Thread 82479889

I miss simping for princess type white girls at my rich ah high/middle school

>>82479889 (OP)
What counts as "princess type"?

i missed out on tween love because all my friends wanted to do is play basketball

>>82479889 (OP)
>I miss simping
on reflection, it really does seem that simps are quite possible the core of the cancer that is ruining the world

entirely shameless
morals are for others, not themselves
obsessed with holes and giving them power
their love of roasties is so profound their sell their soul, their children, their life, to please a roastie
in earnest couldnt care less about the consequences, because to them, if worshipping and giving power to holes is wrong, they dont want be right
wilfully ignorant of the truth, so much as detesting the truth, as the truth would expose roasties as something to be detested

pathetic, shameless, disgusting, vile creatures simps are
something to be detested, and something to look at, aspire to be better than. be better than a simp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWOYSdF7PnA

>>82479913
I missed out on teen love because I never went to high-school.
Now I'm a dysfunctional neet who will never know the love of a moid until I fix myself. Something that probably won't happen for the next 5 years.

>>82479943
that's fine, but i'm talking about tween love. 60x stronger than teen love and 80x more pure

>>82479954
I left school before I became a tween. So I'm also talking about that.

Maybe you don't wanna hear this, but it'll be okay, anon. You still have time to find love.

>>82479979
>I left school before I became a tween.
i don't understand this meme

>>82479943
I will encourage you to fix yourself or I could just worship you like a princess right now, fembot.

>>82479991
It's not a meme.
I started being homeschooled before I became a tween.

>>82480004
>I could just worship you like a princess right now
That would be incredibly para-social...
Since I'm currently dysfunctional, I struggle to form or maintain even just friendships. You'd be worshipping someone who would give you very little in return.

I guess that's what most people mean by simping though? Lol

>>82479899
Very self assured girls that know the world revolves around them

>>82479913
Sounds fun, confession never crossed my mind so it was always one sided love, lots of doki doki and all that.

>>82479938
Great description yesh I stand for tall that although I don't think you need to be ignorant to love women.

>>82480041
>Very self assured girls that know the world revolves around them
Ummmm they sound like bad people... I thought you meant like a more innocent princess archetype lol

>>82480041
>I don't think you need to be ignorant to love women.
well i mean you obviously do have to be willfully ignorant of the truth if you love women, because the truth is women arent worth loving
they are trash in all aspects

>>82480037
>You'd be worshipping someone who would give you very little in return.
>I guess that's what most people mean by simping
Yeah I'm a simp, hah-hahaha
It would be nice just to make a fembot happy by doting on them even if I don't get much out of it

>>82480101
It does sound nice, but sometimes my current inability to form or maintain relationships makes me feel bad.
I don't like people receiving little in return, idk.

Also I'm BLACK

>>82480124
Well you should be my princess to simp for, do you want me to contact you via email and encourage you and simp for you or discord? My discord is typedrobot

>>82480054
They showed me a lot of kindness so I wouldn't say that, desu I don't think I've ever come across an innocent girl at least not past the age 11.

>>82480063
Which descriptive fact would lead me to that normative conclusion?

>>82480124
Seconding this, if you want another friend you can add me :)
surprisinglyanalt

>>82480229
>Which descriptive fact would lead me to that normative conclusion?
well, one fact is that all people, men and women, throughout history have been moral dog shit
so, both men and women defending things like nazi genocides, slavery, animal genocides, etc. most women eat meat and couldnt care about animals. i dont htink you can be a good person if you cause needless suffering and death to animals?

most women are massive hypocrites as well, and i dont think hypocrisy is a virtue? like, they are okay with male genital mutilation but not with female, despite not really believing any religion deeply

they're also sort of childlike in their thought process and are often times completely incapable of understanding the thought processes and lives of others, like of loser men, for example

they advocate men die in wars but themselves flee. you never see them defending innocent men who get conscripted and die in a war they didnt want

theyre just sort of these spoiled ultra-powerful children with no shame, no sense of justice, no conception of hypocrisy, and they continue to weird power and pervert it, because of pathetic creatures like you enable them

>>82480037
You'd be surprised how many men feel worthless. For them- okay, lets be honest, US, women like you sound like an equal match, like someone with whom you'll finally won't be ashamed of yourself, someone who won't look down on you.
Black girls are cute but I live in Poland so I'll leave the simping to the americanons

>>82479899
>>82480041
>What counts as
When you just know they're angels (possibly literally).

