>>519746899
>Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
No, sadly I haven't read any of the Stoics, it's something I have been wanting to do for a long time. It's something that would do me good since I tend to stand on the "opposite" side and be too taken with romantic and decadent ideals.
>Meaning? I don't understand what you mean here
Yeah, I find that when you look into most of the modern philosophers grappling with meaning, be that Sartre with his focus on choice and freedom, Nietzsche with creation, or even Camus who claims meaning is not there and so you should live absurdly, there is this elevation of the human will to the highest seat, it turns into the only real thing and ultimate factor, which I simply can't accept. I agree with Kierkegaard that meaning exists if you have an absolute above you, and if you don't, all that's left is despair (and at most you can find some beauty in the recognition of that, which is what I enjoy about Cioran).
>Dasein.. The Being? The thing that is? Maybe I've misinterpreted.. What are you issues with this idea?
Not just the Being, but specifically the Being that can question itself, that can reflect on its own existence.
What makes it compelling is his idea that the mere fact of finding ourselves here, our "throwness", supposedly makes meaning one with being, the being-in-the-world is the meaning, and our modern craving to "find" meaning is more something like a sickness, which in some ways makes perfect sense when you see how ancient societies, even highly sophisticated ones like Greece and Rome, did not have our same existential doubts and took life for what it is.
I find that framework consistent, but I still can't bring myself to fully accept it. It feels almost evasive of the question. If anything I find Fernando Pessoa's simpler depiction in his poetry closer to that ideal: "I am glad I see with my eyes and not the pages I read".
But even then it's still an idea that cannibalizes itself as you write it.