>>519732509
This is exactly right. My opposition to diversity is not racial; it’s philosophical. The racial issue is a function of the philosophical. The essence of the philosophical principle is that solidarity/fraternity/unity is the most essential element of any society. You want to make the basis of said solidarity as broad as practicably possible, such that it allows for freedom and among the demos and large numbers of people. The basis of solidarity must also be an immutable characteristic; it cannot be ideas or ideologies, as both are subject to change within the individual and among the demos. It has to be race, as no other characteristic permits the type of durable solidarity suitable to nation building. Moreover, the more we learn about race based genetics, the more we understand that they’re basically deterministic. We can say, with perfect confidence, that culture is not only downstream of race, culture is intrinsic to each given race. In light of genetic studies, the case for race based societies has never been stronger.
Aside from the primordial aspects of genetics, we have abundant literature/studies that strongly support my premise. Every single sociological study demonstrates that the more racially homogeneous a given society, the more engaged they are in their communities, all metrics regarding quality of life are vastly superior and happiness indexes out at max/happy. Such societies are always happier, safer and more prosperous.
There’s simply no scientific or rational argument against it. The only argument is emotive and melodramatic boomer feels. This stuff will absolutely not survive the passing of the boomer. As such, we need to begin the process of reforming the world now while there’s still something to salvage. We need a new new world order.
If it means that much to boomers to retain their cheap and servile lawn crews and floor scrubbers, the boomers are more than welcome to live among diversity and prove us all wrong.