>>82480394
We're not built to be moral the prosocial behavior we do have is to help advance our genetics (moral in this case just means going against your preferences anyway). And I think it's attractive when girls eat meat desu they're imposing their will over other life forms.
The same goes for the rest of the points I acknowledge they're true but it doesn't make me dislike them sometimes I even find it charming.

>theyre just sort of these spoiled ultra-powerful children with no shame, no sense of justice, no conception of hypocrisy, and they continue to weird power and pervert it, because of pathetic creatures like you enable them
Banger post again I absolutely agree

>>82480560
>And I think it's attractive when girls eat meat desu they're imposing their will over other life forms.
Are you that anon that is sexually attracted to girl eating g sandwiches? I see such a moid on /soc/ sometimes

>>82480560
>We're not built to be moral
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRQg_9ulGuI

ahh, yes, the simp, being exposed intellectually, must retreat in whatever intellectually pathetic defense to protect the "dIgNiTy" of the roasties he worships, for he cannot, under any circumstances, fathom a world in which his blind worship of roastie whores is not justified or wrong

>the prosocial behavior we do have is to help advance our genetics
even if this is a statement of fact, its just a "is" statement
"birds have wings"
"watermelons are green outside, red inside" etc
but the problem with this line of thinking MR SIMPARINO is that thats entirely irrelevant. because when it comes to morals, it isnt about is, its about ought. as in, despite our evolutionary genetics influencing us, we still OUGHT to be moral, despite what were predisposed to, by genetics or environment

a great example is rape. a little rapearino, if you dont mind oh you wouldnt mind some hypothetical rape examples to test logical consistencies? hm?, perchance? rape is evolutionary advantages, but its still wrong. we evolved from rapists, as they spread their genes better, but its still wrong, ISNT IT

there is a gap between what is and what OUGHT to be
and you OUGHT to be moral, which females arent. and thus, are trash (like most people)

>And I think it's attractive when girls eat meat desu they're imposing their will over other life forms.
of COURSE you do. you shameless hypocrite
do you think its attractive when whites enslave blacks?
how about when a sadistic pedophile rapes and kills a child?
is ALL imposing of will by the strong attractive? or only when some shameless roastie whore that you worship does it?

>Banger post again I absolutely agree
exactly. you have no love of justice. you dont care for it. you look to god, and thank him for the horrors of this shit world. thats why you are trash, inside and out

>>82480633
You know you're feeding in to this moids fetish that he's a simp who let's evil women walk all over him, right?
How dumb are you genuinely?

He wants you to say all this stuff.

>>82480648
eermm.... nyactually... i think its the whole point is to point out that being a simp is not intelectually justified on grounds on philosophical misanthrophy being justified

i kind of dont give a hootarino if to be quite deviously honest our little simp friend gets off on whatever. i get off on telling people they're wrong and defending my position. i also get off off on korean yandere asmr lovebombing me. quite perverted am i rite?

anywhoo my mineral sunscreen has officially set it sunbum btw, its great! and i am now ready to waddle over to timtims for my local covfefe

>>82480602
>>82480648
>tfw no fembot princess to simp and buy a burger for
>she didn't even politely reject my simp request

>>82479889 (OP)
What exactly did you do for them? Like, did you carry their backpack or share your snacks with them?

>>82479889 (OP)
Me too I was a slave to the older Stacies in my highschool, I knew they would never date me but being used by them felt great

>>82480705
>>82480721
>philosophical misanthrophy
Simp king here
philosophical misanthrophy isn't a thing. People are trash gives no guidance to living with others.
Second, Eating meat, enslaving people, and child abuse aren't the same category of act. Females arent moral also means nothing. There's no evidence to back it up. Some women lack morals, some women have morals but would choose to enslave a moid because he gets something out of it or just is passive.

>>82480782
>philosophical misanthrophy isn't a thing
WRONG!
not only is it a thing, but its defending by philosophers like ian james kidd. i kind of wanted to buy his epistomology of vices i believe, but ive been slacking off on my philosophical studies. and besides kagan's geometry of moral desert is much more pertinent to my particular set of interests, so i have more important matters to ponder about

heers a hecking youtube videoarino and a link to a ENTIRE book by another philosophy professor defending philosophical misanthropy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYr5LFGaauQ
A Philosophical Defense of Misanthropy Toby Svoboda
https://philarchive.org/archive/SVOAPD

>Second, Eating meat, enslaving people, and child abuse aren't the same category of act.
yeah sure. shooting a glock and stabbing and nuking are all different. but theyre all forms of violence, arent they?
and in the same way, the analogies i used are to highlight that indiscriminate violence by the powerful on the weak is morally and aesthetically repulsive, regardless of who is in power or whatnot

