← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16819177

1000 posts 498 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16819177 [Report] >>16819180 >>16819197 >>16819799
/sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Cheeky - edition

previous >>16815938
Anonymous No.16819180 [Report] >>16819183 >>16819190
>>16819177 (OP)
First for subsurface rockets.
Anonymous No.16819183 [Report]
>>16819180
You are really funny anon :D
Anonymous No.16819184 [Report] >>16819250
spehs
Anonymous No.16819185 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819187 [Report]
for me it’s grifting with Lunar Module II
Anonymous No.16819189 [Report]
Is there so little happening in space flight that you have to comfort yourself with AI slop?
Anonymous No.16819190 [Report]
>>16819180
Theia mission when
Anonymous No.16819196 [Report] >>16819199 >>16819259
is this a new parking garage?
Anonymous No.16819197 [Report] >>16819200 >>16819212 >>16819242 >>16819246
>>16819177 (OP)
I can we can all agree this is the worst OP ever
Anonymous No.16819199 [Report]
>>16819196
apartment building + parking garage
Anonymous No.16819200 [Report] >>16819242
>>16819197
There have been far worse
Anonymous No.16819212 [Report]
>>16819197
but it's cheeky
Anonymous No.16819242 [Report] >>16819286
>>16819200
>>16819197
I got banned for posting less retarded OPs than this. OP must be a janny.
Anonymous No.16819246 [Report]
>>16819197
Examples?
Anonymous No.16819250 [Report] >>16819262
>>16819184
I had to google to discover what is that thing.
Pretty cool for its time.
Anonymous No.16819252 [Report] >>16819254 >>16819256
spaceboat
Anonymous No.16819254 [Report]
>>16819252
the turducken concept hasn't been taken far enough
we need a submersible aircraft carrier that surfaces at great speed, accelerates on hydrofoils to launch a great big subsonic plane that drops a supersonic plane from its bomb bay that has a hypersonic drone riding on top that goes beyond the karman line to launch a space vehicle which expends a stage to circularize, another to reach earth escape velocity and finally an ion drive to push the payload
Anonymous No.16819255 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSebXD8Md3s
sex (in space)
Anonymous No.16819256 [Report]
>>16819252
space ship
Anonymous No.16819259 [Report] >>16819261
>>16819196
How many staff can they stuff into that?
Anonymous No.16819261 [Report]
>>16819259
bout tree fiddy.
Anonymous No.16819262 [Report]
>>16819250
Basic /sfg/ knowledge? Lurk more my friend
Anonymous No.16819263 [Report] >>16819265 >>16819321
https://x.com/robert_savitsky/status/1979134584622104620
>Proton-M is now assembled at Baikonur for the upcoming launch in December, awaiting stacking with the payload/fairing section.

Only eleven more Protons left
Anonymous No.16819265 [Report] >>16819269
>>16819263
I thought Proton was retired
Anonymous No.16819266 [Report]
https://x.com/Cosmic_Penguin/status/1979151689589432372
>And "Thousand Sails" is back sailing w/ the 1st new satellites in 7 months for the G60/Qianfan constellation launched on this LM-6A at 07:08 UTC. Lots of numbers skipped this time though - after G60 Polar Group 01, 02, 03, 06 & 05, this is G60 Polar Group *18* for some reason. The large gap in batch nos. might be real indication that there are satellite manufacturing problems w/ some of the earlier batches (specifically the ones from Genesat of Shanghai, as per orbit raising behaviors of previous sats). But constellation operator Spacesail/Shanghai Spacesail Technologies seems confident now to restart deployment after a long pause since March 11. The subsequent movements of the 18 satellites of this Polar Group 18 will definitely be closely monitored from the outside.
Anonymous No.16819269 [Report] >>16819270
>>16819265
Pseduo-retired. It's in the same place the Ariane 5 was for the last few years of its career. Khrunichev shut down the Proton production line back in 2022, but they still had 14 unflown boosters left in stock. They had planed to have launched all of them by now, but Russia just doesn't have that many payloads that need rides to geostationary orbit.
Anonymous No.16819270 [Report]
>>16819269
Thanks, bleh I was dumb & posted before even reading your entire post. I forgot they still had a handful left on the itinerary
Anonymous No.16819285 [Report] >>16819288 >>16819289 >>16819290
Is RP1 or Propane more likely to be available in the 2040s?
Anonymous No.16819286 [Report]
>>16819242
its on topic you salty ass nigga
Anonymous No.16819288 [Report]
>>16819285
Only jeets use apu, back to your designated shitting orbit saar
Anonymous No.16819289 [Report]
>>16819285
Propane just seems like a meme. I think RP-1 will still be around for cheaper rockets and Methane will be the big boy stuff.
Anonymous No.16819290 [Report]
>>16819285
well I can't find RP-1 at my local hardware store. closest they have is kerosene. I can get propane pretty easily
Anonymous No.16819292 [Report] >>16819293 >>16819296 >>16819309 >>16819408
Zhuque-3 Y1 getting delivered to Jiuquan. The launcher is currently on the LC-96B launch pad in preparation of a static fire in the next days before a launch in about a month.
https://x.com/LandSpace_Tech/status/1979158729577893943
Anonymous No.16819293 [Report]
>>16819292
Anonymous No.16819296 [Report] >>16819309 >>16819408
>>16819292
China news is the glup shitto of spaceflight. Every other day it’s
>YF-18 has been transported to Zhinquao after a successful hot firing at Changuang. It will deliver the Yunzhao-1 satellite, with the next one being launched on the upcoming maiden flight of Universe Space’s IX-L1 medium lunch vehicle next month.
Anonymous No.16819297 [Report] >>16819372
Elon's Space Empire continues its march of Evil.
Anonymous No.16819298 [Report]
Elon assisting online scammers to run slave labor call centers in the jungle.
Anonymous No.16819301 [Report] >>16819303 >>16819305 >>16819318 >>16820485
LA flexes on Houston:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bqMolALdVGg
Anonymous No.16819303 [Report]
>>16819301
Looks cool. I'll never go there.
Anonymous No.16819305 [Report] >>16819311 >>16819378
>>16819301
JSC is pretty lame and none of the installments feel like they were designed with love. It’s a shame. I wish Trump or Isaacman would throw a billion or two at it and make it nice. Art deco, Beaux-Arts, something… Also we don’t need a shuttle. No one here except Cruz wants the shuttle lol
Anonymous No.16819309 [Report] >>16819313 >>16819374 >>16819408 >>16821566 >>16821584
>>16819292
no one gives a shit about chinkspace you can stop posting now

>>16819296
this
Anonymous No.16819311 [Report]
>>16819305
Grim. I've only ever been to the Smith on the mall. Its got plenty nice stuff (Darkstar drone so secretive they covered the jet nozzle because fuck you)
Anonymous No.16819313 [Report]
>>16819309
I enjoy the china news posts! I just find them uninteresting compared to more domestic news like what F9 and amazon and ULA is launching.
China just has a billion boring launchers and payloads
Anonymous No.16819318 [Report]
>>16819301
Ted Cruz can't touch this.
Anonymous No.16819321 [Report] >>16819326 >>16819327
>>16819263
won't run out for thirty years at this rate
Anonymous No.16819326 [Report] >>16819416
>>16819321
do you ever get tired of underestimating Russia?
Anonymous No.16819327 [Report] >>16819359
>>16819321
If they can mange the 2/year cadence that looks like the current Russian max they'll run out in late 2030. If they can only do 1/year they're look at launching from LC-81 until 2036. Given how Khrunichev is pushing to get the Angara 5 into regular operation most of those Protons are just going to end up in a rocket garden or scrapped.
Anonymous No.16819333 [Report] >>16819340
Los Angeles will have not one but TWO Shuttles. The old Rockwell full size mockup is also going back on public display:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DN_qXGEfqYY
Anonymous No.16819338 [Report] >>16819341
when is the next expected starship launch?
Anonymous No.16819339 [Report] >>16819343
I was trying to find technical talks given by SpaceX employees but mostly came up empty. This is about the only thing that actually qualifies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYA0f6R5KAI
Anonymous No.16819340 [Report]
>>16819333
? I thought the Shuttle got destroyed, I saw pictures on /sfg/
Anonymous No.16819341 [Report]
>>16819338
w 2eeks
Anonymous No.16819343 [Report] >>16819344 >>16819345 >>16819349
>>16819339
>Simulations
I thought they don't do that in SpaceX.
Anonymous No.16819344 [Report]
>>16819343
The truth is SpaceX does more CFD and computer analysis than ULA or Boeing.
That talking point is retarded. The company is just run way better and the incentives are aligned
Anonymous No.16819345 [Report] >>16819350 >>16819352 >>16819354
>>16819343
https://youtu.be/xahiWQQKw7Y?si=KKomCccMYh8lGQHj
Straight from the horses's mouth. They simulate and they also test a lot and early.
Anonymous No.16819349 [Report]
>>16819343
why would they not? do you really think they caught the booster first try after not simulating anything?
Anonymous No.16819350 [Report]
>>16819345
14 years ago lel
Anonymous No.16819352 [Report] >>16819358
>>16819345
>Stupid background music
I can't watch this.
Anonymous No.16819354 [Report]
>>16819345
>pajeet replying to me
Anonymous No.16819358 [Report]
>>16819352
That's from the time when they were the cool California tech startup (tm)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcaBI_I0Td0
Anonymous No.16819359 [Report]
>>16819327
Wow basic math. I'm impressed
Anonymous No.16819361 [Report]
>>1681935
The bar here is very low, to be fair
Anonymous No.16819366 [Report] >>16819369 >>16819380
So those nasa spaceflight people said some of the engine bells on the booster for flight 11 were bent and hadnt been fixed since its initial landing. is this true? imagine if they never fix bells and just fly with bent engines. maybe the pressure of the exhaust automatically straightens the bells?
Anonymous No.16819367 [Report]
>once around... eris!
BASED
Anonymous No.16819368 [Report] >>16819381 >>16819382 >>16819384
>“What you have here is about 150 years’ combined experience at the top leadership level of this agency,” Draper recalled arguing, “You're telling me you can't find a place for these talented people?”

Then he dropped to the ground and started to cry and kick his feet.
Anonymous No.16819369 [Report] >>16819373
>>16819366
things dont have to be perfect you know? they only have to work. enough with the autistic requirement that everything be shiny and just so. remember how they made the ships look used and beat up in Star Wars? thats because its realistic.
Anonymous No.16819370 [Report]
New space related fetish unlocked.

