Thread 520232868

>>520232868 (OP)
Art hoes. They want them virtue signal points.

This moment spawned several Asahina Hikage shotacon doujins.

This spawned several Asahina Hikage shotacon doujins.

>>520232868 (OP)
They all thought they'd be cartoonists for scribbling manic depressive bullshit while high on drugs.

Because it's boring as shit due to being cranked out by other normies in infinite quantities.
Turns out that even when given a magic box, the average retard can't come up with anything even remotely interesting.
Worst part about AI is that it allows idiot normoids to burn through any meme in a matter of hours by oversaturating the internet with the most boring slop they can crank out.

>>520232868 (OP)
Because it shows that most art isn't deeply spiritual at all. It's just a learned skill like anything else.

>>520232868 (OP)
They are ultra liberal and believe true art comes from humans only. Or they are Jewish and attack anything that is beautiful or something not easily recreated. People who hate AI art are actually losers

>>520233063
Fucking weeb lol

>>520232868 (OP)
uh, that's rape and shit

>>520233141
It's been said many times before that the slop must flow.

>>520233269
I legitimately had someone threaten me for posting these images. Frothing at the mouth unhinged turbo kikes.

>>520233141
>Worst part about AI is that it allows idiot normoids to burn through any meme in a matter of hours
no this is good. acceleration was always the way. we will burnout memes once and for all

>>520233184
That's also a good point. They can keep their happy little accidents to themselves. AI art is the future and won't ever go away

>>520233372
>we will burnout memes once and for all
:^)

>>520233135
Also:
Them art degrees and social positioning points!
See here:
Some of the best tacitly acknowledged and stoically endured the bitter truth. Some attempted to deny its existence, and thanks to the shoddy thinking of some of the literary prophets of cultural doom, found a good many weak points in their thesis. Moreover, those who took exception to the aforementioned prophets could be sure of a hearing and influence among the bourgeoisie. ***For the allegation that the culture he had only yesterday been proud to possess was no longer alive, that the education and art he revered could no longer be regarded as genuine education and genuine art, seemed to the bourgeois as brazen and intolerable as the sudden inflations of currency and the revolutions which threatened his accumulated capital.***
Another possible immunization against the general mood of doom was cynicism. People went dancing and dismissed all anxiety about the future as old-fashioned folly; people composed heady articles about the approaching end of art, science, and language. In that feuilleton world they had constructed of paper, people postulated the total capitulation of Mind, the bankruptcy of ideas, and pretended to be looking on with cynical calm or bacchantic rapture as not only art, culture, morality, and honesty, but also Europe and "the world"
proceeded to their doom. Among the good there prevailed a quietly resigned gloom, among the wicked a malicious pessimism. The fact was that a breakdown of outmoded forms, and a degree of reshuffling both of the world and its morality by means of politics and war, had to take place before the culture itself became capable of real self-analysis and a new organization.

>>520232868 (OP)
I don't hate it. But actual drawn art by humans will always be superior for those of us who know how to spot AI. It's easier to enjoy beauty when you're not searching for the indicators that it's just a mathematical estimation.

>>520232868 (OP)
I don't I just hate how generically people use it. I imagined using it to revive dead art styles. Speaking of art styles there's this DeviantArt user whose art I like but they haven't posted anything new in over a decade. Here are two pieces of their art.

https://www.deviantart.com/esuri/art/Tp-Midna-128650406

https://www.deviantart.com/esuri/art/oot-link-and-malon-128649111

How would I train AI to re-create this art style?

>>520233141
Cope

>>520233597
As far as I know when I train LoRas on civitai, you have to get clear screenshots or images of the art style of an art or show or anime you want, get like over 30 or 50 or more, you tag or caption them based on the photo contents as much as you want, then you train it, if you don't use civitai website and if you have a powerful enough GPU you can train on your computer.

>>520232868 (OP)
Midwits don't care about quality or entertainment value, they care about attention to detail and effort. If you spend 10 years making a dogshit film by hand, they'll worship you. If you spend 10 hours making a hilarious comedy animation with AI, they'll hate you.

