Arguing with anti-incels and anti-blackpillers is a waste of time. Every argument goes the same way
>cite old data or cherrypick data that's convenient
>bring up constant red herrings and fallacious thinking
>assume that you're evil because you're an incel/blackpiller despite never having met you
>eventually they get frustrated and just start insulting the other person
>or they cave and admit that women are extremely selective but say "it's just natural selection" or "they have the right to be"

Don't waste your time with these people. Just hide their replies and move on with your day. They hate you for existing, no amount of data will change that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tjqpE_uVvk

>>82173058 (OP)
Very jewish thread, you should be ashamed of yourself

gem lmao

>>82173109
>whatever I don't like is Jewish
Expect nothing less from 4chan

>>82173058 (OP)
i've got to say all this natural selection shit is proving that darwin should have been burnt at the stake and evolution shouldn't be taught in schools. if you want to be an animal, go live in the woods and eat twigs or whatever, don't fucking make arched eyebrow arguments to me.

>>82173058 (OP)
They have no arguments or data, it's all just MUH CONVENTIONAL WISDUMB

>>82173058 (OP)
Femoids are all retarded whores and deserve enslavement. They squander their youth fucking abusive pieces of shit and then thanks to feminism they get to settle with a nice, respectful man who treats them like a queen AND SHE GETS TO KEK HIM AND IF HE DOES ANYTHING ABOUT IT LIKE BEATING HER HE GETS JAILED AND DIVORCE-RAPED.
>Just say you can't get pussy
I CAN'T "GET PUSSY" THE ONLY FEMOIDS WHO SHOW ME ATTENTION ARE THE DIRTY USED GOODS WHORES AT MY WORK WHO CALL ME HUSBAND MATERIAL. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. GET PUMPED AND DUMPED AND THEN MARRY A NICE GUY AFTERWARDS. NO THANK YOU. I deserve love. I deserve a virgin. I am an intelligent, hardworking, successful young man. I am athletic and tall and handsome and interesting and my penis is slightly larger than average and I have hobbies and I can cook and I have a nice career lined up and any time in the past I would have been awarded with a beautiful, dainty virgin who likes reading, painting, and hiking through the woods. BUT THANKS TO FEMINISM I AM TOLD BY EVERYONE TO SETTLE FOR RAN THROUGH FOIDS.
NOT GONNA FUCKING HAPPEN
I will groom the teenager. I will deflower her on her 16th birthday (legal in my state). We will live happily ever after. I will NOT settle for a NASTY USED-UP LOOSE HARLOT SLUT BITCH WHORE. Jesus fucking Christ just thinking about it stresses me out.

>>82173175
They act like "natural selection" is compatible with a society that requires motivated citizens and enough workers to support it. Although some people shouldn't reproduce, these people seem to be reproducing since the average IQ has been dropping.

>>82173178
If you're lucky they'll cite data from 10 years ago

>>82173058 (OP)
>blackpill
Do you like more obscure, theoretical stuff?

>>82173058 (OP)
>assume that you're evil because you're an incel/blackpiller despite never having met you
This is the one that bothers me the most, these people seriously act like they can detect one's inner workings and social abilities by their anonymous internet posts. They need every reason they can get to blame you for your lack of success with women because it wouldn't fit within their emotionally determined beliefs.

>>82173175
nahhh no way man. the world would be the same, women would still be selective and natural selection would be the reason for it, it's just that instead we wouldn't know why they were like that. Darwin didn't invent evolution, he discovered it.

>>82173252
If Ellie was real would you take her as your wife?

>>82173620
Only Ellie from the first game (excluding the DLC because it is not canon). This is not to say that I am exclusively attracted to 14-year-olds, far from it I find her incredibly attractive in the second game, just that as a gentleman I am entitled to a pure virgin and not a used goods dyke.

>>82173618
nah civilised men knew the wicked nature of women, which is why every civilisation restricted their "rights" and stoned them for being whores. it's only in primitive tribal cultures where women were treated as people.

>>82173680
our knowledge of darwin's knowledge isn't what makes women whores though, you're right when you say its their nature. it's our good nature as men that allows them so many rights. It's not darwin's fault, it's theirs. man what the fuck am i typing

>>82173820
the argument of natural selection is what allows women to be whores and removes our philosophical defenses against them

>>82173833
Nta but yeah in "it justifies this" way right. Like people who become assholes if they havent had their morning coffee or even more apt, women when they are menstruating being rude and moody.

>>82173850
no, i am saying it removes out ability to logically argue against whoredom if we are forced to accept that natural selection is good or an inherent fact of existence

>>82173833
no, whores have been whores regardless of whether or not they have natural selection in mind. None of them are like "hmm i could be a good woman but darwin said i'm supposed to be attracted to the tall guy with broad shoulders because that implies strength and i need to be protected", she was always going to like the tall guy with broad shoulders.
And we're not saying "it's okay for you to be a whore for chad because DARWIN said so! You can't help your nature, just go do it it's okay to fuck that random manwhore who won't care about you, it makes sense."
We're just acknowledging WHY the foid acts like a foid, not justifying it. Regardless of darwin's existence, women would be whores, and people would try to justify it; and currently we are not justifying it with darwinism, just explaining it.
At least i am, I dunnno about anyone else. I don't think anyone is condoning women being whores just because its in their nature. Humans should be able to overcome their nature to a degree.

>>82173899
Ah for me it's the idea that it may be true it doesnt justify the behavior and we shouldnt accept it. So it may be nature but that doesnt mean we should like it if we actually can suppress it like we can other parts of our nature. And using the evolution theory as justification for abysmal behavior is then unwanted if you want a functioning society. Way I see it anyhow.

>>82173915
>And we're not saying "it's okay for you to be a whore for chad because DARWIN said so! You can't help your nature, just go do it it's okay to fuck that random manwhore who won't care about you, it makes sense."
We're just acknowledging WHY the foid acts like a foid, not justifying it.
ok then you're not accepting the premise that natural selection is good on an inherent fact of existence, which is my point. merely saying that women act the way they do because of natural selection is not what society does or even that helpful-you might as well jsut say women do it because they're stupid/ evil/ animalistic.
>>82173944
i would rather just ban anyone from saying it because i find it annoying and i don't find the reasoning useful. saying foids act the way they do because of natural selection isn't more useful than saying they do it because they're evil.

>>82173970
>i would rather just ban anyone from saying it because i find it annoying and i don't find the reasoning useful. saying foids act the way they do because of natural selection isn't more useful than saying they do it because they're evil
Yeah I get that. It doesn't help anything or anyone. Like how wild animals are just like that or serial killers. Okay it's their brain being that way or whatever what now.

>>82173970
>>82173980
The funny part is when people mention that "it's just natural selection bro" they don't think for one second that we don't live in a natural society. One's survival nor success isn't contingent on height (as if it ever was) nor physical prowess, it's contingent on not being a criminal and being able to maintain a job. Saying "women act like animals" isn't doing them any favor in a civilization.

>>82173058 (OP)
>assume that you're evil despite never having met you
So like you and women?

>>82174105
Not the epic gotcha you think it is. So a man who generalizes all women and says they are all evil is an incel, but there is no term for a woman who does the same with men, she's still just a regular woman and receives no backlash

>>82174105
I assume that 80% of women are evil because that's what data shows

>>82173653
She could pump out so many freckled children!!

>>82174250
>Willing to sacrifice her life to cure the world
>Not willing to sacrifice 3 minutes and then the subsequent 9 months to birth a (possibly) immune baby