You know, JPL founders were in freaky sex cult. Guess that tradition has continued.
Anonymous No.16819372 [Report] >>16819376
>>16819297
that's like blaming the roads for drunk drivers
Anonymous No.16819373 [Report] >>16819388
>>16819369
I never said they should polish the ship and give it a lick of paint. I just thought the bell might fail if it wasnt the right shape on ignition.
Anonymous No.16819374 [Report]
>>16819309
I appreciate the chink updates.
Anonymous No.16819376 [Report]
>>16819372
Actually, there is a situation here. The big telecoms bought off the government so they're protested, but the Feds have been going after small firms and voi providers being used by scammers. Elon may get some grief here. More bad PR at the least.
Anonymous No.16819378 [Report]
>>16819305
Three hour drive to JSC for me and I can't gaf about shittle.
I got to see one (probably Endeavor or Atlantis) taking off one morning on its carrier plane, so I have even less need.
Anonymous No.16819379 [Report] >>16819383 >>16819385 >>16819390 >>16819400 >>16820647
>all those specific tiles
Shittle 2.0
Anonymous No.16819380 [Report]
>>16819366
dynamic control algorithms
handling an under-performing engine is not much different from handling an engine out
Anonymous No.16819381 [Report]
>>16819368
kek, this is based
Anonymous No.16819382 [Report]
>>16819368
>you can't find a place for these talented people?
tell them to get in line with the rest of us who can't even get call-backs from companies
Anonymous No.16819383 [Report]
>>16819379
One they have a stable design, the installation can been automated. That's pick and place.
Anonymous No.16819384 [Report] >>16819391 >>16819931
>>16819368
ARE WE WINNING YET?
Anonymous No.16819385 [Report] >>16819883
>>16819379
you now remember transpiration cooling
Anonymous No.16819388 [Report]
>>16819373
doesn't matter. thats why they have so many extras.
Anonymous No.16819390 [Report]
>>16819379
95% of them are straight up hexagons (aka bestagons)
Most of the rest are a hexagon with a straight cut
But every fucking Shittle tile was a snowflake
Anonymous No.16819391 [Report] >>16819394 >>16819395 >>16819405
>>16819384
So... who's gonna bring us Mars samples now
Anonymous No.16819392 [Report] >>16819398 >>16819415 >>16819424 >>16819431
Can you take a picture of me being emotionally distraught for my Insta? Thank you SO much!"
Anonymous No.16819393 [Report] >>16819396 >>16819412 >>16819417
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1979231198699237519

Starship bath over boca
Anonymous No.16819394 [Report] >>16819402
>>16819391
quick, give Boing a cost-plus contract for MSR while nobody is looking
Anonymous No.16819395 [Report]
>>16819391
>le commercial
Anonymous No.16819396 [Report]
>>16819393
path
Anonymous No.16819398 [Report]
>>16819392
>Patel
I hear that ISRO is hiring.
Anonymous No.16819399 [Report] >>16819401 >>16819403 >>16819404 >>16819410 >>16819413 >>16819414 >>16819419 >>16821608
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/17/musk-trump-putin-tunnel-russia-alaska.html
Anonymous No.16819400 [Report] >>16819409
>>16819379
And it will definitely become worse in the future. I feel like either starships for humans won't be reused or they will be refurbished shuttle style.
Anonymous No.16819401 [Report] >>16819411 >>16820356 >>16820488
>>16819399
Tunnel for what?
Anonymous No.16819402 [Report] >>16821247
>>16819394
NB: The Rover is almost out of sample tubes. Think it's down to a half dozen. But even though the Rover could go on for years, there was no plan to resupply with new tubes from MSR.
Anonymous No.16819403 [Report]
>>16819399
That would be cool. To go from Russia to America without flying over the ocean. I was going to say "would be cool to go from Russia to America without taking a flight", but that would mean spending a week on a train to get from where I live to the Bering Straight, and I don't like train rides.
Anonymous No.16819404 [Report]
>>16819399
hell fucking no
Anonymous No.16819405 [Report]
>>16819391
who gives a fuck
we'll analyze the rocks on Mars
Anonymous No.16819408 [Report] >>16819671
>>16819296
>>16819292
>>16819309
I'm interested but that anon is right, you never get launch footage or anything because they are terrified of bad news, so all you get are pics of nothing.
Lets see them fuck up reusables for a year or two and at least make it interesting. I doubt we'll see one blow up.
Anonymous No.16819409 [Report]
>>16819400
About cargo mode I wonder what would be the cost of and expendable ship, without tiles, ablative shield, fins, landing tanks and maybe it wouldn't even need those three sea level engines.
Which means also a lot more payload, so even cheaper.
Anonymous No.16819410 [Report]
>>16819399
lmao, Putin plays trump for the fool and it's so funny. 2 more weeks.
Anonymous No.16819411 [Report]
>>16819401
Tanks and Russian prostitutes
Anonymous No.16819412 [Report] >>16819417
>>16819393
>aerobraking
>aerolift
Spaceplane
Anonymous No.16819413 [Report] >>16819418 >>16819420
>>16819399
How reasonable it it to transport freight across subarctic / tundra climes as opposed to cargo ships?
Chukotka is not connected by rail to the trans Siberian railway so that would have to be built. The rail gauges are also not compatible so you can't just simply drive the same trains across USA to Russia
Anonymous No.16819414 [Report]
>>16819399
Hmm, looks like it's a bit less than 2 chunnels worth of tunneling. Of course neither side has much on either end, so it would be sort of a bridge both to and from nowhere.
The important question: which rail gauge would they use inside? I doubt that RU uses the same rail gauge as US.
Anonymous No.16819415 [Report] >>16819444
>>16819392
>What does your job entail?
>Today, I challenge myself to be the expert the agency needs as we develop our science priorities in space. This means ensuring we are investing in the science it takes to enable exploration and a return investment to life on Earth. This leadership position requires foresight and relationship building because almost all innovative advances are the result of partnerships and teams.
complete non-answer on the "what would you say you do here?" question
good riddance
Anonymous No.16819416 [Report]
>>16819326
their last Proton launch was a couple years ago. Don't see much demand, especially with Angara A5 finally coming online.
Anonymous No.16819417 [Report] >>16819422
>>16819393
>>16819412
Starship is a spaceplane
Anonymous No.16819418 [Report]
>>16819413
It's obviously a bullshit proposal to make Trump delay any action in support of Ukraine for 2 more weeks. After that he will gie another 2 week ultimatum to Putin, Putin will resond with a phone call about 2 weeks after that and the cycle will repeat in about a fortnight.
Anonymous No.16819419 [Report]
>>16819399
yeah, but how would you get from Alaska to the United States?
getting to some non-location in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness accomplishes nothing
even worse, it's simply connected to another non-location literally in Siberia
Anonymous No.16819420 [Report]
>>16819413
>How reasonable it it to transport freight across subarctic / tundra climes as opposed to cargo ships?
Imagine driving a truck from New York to San Francisco, except on worse roads it's colder than you've ever experienced unless it's late spring, summer, or early autumn. This is just the Siberian part of the trip, now you also need to drive through west Russia to get to Europe.
Anonymous No.16819422 [Report]
>>16819417
sir, this is a spaceplane
Anonymous No.16819424 [Report]
>>16819392
AYO HOL UP
SO YOU BE SAYIN
WE WUZ CHINESE EMPERORS N SHIET
Anonymous No.16819431 [Report] >>16819436 >>16819457
>>16819392
well, we have to fix earth's problems first, i thought everyone agreed on that
Anonymous No.16819436 [Report] >>16819438 >>16819439 >>16819443
>>16819431
why pay JPL 10 bil if you could pay rocketlab 1bil for the same thing?
these incompetent money vacuums are holding spaceflight back
Anonymous No.16819438 [Report]
>>16819436
if you give jpl 10b they'll deliver a 2b product. if you give rl 1b they'll deliver an 800m product. nasa wants a 10b product, so they pick jpl
Anonymous No.16819439 [Report] >>16819441 >>16819450
>>16819436
Do you actually believe rocketlab would manage that?
Anonymous No.16819441 [Report] >>16819445 >>16819452 >>16819460 >>16819462 >>16819481 >>16819581 >>16819582
>>16819439
Peter Beck is the most competent CEO in the industry. He's like what if Musk wasn't a clown.
Anonymous No.16819443 [Report] >>16819448
>>16819436
>why pay JPL
So that our space endeavors don't depend on the whims of shareholders, CEOs, and the irrational market?
Anonymous No.16819444 [Report]
>>16819415
lol
Anonymous No.16819445 [Report]
>>16819441
>if Musk wasn't a clown.
*launches another transporter mission*
Anonymous No.16819448 [Report]
>>16819443
lol
pay for performance you retarded fuck
Anonymous No.16819450 [Report]
>>16819439
yes, so would spacex for that matter but spacex isn't really interested in doing small side missions
the ISS deorbit thing is probably more of a "favor" than anything else (nobody else can really do it and spacex can do it relatively painlessly)
Anonymous No.16819452 [Report] >>16819456
>>16819441
>reusable carbon fiber second stage
Anonymous No.16819456 [Report]
>>16819452
the second stage is expended
Anonymous No.16819457 [Report]
>>16819431
"The poor shall be with you always..."
Even Jesus dosen't believe in that
Anonymous No.16819460 [Report]
>>16819441
>"Self taught " "Engineer"
>$6 NZ net worth -- all of it in his bubble company stock
>Everyone thinks he's someone else. The drummer in KISS or something.
Anonymous No.16819461 [Report] >>16819464 >>16819469 >>16819470
Is Starship the only thing Super Heavy can launch?

Like, when it's complete, would it be a tremendous challenge to make an alternative simple clamshell second stage to deliver fuckhuge space telescopes or space station modules to orbit?
Anonymous No.16819462 [Report] >>16819488
>>16819441
>Peter Beck is the most competent CEO in the industry! He just is okay!

Rocket Lab

Annual net income for 2024: -$190.18 million.
Quarterly net income for Q2 2025: -$66.41 million.

*chortle*
Anonymous No.16819464 [Report]
>>16819461
that's what new glenn is for
Anonymous No.16819469 [Report] >>16820359
>>16819461
It would be hard, you would still need powerful second stage.
Anonymous No.16819470 [Report] >>16819480
>>16819461
They would probably do a clamshell expendable Starship at some point or figure out how to do the hungry hippo fairing with the heat shield and flaps.
No way in hell Elon would allocate any resources to building another second stage or integrating someone else's.
That's not happening
Anonymous No.16819480 [Report] >>16819484
>>16819470
hungry hippo nose is inevitabily the long term design of starship. It's proven that openings on shields are possible by the space shuttle landing gear.
Anonymous No.16819481 [Report] >>16819483 >>16819485 >>16820491
>>16819441
Lookin good, champ
Anonymous No.16819483 [Report] >>16819552 >>16819554
>>16819481
What's upmass?
Anonymous No.16819484 [Report]
>>16819480
You don't really need to open the heat shield at all.
Just have the non tiled half open up and eject the satellites with some sidewards velocity.
Anonymous No.16819485 [Report] >>16819487 >>16819491 >>16819496 >>16819502
>>16819481
Starlink doesn't count.
Anonymous No.16819487 [Report] >>16819501
>>16819485
holy cope
btw how's that rocketlab dc2 constellation going?
Anonymous No.16819488 [Report] >>16819493 >>16819498
>>16819462
So what you're saying is that they're heavily focused on investing into product development?

They got a $777m injection from their SPAC merger in 2021; I assume they're still investing that money.
Anonymous No.16819491 [Report] >>16819499
>>16819485
Why not?
Anonymous No.16819493 [Report]
>>16819488
>SPAC merger in 2021
they really never stood a chance. unfortunate
Anonymous No.16819495 [Report]
Is Sally Ride cool or lame?
Anonymous No.16819496 [Report]
>>16819485
>Starlink doesn't count!

Giant Moa hands typed that.
Anonymous No.16819497 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819498 [Report] >>16820110
>>16819488
>Get $777m in 2021
>Lose it all

Net
Loss
Anonymous No.16819499 [Report] >>16819503 >>16819504 >>16819505 >>16819509 >>16819521 >>16820516
>>16819491
Artificial demand. RocketLab could also reach those numbers if they had their own constellation.
Anonymous No.16819501 [Report]
>>16819487
Any updates on the Rocket Lab Mars Sample Return? Still going strong?
Anonymous No.16819502 [Report] >>16819528
>>16819485
There ya go. only 10X more than China now
Anonymous No.16819503 [Report]
>>16819499
With what rocket
Anonymous No.16819504 [Report]
>>16819499
Anonymous No.16819505 [Report]
>>16819499
>I could do that but I don't wanna!