>> 520233141
Melt harder, amorphous retard tranny nigger.

>>520232868 (OP)
It's fun to just do for keks or memes or whatever, but it's never really going to be art by any proper definition. Art implies human intentionality and desire to communicate and connect. AI imagery will always just be a machine's approximation of human intent based on some prompt or instructions it's given. Scrub artists are always going to be insecure by how technically good it can look, but I don't think talented artists are ever really going to have anything to worry about. People are always going to want something made by a human trying to communicate something. Your kid's stick figure doodles of your family is always going to mean more to you than if you asked grok to render a very similar looking image for you.

>>520233597
That's the most generic anime garbage I've ever seen. Oh wow, they added a bit of shading, so profound!!

AI gives everyone access to create

Demonrats only want their sodomite gatekeepers running art

>>520233345
>>520233430
>The judy aifag from /pmg/ is american
I have nothing against ai, I gen images all the time, but the quality of your images made me think you're a thirdie

>>520232868 (OP)
They are told to hate it by those it will either replace or those who want to incite against it. Most normies don't think for them selves. Personally I use it as someone who is not capable of drawing art but I do create plenty of writings.

>>520233986
gigatrvke

G-string Sailor Jupiter

>>520234226
Truthfully I just use prompts that work and post tests. I'm curious though what made you think they were third world tier? They are just the same shit other people have been posting for years, I thought. But slightly better since prompts have improved.

>>520232868 (OP)
If only Sailor Moon was this half-based. Shame it's trooner shit.

Sailor Mars is best girl, btw

>>520233289
ΣΚΑΣΕ, ΛΟΥΓΚΡΑ!

>>520233889
Midwits cling to old value systems they've climbed midway the top of.
Dinosaurs too fucking blind to find the nearrst tarpit.
People are stupid.
Art and artists have been overvalued for decades.
Fuck em.
I've got 40 TV collection of Ark Canon Art Tier Nonsense Noise and Western civilization completely best of.
Fuck new art.
99% of which is complete shit made by nepos.
THE GREAT FILTERING HAS BEGUN AND IF YOU CAN'T COMPETE WITH AI, MAYBE YOUR ART WASN'T WORTH SHIT AND WAS JUST SOCIAL POSITIONING TO BEGIN WITH?

NOW I'M STEAMED!!!

>>520232868 (OP)
The number of normies that're going to bat against AI art is getting lower because the art hoes are exhausting their momentum on constant witch-hunts. That said, I started using it for fun, but after getting flamed by said art-hoes I doubled down. They said that the only way to keep them alive was to avoid AI and commission from them for $40 a pic (& that doing otherwise was genocide), and so I transferred from free to paid AI in order to let them starve faster.

>>520234471
They look all fucked up, blurry texture, bad anatomy, and dicoloring. It's worse than what sd1.5 could gen.

fuck normies

>>520233430
>hey can keep their happy little accidents to themselves
Nah, the Bob Ross approach actually helps with making decent AI art. If you can work out what it "wants" to draw from a seed and then lean into it the results are usually better with less weird glitches. People assume that you just type in what you want and then it draws it and to a point that is true but getting it to draw something that doesn't have 16 fingers and penises coming out of its eyes is more involved.

>>520234716
How did you transfer to paid AI?

>>520234716
Novelai?

>>520233492
downloaded that pic never seen it

>>520234917
Switched from ChatGPT and a free version of Leonardo to NovelAI. I can mimic anyone's art-style near-perfectly without ever having to appeal to their commie politics.

>>520232868 (OP)
Mars is too busty, but Sailor Moon's brother banging her friend is funny.

>>520233777

No, you cope because I'm better at this than you. Have a goblin.
Those pics you posted look fucking terrible, like something from SD 1.5 era and if that's actually what you're using, you're a fucking thirdie and this is exactly my point.
People in general have zero artistic vision, no ability to determine between good and bad and no real creativity.
Therefore they can't make anything good even with perfect tools and they keep on cranking out utter garbage endlessly without learning a thing.
AI can create interesting stuff, but in the hands of the average Joe it's just plain shit and will always be so, because he refuses to learn anything.

as it becomes more and more easy and accessible to use people hate it less

>>520234719
I see some flaws sure. I just figured they got the point across so to speak. I'll try prompting improved gobs. Something I did notice is if you add too many items at once it gets all blurry and low res.