>Females arent moral also means nothing
sure it does. it means we shouldnt worship these amoral godless whores

>There's no evidence to back it up
theres plenty of evidence of women commiting morally wrong things. history is a great example yes i am aware men are also trash please dont @ me with this thankies

>Some women lack morals
yeah. lots do. lots kill their children in late term abortions, commit paterinity fraud, cheat, false rape accusations, commit murder, crime, etc
they arent these angels. no, not at all

>>82480826
>heers a hecking youtube videoarino and a link to a ENTIRE book by another philosophy professor defending philosophical misanthropy!
He's defending targeting humans in general. Not your bullshit about women as a subgroup. The way you're using it, politcal misnthropy isn't a thing.
Another paragraph of bullshit conflating eating meat with slavery with child abuse. Yawn. You're kind of boring, man.
>they arent these angels. no, not at all
And? Who gives a shit?
If the simp enjoys it and the woman enjoys it, what's the problem again?

>>82480879
>Not your bullshit about women as a subgroup
>women are not a subgroup of humans when its inconvenient for me, but are obviously people, chud!
ok simp, thats for the contradictory retort

>If the simp enjoys it and the woman enjoys it, what's the problem again?
well, i think the problem is you give an abundance of power to those who are incompetent at using it (women)

its the equivalent of giving power to hitler or slave owners or whatever

"i like hitler, i like giving him power, hitler likes power, whats the problem?"

it would seem... power corrupts and the current powerful (women) are quite deep into moral putrefaction

>>82480925
>well, i think the problem is you give an abundance of power to those who are incompetent at using it (women)
I'm giving an abundance of power to people who cheat and steal me out of my productivity. I still like working. It gives me something in return. Why should I care what your opiinions are, again?
People being potentially shit doesn't change the fact that I feel good making them feel good.

>>82480957
>I'm giving an abundance of power to people who cheat and steal me out of my productivity.
exactly. you ought to stop, because you are benefiting people who are shit and dont deserve it


>I'm giving an abundance of power to people who cheat and steal me out of my productivity. I still like working. It gives me something in return
you know, this sounds like people who are overly proud of their race/country/culture, and blindly defend it to the death
a sort of unique subhumanism going on with those people. proud of your own subhumanity

you're like a slave defending their slave owner
more evidence that simps have no self respect, dignity, or sense of justice

>Why should I care what your opiinions are, again?
because if theyre logically coherent, then its entailed that you ought to take them seriously, if you care about truth. the question are they logically coherent or not

>People being potentially shit doesn't change the fact that I feel good making them feel good.
oh i think it does, because of "moral desert"
the idea is that shitty people deserve to be worse off. like, some kind of justice
a violent criminal who shoots up a kindergarden doesnt deserve to live in a mansion with a harem. no, he deserves to rot in solitary confinement. if most people heard a public shooter was living in a harem mansion, they'd be repulsed, because that would be wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxBiTm7vtCs

>>82481018
>exactly. you ought to stop, because you are benefiting people who are shit and dont deserve it
Not everyone can be a loser in the basement.
>more evidence that simps have no self respect, dignity, or sense of justice
I have all of that. You're a NEET conflating eating meat with slavery.
>the idea is that shitty people deserve to be worse off. like, some kind of justice
Right, you're the one claiming people are shitty for something consensual between each other. Are you a shitty person living off of disability or your mother and the work of others? I'd say so. So, what's your "moral desert"? Probably shitting up /r9k/ comparing eating meat to child rape and slavery I imagine, like the retard that you are.

This baka deleted his post and now has to rewrite it

>>82480602
Nyo that's not me but I do have a thing in general for girls eating

>>82480633
I made a descriptive statement, you don't need to explain the is-ought distinction to me. Also saying you ought to be moral is circular. You started out by saying that if I faced some truth about females I would detest them yet I heard and accepted the truth and still like them.

I think those examples are less attractive to me because of my schema. With meat it would be overwhelmingly positive since it gives sustenance, promotes health, survival, fertility and it reminding me of a certain other meat. That being said I still feel some sympathy with the state of the animal. Same with some of the other examples you gave men dying in war is sad but that's distinct in my head from the mental model that leads to defending some men while sending others to war.

>>82480747
>>82481119
ooooooooop you faggot

>>82481055
>Are you a shitty person living off of disability or your mother and the work of others? I'd say so
well i mean obviously disabled people by definition cant work... haha
huh? what do you mean?
if theyre disabled how can they work? its like expecting people without legs to run?