Oh, this is getting embarrassing.
Anonymous No.16819509 [Report]
>>16819499
If only Rocket Lab had wheels then they could be a bike
Anonymous No.16819510 [Report]
Cope worldwide outage we all know who the nigger who's coping is its a chink most likely indian
Anonymous No.16819511 [Report] >>16819514
Anonymous No.16819514 [Report] >>16819518 >>16819519 >>16819522 >>16819852
>>16819511
Is this the chic who got waylaid in her tesla at starbase and almost died
Anonymous No.16819518 [Report]
>>16819514
It wasn't at Starbase it was in Florida ahead of Inspiration4 launch
Anonymous No.16819519 [Report] >>16819595
>>16819514
shhhhh it's bait for the aislopper.
Anonymous No.16819521 [Report]
>>16819499
artifical demand that is printing money for SpaceX on the tune of 2x their launch revenue (and this is just the beginning)
Anonymous No.16819522 [Report] >>16819525 >>16819558
>>16819514
>waylaid
how does this happen wtf
Anonymous No.16819523 [Report]
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1979285350167253058
Anonymous No.16819524 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819525 [Report] >>16819533
>>16819522
surprised she still has the leg
Anonymous No.16819526 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819528 [Report] >>16819536 >>16819540
>>16819502
Okay, my bad, I thought it was the graph about number of launches. Still, my point stands. Of course SpaceX will be able to launch more mass into orbit if they have a bigger rocket in the first place, it's like comparing apples to oranges. Now, imagine if Falcon 9 was scaled down to the size of Electron, or the other way round, then that would be a fair metric.
Anonymous No.16819529 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819532 [Report] >>16819535
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1979271919850618919
>Starship ascends to space
Anonymous No.16819533 [Report]
>>16819525
Yeah
Anonymous No.16819535 [Report] >>16819538
>>16819532
Anonymous No.16819536 [Report]
>>16819528
China has bigger rockets too, they just don't use them very much, and leave it to the Long March 2 most of the time.
Anonymous No.16819538 [Report]
>>16819535
Anonymous No.16819540 [Report]
>>16819528
If only Electron had wheels then they could be a bike
Anonymous No.16819541 [Report]
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1979261047182635135

2 videos
Anonymous No.16819543 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819545 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819549 [Report] >>16819560 >>16819610
Look at those tits!
Anonymous No.16819552 [Report]
>>16819483
I dunno, you tell me what's up Doc?
Anonymous No.16819554 [Report]
>>16819483
It's similar to updog
Anonymous No.16819558 [Report]
>>16819522
Holy shit
Anonymous No.16819560 [Report]
>>16819549
Be respectful anon :(
but yeah lol
Anonymous No.16819581 [Report]
>>16819441
>Peter Beck is the most competent CEO in the industry.
Anonymous No.16819582 [Report] >>16819591
>>16819441
dinner is served
Anonymous No.16819591 [Report]
>>16819582
That's a light meal.
Anonymous No.16819595 [Report] >>16819601
>>16819519
ooga booga where the bicyclists at
Anonymous No.16819601 [Report] >>16819609
>>16819595
not so sure she would be able to bike after her legs got that fucked up
Anonymous No.16819606 [Report]
Why couldn't they use pad A to test catch a ship?
Anonymous No.16819607 [Report] >>16819623 >>16819625
Why are Falcon 9s white and not metallic
Anonymous No.16819609 [Report]
>>16819601
thankfully grok was able to patch up her leg in the first few frames
Anonymous No.16819610 [Report] >>16819663 >>16819666
>>16819549
@gork animate her boobs expanding
Anonymous No.16819616 [Report] >>16819620 >>16819628 >>16819633 >>16820365
Phobos in KSA.
Anonymous No.16819620 [Report] >>16819629
>>16819616
Why is it so easy for space sims to get Earth's atmosphere and clouds looking good, but Mars always looks like an ugly brown ball when the atmosphere looks like this?
Anonymous No.16819623 [Report]
>>16819607
because they paint them with white paint and not metallic paint
Anonymous No.16819625 [Report]
>>16819607
not made from steel
Anonymous No.16819628 [Report]
>>16819616
>Phobos surface area: 16,400±8 km2
>Saudi Arabia land area: 2,150,000 km2
checks out
Anonymous No.16819629 [Report]
>>16819620
It doesn't look that different. What is that white layer? Clouds? When Blackrack does his magic I'm sure it'll look good too.
Anonymous No.16819633 [Report] >>16820257 >>16820270
>>16819616
Is there any better place to figure out asteroid colonisation than Phobos?
Anonymous No.16819634 [Report] >>16819636
I unironically work for Boeing and have my finger on the pulse of the place pretty well. Morale's been up bigly recently and there's been a real shift internally, not to spoil anything but there's some pretty big stuff in the works regarding Starliner II. Might be a good time to buy in, not financial advice.
Anonymous No.16819636 [Report] >>16819638
>>16819634
Sorry I meant to schedule this post for April 1st, my b
Anonymous No.16819638 [Report] >>16820366
>>16819636
Whats that supposed to mean?
Anonymous No.16819644 [Report] >>16819661
Anonymous No.16819645 [Report]
Anonymous No.16819661 [Report] >>16819785
>>16819644
Blue sunsets look unwholesome
Anonymous No.16819663 [Report] >>16819665
>>16819610
It really doesn't like boobs :-(
Anonymous No.16819665 [Report]
>>16819663
HAHAHAHA
Anonymous No.16819666 [Report] >>16819669 >>16819686 >>16819708 >>16819711
>>16819610
there was a way
Anonymous No.16819669 [Report]
>>16819666
good work, Satan
Anonymous No.16819671 [Report]
>>16819408
idk what to tell you, orienspace just entirely livestreamed their latest launch with onboards, the chinese private are less afraid than some american companies.
Anonymous No.16819677 [Report] >>16819679 >>16819695
Quitting /sfg/ until something absolutely revolutionary happens (very low TRL)
Anonymous No.16819679 [Report]
>>16819677
see you tomorrow
Anonymous No.16819686 [Report] >>16819695
>>16819666
Can you start namefagging so I can filter your posts
Anonymous No.16819695 [Report] >>16819782
>>16819677
don't forget
you're here forever

>>16819686
sure, what name should I use?
Anonymous No.16819708 [Report]
>>16819666
The milkship has arrive.
Anonymous No.16819711 [Report]
>>16819666
I was hoping for a wet T-shirt contest
Anonymous No.16819713 [Report]
bitch is mid as fuck and not even spaceflight
Anonymous No.16819724 [Report] >>16819727
>wake up
>nothing at all happened today
ugh
Anonymous No.16819727 [Report] >>16819729
>>16819724
spaceflight
Anonymous No.16819729 [Report] >>16819731
>>16819727
thats what im talking about. nothing happened today. all we got was a small hit piece about starshield and thats it.
Anonymous No.16819731 [Report]
>>16819729
yeah i know
Anonymous No.16819746 [Report] >>16819747 >>16819750 >>16819752 >>16819777
>le glass bubbles that we will then keep stacked ontop of its module and fill with regolith
What the fuck even is this. Why would you fund this retarded idea that would probably take multiple decades to even get a prototype launched and powered.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5lMst6McUs
Anonymous No.16819747 [Report]
>>16819746
I'm skeptical of any Insitu structure honestly. in the near term we can just ship inflatables with starship.
Anonymous No.16819750 [Report] >>16819753
>>16819746
the words "insanely retarded" come to mind
they're going to make a giant structure (25 stories or so high according to their image) by inflating it with "high pressure gas"
later they say it's going to be filled with argon
just to get that thing to 1 atmosphere they'd need like 400 tons of argon
where is the gas coming from? if it's not argon they're making it on the moon, so I guess it's oxygen but they don't describe making any
making enough "high pressure gas" to inflate a 25 story high molten glass bubble is much harder than the part of the project they actually describe
Anonymous No.16819752 [Report] >>16819759 >>16819764
>>16819746
it doesn't take long for this to look retarded
Anonymous No.16819753 [Report] >>16819755 >>16819763
>>16819750
O2 would be a byproduct from processing regolith but even then it's still silly to make your habitat out of fucking glass like why. there is abundant regolith to use to make concrete structures or you can process the metals and make aluminum or titanium
Anonymous No.16819755 [Report] >>16819757 >>16819763 >>16819770
>>16819753
yeah, just sinter some fucking rocks and you're done
Anonymous No.16819757 [Report] >>16819862
>>16819755
ICON mentioned
Anonymous No.16819759 [Report]
>>16819752
Is tipping included in the bill?
Anonymous No.16819763 [Report] >>16819767 >>16819867
>>16819753
>>16819755
Isn't sintering the rocks producing glass?
That's how I understood it.
Landing pads would essentially be made by driving a heater over flattened soon and it ends up being that brown moon glass
Anonymous No.16819764 [Report]
>>16819752
timber!!
Anonymous No.16819767 [Report] >>16819786
>>16819763
"glass" is any substance with no ordered crystalline structure. they dont all have the same material properties as silica glass
Anonymous No.16819770 [Report] >>16819776
>>16819755
>Just like they do in construction on Earth

Wait. That's not how they do it on Earth. So there's probably a lot more involved than just that.
Anonymous No.16819776 [Report] >>16819780
>>16819770
yeah, because on earth you can buy construction materials
but on the moon all you have is fucking rocks
heating them up is like the simplest thing you can do short of just breaking them
Anonymous No.16819777 [Report]
>>16819746
>Why?

NASA DEI NIAC. The CEO of this company that is going to build glass house on the Moon is in delivering tortillas in Mexico:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-martin-bermudez-07722311
Anonymous No.16819780 [Report] >>16819791
>>16819776
You don't even know how a driveway is constructed on Earth, let alone buildings, roads and airports. Please stop posting. You're making us look bad.
Anonymous No.16819782 [Report]
>>16819695
Well, that's a development...
Anonymous No.16819785 [Report]
>>16819661
Because it's the opposite of here on Earth.
Anonymous No.16819786 [Report]
>>16819767
I get that it's not going to be like what we've gotta in windows but still I thought that was the main outcome of lunar regolith, don't think you can make like proper bricks out of it in an oven, it's basically always going to be glass
The whole things a moot point though because that stupid fucking video has all this effort for the shell then fills it with a million tonnes of stuff you need to bring from earth anyway
Anonymous No.16819791 [Report]
>>16819780
shut up, faggot
I've poured driveways and that has nothing to do with this
Anonymous No.16819794 [Report] >>16819806 >>16819821
wtf rocket is that in the back? Is it sloppa?
Anonymous No.16819795 [Report]
>read about eLORAN
>wikipedia article on LORAN mentions it in passing
>never updated again for 15 years
That website is dying, just not in the way I expected. You see this kind of shit everywhere. Looks like DoD and DHS are in fact serious about eLORAN and the retards in gov't who shut it down and blocked funding for eLORAN because it threatened GPS funding are finally gone. I won't even mention procurement has already been bungled by at least one agency because that is the norm these days.
Anonymous No.16819799 [Report]
>>16819177 (OP)
Is there an updated version of this?
Anonymous No.16819806 [Report] >>16819821
>>16819794
My closest guess is that it's an Atlas V 431, but that doesn't make much sense. It'd be weird if it's slop considering the sheer number of perfectly good public-domain images for rockets, but given that it has what appears to be an escape tower... maybe it is.
Anonymous No.16819816 [Report]
>this guy is confined to a wheelchair
wtf i never knew this whole time
Anonymous No.16819817 [Report] >>16819832 >>16819861 >>16819890 >>16819915 >>16819917 >>16819919
>On May 16, 2006, a bully punched Rosenstein so hard that he fell to his knees. Two days later, he screamed out at home.
>“We picked him up and called an ambulance,” his father told the newspaper. "He hasn't walked since."
>Rosenstein was paralyzed from the waist down due to a clot that had formed after the blow in a major artery above his abdomen. When the clot moved down to his spine, it burst, leaving him paralyzed. Complications resulting from his paralysis, such as scoliosis, led to 19 surgeries and a complete spinal fusion. He almost died several times, Youngman said.
did he get punched by goku
Anonymous No.16819821 [Report] >>16819835 >>16819837
>>16819806
>>16819794
Atlas V (or any American rocket?) ever had four boosters. The tower makes me think LC39, but the configuration is all wrong. Also escape tower on a fairing.
Anonymous No.16819832 [Report] >>16819855
>>16819817
There is a recent story about something similar. A clot from a punch causes a teen to become disabled. No idea how that happens.
Anonymous No.16819835 [Report]
>>16819821
>any American rocket ever had four boosters
This is worded like a statement. Was it supposed to be a question?
Anyways, I can only see 3, and the orientation of the rockets is a bit weird, so I figured maybe it was an assymetrical booster configuration. As it so happens, the Atlas V HAS an assymetrical 3 booster configuration. It's the 431. (Technically, there is also the 531, which is the same thing but with a 16 foot fairing, but that looks like a stouter fairing to me.)
Anonymous No.16819837 [Report] >>16819842
>>16819821
>any American rocket ever had four boosters
This is worded like a statement. Was it supposed to be a question?
Anyways, I can only see 3, and the orientation of the rockets is a bit weird, so I figured maybe it was an assymetrical booster configuration. As it so happens, the Atlas V HAS an assymetrical 3 booster configuration. It's the 431. (Technically, there is also the 531, which is the same thing but with a 16 foot fairing, but that looks like a leaner fairing to me.)

