Thread 82221127

why did everyone become so unnattractive?

you look at photos from the 1950s and the average person looked so much better

>>82221127 (OP)
Everyone is fat as fuck now

diet.. alcohol. both of them destroy your looks fast

>>82221127 (OP)
It's unironically a weight problem. Tons of western nations, most famously the USA, have an absurdly high rate of overweight citizens that didn't exist like 40 years ago. It only took about 1 generation for everyone to become fat as fuck.

>>82221143
people drank way more back then than people do now though
like WAY more

It's not just the weight. Look at their faces. They're all dysgenic. We are literally being poisoned

>>82221127 (OP)
Weight and lack of exercise. People in the 50s had to move around more so they had better muscle tone. Skinny people today have no muscle so they look sickly.

>>82221127 (OP)
>why did everyone become so unnattractive? [sic]
I blame Nixon.

>>82221127 (OP)
Is this ai? I really can't tell.

>>82221186
no this is just how buc ees are actually like

>>82221181
>I blame Nixon.
You got the timing right.

https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

>>82221193
>cherry picked nonsense and a misunderstanding of what exponential growth curves look like
lel

you're telling me you guys can't get laid when the average guy looks like that? literally just be 12% bf and don't be deformed and you mog 90% of men

>>82221193
>>82221202
Erm this website just has a bunch of graphs pointing at 1971 idgi

>>82221223
It's trying to blame the collapse of the West on the end of the Bretton Woods system, but most of its graphs don't have the inflection point in 1971 and almost all of them are attributing the wrong cause to the effects. Many of their charts are also disingenuous comparing wages to productivity rather than total compensation to productivity for example. It's a perennial laughing stock in economic circles but lolberts cling on to it because they're stupid.

>>82221239
OK, but what does that have to do with corporations making profits out of gutting the public sector?

>>82221260
Corporations don't gut the public sector, voters put in politicians who pursue privatization. This can be good or bad and really depends on what specifically you're talking about. It also has nothing to do with wtfhappenedin1971 because that is a lolbert website specifically railing against the end of the pseudo gold standard in 1971. They would be in favor of gutting all public sector things.

>>82221127 (OP)
Can't believe no-one in this thread has pointed out racemixing yet

>>82221311
They look happy. Good for them.

besides the fat ones, those are just normal people.

>>82221127 (OP)
I think lack of cultural context and ugly modern clothes is part of it. Dirty brown tribal kids in Afghanistan look better than kids in Gaza or Africa that are wearing Chinese garbage (well it's not fair to insult kids in Gaza because they're getting bombed and shit. To me it's just somehow sadder)

>>82221127 (OP)
Millennials and gen x gave up on trying to look good.
Zoomers are different though.

>>82221127 (OP)
Poison food, poison air, low social trust, increased stress, lack of exercise, gluttony, and sloth. In a society that creates the maximum amount of safety 2 things become essential: eugenics and physical training.

>>82221469
Those people all look a lot happier than you though maybe those things aren't a problem

>>82221503
>Those people all look a lot happier than you
How do you know that?

>>82221549
Educated guess given what site and board we're on. Go ahead and lie and say how happy you are.

>>82221551
I'm not happy. Who could be happy when we are all barreling towards a global catastrophe? How can anyone be content with this horrible state of affairs and still be called both human and good? There can be no future built on this rotten foundation, but one thing I am happy about is that I can help fix it.

fag nigger spotted

>>82221549
>>82221581
good morning sir

>>82221581
So I did know that you were not as happy as them and you just argued with me for no reason? Good to know.

>>82221127 (OP)
Everyone works in an office now and has easy access to high calorie snacks that make you fat.

>>82221591
Yes, Anon. I'm a 3 foot tall dravidian who insists that I'm actually Aryan. You got me.
>>82221594
You engaged me, don't engage if you don't want to talk.

>>82221277
>Corporations don't gut the public sector
w a t
That's basically all the healthcare system is, HMOs, insurance, all of it is a big fucking scam to fuck people out of the money we already paid for care

>>82221127 (OP)
Jews and the elites turned food into slop and normalized gluttony.

>>82221608
And who facilitates that? The politicians people vote in and continue to vote in. Corporations respond to incentives, that's all they do. If you want them to stop doing something, remove the incentive. Try to understand the system you live in at least.

