>>82148378
>0 divorces, 3+ children, 60 year long stable marriages.
This lasts for 2-3 generations at best before women breach containment and you are forced to start conceding pieces of the system, all of which then will be utilized against you to accelerate the process of dismantling society.
This happened hundreds of times before and it will keep happening forever because women just don't feel "right" in this environment.

Women will always despise men and they will never accept a society in which they have to share space with them. They will never think of men as their own people, it's not possible.

Women have a visceral hatred of men and it's just easier and better to let them go their way if they prefer. Everyone's better off.

What do you think of this hypothesis? Is it worth exploring?

>>82145822
>it's le new heckin' internet feminism
Just for that, I'm compelled to drop it again.

What do you think of this hypothesis? Do you have anything to add to it? Do you categorically reject the idea?

If you have any relevant papers that I haven't yet read, feel free to drop their title or pubmed ID/DOI and I will read it.