I originally said stouter fairing, oops.
Anonymous No.16819838 [Report] >>16819839 >>16819841
Say you took Mars but replaced all the surface iron with copper, would we get a green sand desert planet?
Anonymous No.16819839 [Report] >>16819840
>>16819838
yes
Anonymous No.16819840 [Report]
>>16819839
friggin aweseom
Anonymous No.16819841 [Report] >>16819896
Oh, and uh, if you're curious, yes the U.S. has used the 431. Specifically, Echostar has used it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pxYlm5z45I&t=4536

>>16819838
Probably, but it looks like Minmus with an atmosphere when you do that.
Anonymous No.16819842 [Report] >>16819843
>>16819837
I guess I should have elaborated further.

The pic has quite thick SRBs compared to the core. The ends also taper into cones not smoothly like with Atlas.
Anonymous No.16819843 [Report]
>>16819842
Oh, lol
Yeah to be honest I clocked that instantly too, but for some reason I forgot to mention it the first time. "that doesn't make much sense" was me admitting that my guess didn't pass a sniff test beyond "hey, the general concept for what appears to be an Atlas V is there."
It's still such a weird ass thing to generate. Like, honestly, there's so many other images you could use freely...
Anonymous No.16819845 [Report] >>16819849
>vast mission control has a false floor to hide all the cabling
working there must be suffering. anything that moves will send vibrations thoughout mission control, giving people nausea and uncomfortable feelings. you work in a high stress environment but they design a shitty work area for you because muh clean design aesthetic.
Anonymous No.16819849 [Report] >>16819850
>>16819845
Firstly, which mission control room? You mean ALL of them? They certainly don't put the cables in the ceilings, because that would obstruct the bigger screens.
Secondly, what the fuck are you talking about? "Giving people nausea and uncomfortable feelings?" "Anything that moves will send vibrations throughout mission control?" The latter doesn't even happen with decent false flooring, and the former is nonsensical. No one's going to panic because I'm stamping my feet while thinking.
Anonymous No.16819850 [Report] >>16819851
>>16819849
i used to work in an office with false floors and that bitch had uncomfortable vibrations when people walked around. there's no reason workers should be getting motion sickness at a desk.
Anonymous No.16819851 [Report]
>>16819850
You're right! There is no reason workers should be getting motion sickness at a desk!
. . . which is why I'm baffled that my completely underfunded community college that couldn't afford to replace their abestos dorms for several decades apparently had BETTER false flooring than your office job.
Anonymous No.16819852 [Report] >>16819856 >>16819865
>>16819514
>waylaid
What does that mean?
Anonymous No.16819855 [Report]
>>16819832
it's been happening quite a lot more than it used to
Anonymous No.16819856 [Report]
>>16819852
In this context, stopped or interrupted abruptly and unpleasantly.
Anonymous No.16819860 [Report]
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LxjYvnZ1Z0s
Anonymous No.16819861 [Report]
>>16819817
Poor kid. Perhaps I was too harsh on him
Anonymous No.16819862 [Report]
>>16819757
I wonder if it will be more power or time efficient to sinter the regolith into bricks first then laser weld them together.
Anonymous No.16819865 [Report]
>>16819852
>You have been waylaid by lunchtime rowdies and most defend yourself
Anonymous No.16819867 [Report]
>>16819763
Sintering is fusing particles together (like in pottery or bricks). There is relatively lots of pores that make it brittle. The benefit is you can shape it cold.
You can melt just about any rock to lava if you heat a bit more, but then you have to cast it (pic rel)

For glass, you need high% of silica, with very little other minerals
Typically, you also add flux to lower the melting temperature and allow it to retain amorphous state without crystallisation.
Lava (raw molten regolith) doesn't have the same viscosity and strength glass has, so blowing bubble out of it is pure fantasy.
Anonymous No.16819883 [Report] >>16819892
>>16819385
THEY TOOK MY SWEATY GIRL FROM ME
Anonymous No.16819890 [Report]
>>16819817
I hate assholes who "vacation" in Scottsdale. Kill yourselves, get out of my state. There is nothing of value in that soulless shithole town.
Anonymous No.16819892 [Report]
>>16819883
>SNNNIIIFFFFFFFF SNNNNEEERRRRT
Anonymous No.16819896 [Report] >>16820157
>>16819841
Why would the dust still be red? Wouldn't it be blue also?
Anonymous No.16819905 [Report] >>16819913 >>16819954 >>16819961
"Hey Hey! OMG!"
Anonymous No.16819913 [Report] >>16820370
>>16819905
Youtube thumbnails are a literal cancer on the planet
Anonymous No.16819915 [Report] >>16819918
>>16819817
>get punched
>spend two whole days thinking about how to maximize profits
>luckily you have several doctors and lawyers in your family
>make up a story that defies reality but you have the best expert witnesses and lawyers
>the bully's lawyer tries to defend him, anti-semitically pointing out the implausible nature of the claim
>judge assigned to the case is a co-religionist
>bully's family offers to settle immediately
I'm only surprised he didn't get more
Anonymous No.16819917 [Report]
>>16819817
vaxx status?
Anonymous No.16819918 [Report] >>16819985
>>16819915
the family didnt get sued afaik, it was the school district. so the taxpayers paid him the money.
Anonymous No.16819919 [Report] >>16819985 >>16820042
>>16819817
>the New Jersey school board in the district where he was a student has agreed to a $4.2 million settlement
so fucking disgusting. the perpetrator got away unpunished. instead the tax payer had to pay big time. how are tax payers so cucked that this happens every time?
Anonymous No.16819920 [Report] >>16819922 >>16819925 >>16819926 >>16819967 >>16819984 >>16819994 >>16819998 >>16820118 >>16820190
How do we solve this?
Anonymous No.16819922 [Report] >>16819924 >>16819997 >>16820017
>>16819920
damn. if weenus was not so hot it would be a great place for solar.
Anonymous No.16819924 [Report] >>16819927 >>16819936 >>16820017
>>16819922
Not really because on the surface it's even darker than Mars.
Anonymous No.16819925 [Report] >>16819997
>>16819920
collapse Jupiter into fusion
Anonymous No.16819926 [Report] >>16819997
>>16819920
its not a problem on mars, but i believe i read that we need improved solar tech to do jupiter. it was awhile back so we might've already caught up on the solar tech.
Anonymous No.16819927 [Report] >>16819930 >>16820017
>>16819924
Why is it rocks and desert everywhere we go
Anonymous No.16819930 [Report] >>16819933 >>16819935
>>16819927
A geochemist would say because gibbs free energy wants to tend towards an equilibrium
Anonymous No.16819931 [Report]
>>16819384
But seriously? Are we winning yet?
https://www.planetary.org/articles/promoted-on-sunday-fired-on-monday-inside-a-nasa-offices-sudden-closure
Anonymous No.16819933 [Report]
>>16819930
ffs I read this as "it gibbs free energy"
Anonymous No.16819935 [Report] >>16819938
>>16819930
Then why is Earth so alive?
Anonymous No.16819936 [Report]
>>16819924
for it to be cooler I thought not having a 90 bar atmosphere was taken as a given
Anonymous No.16819937 [Report] >>16819946
Thanks for letting us know there's probably Martian life living on the ice caps, but NASA only likes to look at sand dunes, or craters, or sand dunes in craters.
Anonymous No.16819938 [Report]
>>16819935
Idk. Life and living organisms, at least as we know it, is strange and goes against these principals, increasing overall entropy. One of God’s great mysteries
Anonymous No.16819946 [Report] >>16819964
>>16819937
please understand

poles too hard to get to
Anonymous No.16819954 [Report]
>>16819905
THATS INSANE
Anonymous No.16819961 [Report]
>>16819905
You now remember this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqGQ-qkoZOk
Anonymous No.16819964 [Report]
>>16819946
also mass autism

real scientific instruments too heavy
Anonymous No.16819966 [Report]
>latest MECO is just some boomer CNN reporter seething about getting refused an interview with SpaceX/Shotwell and equating SpaceX doing fade-to-blacks for explosions now to the USSR's censorship
lmao
just get over it dude
Anonymous No.16819967 [Report] >>16819977 >>16819997
>>16819920
Move the sun closer
Anonymous No.16819977 [Report]
>>16819967
b-but the poor earthlings
Anonymous No.16819978 [Report] >>16819981 >>16820031 >>16820053 >>16820062
https://x.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1979542069946552550
>More official renders of Starship including the tanker, depot and HLS lander just dropped! I still think HLS should drop anything not needed after TLI (Raptors / Tankage)...

