>>520302200
22. False equivalence – It equates scientific theories (which are evidence-based) with faith-based beliefs as if both were equally testable “worldviews.”
23. Middle ground fallacy – It suggests the truth must lie “somewhere between” atheism and theism, as though compromise determines fact.
24. Appeal to consequences – It argues that life would be meaningless without God, therefore God must exist.
25. Reification (concretizing the abstract) – It treats “sin,” “evil,” or “faith” as literal cosmic forces rather than human concepts.
26. Moralistic fallacy – It assumes something is true because it ought to be comforting or morally good if it were true.
27. Argument from personal incredulity – It insists, “I can’t imagine how the universe came from nothing, so God must’ve done it.”
28. Equivocation – It shifts the meaning of words like “faith,” “truth,” or “theory” mid-argument to blur logical scrutiny.
29. Appeal to nature – It claims belief in God is “natural” or instinctive, as if that alone makes it true.
30. Texas sharpshooter fallacy – It cherry-picks fulfilled prophecies or coincidences while ignoring the countless failed ones.
31. Appeal to perfection – It argues that divine teachings must be perfect and any apparent flaws are due to human misunderstanding.
32. False cause (non causa pro causa) – It claims prayer heals or divine intervention saves, without ruling out natural explanations or coincidence.
33. Appeal to anecdote – It presents personal religious experiences as universal proof rather than subjective perception.
34. Cherry-picking (suppressed evidence) – It highlights verses or stories that seem moral or profound while ignoring the violent, absurd, or contradictory ones.
35. Moving the goalposts – When confronted with disproof, it redefines what “counts” as evidence for God to keep the belief unfalsifiable.
11/1/2025, 1:14:19 AM
No.520301737
[Report]
>>520301871
>>520301946
>>520302619
>>520304513
>>520306298
>>520306665
>>520307169
>>520307237
>>520307255
>>520307369
