eurasians: east asians, southeast asians and amerindians) and abboids (euphemism southern eurasians: native people of India, papuans, abborigenes in Australia).
The sub saharan group can be distinguished even more because the bushmen are distinct from the rest of humanity for over 100,000 years.
According to the family tree of the bible white people are thr children of Japhet. Middle Easterners the children of Shem and all africans including egyptians but also the canaanites (levantine natives) the descendants of Ham. Egyptians are closely related to middle easterners more so than they are to any subsaharans unless you think that the hoteps are right.