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250008727
Anonymous No.16819981 [Report]
>>16819978
shits getting real
Anonymous No.16819984 [Report] >>16819997
>>16819920
if you are still using solar by the time you colonize the outer solar system you're NGMI
Anonymous No.16819985 [Report] >>16820157
>>16819918
>>16819919
Wait, how does this make any sense?
Person A assaulted Person B, so everybody else has to pay Person B?
Why? Isn't this on Person A? Why is everybody else on the hook for a single penny?
What the fuck is this excuse for justice?
Anonymous No.16819994 [Report] >>16819997
>>16819920
Helium 3, if this won't work, Uranium, if this won't work, geothermal.
Anonymous No.16819997 [Report] >>16819999 >>16820125
>>16819922
>>16819925
>>16819926
>>16819967
>>16819984
>>16819994
I was talking about the psychological effects, spergs.
Anonymous No.16819998 [Report]
>>16819920
whats the problem? also, special light bulbs
Anonymous No.16819999 [Report] >>16820009
>>16819997
Don't care, still voting Trump.
Anonymous No.16820009 [Report]
>>16819999
checkt
Anonymous No.16820017 [Report] >>16820018
>>16819922
>>16819924
>>16819927
>surface
retards
Anonymous No.16820018 [Report] >>16820025
>>16820017
Why not go a little higher until temps are sub 30 and you'd be able to walk around with nothing but an oxygen breather. Also Venus' upper atmosphere is whitish-yellow not blue.
Anonymous No.16820025 [Report]
>>16820018
You could but it's easier to blame the intern who made that for being retarded.
Anonymous No.16820026 [Report]
Venus is for foids
Anonymous No.16820031 [Report]
>>16819978
>What's the difference between a tanker and a depot?
how do these people breathe
Anonymous No.16820032 [Report] >>16820033 >>16820049
Boys go to Jupiter to get stupider
Anonymous No.16820033 [Report]
>>16820032
girls go to Venus to get peenus?
Anonymous No.16820035 [Report] >>16820037
It does seem like 55-58km is a sweet spot. You wouldn't want to go outside in the clouds though so navigating around the taller ones is likely needed to go outside. There's going to be areas with lower cloud tops I would assume.
Anonymous No.16820037 [Report]
>>16820035
fug
Anonymous No.16820040 [Report]
Anonymous No.16820042 [Report] >>16820047
>>16819919
My family got less for a boat explosion that maimed my mother and sister. Guess I shoulda got Jew lawyers
Anonymous No.16820047 [Report]
>>16820042
sorry about that explosion btw. won't happen again boss.
Anonymous No.16820049 [Report] >>16820050
>>16820032
you dropped this
Anonymous No.16820050 [Report]
>>16820049
why aren't they on bikes
Anonymous No.16820052 [Report] >>16820055 >>16820063
MOOOM OTP-2 IS ACTING WEIRD AGAIN
Anonymous No.16820053 [Report]
>>16819978
MOGGED
Anonymous No.16820055 [Report] >>16820121
>>16820052
You and the ass guy should get a room and you can entertain yourselves with your nonsense.
Anonymous No.16820056 [Report] >>16820058 >>16820128
https://x.com/TimSweeneyEpic/status/1979371645690376432
Anonymous No.16820058 [Report] >>16820122
>>16820056
>needing AI to explain what has been known for centuries
Anonymous No.16820062 [Report] >>16820294
>>16819978
https://x.com/KenKirtland17/status/1979561031535120692
Anonymous No.16820063 [Report] >>16820064
>>16820052
>apogee altitude goes down
>perigee altitude goes up at the same time
>you can't explain this!
fucking magnets, how do they work?!
Anonymous No.16820064 [Report]
>>16820063
line go up, line go down you can't explain that
Anonymous No.16820069 [Report] >>16820086
why build in moon lava toob when we can make lava toob
Anonymous No.16820078 [Report] >>16820080
I wonder if there will be a some sort of conflict because of Mars in this century. I think Phobos could maybe have a huge benefit in colonizing Mars and it isn't that big, in picture I have illustrated its surface area. So maybe there will be a race to colonize Phobos with possibly military engagements.
Anonymous No.16820080 [Report] >>16820082
>>16820078
>T72 is on Phobos
>fires main gun once
>T72 is now on Deimos
Anonymous No.16820082 [Report]
>>16820080
strategic redeployment
Anonymous No.16820086 [Report]
>>16820069
Because it's already there and facilitates an easier first-foothold. That isn't to say we could take a boring machine and expand it. I think an area with already-in-place lava tubes also helps reveal local subsurface geology as locally homogenous and structurally welcoming to more and more anthropological underground tubes and caverns versus other more sandy/unstable areas of the Moon
Anonymous No.16820097 [Report]
Is this the new one or old?
https://x.com/Starlink/status/1979594186816098799
Anonymous No.16820099 [Report] >>16820100 >>16820102 >>16820108 >>16820154
where the fuck is the drone shot

why tease it in the stream if you're not gonna show it
Anonymous No.16820100 [Report] >>16820126 >>16820129
>>16820099
Ship landed too far away from the target for the drone to see it.
Anonymous No.16820102 [Report]
>>16820099
It hit the drone
Anonymous No.16820108 [Report] >>16820133 >>16820139
>>16820099
Is SpaceX pretty independent at this point with the sheer amount of Starlink revenue, or do they still have a lot of private investors like google, steve jurveston, founders fund, fidelety, etc that they are beholden to? I wonder if Elon has deduced that a significant portion of his overall investors in to SpaceX have started getting annoying when they see headlines about exploding rockets, so he has decided to purposefully cut those out for the time being and also purposefully drip-feed some of the kinography shots to just keep all the investors happy and chugging along without any complaints
Anonymous No.16820110 [Report] >>16820114 >>16820385
>>16819498
Yes, they're "losing" the money because they're investing it into new products? Engineer salaries, etc.
Anonymous No.16820114 [Report]
>>16820110
people with Sp*ceX brain don't listen to rational info when it comes to other companies.
Anonymous No.16820117 [Report] >>16820147
Is Kepler 452b the final home of humanity?
Anonymous No.16820118 [Report]
>>16819920
Simple and effective
Anonymous No.16820121 [Report]
>>16820055
It's a meme, you dip
Anonymous No.16820122 [Report]
>>16820058
That's not what portmanteau means
Anonymous No.16820125 [Report]
>>16819997
>erm actually my vague bait question was actually about this not that.
Kys faggot
Anonymous No.16820126 [Report] >>16820130 >>16820144
>>16820100
it landed right next to the buoy retard
Anonymous No.16820128 [Report]
>>16820056
>no fossils on Mars
That we know of.
Just wait till we find a coal vein on the moon
Anonymous No.16820129 [Report]
>>16820100
>Ship landed too far away from the target
They are going to completely the launch tower aren't they?
Anonymous No.16820130 [Report] >>16820135
>>16820126
and here i was thinking de nial was a river in egypt
Anonymous No.16820133 [Report] >>16820137 >>16821368
>>16820108
If the company is structured correctly, Elon doesn't really have to worry as much about keeping investors happy. Consider also that the investor pool for Spacex is mostly comprised of people that share the actual vision instead of "line go up every quarter or I shit and piss everywhere."
But to answer your first question, yes, Starlink is now paying for itself and producing enough cash flow into the company as a whole that the scales are heavily leaning in Spacex's favor in any kind of negotiations/agreements with investors and lenders. Spacex will almost certainly keep raising investor money and borrowing funds because that's how you grow aggressively, but the giant cash pipeline that is Starlink gives them the leeway to basically write their own terms.
Anonymous No.16820135 [Report]
>>16820130
you can see the buoy on the stream and there is footage from the buoy
it was like 50m away

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1978905901344907726
Anonymous No.16820137 [Report] >>16820140
>>16820133
I don't think it will take many years until they don't really need to raise cash anymore assuming they dont' start spamming a lot of starships at mars
and when they are ready to do that starlink should really print money
Anonymous No.16820139 [Report]
>>16820108
Elon is dictator. If the investors don't like it they can fuck off and sell their shares, unsurprisingly they don't.
Anonymous No.16820140 [Report] >>16820150
>>16820137
Most of the recent cash raises were just opportunities to sell shares for people who wanted to.
Anonymous No.16820144 [Report]
>>16820126
it landed too close to the buoy and the camera couldnt focus
Anonymous No.16820147 [Report] >>16820204
>>16820117
no, it’s gonna be some stupid lame supercomputer network here in our solar system that we try to eternally protect as all futurefags upload their consciousness to it and try to “beat God” and live forever
Anonymous No.16820150 [Report]
>>16820140
yeah that too, secondaries
Anonymous No.16820154 [Report]
>>16820099
did you skip the previous thread? there are links to drone shots there

https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1978179844656480423
Anonymous No.16820157 [Report]
>>16819896
I just hue shifted it man, I don't know why the red kept being red.

>>16819985
I think the logic goes is that Person B warned the school that Person A was going to do it. They ignored B, which enabled A to actually escalate into a punch.
Anonymous No.16820163 [Report] >>16820167 >>16820261
Anonymous No.16820167 [Report]
>>16820163
what the fuck
Anonymous No.16820171 [Report] >>16820381 >>16820595
Anonymous No.16820175 [Report]
In the non-gay timeline Brits would be launching rockets from here and colonising the Solar System. It even has the perfect name.
Anonymous No.16820183 [Report] >>16820187 >>16820192 >>16820233 >>16820597 >>16820600
How does anyone truly hate this dude?
I just stumbled across this tweet and I can't stop fucking laughing
Anonymous No.16820185 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5UAwZo5Cxc
Anonymous No.16820187 [Report]
>>16820183
its tru do, chess is a game for retards. however diablo 4 is too
Anonymous No.16820190 [Report]
>>16819920
Light cabins fitted with white-hot lamps with an extremely high lumen factor. Same cabins should also have IR and UV bulbs fitted for heat, tanning and vitamin-D production. Each therapy treatment lasts an hour or two daily, bathing the person in light and heat to ward off depression and the heat allows for proper rest and a reduced metabolism, reducing daily caloric intake needs. UV lamps will be automatically turned off if the person has exceeded daily UV exposure limits.

Proper lightning throughout the base and special colours for the walls also aid in modulating brightness and helping the circadian rhythm. Example being that work-spaces should have bright lights, bright neutral/pastel colours and roomy and bedrooms for example should have warmer, dimmer lights with reddish/brownish colours, hue's and be cozy. Heating should also be adjustable.
Anonymous No.16820192 [Report]
>>16820183
chess is boring as fuck. There is a reason chess champions are never useful outside of chess. it attracts the kind of math brained automatons who like to memorise shit and have no creative thought. Not really true intelligence imo.
Anonymous No.16820198 [Report] >>16820202 >>16820228 >>16820496 >>16820571
FLIGHT 12 POLYMARKET IS ONLINE!
Anonymous No.16820202 [Report]
>>16820198
>If the 12th SpaceX Starship successfully launches from its launch pad by November 30, 2025, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to “Yes”. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
Anonymous No.16820204 [Report] >>16820213 >>16820238
>>16820147
Wait till they find out uploading is a scam since it's just a copied brain scan and the jeet technician forgot to terminate your brain after the scan
Anonymous No.16820207 [Report] >>16820211 >>16820218 >>16820253
2026 is going to be the most exciting year for space travel since 1969

>Haven-1
>Starship orbital refueling
>Artemis-2
>Sierra LIFE
>Starship full reuse

