Thread 16772463

is cutting parts of your cock the scientific consensus? what are the reason?

>>16772463 (OP)
No. This is just a culture piece that's using a (likely shitty) study a cloak for their culture war shit.

Of course they use Christian imagery

>>16772519
>Of course they use Christian imagery

>>16772676
that was for the jews, not christians, only the retarded dispensationalist christians believe otherwise, dispensationlist christans make up the majority of american christians

>>16772705
retarded & heretical*

>>16772463 (OP)
>science
the "science" was some dude telling parents that if they snip their kid's dick he'll have less reason to jack off and doom his immortal soul to hell.

>>16772463 (OP)
defying the science? oy vey another shoah

>>16772463 (OP)
no. the majority of the supposed "benefits" stated in the article are sexual e.g. reduced risk of contracting hiv, or only affect adults
circumcision of a child is ridiculous and only rooted in weird religions. it is one of those things where if it wasn't for religion, nobody would even think it is a good idea.
if you want to get the flappy bit at the end of your cock cut of when you are an adult, fine go ahead, but don't force it on a baby that cannot consent to it

It's not difficult.
Charge advocates for promoting hate crimes, torture and mutilation. Lock the iron door, throw away the keys. The way all issues are solved.

>>16772463 (OP)
>is cutting parts of your cock the scientific consensus?
>parts of your cock
>parts
Nigga the scientific consensus is that chopping your ENTIRE dick off is fine and dandy

Scientists and therefore their consensus has lost all credibility.

>>16772951
https://allthatsinteresting.com/david-reimer

>>16772951
Both mentally ill to be honest.

>>16772463 (OP)
Just look how batshit crazy the pic is all by itself. They're literally holding a knife on a baby's dick.

No organism requires their genitals to be mutilated to live and reproduce. Quite the opposite as is evidenced by the larges populations on the Earth, which do not mutilated children.

Note also the Jewspeak dripping off every line:

DEFYING SCIENCE!!! ; Our analysis; Up to......etc.....


Meanwhile in reality, this is just a money making scheme for the Dermatology industry and circumcision has caused far more death and disease than any retard ever wrongly assumed it could prevent.

Anyone who even thinks about baby bits is pedo and should be killed on sight.

>>16772916

......and if they were doing it to little girls, it would rightly be called one of the worst offenses in the world.

>>16772463 (OP)
it's supposed to remind you of a mushroom, because eating mushrooms is how your ancestors first met god and now they're a pedophile cult.
it probably has no real medical value at all.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=R3pfsUgtL9A

>>16773087
>They're literally holding a knife on a baby's dick.
It's worse than this, the foreskin is only cut away after it has been crushed. First it's crushed to provide hemostasis.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/513878172

>>16772697
>churches built in the USA 30 years ago are christian imagery

try again, Schlomo

>>16772916
What doesn't she understand, the kid went into shock.

>>16773091
It's always funny watching people criticize female circumcision and defend male circumcision.

>>16772519
yeah thats pretty funny.

>>16772463 (OP)
there are several studies on circumcision trends in the US. most of them indicate a slight increase in the % of babies being cut BUT the increase comes from those having it done outside of the hospital, after the initial time spent there for the birth and recovery.

I think that comes down to the increased muslim population and perhaps a bit because of the large number of hispanics gaining entry to the US too, since they seem to have a bit of a thing for it for some reason.

>>16773380
According to GPT-5 Mini that's false. It says today's overall rate is probably 55% and has decreased over the last decades. With the anti-Israel awakening both on the left and right, it'll only continue to decrease. This is an evil tradition from the arabic desert. It's alien to Whites.

>>16773678
errr muslims are all bout it too. If the left pushes out jews and embraces the palestine crowd nothing will change. the big bloc that don't cut babies are european and african and south american christians. oh and asians, except for Korea due to american influence lol rip. And the phillipines

>>16773702
Egyptians were the OG circumcisers.
Jews and the rest of the Semites copied it from them.
As much as that makes Jews seethe all the archeological evidence points to that.

>>16773705
African Christians do it as well
To be fair, they mutilate everyone, boys and girls alike
https://i.4cdn.org/gif/1756848145413104.webm

>>16773712
The oldest evidence for Egyptians is from 2400 BCE.
And the Mesopotamians definitely did not do it.
Everyone in the area stole it from the Egyptians, though there are other cultures globally who perform similar acts, like the Philippinese, but that's not a complete circumcision.

>>16772463 (OP)
its highly effective for reducing the risk of contagious penis cancer

>>16772463 (OP)
*defying israel

>>16772463 (OP)
>is cutting parts of your cock the scientific consensus?
No.

>what are the reason?
Judaism.

>REEEE!!!!!!!!!
Don't care.

It is funny though how they use a dark ages image to claim people are being anti-scientific.

brit milah is a mark that you have entered the covenant with YWHW and it makes you a jew. Abraham foreskinned all his servants and that made them the first jews

>>16773678
>according to GPT-5 Mini

>>16774137
Don't spread falsehoods if you don't want to be corrected. Posting a laughing pirate gif doesn't change the fact that you don't know what's going on but confidently post false stuff.

>>16772463 (OP)
People supporting circumsicion deserve a torturous death.

>>16773678
you'll notice that your chatbot reply specifies newborn circumcision. i addressed this by mentioning that the increase seems to be in circumcisions carried out after the initial hospital stay for birth and after birth care.

the study i was basing the statement on is here

https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/s0025-6196(14)00036-6/fulltext

there are plenty of other studies and it all depends on how they are counting stuff as to whether there is an increase or decrease.

>>16772463 (OP)
I mean just look at much better off and well-adjusted the uncircumcised world is.... Oh, wait.

>>16774429
Do you think Africa and Middle East are uncircumcised?
This is who America stands with in this matter.