>So, what's your "moral desert"?
wew! what a EXCELLENT question! this is a profoundly wonderful question?

just what is moral desert? how does it look like?
what does justice look like?

is it fairness?
is it a respect of dignity?
is it well being?
is retribution a part of justice/moral desert?
how do you even discern justice? probably intuition/ reflective equilibrium

i think ive said enough about the whole simping thing. if nothing ive said you found respectable, then go ahead and continue being a paypig to smug women who abuse power and despise you. you remind me of an abused dog who loves his owner that despises him. very well, you live your life i suppose

>>82479943
This black nona again
How many anons offered to give you genuine love?
You always deny them with some retard excuse like "oh I can't I have to work on myself first"
Stop attention seeking, pick a robot and let him help you fix yourself

>>82481119
>Also saying you ought to be moral is circular
well, even if its circular its still true. "you ought do the right thing" is still true regardless if its circular or not

>animals, innocent conscripts dont appeal to me

hrmmm.... what about this hypothetical
lets say eugenic slavery is real
so, through eugenics, we can breed loving slaves. a great example of this is dogs. we bred unruly egotistical wolves which dont enjoy pleasing anyone to golden retrivers through eugenics. golden retrivers and over breeds of dogs are love slaves

they will die for you, protect your human children over their own children, will tolerate all abuse form you. they are your perfect love slaves

and it seems to be a bit repulsive to breed love slaves through eugenics and abuse them? especially when the breeder is egotistical, arrogant and heartless? as most women are

and i think this line of thinking applies actually to a lot of simps, because simping is evolutionary selected for. the idea is that desperate simps, over a long time, who look past all a girls flaws are genetically selected for, and are more likely to reproduce. they are slaves in a sense, because through evolution theyve been selected for, for their devotion, self sacrifice and eagerness to please

but i dont see how being born a eugenic love slave would justify blindly loving your owner?
if a abused dog could become intelligent and self-aware enough, wouldnt he realize that his owner is not worth loving as well?

>>82481191
>>well i mean obviously disabled people by definition cant work... haha
>huh? what do you mean?
It's by your train of thought. You're subsisting off of the work of others, that makes you a horrible person, right? Who cares if you can work or can't work. It's irrelevant to what makes you horrible in this case.
>then go ahead and continue being a paypig to smug women who abuse power and despise you. you remind me of an abused dog who loves his owner that despises him. very well, you live your life i suppose
First of all, I'm not giving anyone any money. There you go conflating wildly different and separate things, again. On that note, however, thoughtful gifts are nice. That still needs to be consensual. Someone can accept a gift or not. Second of all, a dog is the most loyal thing in existence, so I appreciate the analogy. I don't feel I'm being abused, however.
>very well
I accept your concession

>>82481258
>You're subsisting off of the work of others, that makes you a horrible person, right?

i dont see how thats the case at all? arent all humans are subsisting off the work of others?

you didnt invent calculus, you didnt invent the internet or modern medicine or cars or the combustion engine, yet you benefit from it. it would seem all humans do this? and i dont see anything wrong with it? haha

>Who cares if you can work or can't work
well, i mean obviously it does, right? if i cant work them im innocent, i cannot be reasonably expected to work if i cant?

not to mention, our society is greatly evil and cruel. by working and contributing your labour and taxes, you inherently vote with your feet that societies values out to prosper. there are people who decided to be a neet DESPITE being able to work, because they found societies values so repulsive, that its not worth contributing to. this would be an act of morally good parasites of society, for example. i dont think people are entitled to give their labour to society, in actuality

>>82481327
>>i dont see how thats the case at all?
You are existing solely based off of the resources of others and the "goodwill" of others. Some don't even consent, yet you suck those resources up.
Whether it's your mother or disability, that makes you a horrible person. Even worse, you are incompetent at using those resources (NEET on /r9k/).
You're conflating use or building off of "public goods" and knowledge with your leeching off of and exploiting a system where I cannot opt out of. It is non-consensual
Further, you were just arguing earlier, the misanthropic aspect. How does that not apply to individuals on disability considering you're an idiot comparing something consensual to child rape? Why should you be supported, again?