The space age we were promised for so long is actually finally beginning
No more vaporware
No more setbacks
No stopping until Andromeda
Anonymous No.16820211 [Report]
>>16820207
inb4 everything gets kicked back to Q4 (a.k.a scrubbed another year and then some)
Anonymous No.16820213 [Report] >>16820224 >>16820693
>>16820204
uploading wouldn't even do anything. consciousness isn't reducible to just the firing of neurons or 1s and 0s on a computer. there is a quantum aspect to consciousness that we aren't aware of yet.
Anonymous No.16820218 [Report] >>16820222 >>16820494
>>16820207
Just like 2025 was supposed to be an exciting year for starship and all we ended up getting was failures.
Anonymous No.16820222 [Report]
>>16820218
third times the charm
Anonymous No.16820224 [Report] >>16820236
>>16820213
And do you have any evidence of that or you are just asking to trust your instinct?
Anonymous No.16820228 [Report]
>>16820198
>November 30
Anonymous No.16820233 [Report]
>>16820183
ouch. I really love chess, used to study it and play it every day, it's like my comfort game. This is not the first time he criticizes it, and he's right at the end. It's something that is not much useful outside of just... playing chess. It'll still be my guilty pleasure, though.
Anonymous No.16820236 [Report] >>16820259
>>16820224
I have personal experiential evidence which is indisputable for me but not enough for the wider scientific community. Not going to pretend otherwise.
Anonymous No.16820238 [Report]
>>16820204
Soma moment.
Anonymous No.16820243 [Report] >>16820246 >>16820247
One corner of the internet is saying that SpaceX has grown negligent of HLS development and sees Artemis as politically unstable–thus any lander dev is secondary to simply getting Starship operational
for Starlink growth (which is almost guaranteed at this point produce more money for them than the artemis contract could ever dish out)
Another corner is saying that ‘Lon is just being sneaky, and that for whatever reason they are for sure working on & prioritizing HLS under cover of night, and somehow HLS SS is just going to emerge next year out of a spooktent completed and ready to fly a long-duration test mission
Is the truth likely somewhere in between?
Anonymous No.16820246 [Report]
>>16820243
as someone who has worked with the HLS team, yes they're serious about it.
Anonymous No.16820247 [Report]
>>16820243
>for Starlink growth (which is almost guaranteed at this point produce more money for them than the artemis contract could ever dish out)
it already does
Anonymous No.16820253 [Report] >>16820262
>>16820207
>ignores new glenn
Anonymous No.16820257 [Report] >>16820270
>>16819633
Proximity with Mars makes things a bit different from a random free flying asteroid in the belt (e.g. can't get continuous sunlight), but yeah, it's the perfect playground. I wish it was in orbit around Earth, stuff like ISRU would have been solved for ages.
Anonymous No.16820259 [Report] >>16820260
>>16820236
OK THEN BACK OFF. PUNK.
Anonymous No.16820260 [Report]
>>16820259
doesn't make it any less true
Anonymous No.16820261 [Report]
>>16820163
I get it
Anonymous No.16820262 [Report] >>16820263 >>16820296 >>16820326
>>16820253
I was actually about to ask "the fuck is New Glenn gonna do that's interesting"

>look it up
>they're sending an uncrewed Blue Moon lander to the moon in two months

sheeeeeeit I didn't realize they were that ready, I'm gonna laugh my ass off if Blue Origin goes from agonizingly slow to warp speed overnight
Anonymous No.16820263 [Report]
>>16820262
they just don't show their work publically much
and bluemoon mk1 doesn't need orbital refilling?
Anonymous No.16820265 [Report] >>16820273 >>16820275
Reminder that the Moon, Mars, Ceres, Callisto, and all other heavenly bodies belong to Britannia.
Anonymous No.16820270 [Report] >>16820290
>>16819633
>>16820257
Another issue is that you probably don't want to shit up Mars orbits with a fuckton of dust.
Anonymous No.16820272 [Report] >>16820274 >>16820502
soon bros
Anonymous No.16820273 [Report]
>>16820265
Kek, make sure that there even is a Britain left at the end of this century. Otherwise, dreaming about colonizing the rest of the system is one that is forever (For Brits that is).
Anonymous No.16820274 [Report]
>>16820272
Anonymous No.16820275 [Report]
>>16820265
All hail Britannia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCIK0jg-yxk
Anonymous No.16820284 [Report] >>16820292 >>16820905
I can't wait for the cuckpod era to be over.
The Shuttle was supposed to deliver us from it, only to retvrn to cuckpod
Anonymous No.16820290 [Report] >>16820293
>>16820270
Sandbraking. A technique for landing large payloads on Mars using the sands of Phobos

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1270963817300664
Anonymous No.16820292 [Report]
>>16820284
The Shittle was way worse then any of the cuckpods safe for perhaps Shitliner. Glad that Starship is here though, finaly something that moves spaceflight forward.
Anonymous No.16820293 [Report]
>>16820290
>pocket sand yourself to slow down
what the fuck
Anonymous No.16820294 [Report]
>>16820062
.614 km^3 :)
Anonymous No.16820296 [Report] >>16820318
>>16820262
Absolutely zero chance of this happening successfully. Jeff did a ferociter when he should have graditimed
Anonymous No.16820307 [Report] >>16820309 >>16820339 >>16820470
https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1979636589279273285

lol apparently joe rogan got a tour of starbase
Anonymous No.16820309 [Report]
>>16820307
That's high praise from someone who has done a bunch of psychedelic drugs.
Anonymous No.16820318 [Report]
>>16820296
If BO makes a lander and NASA puts people in it, they will certainly die
Anonymous No.16820326 [Report]
>>16820262
they are not launching this year, you can bet on it.
Anonymous No.16820334 [Report] >>16820335 >>16820337 >>16820352
If you were the great Bezos, would you be happy with your position after all these years and $15B spent?
Anonymous No.16820335 [Report]
>>16820334
With my current knowledge of how bad blue is, NO...
I firmly believe, however, that Jeffrey Bezos seriously believes BO is neck-and-neck competitive with SpaceX right now. He sees himself as equal, delusionally
Anonymous No.16820337 [Report] >>16820369
>>16820334
He's won quite a bit of contract without having to deliver anything. Just because "I HATE ELON MUSK" reason
Anonymous No.16820339 [Report] >>16820342 >>16820357 >>16820374 >>16820666
>>16820307
isn't he a FEther?
Anonymous No.16820342 [Report]
>>16820339
who knows
Anonymous No.16820352 [Report]
>>16820334
probably doesn't even notice that money and gets to have a potentially cool rocket company.
Anonymous No.16820356 [Report]
>>16819401
don't be antisemitic
Anonymous No.16820357 [Report]
>>16820339
depends which strain of weed he's smoking at any one time.
Anonymous No.16820359 [Report] >>16820361
>>16819469
ok, how about a starship with no flaps and no tiles just a nose that comes off?
Anonymous No.16820361 [Report] >>16820380
>>16820359
not fully reusable
Anonymous No.16820363 [Report] >>16820565 >>16820611
Is terrorism a big issue for P2P?
From the perspective of a anti rich/environmentalist terrorist a starship loaded up with wealthy travelers represent very high value and ease of execution as just a drone or ula sniper equals most probable death...
I think the counter is to allocate some of the seats to poor third world kids, demotivating any foul play
Anonymous No.16820365 [Report]
>>16819616
if you set off little nukes in the focus of that crater you could make it into an orion ship
Anonymous No.16820366 [Report]
>>16819638
it's a joke
Anonymous No.16820369 [Report]
>>16820337
and because he made his own company buy from BO
Anonymous No.16820370 [Report]
>>16819913
Blame LTT
Anonymous No.16820374 [Report] >>16820378 >>16820558 >>16822000
>>16820339
>"hey man like no one knows for sure right?"
>actually we do here is evidence, proof and records
>"yeah. yeah but like no one still knows? like I don't know?"
Anonymous No.16820378 [Report]
>>16820374
based not-sure-about-that-er
Anonymous No.16820380 [Report] >>16820383 >>16820386
>>16820361
I'm not asking for it to be reusable, just for it to put a very large object in space.
Anonymous No.16820381 [Report]
>>16820171
Wait til they figure out it's because they designed it to land on Mars first
Anonymous No.16820383 [Report] >>16820401
>>16820380
no point in a partially reusable starship
Anonymous No.16820385 [Report] >>16820394
>>16820110
"Rocket Lab: Venus in 2025!,
Anonymous No.16820386 [Report]
>>16820380
If you have a working Starship, you launch a hold full of sub assemblies and build the large object in space.
Anonymous No.16820394 [Report]
>>16820385
Starship Moon 2024.
See how easy that was?
Anonymous No.16820397 [Report]
Damn joe rogan actually has insane insight into this now kek he hit the nail directly on its head and drove the nail down to the center of the earth
Anonymous No.16820401 [Report] >>16820402
>>16820383
shit bait, tard
Anonymous No.16820402 [Report]
>>16820401
you don't get sub 100$/kg by expending starships. you just don't.
Anonymous No.16820447 [Report]
Pennies for venus missions
Anonymous No.16820470 [Report] >>16820479
>>16820307
I bet his video would have been better than EDA tour video
Anonymous No.16820479 [Report] >>16820933
>>16820470
remember the time EDA gave elon the idea that doomed several flights. I member
Anonymous No.16820483 [Report]
wen hop?
Anonymous No.16820484 [Report]
fuck the hop wen mars
Anonymous No.16820485 [Report]
>>16819301
They started building this when I was in High School.
I'm now 10 years into my career, married, and have a daughter on the way
Anonymous No.16820488 [Report] >>16820737
>>16819401
freight trains probably, would allow a direct rail link to Chyna and free up a LOT of port space
Anonymous No.16820491 [Report]
>>16819481
This is out of date btw. SpaceX flies more mass to space in 9 months than the shittle did over 30 years
https://brycetech.com/reports/report-documents/bryce-briefing-2025-Q2/
Anonymous No.16820494 [Report]
>>16820218
We did end up getting the perfect V2 flights that they were looking for, after a fashion.
Anonymous No.16820496 [Report]
>>16820198
>Nov 30
I'm all in
Anonymous No.16820502 [Report] >>16820508 >>16820568
>>16820272
Give us the fucking Ioli cats
Anonymous No.16820508 [Report]
>>16820502
Go back to /g/ faggot
Anonymous No.16820509 [Report] >>16820510
https://x.com/raz_liu/status/1979762066191011999
>Mission successful of LJ-1 Y8.

https://x.com/Cosmic_Penguin/status/1979743120456822937
>Next Chinese launch to orbit is coming again in just about half an hour. I am still not sure about the rocket, nor perhaps most of the passengers, but China’s close ally Pakistan government’s SUPARCO reports they have a hyperspectral EO satellite on board:
https://www.brecorder.com/news/40387540/pakistan-to-launch-first-hyperspectral-satellite-from-china-on-oct-19
Anonymous No.16820510 [Report] >>16820512
>>16820509
>Next Chinese launch to orbit is coming again in just about half an hour. I am still not sure about the rocket, nor perhaps most of the passengers, but China’s close ally Pakistan government’s SUPARCO reports they have a hyperspectral EO satellite on board:
jeetchuds, your response?
Anonymous No.16820512 [Report]
>>16820510
https://x.com/r_isro/status/1979646883753787481
>Regional media report suggests BlueBird Block-2 FM1 satellite by AST Space Mobile has arrived at SDSC-SHAR on 17 October. Launch expected in late November.

https://www.andhrajyothy.com/2025/national/bluebird-experiment-to-launch-in-november-american-satellite-reaches-shar-1457604.html
>Sullurpeta, October 17 (Andhra Jyoti): The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is gearing up for another commercial launch. It is getting ready to send the American Bluebird Block-2 communication satellite into space by the end of November from Sriharikota using an LVM3-M6 rocket. The 6,500 kg satellite, which will be launched from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Shar, first reached Chennai from the US. It was transported to Shar in a special vehicle by road under CISF security in the early hours of Friday. Along with this satellite, 8 American scientists also reached Shar. All of them will remain here until the launch is completed.
Anonymous No.16820513 [Report]
Anonymous No.16820514 [Report]
Anonymous No.16820516 [Report]
>>16819499
this is some of the most advanced cope I've ever seen
Anonymous No.16820522 [Report]
Anonymous No.16820558 [Report]
>>16820374
>I don't understand it so it must be wrong
90% of conspiracy theories
Anonymous No.16820565 [Report]
>>16820363
Why don't people shoot down airplanes?
Anonymous No.16820568 [Report] >>16820572 >>16820606
>>16820502
>troon colour patches
And those faggots were gaslighting me on the Discord for saying I don't want furshit because it's a gateway to other kinds of degeneracy. Seriously, the best thing about KSP was that there was no agenda in it whatsoever, nothing for either side to get mad about. And yet here they are, already wanting to force their shit into KSA.
Anonymous No.16820570 [Report] >>16820573 >>16820576
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-19/wa-space-debris-reentry-investigation/105909612
Anonymous No.16820571 [Report]
>>16820198
Based and using my last satoshis pilled
Anonymous No.16820572 [Report] >>16820579
>>16820568
Ah yes, my favorite trans pride flag colors: Turquoise and salmon.
Anonymous No.16820573 [Report]
>>16820570
>the Australian Space Agency
Lel, all 1 part time workers
Anonymous No.16820576 [Report]
>>16820570
The only thing Australia seems to come up in the news space related is pieces of space junk landing on them lol
Anonymous No.16820579 [Report] >>16820585
>>16820572
Don't act like it isn't intentional, disingenuous cunt. I've seen you faggots do this hundreds of times thinking you're clever.
Anonymous No.16820582 [Report] >>16820651
Anonymous No.16820585 [Report] >>16820590 >>16820609
>>16820579
>don't act like it isn't intentional
These colors are literally so far removed from the actual colors of the trans flag(AND it's missing anything that resembles white and pink!) that it's bordering on complaining that the flag of FUCKING HAITI was a secret trans flag.
Salmon isn't a pink by the ways, it's a washed out orange.

