Thread 81626339

I think rape fantasies are weird and I think you're all weirder for activley wanting to rape someone

CNC doesnt count because its literally in the name, consent is there

>>81626339 (OP)
What about wanting to be the one brutally raped and tortured?

Its only ever cnc, not rape. Anyone that activley says they want to rape someone online is either a fat virgin incel or genuinley tapped in the head.

If a normal person ever says they have that fantasy its pretty much only ever cnc

>>81626339 (OP)
its a dom thing, you wouldn't get it

>>81626368
Fucking weird! Because you probably dont actually mean that, you probably mean rough cnc with someone you find hot

>>81626339 (OP)
blame god. he made it that way. when a girl cries i get a boner.

>>81626382
>its a dom thing
Can you genuinley explain then? And like I said not in a cnc context where its been agreed in advance to be rough. But pure, illegal, horrific and traumatising rape

>>81626406
if women didnt actively run from sex and/or make it too hard to get sex from them, rape would not have evolved as a male instinct. women run from it to make you prove your man enough to outrun them, outstrength them, and finally mate with them.

i own chickens. if you observe roosters and hens the hens will run from the roosters all day long and be raped 20x per day. but after the rooster chases them for 60 seconds or so and is finally only 2 feet from getting them, the hen bows down and lets it happen.

its nature's shit test. testing your physically able to do it and have the mercilessness to survive nature's fucked up wrath.

>>81626440
this is the same reason women start random arguments and drama with men, to make you beat them to prove your man enough to put them in their place which shows you are strong and merciless and quick to violence which historically has made you a better protector and they need to test your abilities once in a while to make sure you haven't lost your edge as a protector.

women literally start arguments with men in hopes the man will slap the shit out of them. (consciously or instinctively)

>>81626339 (OP)

Lol, you can't handle the way the world really is. This is the age of the blackpill. Get with the program!

>>81626440
>>81626461
likewise this is why men are strong and women are weak. because the strongest/fastest men are more likely to successfully rape and the weakest/slowest women are more likely to get caught.

women can't really understand how the world really is. there's a legitimate study which shows not only do they have 10% less brain mass, but 50% less synaptic density, and 20% less neurons, (0.9 x 0.5 x 0.8 = 0.36) meaning women's brains are only 36% as complex as a man's.

>>81626648
Now, you are just making shit up. All the studies I can see is about men making up the most retarded and smartest of the group with women being more in the middle having fewer outliners.

>>81626765
the study is 30+ years old which makes it legit, modern studies are just propaganda

>>81626785
Fucking amazing, you think all new studies are modern propaganda and only old ones are legit despite modern studies having more information and data to go with?

>>81626839
...yes. literally that is the case. look up "the reproducibility crisis" that scentists are saying is a new modern problem. 90% of new scientific studies can't be replicated by peers...because they're fake studies.

>>81626503
I am really curious to know what happens when someone rapes your mother. Or maybe you want to rape your mother(or sister if you have one?)

>>81626898
No shit there is reproducibility crises(even if that is a tad bit overblown). That dosen't mean jackshit when old studies have been straight up shit when it comes to biology in the past. Unless the old scientific papers are about mathematics or to a larger extent physics, take it with a grain of salt.

>>81626989
>when it comes to biology in the past
what are we talking about here, you think women can have penises or what?

>>81626901

Why would you be curious about that? What about my post incited this criticism disguised as specific curiosity?

>>81626989
>when it comes to biology in the past
what are we talking about here, you think women can have penises or what? modern science says they can, i consider that a win for my claim modern science is bullshit compared to the scientific golden age of 1900-1980

>>81627041
Cause even if what you is true(Not that I disagree with everything you wrote, that images just sems like a lot simpler with a little bit of truth here and there) that can be attributed to everything that happens in this world from child abuse, molestation of infants, niggers doing crime, female infanticide, bacha bazi(afganistan). Every single shit can be attributed to some shit from the past by showing some chain of events.

I generally see these kind of posts from someone that does not take rape seriously at all and had never needed to worry about any of his family members being in any kind of danger from rape. Maybe you are not that kind of person and I just assumed wrong.

>>81627064
I don't think biological women can have penisis(well a very very few are intersex so some fo have). Your scientific golden age can only really be called the scientific golden age for physics

>>81626404
This is youse

>>81627220

okay, well, i don't condone rape, but it is something women like on some level. there is a difference between the brutal rapes of niggers and rapes out of the desire for companionship or a state of obsession btw. women fantasize about the latter two as long as the rape does not incur permanent physical damage which is what niggers and indians do.