>>520233135
dat port

>>520235029
Download ComfyUI and some models and do it locally (warning: you will need as least some knowledge of how to use the command line to install and run it). It's more fun because you get to build it yourself and mess around with it as you like and learn more about what it's actually doing.

I just use it for character art for my tabletop games. Unfortunately most of them are getting so goddamn pussified in their prompts you can't get anything even remotely harrowing.
>>520235047
Got any tips for getting horror content with tripping the content dog?

Without. Oops.

>>520235230
I would, but the closest thing to a PC in my possession a $60 purchase business model from a pawn shop. Thing belonged to a mid-40's black female law school student with a DEI scholarship, by the way; I got her outlook account with the thing and switched it up.

>>520235161
Try a different checkpoint and a different sampler. I would recommend Dreamshaper or Illustrious for the checkpoint with Euler or DPM++ for sampler, CFG 5, 20-30 steps.

>>520235370

No idea, I do everything locally.
Everyone else should do the same as it gives you total freedom and more control.
My 3080 with just 10GB of memory can pretty much do any job I throw at it and you can get a GPU like this for few hundred.
Though you should get whatever they have in the market with 16GB of VRAM and you're even better off.

>>520232868 (OP)
as someone who generated with it for a few years on and off the main problem is consistency. It will be nice when you can generate an entire scene, basically a doujin with just a short description.

>>520232868 (OP)
>Why do normies hate AI art?
they can't grasp the depth some AI images are produced to portray

>>520232868 (OP)
I think anyone with a soul hates it
Midwits Republicans like it because the bad guys don't like it

The people who hate AI art are furries who make money drawing porn, or art hoes who make fantasy indie slop. None of their works are valuable in any way and none of them are unique either.

>>520232868 (OP)
AI is just CG, CGI and there is no such thing as digital art.
These are just images, nothing physical, picrel could just be a workstation brush/stamp.
Art is objective.
>>520233269
Art is only created by mammals.
Assuming otherwise renders everything meaningless.

>>520232868 (OP)
This pic makes me miss my babysitters, older genX sluts were wild op.

>>520235488
That sounds nice. I'm too goddamn old and calcium brained to set that up. I've tried before but I get all bamboozled and give up.

>>520235448
My computer is a piece of shit and I can run it locally. Takes me about 3 minutes to do a 1024x1024 image (varies by what exact model etc you are using) at 20ish steps. So long as you have at least 4GB of VRAM on your GPU (a decent amount of RAM also helps) you can do it with some tweaking to get it running well. I've got a GTX 1050Ti which is a good card for its time but now nearing ancient artefact status.

>>520233777
>>520235047
lol imagine getting mogged this hard in a public forum lmao

>>520235546
Any Demonrat hates it, you mean. You've all dedicated your lives to impeding people who just want to go about their day, throwing political causes nobody likes or supports into the public's faces and refusing to let them ignore you. Whenever someone tries, you ruin all of our media and corrupt every little advertisement until people can't avoid it. When you get hurt, burn cities down, murder people and violate kids to spite them. After all that, you decided to say that paying companies you dislike will lead to you or some "oppressed minority" you like dying, and so we pay them out of spite because nobody wants you here.

>>520235047
1. Those images are bad and I made them for fun, not for some Finncuck to criticize my lack of artistic integrity.
2. The good stuff I post isn't even on this site so it doesn't even matter.
3. Your goblins look like shit. I like the coloration and her gobcooch, but why do you make fugly faced gobs? I mean come on. Are Finns into dating women with manly, androgynous faces? Here's some tools for your toolbox... make effeminate looking gobs. Here have another fucked-upped image with dollar store juggalos

>>520235483
Thanks for the advice anon. I'll take a look at adding it to my repertoire once I am done with some other tasks.