Unbelievable. Of all the things to take problem with, you picked the only thing that anyone with good eyesight and a decently high contrasting monitor can immediately object to.
Anonymous No.16820587 [Report] >>16820612 >>16820741
>Australian Space Agency

"Hails of derisive laughter."
Anonymous No.16820590 [Report] >>16820592
>>16820585
Total troon death
Anonymous No.16820592 [Report]
>>16820590
Don't get me wrong, I agree. I'm also just worried you're wasting your energy here. No point in tiring yourself out and leaving yourself unable to deal with the ACTUAL troonshit.
Anonymous No.16820595 [Report]
>>16820171
YES
Anonymous No.16820597 [Report]
>>16820183
chess is a battle, go is a war
Anonymous No.16820599 [Report]
https://x.com/deltaIV9250/status/1979569285120102405
Anonymous No.16820600 [Report]
>>16820183
I used to play chess during PE in winter since it was too cold to exercise outside. I know a guy who really likes and plays it for fun over video games, but I can't comprehend that. It's just not fun to me. Even when bored with nothing to do, I'd rather be doing crosswords or sudoku than play chess.
Anonymous No.16820606 [Report] >>16820608
>>16820568
I just think that chibishit (in general, as well) is objectively ugly, and would rather something that's better proportioned
Anonymous No.16820608 [Report]
>>16820606
I would rather you furfags and troons stop shitting everything good up
Anonymous No.16820609 [Report]
>>16820585
Get fucked YWNBAW
Anonymous No.16820611 [Report]
>>16820363
No more than a plane.
Terrorism would be relly be an issue on Mars, a single starship intentionally crashing on a big colony would be fatal.
One of the reasons why I think settlements should be many smaller ones instead of a big single one.
Anonymous No.16820612 [Report] >>16820656 >>16820991
>>16820587
It's kinda sad that this kindergarden-drawing shit is the absolute pinacle of Australian space exploration. I am ENDLESSLY SEETHING that New Zealand is mogging us.
>muh Gilmour
Fucking Astra is lightyears ahead of them
Anonymous No.16820623 [Report] >>16820624
Between this and their Lunar "Roo-ver", it just seems like an odd take. Making a Dad Joke about yourself.
Anonymous No.16820624 [Report]
>>16820623
Australia is full of this cultural cringe stuff, feeling the need to deprecate themselves. They're an odd, neurotic people, lacking in pride.
Anonymous No.16820626 [Report] >>16820635 >>16820638
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1979746018498654274

lots of starship related posts from musk
Anonymous No.16820628 [Report] >>16820695 >>16820749
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1979844869226213630
Anonymous No.16820631 [Report]
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1979848708943663221
Anonymous No.16820632 [Report]
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1979849522374423026
Anonymous No.16820633 [Report] >>16820644 >>16820698
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1979862682674356461
Anonymous No.16820635 [Report]
>>16820626
Yeah this is cool and all when's flight 12?
Anonymous No.16820638 [Report] >>16820641 >>16820642 >>16820657
>>16820626
For a crew of two
For one week

Kinda overkill.
Anonymous No.16820641 [Report]
>>16820638
Orion is undersized
Anonymous No.16820642 [Report]
>>16820638
It's almost too big. Might get kinda spooky. Eternal low sunlight outside, strange creaks from elsewhere in the ship
Anonymous No.16820644 [Report] >>16820660 >>16821337
>>16820633
SpaceX is going to crash and burn isn't it?
Anonymous No.16820647 [Report]
>>16819379
Status on their automated tile gizmo 3000? We still using mexicans for 2 more weeks?
Anonymous No.16820651 [Report] >>16820661
>>16820582
That's funny. People here seethe about this kind of JPL artisinal work, but it's nice and shows that they understand the gravitas of going to a new world. Reminder that it's not JPL's fault that launch has been so expensive. With the cards they were dealt theyve made amazing vehicles second to none.
Anonymous No.16820656 [Report] >>16820745
>>16820612
At least you have a rocket and a functional launch pad. How do you think us bongs feel? We went from ruling the waves to being the butt of the entire world. Fucking India which we conquered and dominated has a more successful space program than we ever had.
Anonymous No.16820657 [Report]
>>16820638
Blame Shartemis not Starship
Anonymous No.16820660 [Report]
>>16820644
you have no ambition
Anonymous No.16820661 [Report] >>16820664 >>16820669
>>16820651
its not launch that makes JPL shit expensive
they could make 10 missions with the same cash instead of 10 mission every ten years
and maybe you are unaware or forgot that JPL has been aggressively defending its "turf" by basically cockblocking anything that tries to do what they do, such as red dragon from SpaceX

they are to blame as much as any ossified bureucracy can be
Anonymous No.16820664 [Report] >>16820758
>>16820661
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26270977

tl:dr from grok
>Ex-NASA insider: SpaceX's Red Dragon (cheap Mars lander/sample return) got killed in three separate concept studies by NASA politics—JPL turf war to protect their bloated jobs program, humiliation for Lockheed's Orion capsule, and lobbyist senators threatening to gut SpaceX's NASA contracts. Elon ditched it for Starship.
Anonymous No.16820666 [Report]
>>16820339
He's basically a blank slate that resets between every episode, and asks dumb questions to make the guest feel smart and keep them talking for three hours
Anonymous No.16820667 [Report] >>16820755 >>16820768
> Enter SpaceX and the 2014 Red Dragon proposal, which was an all-in-one Mars sample return mission that launched on a single Falcon Heavy and landed a rocket inside of the dragon capsule that was powerful enough to send the collected sample directly back to Earth. Do it all in one mission, and at 10x - 100x reduction in cost. So cheap it didn't even need to be a flagship mission and could be outsourced to industry and academia (like New Horizons was).
>JPL was not impressed. Play with your little toy satellites all you want, but don't fuck around with the golden goose. 2014 Red Dragon sample return proposal was a direct threat to the entire Mars planetary exploration program and semi-autonomous JPL's bottom line. They hit back hard trying to discredit the proposal with a bunch of underhanded arguments and agency politics. That's about the time I left NASA so I didn't get to see it fully play out, but apparently JPL won out because in the end the sample-return version of Red Dragon was deselected from funding.
Anonymous No.16820669 [Report] >>16820670 >>16820672 >>16821712 >>16821936
>>16820661
Same for SLS. Anyone with a brain will tell you the delta-v you get with SLS can easily be replicated with a couple of kick stages in orbit and it will do us a lot of good to develop those technologies (zero boil off) for the future but Congress et al keeps cockblocking these projects.
Anonymous No.16820670 [Report]
>>16820669
all of NASA and its contractors were jobs programmes for decades, and most of it still is
Anonymous No.16820672 [Report] >>16820675
>>16820669
Today I will remind them
Anonymous No.16820675 [Report]
>>16820672
@grok disable rocket equation.
Anonymous No.16820683 [Report] >>16820993
https://x.com/Blobifie/status/1979600941746950154
Anonymous No.16820688 [Report] >>16820689 >>16820708 >>16820738 >>16820751
https://x.com/S_F_Archive/status/1979873982355820774
Anonymous No.16820689 [Report] >>16820692
>>16820688
>Booster turned out to be the easy part

That was a surprise.
Anonymous No.16820692 [Report]
>>16820689
That's a really good outcome
Anonymous No.16820693 [Report]
>>16820213
Aristotle and later Thomas Aquinas both attribute it to the existence of a soul
Anonymous No.16820695 [Report] >>16820748 >>16822023
>>16820628
>2 crewed
by what? a robot and a dog? you can say people you know. this dei shit is cringe.
Anonymous No.16820698 [Report] >>16820713
>>16820633
>elon wants to build a dyson sphere
oh boy
Anonymous No.16820704 [Report] >>16820707 >>16820710
Ok, maybe the Universe is expanding to the left and the right but what is at the bottom and the top of the universe?
Anonymous No.16820707 [Report]
>>16820704
Most dark matter has fallen to the bottom of the universe due to gravity, you have to look down there to find that stuff.
Anonymous No.16820708 [Report]
>>16820688
SN5 was fun to watch. So was SN8.
Anonymous No.16820710 [Report]
>>16820704
a 3d universe like ours bounded by a 4 dimensional region would look like an infinitely large area to those on the inside. alternatively space is infinite in size and the universe expands into it.
Anonymous No.16820713 [Report]
>>16820698
he has been talking about it for a while
Anonymous No.16820715 [Report] >>16820716
Was Falcon XX supposed to use a bunch of clustered Merlins? Or just 9 new very-scaled-up merlins like some sort of modern F-1
Anonymous No.16820716 [Report]
>>16820715
Woah it used merlin 2
Anonymous No.16820726 [Report] >>16820728 >>16820730
https://x.com/Truthful_ast/status/1979865110324900275/
>Starship Fuel Depot launch.
Anonymous No.16820727 [Report] >>16820728 >>16820753 >>16820963
https://x.com/Truthful_ast/status/1979747350865457652
>Undocking from a fuel depot.
Anonymous No.16820728 [Report] >>16820729
>>16820726
>>16820727
official renders?
Anonymous No.16820729 [Report]
>>16820728
ksp
Anonymous No.16820730 [Report] >>16820739
>>16820726
>Starship Fuel Depot launch.
[math]\unicode{x1F62F}[/math][math]\unicode{x1F62F}[/math]

