Thread 82156242

What has made you a blackpilled misogynist?

There have been a couple things for me. First of all, just interacting with women and seeing how they behave/talk about men has done much. It's usually the guy's face and height that get mentioned. I have seen Chads that can easily get women despite having no other redeemable qualities. Women have probably taken advantage of me because of my kindness.

Furthermore, arguing with women is akin to trying to reason with a dog. Most people are emotional idiots who will never change their mind anyways, but women can barely argue/debate, at least men are good at their arguing. They never see their own hypocrisy, and when they're losing an argument they resort to insults or making claims as if they're the solid truth. My favorite example is when women bring up male crime statistics then never explain racial crime statistics, just shows how emotionally driven they are.

I've seen plenty of studies showing support for blackpill claims. Dating app data, height data, etc.

The final major point I'll make is that from what I've seen, my idea of love and most women's idea of love is are completely different. Women's idea of love seems to be swearing fealty to a guy because he's hot.

I have forgotten a bunch so I may add some posts underneath

Being alive teaches the Blackpill. As for being a misogynist, I don't have to bother with that really. It's energy that I don't see benefit from wasted on engaging with women, and quite often women make their own lives awful without me or anyone else having to do anything.

They haven't really blacked pilled me entirely just yet. It's more of my own nature that is the problem. I don't see myself being able to even get in a relationship it's too hard and complicated and full of stress. Luckily for me I've been able to put up with it so far most of my life and it doesn't bother me much. Unironically just having a close friend that is a girl sounds like a better time than one for an intimate relationship and how much work that involves getting and keeping one.

>>82156242 (OP)
>What has made you a blackpilled misogynist?
>misogynist
No such thing, but I'll humor you:
2007 I learned of PUA, the following year I read a bunch of books and watched tons of pirated videos/bootcamps/etc. I wrote down the "tactics" and pick up lines that made most sense and just tried them out.
To this day one particular tactic has never failed me to make friends, get pussy, or get invited to a random party (with noone I know there).
Women are literally automatons.

>>82156575
Ok. Dont be a turd and share it with the class.

>>82156575
Yeah buddy share it up

>>82156242 (OP)

A bunch of things, but the overarching point was how well human - in this case, female behavior, and in the context of romance - can be tied to Darwinism. Everything about the woman's sexuality is brutally Darwinian despite whatever moralizing and virtue-signaling crap you'll hear them spout to save face - also a Darwinian quality by the way since the absolute worst outcome for a physically weak, dependent creature like a woman is to out herself from the community/tribe.

I think the most brutal pill is the dark triad pill though. Women select for dominance but dominance is correlated with evil. There is enough of a correlation between the two that women evolved also a preference for evil which is being used as a marker for the true trait which is dominance. Evolution said to the woman that it was better for her to tolerate a little bit of evil from a man in exchange for the protection his dominance provided rather than die because a weak man couldn't protect her and her genes in the form of offspring from tigers or barbarians. Worse yet, a similar correlation exists between kindness and weakness which need not be a 1:1 correlation to generate a disaffinity for kindness. We also see regression to the mean in that evolution isn't perfect so some women have evolved genes for men that can and often do kill them like general serial killers or women-specific serial killers which is why women send them love letters and men can't seem to understand why. Crazy, huh? Most women don't go this far with their bad-boy preference though which is where the "regression to the mean" part comes in because that's not only what we would expect to see from female serial-killer-loving genes self-pruning out of the gene pool but it is in fact what we actually see. It is a spectrum, but from the high school star quarterback jock that bullies nerds to the criminal biker gang member, most women like some flavor of mild to moderate bad boy. It's in their romance novels after all.

>>82156242 (OP)
I lost 80 pounds and went on dates with more than 100 women and slept with a lot of them. They were all basically evil and needlessly cruel, bragging about hurting others and exploiting others.

>>82156659

Self-reply, but see pic-related for an example of male behavior tied to this statement:

>jock that bullies nerds

Keep in mind that pic-related book passage was written by a woman for women and was the female author's idea or interpretation of what goes on inside Chad's dominant, dark-triad brain. Take special note of how the male love interest physically and behaviorally out-mogs the beta that bumps into him even though it was his fault for suddenly coming to a stop in the middle of a walkway. All of this is a testament to my theories from the horse's own mouth.

>>82156695

Example 2, same chapter (chapter 2) from Haunting Adeline by H.D. Carlton.

>>82156659
>>82156695
So you're saying that we should abuse women?

>>82156584
>>82156635

5 questions game by Neil Strauss and Mystery's group approach method. Goes like this:
>walk by group of 3-4 people
>just before walking past them turn naturally towards them as if you remembered something, spontanically (better practice this somewhere neutral lel)
>If you catch anyone's eye - say any ONE of the following
>"Have I seen you somewhere?"
>"Hey, can I get an unbiased opinion real quick?" (proceed with jealous/cheating gf routine(Mystery method book has like 20 of these))
>Once you get them talking transition to play the 5 questions game
>Frame it as a dare to play for a drink
>Explain the rules thoroughly
>Doesn't have to be against your target, can also be against an antagonistical guy/bitchfriend of target
Out of 100+ games I've only lost once so idk what to really do when ya lose, apart from just buying the drink.
>win, get free drink
If you win and they refuse to buy that drink, sometimes someone else from inside the group will call them out on it - that's your new friend right there (They like you). If they don't buy the drink, and noone cajoles them to get you that drink - it's best not to continue, just wish them a good night or something.
That's it. At this point you should have enough conversational info to keep it going. If you did it right (for me it was 4/5) the group likes you already.
I've not known a single guy/girl who has known about this game prior to playing it. Never been called out on these tactics, told that it's pickup or whatever.