>>520234405
where

furries will always get paid for comms. they just prefer real art by real people.
>aint got shit to worry about then

>>520233269
>>520235773

I kinda hate how ChatGPT makes everything with a brown filter unless you get really strict with it.

If you don't know already than youre too far gone

The people who generate images in the IA degen threads on /b/ are pedophiles associated with Leto and Lemur.

>>520232868 (OP)
Why do older women hate younger women?

>>520235679
I can run SDXL on my miniPC with no GPU, just AMD integrated graphics. About 7 minutes per 1024 by 1024, 3 minutes for 512 by 512.

>>520235713
I think I've proved my point take really well considering you've made incorrect assumptions about me with such confidence. You are the midwit Republican Anon. If you just want to go about your life then stop getting on the products billionaires are giving you for free like social media and AI

>>520236334
If it talks like a pedophile and masks itself like a pedophile, it's a pedophile. No need to ask the pedophile.

>>520232868 (OP)
The whole left propaganda relies on "culture" and “art”. If anyone can create anything, it's game over for them. They lose everything.

> muhhh AI just copy what exist
Exactly as so-called "artists". Actual pure creation doesn't exist. We are all a product of our environment. Inspiration is a copy with variation.

>>520232868 (OP)
It’s slop, fake art for midwits. Republican faggots went on and on when these tools first released, about how it would “democratize art” and finally let based conservatives churn out slop they were far too lazy to hand create.

After 2-3 years the only things generated by this computer cuck art assist program is bad, soulless porn of niche anime characters and racist memes. Turns out “Republican art” was just a digital minstrel show and saying nigger out loud.

It’s not used for anything worthwhile, it just copies other art styles, it can’t innovate. It’s slop.

>>520233949
Intention: create picture of big boob fox girl
Desire: coom
AI art is real art confirmed

>>520234505
>Sailor Mars is best girl, btw
you have stated the actual truth

>>520236332
Nice. Like I said you can do it on a shittier computer than you might think.

Progressives sure do hate progress.

>want to support AI to piss off lefty cucks
>don't want to side with pajeets
what is the solution to this conundrum?

>>520233563
You think your brain doesn't execute millions mathematical operations & estimation when you draw?

>>520232868 (OP)
Because it means you have to actually be an exceptional artist to compete. Nomie artists can't compete with the speed at the quality it currently produces with enough iterations/proding. Most artists are mediocre and are fucking terrified they will literally have no chance against AI art. The only issue is without fresh human art to bolster the models AI won't progress anymore. AI will only be able to train on it's own creations and shit gets weird when it does. It's not perfect currently and it's easy to make slop if you don't manually fix stuff or keep iterating on the same image which burns credits.

>>520236580
I have a deterministic framework that you might find interesting.
>>Ashkenazi Jews have a 112 verbal IQ, but a 92 spatial IQ - an 8 points lower visual IQ then the European average
>The same trend is seen in converts.
>This was proposed in the famous 2005 Cochrane study about their high IQ, and was used to explain why Jews dominate Law and Academia, but are absent in Engineering
>A study by Rahman in 2003 found that females and gay men have a similar verbal dominant brain, whereas lesbians and straight men have high spatial intelligence
>They wondered if the visuospatial mind is the male hunting brain that models reality in the right hemisphere - compared to the "talkative female brain" of the left hemisphere designed for the village
>A 2016 study by Mueller found that female transexuals given testosterone exhibited increased right-hemisphere activity during mental rotation tasks
>So: Ashkenazis, Females, and Homosexuals have girl coded wordcel brains - but Europeans, Men, Lesbians, and Transsexuals on gear have a more hunter shape rotator brains
>The Jewish religions - Judaism, Christianity, Islam - all have a streak of hating icons, and making God abstract, textual, and a moral teacher
>European artistic movements - Athens and the Italian Renaissance - produce high fidelity shape rotator art, that teaches no law, but imposes the majesty of its presence

