>>519342067
>it was jinns!
The Arabic specifically says "haneen" meaning male men. Describing their origin "men from Al-Zutt" also disproves this. Abdullah specifically states he placed his ass in the sand to protect it.
This cope stems from the following verse after. Muhammad fell asleep in Abdullah's lap, and then men clothed in white garments came and surrounded them, scaring Abdullah. After Muhammad awakens Abdullah tells Muhammad what happened, and the Prophet says "they must've been angels sent to check on my wellbeing." The argument is essentially that since these "Angels" were present, then the men before must have been demons.
This falls apart for two reasons. One, the word used for the men in white garments is not haneen, as it was used for the men from Zutt. Reason two ties into the next cope.
>He was praying!
Never is the word "rode/mounted" (yokaroun) used to describe prayer. Not one time. It is however used multiple times to describe other sexual acts in Sahih Hadiths. If Muhammad was simply praying, why would Angels come to check in on him?
>He was sore and out of breath from reciting prayer!
If this was the case, why does it specifically mention his hips? Why does Abdullah care to mention the nakedness and genitals of the men from Zutt if they were indeed demons?
The answer comes to he obviously had sexual intercourse, and the implication was that he was recieving. You either have to affirm he got fucked by literal jeets from Zutt or demons. The real question becomes why he felt the need to do this, why did he not try and resist? He seems to know what is about to take place, he draws a line in the sand to protect Abdullah. He could have chose to simply leave if this were the case.
