>>81494356
I definitely conceptualize this system as creating a new gender. Unlike women, men can be both active AND passive participants in sex, so it doesn't make sense that they're classed as just one sexual role.
I am against trannies, for a similar reason to you. I believe that a lot of people assume that when a man takes on a passive role, he "becomes" a woman. In fact, I think he becomes a new thing, neither man nor woman. It is impossible for a man to become a woman, and if he tries, he will only bring misery to himself and others. I believe that is in fact happening in the trans community today.
The big issue is how we actually achieve this in a world where only a small portion of men (like you) are willing to be made into bottoms. As I said, I think it's wrong to do it with force. I think the best option is to have a second sexual revolution, where we start with a small community of people who live in the four-person family unit I described and that as people see how preferable that is, the culture shifts until it becomes normal. I'm considering writing a story based on this idea, and in that story there is also a class of people who don't participate, and everyone just lets them do their thing because who cares? They're not allowed to hold power though, that's reserved for tops.