>>520236170
Childless women never advance beyond the maiden archetype, so younger women never stop being sexual competition. Happily married women with children advance to the mother archetype and eventually to the crone archetype once their children are grown. That evolution is complete once they are satisfied enough with how fruitful their lives were. They no longer base their value on their youth, sexuality, and beauty, but rather on what they were able to create with it. If a woman achieves this she actually becomes wise for the first time in her life post menopause ( the first time in her life where her hormones permit her to think rationally like a man and actually self reflect on her life) Your grandmother was the fantastic lady she was because she was among the last generation of women to advance through these phases of life. Boomer women onward have had this natural evolution permanently stunted by feminism and sexual liberation.

>>520233345
to be fair, the bar is going through her neck

>>520234583
Those are cool
Although I haven’t fucked in it for a while it was cool to see what fucked up shit it would come up with

>>520237247
Kek I didn't even see that good catch

>>520236825
You sound like a farmer from the 19th century
> This "machine" can barely sow the land, and it needs gasoline. It will never work, trust me.

200 years later, we got self driving cars and fuckin spaceships that land back on earth. And guess what, it's exponential.

>>520235546
I hate lefties and I hate AI art, it doesn't have to do anything with political stances in fact what you said is prime low IQ retardation

>>520237046
Perhaps. But when the final product is finished, there aren't leftovers of your faulty calculations left in conspicuous parts of the picture, that clearly make no sense. AI suffers from that problem, and I doubt it will be solved anytime soon without humans editing the AI-produced result in order to remove those chunks of nonsense. I guess one could argue that humans make mistakes, but again, those humans subsequently remove those mistakes. AI is incapable of doing that because it has no fundamental understand of what it's doing. It's just making calculations. It has no concept of beauty, reality, or style.

>>520237229
My mother is in her 70s and she resisted the mind virus that was feminism and liberalism. She thinks these younger women are stupid for falling for the lies of the media so easily. Then again she grew up in the south in the 50s and 60s So the environment was not the same as in California or New York of that time.

>>520237507
Xhe already posted here under a different IP. They're one of those cowards who try to obfuscate their ideology to stop you from labeling them as a deplorable; that, and to call you stupid.

>>520232868 (OP)
I tell them the same thing these trust fund babies said to coal miners: learn to code

More of that red-haired girl for your viewing pleasure.

>>520237694

Any art is imperfect by nature. All works are riddled with errors, such as straight lines which are never actually straight. It's all artificial, and your brain just fill the gap to make them look credible.

The future will consist of millions AI agents specialized in specific sub-tasks working together, like hivemind. I can't see how it couldn't correct any error in such setup.

Also beauty, reality and style is just a product of your environment. You can find something beautiful, and someone on the other side of the planet say it's dogshit slop. Art if not about beauty anyway, since we basically covered everything that reproduce reality since the invention of photography. That's why modern art focus on the concept, to transcend material which became boring.

If I can take a dump and present it as art for the concept, there's no reason to present AI hallucination as such too. This is basically checkmate in terms of logic.

So if it's not about art, it's about something else. Back to my other post. It's about control.

>>520236580

"real" artists priced themselves out of the market.
Even students at art schools expect $50 for a simple drawing. If they aren't professional they'll fuck it up with their politics. Meanwhile AI art makes what you want. No political bullshit, no judgement, no bartering.
I want a kitsune running a book store for a DND campaign. I'm not paying $75+ for this simple prop.

Anyone with creativity or an appreciation for art recognizes it as a glimpse into the human soul and that such things can greatly help us understand each other and even make life a little bit better. Naturally this means right wing people embrace AI to get rebel against liberals since creativity is generally a left-leaning thing.
What's funny is it's another connection between conservatives and jeets since both groups wholeheartedly embrace AI and have made it part of their identity.

>>520239463
Art isn't about empathy you fucking faggot. Art isn't supposed to make you think or make you uncomfortable, fucking faggot slave. Kill yourself.

>>520232868 (OP)
Because it's cringe and boomer-coded

>>520239668
This is the mind of the average American. We don't care about abstract concepts that we aren't drawn to. If you try to force us to care, we tell you to fuck off in the least polite way possible.

