>>12590861
I don't know what thread this is in but if it's posted under some thread people would generally ignore or filter/hide then it wouldn't be difficult to pull off. I'm not impr3ssed
Check the thread. He pulled it off fair and square and on his own. "It's supposed to be a team effort" is just major cope for the fact that nobody can ever do shit like this by themselves. Actually it's basically unheard of, which makes it that much more impressive.
Everyone downplaying this accomplishment is either trolling for (You)s or is legitimately brick-brained.
It certainly takes a longer amount of time attempting it on one's own! When there's multiple people involved, it's easier to make consecutive posts because the reset timer for posts becomes a total non-issue. I was able to accomplish the feat dealing with that reset timer in-between every single post I made, which would have given literally anyone a perfect window of time (x10) to fuck up my count, as opposed to multiple people counting, where posts could be made literal seconds after one another.
But it's okay. People can continue to downplay my accomplishment. I don't need to be in the newspaper. :)
I am lik1 100% certain we counted to 10 earlier this year
which is why I do not see this as such a big deal
but good jobe
but also I do not think it has not been done here