>>82156723

>No, Neo, I'm saying that when you're Chad, you won't have to.

Just kidding. In seriousness, it's a cheap form of dominance, so I suppose you could if you wanted to maximize your raw appeal to a woman's pussy. The caveat is that you need to be sufficiently attractive or the halo effect will just paint you as a monster instead of as an assertive alpha. Perhaps a workaround to this is lowering your standard of woman enough that to her, relatively speaking, you are effectively Chad. The problem is that would require significant levels of dumpster diving for the average normie-tier man.

I would not recommend dark-triad-maxxing though because it's immoral and can land you in jail or with serious injuries from another man if you aren't "that guy" if you will. Men have rationality and a capacity to self-govern that women do not which is how we were able to found civilization. I believe we should exercise those qualities, perhaps even at the expense of getting laid, although no one would blame a young, red-blooded male for succumbing to some of the lusts of the woman.

>>82156778
>>82156584
>>82156635


5 questions game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro6T1PIpKWQ (take note around 1:35-1:50)
Mystery method "Need a female opinion real quick/Can you help me?" gambit: Can't find the vid so I'll describe:
>Hey, Can you guys(girls) help me out? I need relationship advice real quick
>My friend has a girlfriend and he really loves her, but last week I think I saw her here making out with some guy. I don't know what to do, should I tell him or is it not really any of my business?
9/10 if you use this on a group of 3-4 chicks they will start arguing among themselves. Just ask them to explain their reasoning as they argue, and as you eventually get to consensus just do a:
>"Phew! Glad you helped me with that, you gals from around here?"
and just keep going.
OR
Thank them and come back later to play the 5 questions game.
>Hey, thanks for helping me there, my name's *** btw.

>>82156778
Does this work if you're ugly and socially retarded

>>82156802
For pussy idk, but it will definitely work to get yourself a social circle. Whether I got pussy one night or another seemed completely random. But I made such a huge social circle after 6 months that I couldn't ever go out on a Friday night without meeting a familiar face.
I'm average everything so I can't exactly tell you one way or the other desu.

>>82156778
This works for you because you're chad, not because of anything you're saying or doing. You're just attractive. Attractive people live on tutorial mode.

>>82156801
I know this is fake because real women wouldn't argue about this, they would just say "it's okay for women to cheat" because they hate men.

>>82156966
I've been bullied throughout highschool, and outside of it. I didn't spend years figuring out social dynamics for the fun of it my guy. If I hadn't went down this rabbithole I'd still be a virgin.
>>82156987
It's what worked circa 2009, there's more routines though. 5 question game still works Today.

>>82156242 (OP)
It's westernized women who never had to struggle that act like this. The vast majority of them are whiny bitchy narcissists

>>82156671
And you absorbed most of their cruelty and evilness when you fused your soul with theirs.

As a boy and a young man, I was very sensitive, quiet, and introverted. I also tended to take things at face value. Since I grew up in the 1990s, that means I absorbed all of the feminist messaging that was super common then.

>Treat women with respect.
>If you do well in school and get a good job, women will like you.
>Women just want to be with nice, good guys.
>Women want to be treated equally.
>Women like men who take care of them!

And all that bullshit. Of course, being a dumb kid, I believed it. A decade and a half or so passes, so it's the late 2010s. I'm nearing my 30s, I've had very little experience with women and very little success. No one ever really could give me any advice. I had never really had any sort of courage to go and approach women, but eventually I built some up for two I knew from college.

The first, after we hung out again for a while for the first time in a few years told me that she just realized that night she was a lesbian. I get that she can't help it and that she didn't mean it as an insult, but, a bit of a blow to the ego.

I went out with the second one. It didn't work out either.

Again, no one could tell me what I needed to do differently. As far as I could tell, I was doing exactly what I had always been told with as much success as you might gather.

I spent a while thinking about this and came to the realization that people only seemed to want me around when I was doing stuff for them so, I stopped doing stuff for them and they all disappeared, as you might guess. I got into the redpill stuff, lost a bunch of weight, became a much nastier person once I realized that everything I had been taught was a lie, and tried to remake my life over the next year.

>>82157942
Once I was in better shape, dressed better, and all that, I spent a year on Tinder. My goal was to have sex with a woman who weighed less than me. This should not be a problem seeing as I am very tall. I spent at least 40 hours a week on Tinder trying to set things up, swiping, and so on. I could go on a date a month, maybe, and wondered if my standards were the problem. So eventually I just tried to go out with anyone who would agree to it. Still extremely difficult to ever get a date and I never really managed to get any second dates or sex. I realized the redpill was bullshit, too.

I'm a tall, white dude with a full head of hair, a very good job, and, at this point, in decent shape. It's a full time job to even get a date a month with a woman who is twice my weight in a major US city. I eventually just realize that this is not working and I am wasting my time. So I give up because if I'm not even enough to meet the standards of even low quality women nowadays, who the hell is?

Haven't really been on dates in almost a decade. Likely never will. I have gotten even more bitter and even more nasty over the past few years, especially because the one friend who didn't abandon me the moment I stopped basically trying to bribe people into being my friend died.

>>82157942

Welcome to the desert... of the real.