Thread 520318273

Imagine suddenly having to use your last name at the tender age of 65.

>>520318273 (OP)
He should raise an army in rebellion and retake the throne but he won't because he's a bitch.

>>520318273 (OP)
We should give him honorary pol knighthood.

>>520318273 (OP)
And why DID he give up his royal title again? I've been working like a dog and haven't kept up with this. Is it Epstein related?

>>520318273 (OP)
I dont understand
why are they doing this to him?
epstein didnt traffic anyone to anyone saar

>had life handed to you easily on a golden platter
>goes and fucks kids
what illness is this called?

>>520318521
Last time it was giving up additional titles like Duke of York. This time, Charles is forcibly taking all of his status. He can't even be called "Prince" anymore. The Bong royals likely knew about what Andrew did in detail before. The punishment is for doing it so carelessly, it now can't be PR-managed at all.

>>520318694
Does Charles have any "real power" in the UK? Like, can he just launch a nuke? You're talking to a high school dropout here...

>>520318658
minmaxxing

>>520318521
The book by Virginia guiffre is coming out, and there are stories leaking about him fucking 40 boys and girls in Thailand over a week

>>520318273 (OP)
Even his real name sounds like royalty. I'm sure he is doing just fine anyway.

>>520318658
>17
>kid
Choose wisely, femoid.

>>520318978
Nah. The royal family is really for show. They're VIP's and the royal bloodline runs through them, but parliament and the prime minister run the show, along with the kikes.

>>520318273 (OP)
I guess he will start scrounging around Hollywood now looking for some easy work.

>>520318978
he could but he wont. he has the power to dissolve government i think and take over that way.

Fucked a 17 year old which is legal in the UK. They've got nothing on him, should have just told his brother to go fuck himself. All because of that schizo slag Giuffre who used to get her cuck boyfriend to drop her off to Epstein sex parties and got paid.

>>520319480
Go to bed, Mr. Windsor.

>>520319517
I mean, he's not wrong...

>>520319313
Yeah but like this Anon said>>520319454
>he could

CAN he though? Like, dude just says "bomb Finland" and would he have to get some kind of approval, or would they just bomb Finland? Even if they "won't" are they supposed to?

>>520319600
Parliament controls the Army, King /technically/ controls the RAF and Navy

>>520318372
Yep. Like his whole family.

>>520319682
Even the royal units?

>>520319600

No, though the military is loyal to the Sovereign.

What the British Monarch has are Reserve Powers. Parliament has what powers were supposedly given by the King, with the King reserving certain powers and privileges.

>>520318978
No not really. It used to be that Parliament required Royal Assent where the crown would need agree to some new legislation or policy proposed before it became law. Now it's generally just waived through with the constitutional monarchy just a big meme. Everyone is owned by Rothschilds and has been for hundreds of years.

>>520319834
Yeah since the English Civil War and Parliament forming the Army, every new Parliament has to create a law recreating the Army.

>>520318273 (OP)
>A man that grew up thinking he is better than everyone else has to get a regular job.

>>520319957
Can the Monarch still dissolve Parliament?

>>520320162
Technically, yes, but only at the advice of the Prime Minister so really, no.

>>520318273 (OP)
more of his victims come forward everyday
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJGMGyfKd6M

>>520318273 (OP)
They're actually Rothschilds