there's literally no reason not to make AI images and video illegal. they contribute nothing and have many negative effects. if you disagree you're probably indian or spiritually indian.

>>81700557 (OP)
I mean if I generate gay porn featuring you and a black man, and then share it online, you might start to see it as a problem. As long as there is a clear watermark, it wouldn't matter though

>>81700557 (OP)
>let's argue in bad faith where I claim you're a caricature if you disagree with me
yeah nah kys

>>81700806
you're spiritually indian

God I love my a.i. slop

>>81700557 (OP)
Turn your computer off if you don't like it. Go touch grass as they say

Why is a.i. slop so good?
Stop clinging to your flesh anon, it will only decay and wither, accept the strength and certainty of steel instead.

>>81700557 (OP)
OP you have it backwards... it is in fact the OPPOSITE! abolish copyright! abolish the civil rights act! no moar gubment that exists only to RAPE US of our souls!!!

I agree, but considering the advancement of AI at a rapid pace, there should still be legible disclaimers on AI generated content stating they're made with AI. We should not sacrifice transparency for creativity.

>>81700557 (OP)
Its helping vagabonds forcing them to get real jobs anon