>>82148442
I did read this, and I enjoyed my time doing so.
It was really fun to even think about something like this and a lot of points do make sense if examined from only one perspective.
I would propose that you take into consideration the way women enjoy how a man ignores their horse shit and takes charge in an immovable way. They set up these shit tests as a way to make sure that a man is secure and not shakable, and when he proves himself, they like him even more. A lot of the "against their own self interest" behavior could be explained by this phenomenon where they set up an illogical situation for a man to dismantle it and set it straight.
A lot of what women want from a man is for him to do a certain act without her explicitly saying so. Saying the thing they want "breaks the spell" in a sense and nullifies all the build up, that's why they never directly tell men what they want, because it's build up for a man to fulfil that fantasy.
This entire movement of feminism and equality could be just one massive shit test that allows a man to come in and just tell a woman to shut up and make love to her against a wall.
Have you seen the amount of smut and porn literature women write? The undocumented fantasies about men that they think about without telling anyone?
I do see the logic in the foreign DNA theory but it does not fit in with the fact that women do fantasize about men and do like getting their fantasies fulfilled.
Even women who got impregnated and gave birth do come back for more. If your theory was true then most mother would swear off men and sex after the first kid