>>81627575
Sure, rape fantasy is pretty common among women but that shit becomes becomes horrid real fast even in cases where no permanent physical damage occurs(if you are talking about actual rape and not some cnc play between couples). Rape that women fantasize about goes in a really specific chain of events that does not happen in reality. It's like the fantasy of war that a lot men have untill real shit hits the fan and you get some lifelong ptsd that never leaves till you die.

Are there some that actually want rape and war shit to happen? Sure, but they are really really small minority of those within that group.

>>81626339 (OP)
90% of women would choose to marry a 7 feet tall drug addicted rapist who just got out of prison after raping and cannibalizing a toddler instead of picking an average dude.

>>81626765
>Now, you are just making shit up. All the studies I can see is about men making up the most retarded and smartest of the group with women being more in the middle having fewer outliners.
here are 3 studies that say "male brains are 9% bigger, 13% more neuron density, and 33% more synaptic density" aligning almost perfectly with my memorized numbers earlier. sucks to be indoctrinated by woke nu-science but these studies from 25+ years ago are more reliable than your modern bullshit fake studies funded by woke jews.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10073431/
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0803652105
https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article-abstract/58/3/217/2609732?redirectedFrom=fulltext

>>81627986
this means the female brain is only 61% as complex as a male brain

>>81627730

what is rough sex an analogue for? rape. women fantasize about rape so much precisely because they want it. it's like with men who want a big tiddy goth gf. you think if there was a button that would magically make a big tiddy goth gf show up they wouldn't push it? shit, i'd push it 20 fucking times, have a whole harem of big tiddy goth bitches. but women don't want their sometimes hyperspecific rape fantasies to happen? bullcrap. they give themselves up to invaders via a known phenomenon called horizontal collaboration which was put on full display in France during WW2. sure, the ladies put up a little fight, but just to make sure you're really a dominant man because real submission is not given but taken.

>it's just a fantasy

what could be more honest than what makes a woman cum?

>>81627889

i see you met ray and jason.

>>81627986
>>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10073431/

Dude, that study basically concludes with Males having more neurons packed into a similar cortical volume but also show females compensate with it by having greater neuropil development which suggest enhanced interneuronal communication capacity. Also the sample size for that study is kinda small with only 6 males and 5 females. Not to say that it simply bares it from any value but do take that into account.

Also, females exhibited a higher connectivity potential per unit volume in that study.

>>81626580
isn't this not how genetics work? a strong man + weak woman = a mid daughter or son

>>81626503
>Wall of text justifying invading someone's privacy
Not reading all that

>>81628322

u don't need to read it when u justify every day with your vagina, you dumb cunt.

>>81628068
What the fuck are you talking about? I literally said that the rape that happens in those hyperspecific circumstance which women fantasize about would want to happen in real life. But like I said those hyperspecific fantasies don't happen like in real life. Real rape is very fucking different from rape. Women that fantasize about the real horrid rape shit are very few. Your big tiddy goth gf comparision is fucking garbage. That's like women fantasizing about a billionaire chad that falls in love with her despite her being plain. I already fucking gave you the example of fucking war there. Men fantasize a shitton about war and being heroes in it but that has nothing to do with real war. You would get a shitton of ptsd in real war until you die.

>>81628068
Also, horizontal collaboration. Holy shit you are actually taking this shit serious. That was fucking war and
>>but just to make sure you're really a dominant man because real submission is not given but taken.
How fucking mentally braindead you are to think that? A lot of those women were coerced through rape or economic desperation. Sure did collaborated but that was not the fucking majority.

>>81626339 (OP)
>I think rape fantasies are weird and I think you're all weirder for activley wanting to rape someone
Most rape fantasies are women wanting to be raped because they are closer to animals than human

>>81627986
>https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.0803652105
My fucking sides. This study was done on fucking epilepsy patients. Holy shit, so this is what makes old study more reliable huh?

>>81626339 (OP)
I can't into rape fantasy, doesn't do it for me. When I fantasize about a woman I imagine that we are in love and deeply infatuated with each other and we have only just found out the mutual nature of this. In a moment of extreme passion we tear off each other's clothes and make passionate love where she begs me to cum inside of her, begs me to impregnate her.
That's HOT

>>81628454

if they didn't voluntarily collaborate, why were their head shaven?

>>81628536
Holy fucking shit. You know that those garbage shit was frequently orchestrated by vigilantes (many with dubious resistance credentials) rather than official courts, right? I am genuily terrified of your mother if that's what your thinking is like.

>>81626339 (OP)
It's maladaptation to a certain broad I knew getting raped, it makes me feel gross but it feels so good.