>>82481398
>You are existing solely based off of the resources of others and the "goodwill" of others
yes

>Some don't even consent, yet you suck those resources up.
well i mean obviously they consent because they implicitly agree to pay all of their money to our overbearing government

>Whether it's your mother or disability, that makes you a horrible person
see i dont see how thats the case. you keep stating it but dont give a reason for it. WHY would that make me a bad person? i dont think i owe society anything, anymore than id owe nazi germany anything or a slave owning society anything. im not a fucking slave to keep society running, and when i dont work, thats not a moral failure

not to mention, its not like i really have a choice, i have been homeless a lot before

> How does that not apply to individuals on disability
i think it largely does. this applies to everyone; neets, robots, normies, women, men, autists. everyone, by and large, on average

i think there could be some people who, by whatever standard, are more morally "righteous" than others
so if you compare some kind of person who works for charity and some kind of serial killer. to me, on face value, it seems one is worse than the other, but still most people are seriously morally flawed in some aspect

>Why should you be supported, again?
well, on the simple basis that i didnt ask to be born and im sentient. i suffer
it would be like birthing a child and then abandoning it, and asking the newly homeless orphan "why should i support you?"
it would seem that if you have children, its your responsibility to support them!

>>82481460
>>well i mean obviously they consent because they implicitly agree to pay all of their money to our overbearing government
Incorrect. You are threatened with prison and arms if you do not fund your retarded NEET lifestyle.
A frumpy fembot does not threaten me with prison for the rest of my life if I do not simp for her.
>WHY would that make me a bad person?
Why are women bad people? You argued above in generalizations, none of which apply to the vast majority of women, let alone fembots. Yet I can name something bad about you: you enjoy wasting other's times, you conflate consensual acts with child rape and essentially trivialize them.
>not to mention, its not like i really have a choice, i have been homeless a lot before
Not my problem. I'd rather simp for weeb girls. Oh wait, I can't. Government will take my house if I opt out of simping for the disabled and only simp for cute fembots.
>well, on the simple basis that i didnt ask to be born and im sentient. i suffer.
Cute fembots are sentient. They suffer. That suffering might be alleviated with words of affirmation, attention, kindness. i.e. SIMPING.
>child
Not my problem, you're not my child. I like cute fembots more. Not my responsibility. You are only my responsibility under threat of force. Cute autistic fembots are better in every way.

>>82481198
It doesn't work like that. Trying to force a guy in to my life would end in disaster.
Give me credit for not leading guys on making them think we could be together.

>>82481610
then start off with those pretensions clearly stated and try it out
you might surprise yourself
not everything has to be a life long commitment, friends come and go, people come and go
not everyone expects you to give them all of your time or equivalent to what they give, either

>>82481639
I have tried once in the past, it ended disastrously. I know you're just trying to help, but I'm really not in the place for having friends or a boyfriend. It's probably why I'm here, to socialise somewhat.

>>82481703
>it ended disastrously
you can only grow through disaster or by avoiding disaster through an act that may end in disaster

>>82480747
>>82481150
Jeeez relax anon I didn't forget about you. I would white knight for her, reserve her seat, piggyback her, share food (indirect kiss chuuu desu), I was also very yes-manish/obedient, I'd let her ragdoll me around and tease me. Stuff like that.

>>82480758
I always went for younger girls lel

>>82481252
It's true but it lacks content

That was beautiful anon you should be a good doggy like me and listen to your body instead of resisting your nature. I can look at everything my owner did and still love them. And why shouldn't I?

>>82481851
Omegabased Louise enjoyer. I crushed on a lot of girls of that phenotype because of her

>>82481892
Umu she definitely awakened something in me

>>82481851
>piggyback her, share food (indirect kiss chuuu desu)
That's not simping, it's a reward! Now even I'm envious.

>>82483581
It was cash I won't lie one time she was in a bikini so I got lots of skin to skin contact, uuuh what else would make anon jealous.. I also sat on her lap a couple times, I got hugs (obviously), got called cute, got pet by her (lel she literally called me a loyal dog at one point) and she mended one of my insecurities.

To balance it out she ended up dating a guy 4 years older than her lel

>>82479889 (OP)
Is that what you do in American school. In Scottish schools someone pulls a fire alarm and a fight happens once a day, with the rest of the day being a demoralizing nothing burger.

>>82479913
I had tween love once, it was like something out of a storybook, but naturally I fucked it all up. Don't get hung up on what you missed out on anon, it hurts less than having it, but knowing you threw it away.

>>82484208
>one time she was in a bikini so I got lots of skin to skin contact
IN WHAT CONTEXT IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE TO HAPPEN?!
>got pet by her (lel she literally called me a loyal dog at one point)
Urgh - now I understad your fight with the moralistic anon, even I would give in and stop thinking in a situation like this. But I'm also happy that you were able to make such good memories, champ.

>>82484346
I dunno I'm not from America

>>82484663
>IN WHAT CONTEXT IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE TO HAPPEN?!
Messing around on ze school pool trip hehe

Thank you anon this humble neet makes do.

>>82479889 (OP)
both of them dont care though