>>520232868 (OP)
Xenophobia. AI is just doing the jobs Americans either can't do, or are too lazy to do.

>>520239880
Exactly. If artists want to get philosophical they can write a fucking book. Fuck these niggers and their subliminal messaging. Dean Ambrose is the best WWE character of all time.

>>520232868 (OP)
Because none of it is good

>>520239463
It's true just look at little apustaja, the mspaint miracle

>>520232868 (OP)
Oh wow another thinly veiled advertisement for AI, wonder why oh look at news always getting sued again and the court case is going forward. Everyone is getting scared of the AI bubble that's why we get all these Indians here. You only see these threads when something bad happens to AI

>>520239463
Creativity isn't left wing. Anyone can be creative. It's just the matter whether it's tied to realism (actual real world application) or dreaming up concepts. You're just taking practical applications for granted and don't acknowledge them as works of creativity while only acknowledging art as such.

>>520239238
>All works are riddled with errors, such as straight lines which are never actually straight.
False equivalence. You're comparing lines not being straight to nonsensical objects that no human being would concoct, patterns that are innately random and lacking in symmetry or consistency, and other errors that no human would create unless they were intoxicated or mentally ill.

>>520232868 (OP)
>pol
>obsesses over classical conservative art, namely old greek and nazi architecture and statues
>is 95% weebs, want anime and manga from japan and only japan to replace all entertainment and art right now

>also pol
>HAHAHA AI is BASED and TRAD and should replace all human art!

Which way? You can't have both, not in principal and values

Couple reasons.

1) Mad about being wrong. Back in the 50s every scifi writer thought we'd have humanoid robots but that we'd still be using slide-rules thousands of years in the future, most of the writers were libtards. Same thing today, except not its their entire lives which can be replaced by a computer running a large enough clipits program.

2) Loss of job security as many others have said. They thought those dirty tradesmen, minders, engineers, natural scientists, ect would be the ones getting replaced by robots. Turns out that all most of these faggots do it regurgitate and reformat the cultural context they've absorbed all their lives. And then of course they apply the lens of political correctness in order to publish it in the existing system which demands a specific set of morals. While billy joe bob mining coal from the side of a hill has to respond to unforeseen circumstances constantly including maintaining the machines.

3) Jews and their lackies(aware or unwitting) have run the entertainment industry for a century, originally because whites felt non-productive activity was not a priority. Now that anybody can make shit not only are they in danger of loosing money but also political control. If someone wants to make a racist product they can and it will likely sell well, it was selling well on youtube before they shut it down in 2017.

>>520233141
Those are two arguments in favor of AI:
1. AI drives soulless artists out if work, while masters will still trump the artistic capabilities of AI.
2. Search engine AI must improve alongside art-generating AI.

I hate ai cuz it's ugly slop

>>520241027
You're arguing with literal chatbots, that some advertisement firm sends over here. Normies don't care where art comes from AI is not really a big issue and no one really gives a damn about it, the only reason you get these threads is there's a literal Indian company that AI companies hire to drum up users and create buzz. They do the same thing on Reddit with a bunch of Lefty stuff where they talk about how AI art is going to let everyone create their dreams even if you're disabled and depressed or transgender. It is guerilla marketing strategy

>>520232868 (OP)
dunno lol

>>520241027
My values are that every superpower has a right to dispose of things that nine out of ten of its people don't appreciate. If we want digital art to cease to exist along with ugly statues and modern architecture, then we'll make that happen. It happens that AI is a tool for us to remove more of the aspects of life that we don't enjoy. If that means you, then yes; you will be disposed of.

>>520232868 (OP)
Combination of issues but the underlying cause is loudmouthed assblasted middling to shit tier libshit to full blown commie "artists" establishing a consensus through brute force and volume. Normalfags want to be in the club so they side with the group who appears to be the largest. Of course they don't realize initially that it's only a few thousand shrieking retards but by the time the smarter among them bothers to ask the question, the critical mass is already achieved and they all follow the herd.