>>82221625
People are dumbasses and just do whatever ads tell them to

>>82221666
Nice trips
But ok, and? Politicians can put out ads for whatever. Why don't people vote for turning healthcare into a public good? It's because they don't want to. They prefer the current system for whatever retarded reason.

>>82221675
First: democracy is a sham; It puts the direction of state policy in the hands of those who control public opinion ie. media moguls.
Second: most people don't want to fight for what they want or prefer because fighting is scary.
For the situation to change one of two things must happen. Either there is a complete collapse followed by ultraviolence, which is not very likely. Or a figure emerges which can rally support and attack these policies, and those who push them, directly.

>>82221712
What happened to Nazi Germany anyway? Didn't a bunch of weak ineffectual faggots and mixed race mutts burn it to the ground and rape all the Aryan women?

>>82221724
Calling any of those countries weak or ineffectual is a disservice to them. The only one that could genuinely be called mixed-race was the USSR, but that was jewish commissars forcing Slavs into pitched battles at gunpoint so it was more of a one-sided racial stew than a soup. But it was a pyrrhic victory at best, even discounting the miserable state of the world today and the fact that the majority of those who served the allies regretted their contributions. The largest empires and virtually every country on the planet united to destroy a country the size of Texas, and they very nearly lost. That is like forming a 30-man posse to kill one man and getting thrashed before narrowly winning.

>>82221127 (OP)
What are you a foid? Humans have never been good looking on average

>>82221757
I think of Dresden and all those proud Aryan men and women. I think of their final moments, burning alive or suffocating to death in the vacuum produced by the sheer magnitude of firepower dropped on them. I think of the fear and pain they must have felt as their entire life was evaporated. I think of all that pure blood, those supermen, sublimating and disappearing from the pages of history forever. It brings a smile to my face. All praise LeMay.

>>82221779
I thought so. Here's your 1 shekel, jew; enjoy it while you can.

>>82221799
Sorry that your side lost so bad. Maybe next time your genetics will be better and you'll win.

>>82221239
>It's trying to blame the collapse of the West on the end of the Bretton Woods system,
Yes uncontrolled money printing by private banks ruins working people income and wealth and everything else follows.
Fractional reserve banking should be banned and classified as money counterfeiting.
Preferably retroactively.

>>82221899
Then why do none of those graphs actually inflect in 1971? Why are the 80s the more common inflection point? And why is it that real compensation has actually risen significantly (conveniently not shown on that site)? You're definitely wrong about wealth growth by the way, money printing can only ever benefit wealth in nominal terms and should generally be neutral in real terms.

>>82221917
>Then why do none of those graphs actually inflect in 1971? Why are the 80s the more common inflection point?
Economic lag.

>money printing can only ever benefit wealth in nominal terms and should generally be neutral in real terms.
Money printing is transfer of the real wealth to those who prints money.

>>82221946
>Economic lag.
Took more than 9 years for inflation to hit? You do understand that inflation from money printing is almost instantaneous, right?
>Money printing is transfer of the real wealth to those who prints money
That's fairly nonsensical. Money printing can't transfer wealth.

>>82221962
>That's fairly nonsensical. Money printing can't transfer wealth.
Lets say there only $100 in economy and you have them all.
I print another $100.
Your money is supposedly still in your hands... but actually now you have only half of it. In real terms.

And most ridiculous thing its not even a state printing money, state is supposedly allowed to take wealth from citizens without compensation, this is what taxation literally is. Because State is collective enterprise is doing collective good institutions (defense, police roads etc). So supposedly money (with some waste fo course) are used for collective good. Though financing via money printing is much less controllable by society than taxation. Your vote for taxes via proxy you don't vote for central bank regulation. You don't vote for central bank chairman and policies.
But most of the money printing is done by private banks via lending. WTF is shit?

>>82222013
>Your money is supposedly still in your hands
Money is a means of trade, not wealth. It's my fault you're too stupid to invest in productive assets. You deserve whatever "wealth" erosion you suffer.

>>82222022
When you take mortgage you pay solid chunk (like 15%) of your income to a bank as tax for bank's privilege of money creation. And that is a real transfer of wealth. You spend income that you obtained with your labor, sweat and blood to a bank who did nothing. They simply created your mortgage money out of thin air.