>>520232868 (OP)
I dunno I think normies liked to have jobs and shit.

>>520240908

> nonsensical objects that no human being would concoct, patterns that are innately random and lacking in symmetry or consistency, and other errors that no human would
So you're basically saying AI can create art. And unique, adding to that.

I think the problem rely on your definition of "Art". If you think it's only renaissance paintings, then you need a massive update. Go to your local art museum, you'll see so much dumb and non-sense shit, that you'll glad AI actually exist.

It's all about concept, not actually drawing objects. Thus why it makes no sense to not define AI as art, since it's already a conceptual art on its own.

>>520239463
>liberals since creativity is generally a left-leaning thing.
Please they are congenital hall monitors who simply repeat what the kikes above them want to hear and only give the masses what they want begrudgingly. They shove their faggot shit into everything even when they know it is not wanted, they politicize art far more than any university churning out paintings for the Royal Navy or salon in Napoleonic France painting portraits marshals. Right wing white men encapsulate essentially all competent engineers, technicians, natural scientists who actually do need to think to solve problems rather than just puke up what they've been fed on command and slap the current year politics on top of a basic framework.

Right wing whites still see creating fictional content as a thing which should be done as a hobby. Many are also very selfish, I've written and run a dozen table top campaigns which the players claim were the best ever, i will never even attempt to publish them because they are mine and I do not want to share and they were tailored to the players. Making them appeal to a wider audience would only dilute them. This attitude was cultural standard up until the 20th century.

>>520232868 (OP)
Which episode was this?

Ai paintbrush apps will do fine, somebody start a company that does that and get rich

>>520241503
>So you're basically saying AI can create art.
No, I'm not, and at this point, it's evident you're just trolling.

>>520233563
Like any tool it is more useful in the hands of somebody who can already do the job without it. If you are an artist you could even train the AI in your own style thereby allowing it to vary its composition at your whim and you will know how to correct all the mistakes the program makes as well it introduce greater variance to the point that it may not even be recognizable as ai-assisted.

I've seen kids using ai to brainstorm concepts for Lovecraftian horror stories which are better than many of the shit entries which have been published over the years and are vastly superior to the recent entries. LIbtards have tried to coopt cosmic horror for almost two decades now and have failed every single time, because the very nature of the genre is antithetical to them. They introduce libtard themes and morality into a cosmogony which is fundamentally hostile to those things and entirely invalidates them if taken to any logical conclusion. Some 17 year old using ai to give him ideas for a short story and then use basic "writing for dummies" level reasoning to clean up and embellish concepts and passages generated by a computer produces results which while not masterful are at least not insulting or retarded at a base level.

And lets be clear all modern libtard art is social signaling and thus is correctly assessed by most viewers are disingenuous. Libtard/jew art isn't made by the passion of the artist in the first place, they are in fact little more than an organic version of the algorithms they hate. Why is essentially nothing new made except by crazy autists and intendents who had a personal vision and saw it through? Assuming AI continues to improve it will only allow more of these capable but time constrained individuals to rise up and display their quality to the world. If they AI can remove 90% of the work which goes into coded a new boomer-shooter which some nerd wants to make but cannot because he has a job and family I see no problem.

>>520242091
You literally defined an art work with your simple, yet precise, words when describing AI.
Now you try resolve that cognitive dissonance. Good, go ahead, but don't project that on me.

Come back with an argument.

>>520242410
You came back with the argument that literally any bullshit is art, and that is one of the most bullshit arguments in history. You doubled down by claiming all the bullshit "modern art" that largely exists for money laundering purposes also constitutes art, which furthers the aforementioned bullshit arguments. If I take a shit on a paper plate, and claim it's art, and you agree with me, you are an unserious person.

>>520233269
Why is Tim Pool one of the four evil clowns

>>520242536
So AI is not art, modern art is not art. Anything else is not art? Let me guess, if it's not "beautiful" it's not art?