>>82222046
Mortgages are leveraged buying of real estate. The buyer is advantaged against the lender especially with inflation factored in. Are you retarded?

>>82222055
Again you pay 35% of you income as mortgage and 15% of it been interest. For what?
Average Americans pays another income tax just for right to live in teh house to banks.
Because banks have privilege of money creation. And private banks are private and have no obligation to use this income for interests of people, like State supposedly should use tax income.

>>82222076
Then simply don't get a mortgage. Again, are you retarded? If you don't like it, don't use it. If you want to leverage into a house at 5:1 or 10:1, you need a loan. That's an insane amount of leverage and it benefits the homeowner immensely. And what the fuck, are you a commie?

>>82221127 (OP)
Excess calories, shitty diet which leads into eating excess calories.

>>82222081
>Then simply don't get a mortgage
Yet that depth of fractional reserve banking trickery average people cant comprehend so they don't complain.

But you cant. Supposedly you have $100000 saved and you want to buy a house. Too bad another guy takes $400000 and outbids you. You have no choice to but take mortgage yourself and now you both compete who would take large mortgage. Were does it stop? At maximum possible debt to income ratio 35% (or even 50% at best credit ratings). So housing price all increase until mortgage on them reaches 35-50% debt to income ratio and you pay 35-50% of you income (about half of that is interest, bank profit) for right to live in the house.

>>82222126
So you're crying because you're too poor and think capital should be provided for free? Skill issue. You're too stupid to understand what's happening and you get mad because your stupidity prevents you from success. Blame yourself dysgenic mutt, it's your fault.

>>82222126
If housing was so profitable, surely more would get build. People want to live in nice neighborhood that troubled people can't afford.

>>82222134
>So you're crying because you're too poor and think capital should be provided for free?
Is that best response you can master?
Banks create this capital for free. They literally make money that didn't exist before by giving you a loan (like mortgage). So you are crying that capital should be provided to private banks for free. Because.... because why? Who can be behind this post?

Rules should be very simple for banks: you have $100 deposited in your bank you can lend $100. Not $200 or $200000. $100. Everything extra is money counterfeiting with according punishment.

>>82222157
>Banks create this capital for free
Risk of default, that capital has a cost
>They literally make money that didn't exist before
A debt on one side and an asset on the other, no net money is produced.
>Everything extra is money counterfeiting with according punishment
Huh, not the definition of counterfeiting anywhere in the civilized world. Are you Muslim?

>>82222139
>If housing was so profitable, surely more would get build.
Again you don't understand depth of this trickery.
Doesn't matter what is on supply side of the housing. On the demand side is literally money printer that can print infinite amount of money and is only limited by debt to income ratio of a borrower. So housing prices would always rise until you pay 35-50% of your income as mortgage again.

>>82221127 (OP)
Bad diet
Drugs
Sedentary lifestyle
Mental illnesses
Mental immaturity
Bad fashion
Extreme individualism
Societal acceptance of above

>>82222167
>no net money is produced.
Interests is net money produced. And that net money produced goes to bank. That is mechanism of wealth transfer.

>Huh, not the definition of counterfeiting anywhere in the civilized world.
But should be. Because its literally is money counterfeiting and how its started with fraud on gold money deposited in banks.

>>82222179
>nterests is net money produced
Interest is not "produced" it is earned. No net money is produced as in created. You claimed banks were "creating" money, they are not.
>But should be
I prefer a functioning banking system thank you. You're too stupid to understand what you're talking about.

>>82221127 (OP)
>americattle clapping on their way to buy more hamburgers
poetic.

>>82222183
>Interest is not "produced" it is earned.
Its earned? How? Bank didn't have money it lend do you. There was no "earned".
That interest is a tax you pay to bank's privilege of money creation. If you have same privilege you don't need to pay that interest tax, you could've just write loan you yourself at zero interest.

>I prefer a functioning banking system thank you. You're too stupid to understand what you're talking about.
That is tragedy that some tribe whose name cant called persuaded everyone that banking system should be fraud of money counterfeiting by private banks.

>>82222218
So do you want the loan or do you not? You can always save the amount and see how long that will take you.

>>82222270
>just compete against my money printer bro
Yes this debt net is very intricate and insidious.