You should open a tumblr with a compilation of your throughts.

bumping cuz making something

>>520242786
>So AI is not art
I said the nonsensical objects created by a system that takes estimations of data sets and makes mathematical models based on the averages are not art. Again, you're a troll reducing the specifics of arguments to glib overgeneralizations. You are consistently disingenuous.

>>520232868 (OP)
Just malding tranny fartists.

>>520233141
>, the average retard can't come up with anything even remotely interesting.
When have you ever come up somethinf that is even remotely interesting? I'm waiting

Art is supposed to show you something new, not harden the crust calcifying the entire surface of your brain

>>520232868 (OP)
pajeet coded

>>520243454
Brevity is the soul of wit, after all

>>520232868 (OP)
Faggot normies who used to plaster their art all over the internet and desperate for people to be "inspired by" (copy) their art or commission are now mad that machines are doing exactly that, and can do it faster and cheaper.

They also seethe that they can't gatekeep creativity.

I just made a fairimon Nagatoro because I wanted it. Took me 10 minutes of prompting. I'd spend longer than that to find someone to commission, wait for them to make it, make revisions -- and of course, pay more.

This is the modern day version of painters seething at the first cameras.

>>520243518
:(

Don't do that, it's dirty

>>520243051
> nonsensical objects created by a system that takes estimations of data sets and makes mathematical models based on the averages are not art
Thank you for sharing a glimpse of your next Art Tumblr publication. BTW, good job you just defined the human brain.

Regarding your different attacks (false equivalence, reducing arguments), it's quite ironic coming from someone who only answer one specific point for each answers I provided.

What about AI being conceptual art by definition? What about beauty/reality/style not being a criteria to define art?

>>520243883
>Yes I'm a smug disingenuous faggot that gets uppity like a nigger when my glib generalizations are called out and your actual positions are stated clearly
I know.

>>520243971
You're calling us out for that?

>>520237507
>200 years later, we got self driving cars and fuckin spaceships that land back on earth.
BTW we don't have either of these, you fucking dolt. We have prototype self driving cars that are so unreliable that no insurance company on Earth will back them, the Space Shuttle has been retired for nearly 15 years, and the craft used by companies like Virgin and Blue Origin so far are nothing more than toys for the super-rich to reach the technical definition of space for 20 minutes so they can brag at their next cocktail party. It becomes evermore clear that you, in fact, are the normie here.

>>520232868 (OP)
they're sick of brown turd worlders flooding the internet with slop

>>520243650
I will cross-breed Japanese children's cartoon girls with lingerie-clad sexy japanese children's cartoon women and masturbate to it and there's nothing you can do to stop me.

The future is now.

>>520244039
>us
Huh.

>>520244217
yeah, nah

>>520233141
90% of "art" is derivative shit regardless of whether a human or AI created it.
Most modern "atrists" are also nepo babies or children of the elite as well which is why most creative industries have been bankrupt since the 90s.

>>520232868 (OP).

AI creates very White Art, so White that the Whites from the Earth are a fucking joke of a species.

>>520232868 (OP)
@/pol/ why:
quantity > quality
- the thread

>>520233319
slop et circenses

>>520232868 (OP)
>Why do normies hate AI art?
because they are not autistic reptile brain coomers

>>520243971
I see the cognitive dissonance is still strong. Good luck with that!

Because they're all shitty artists who think AI is taking their jerbs. Some of them it is taking their jerbs but that's the way of progress. Same as the steam engine, the printing press, the combine harvester, etc etc etc etc. It's a story as old as time.

>>520233777
>cute domestic goblin, docile and cleanly
>will only produce goblin daughters with human men
>will grow huge tits to feed them, butt stays slim

>>520235047
>crazy wild goblin straight from the dungeons
>will fuck you in the ass, bend over now
>will grow a huge ass no matter what you do
What is this crazy world I woke up to.

normies actually think theres a AI bubble lmfao

like nigga im sure AI will pop just like the television huh

>>520244174
Damn, a second 19th century farmer!

> It will never work! It still need a stamp the document!!!11!!
I think we now have the proof it requires 3 figures IQ to make a model projection.

FYI, planes were invented 100 years ago.