>Truthful
[math]\unicode{x1F611}[/math][math]\unicode{x1F611}[/math]
Anonymous No.16820737 [Report]
>>16820488
extremely retarded
you'd have to build thousands of miles of rail and the freeze and thaw cycles would absolutely fucking wreck them, so a considerable fraction would need to be repaired every year
and it would still be significantly more expensive than shipping
Anonymous No.16820738 [Report] >>16820742
>>16820688
where's MK3/SN1?And MK4 (built in Cocoa Beach), and SN7.2... man, I still remember that one being tested while watching it live on the LabPadre stream... those were the times.
Anonymous No.16820739 [Report]
>>16820730
Anonymous No.16820741 [Report] >>16821142
>>16820587
Fuck the wifi tax and fuck australia
I'd beg God to curse australia and turn it into a blasted desert filled with subhuman orcs and venomous creatures of all kinds, but He is way ahead of me
Anonymous No.16820742 [Report]
>>16820738
missing I guess, its also missing a bunch of unlaunched boosters I think
Anonymous No.16820745 [Report]
>>16820656
you forgot the part about never being slaves, kek
Anonymous No.16820748 [Report]
>>16820695
actually some of the crew will be blacks
Anonymous No.16820749 [Report]
>>16820628
>1000m^3
wow, a cubic kilometer?
Anonymous No.16820751 [Report] >>16820779
>>16820688
>SN42 and SN69 will debut soon
i wonder what surprises elon has for us
Anonymous No.16820753 [Report] >>16820756 >>16820995 >>16821344
>>16820727
>fuel depot has the male side of the docking mount points
chat, how do we feel about this
Anonymous No.16820755 [Report]
>>16820667
yeah, the hackernews-red-dragon copypasta is common knowledge here.
Anonymous No.16820756 [Report]
>>16820753
saves mass for the vehicle that has to do repeated flights, the depot is going nowhere
Anonymous No.16820758 [Report] >>16820764 >>16820768 >>16821206
>>16820664
>JPL gets reduced by 550 jobs
who's laughing now?
Anonymous No.16820764 [Report] >>16820765
>>16820758
they should make a movie out of this
Anonymous No.16820765 [Report]
>>16820764
after the first starship mars landing
Anonymous No.16820768 [Report] >>16820790
>>16820667
>>16820758
I still wonder from time to time how things would've turned out had SpaceX gotten away with their Red Dragons. I mean, they would've gained a lot of experience and real data in terms of interplanetary reentry, and ECLSS for extended periods of time, though it might've still slowed things down in the long term for Starship (?), as they would've spent lots of resources and time on these missions.
Anonymous No.16820775 [Report] >>16820778 >>16820782 >>16821718
https://www.tomshardware.com/service-providers/network-providers/secret-spacex-satellites-are-transmitting-mysterious-signals-on-the-wrong-spectrum-a-classified-network-caught-sending-data-on-the-uplink-frequency
Anonymous No.16820778 [Report] >>16821718
>>16820775
>starshield is owned by spacex
stopped reading right there
Anonymous No.16820779 [Report] >>16820784
>>16820751
SN69 will be the first orbital refueling attempt.
Anonymous No.16820782 [Report]
>>16820775
The military doesn't give a fuck about the ITU oh my goooood
Anonymous No.16820784 [Report]
>>16820779
Hot.
Anonymous No.16820787 [Report]
reminder you dont hate journalists enough
Anonymous No.16820790 [Report] >>16820795
>>16820768
it would have not slowed down starship. different teams. all it would have done is speed starship development and also give morale to elon stans.
Anonymous No.16820795 [Report] >>16820798
>>16820790
people can change teams
Anonymous No.16820798 [Report] >>16820810
>>16820795
your dad can change sexual orientation.
Anonymous No.16820804 [Report] >>16820808
https://x.com/CNSAWatcher/status/1979849575927324684
>Long March 5 Y9 rocket successfully transported. The rocket features advanced cryogenic liquid fuel technology. Rocket stands at 63.2 meters tall with impressive specifications.
Anonymous No.16820808 [Report]
>>16820804
thanks, chinkposter
Anonymous No.16820810 [Report]
>>16820798
I find this argument unconvincing
Anonymous No.16820857 [Report] >>16820865
14 min to record breaking f9 launch
Anonymous No.16820862 [Report]
spacex breaks a new record with every launch
Anonymous No.16820865 [Report]
>>16820857
Which record?
Anonymous No.16820866 [Report] >>16820888 >>16820909 >>16820997 >>16821210
Anonymous No.16820867 [Report]
I still remember when the 3rd flight of a booster was such a big deal, time flies.
Anonymous No.16820875 [Report]
Rat spotted.
Anonymous No.16820877 [Report]
how do they do it
Anonymous No.16820878 [Report]
Another one
Anonymous No.16820883 [Report]
Only 3 more launches from this booster to surpass Atlantis (33). After that, 6 more launches and it'll have surpassed Discovery (39) as well, finally beating the entire Space Shuttle fleet.
Anonymous No.16820888 [Report]
>>16820866
Is this a space station orbiting Europa?
Anonymous No.16820893 [Report] >>16820898
when is next flight
Anonymous No.16820895 [Report]
ahem
>SpaceX: 523
>Rest of the world combined: 0
Anonymous No.16820898 [Report]
>>16820893
like an hour and 15 minutes from now, from Vandenberg
Anonymous No.16820905 [Report]
>>16820284
>Luke Leisher screenshotted this and posted in on "Spitter"
cringeee. i would consider killing myself in this situation
Anonymous No.16820907 [Report] >>16820910 >>16820939
https://avbrief.com/united-max-hit-by-falling-object-at-36000-feet/
Anonymous No.16820909 [Report] >>16821140
>>16820866
gouged out the plug welds
welds are stronger than the base material bros i don't feel so good
Anonymous No.16820910 [Report]
>>16820907
ELMO is finished. Clown show over guys.
Anonymous No.16820911 [Report] >>16820915 >>16820916 >>16820919 >>16820934 >>16820936 >>16820953 >>16820998
OH NO NO HORIZONTAL STARSHIP BROS??? WHAT ABOUT OUR RETARDED STARSHIP HABITAT IDEA??????
Anonymous No.16820914 [Report] >>16820920
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vHZr6TSyYk
Anonymous No.16820915 [Report]
>>16820911
its over
Anonymous No.16820916 [Report] >>16821023
>>16820911
Why would you lay it down? The living volume is the same in either direction.
Also Starship is a rocket not a habitat. You'd rather cut it up and reuse the steel than shoehorn it.
But it can be laid down given a cradle and breakover mechanism and sufficient internal pressure as that's how they're gonna be transported to Florida.
Anonymous No.16820919 [Report] >>16820921
>>16820911
Yeah, Musk is not a reliable source, so this doesn't mean anything. Sorry not sorry.
Anonymous No.16820920 [Report] >>16820922
>>16820914
>((NARRATED))
Anonymous No.16820921 [Report]
>>16820919
cope lmao. this is his opinion so he's gonna shut down anyone at spacex who wants to do it
Anonymous No.16820922 [Report]
>>16820920
Tankwatching ASMR
Anonymous No.16820933 [Report]
>>16820479
>remember the time EDA gave elon the idea that doomed several flights. I member
No. The ullage gas is still being for RCS on ship V3 and all of the successful V2 ships.
Therefore you are misrepresenting the root cause of the failures.
Anonymous No.16820934 [Report] >>16820937
>>16820911
Our dome town design was informed by data, and since the beginning we have pushed to bury the Starships vertically. We are committed to delivering you an innovative, scalable living solution
Anonymous No.16820936 [Report]
>>16820911
>Aug 25, 2020
don't worry bros, he might have changed his mind
Anonymous No.16820937 [Report]
>>16820934
>burying
afraid of a bit of radiation cuck detected. there is no reason at all to bury anything.
Anonymous No.16820939 [Report] >>16820947
>>16820907
it was "youths" throwing pebbles down from an overpass bridge
Anonymous No.16820941 [Report] >>16820943
@grok how do you train an Optimus robot to move in 0.3G when they're trained on Earth
Anonymous No.16820943 [Report]
>>16820941
Humans can do it.
Robots would have to be similarly general to be useful enough to bring.
Elon is unironically more delusional about AI timelines than Mars colonization timelines
Anonymous No.16820947 [Report]
>>16820939
kek
Anonymous No.16820953 [Report] >>16820954 >>16820957 >>16820969 >>16820974
>>16820911
Anonymous No.16820954 [Report]
>>16820953
good news everyone
Anonymous No.16820957 [Report] >>16820959 >>16820960
>>16820953
>that disgusting prong to make it look more like the sh*ttle
>muh plane soo coooool
kill yourself tonight
Anonymous No.16820959 [Report]
>>16820957
A shuttle with blackjack and hookers.
Anonymous No.16820960 [Report] >>16820963 >>16820967
>>16820957
Make it manlier then, alpha internet poster.
Anonymous No.16820963 [Report]
>>16820960
see picrel >>16820727
Anonymous No.16820967 [Report] >>16820979
>>16820960
Anonymous No.16820969 [Report] >>16820974 >>16820986
>>16820953
Musk will never do this, but he would if he was funny as fuck.
Anonymous No.16820974 [Report] >>16821006 >>16821170
>>16820953
>>16820969
Needs to send up a woman with an eye missing to complete the package.
Anonymous No.16820979 [Report] >>16821001
>>16820967
Nice.
Anonymous No.16820986 [Report] >>16820988
>>16820969
In the not-too-distant future, if Starship eventually reaches its price estimates and becomes as cheap as Elon promised, then you know there'll be groups of people buying a rocket and giving it a custom paint job. And you also know that the FAA will have problems with this, impose rules, and future anons will complain on future esefgee, all because they aren't allowed to draw hentai on the walls of the craft.
Anonymous No.16820988 [Report]
>>16820986
Starship will be cheap because of reuse not because you can buy whole ships for cheap.
Anonymous No.16820991 [Report]
>>16820612
its sooo cute
Anonymous No.16820992 [Report]
Something might have gone wrong with the 2nd stage on the Starlink launch just now? Telemetry seemed to stop updating before planned SECO.
Anonymous No.16820993 [Report]
>>16820683
they really do make the best test launch videos. nothing else comes close. watching that BO launch a bit back was weird compared.
Anonymous No.16820995 [Report]
>>16820753
i feel like she's canny tek any moor captin
Anonymous No.16820997 [Report]
>>16820866
looks like they need a new stargate
Anonymous No.16820998 [Report]
>>16820911
Yes, actually.
Anonymous No.16821001 [Report]
>>16820979
ha, my kids just got this book
Anonymous No.16821003 [Report] >>16821005
Why do libtards hate the idea of humans in space but love robots in space?
Anonymous No.16821005 [Report] >>16821112
>>16821003
They can't control humans, they can with robots.
Anonymous No.16821006 [Report] >>16821011
>>16820974
Anonymous No.16821010 [Report] >>16821032
eesa is beyond a joke
Anonymous No.16821011 [Report] >>16821021 >>16821121
>>16821006
@grok saar please make sex sex video. thank u
Anonymous No.16821021 [Report]
>>16821011
Indians are the most sacred and divine race of people
Anonymous No.16821023 [Report]
>>16820916
>Also Starship is a rocket not a habitat.
It needs to be though.
Going to mars requires at least 6 months.
Anonymous No.16821032 [Report] >>16821034
>>16821010
bike lady passes by them on her moon cycle
Anonymous No.16821034 [Report]
>>16821032
Buzz aldrin’s freaky ahh cycler
Anonymous No.16821035 [Report] >>16821039 >>16821042 >>16821043 >>16821063 >>16821089
LMAO
Anonymous No.16821039 [Report] >>16821044
>>16821035
someone post this on X so it can be screenshotted again
Anonymous No.16821042 [Report] >>16821051
>>16821035
of all the good posts in this general, these fags always choose the most retarded ones to share
Anonymous No.16821043 [Report] >>16821048
>>16821035
who
Anonymous No.16821044 [Report]
>>16821039
you mean twitter
you mean spitter
you mean nigger
Anonymous No.16821046 [Report] >>16821047 >>16821049 >>16821094
It's over Faclon 9 is finished
Anonymous No.16821047 [Report]
>>16821046
true reliability metrics soon
Anonymous No.16821048 [Report]
>>16821043
Just another twitter account that steals content, this one just happens to steal from /sfg/.
Anonymous No.16821049 [Report]
>>16821046
>Deployment of 28 @Starlink satellites confirmed

doesn't matter where they deploy, that's not my department
Anonymous No.16821050 [Report]
>SpaceX: 524
>Rest of the solar system combined: 0
it's that easy
Anonymous No.16821051 [Report]
>>16821042
Of course, need to cherry pick in order to make fun of others
Anonymous No.16821053 [Report] >>16821056 >>16821071 >>16821092 >>16821099 >>16821104
Is LandSpace still a meme?
Anonymous No.16821056 [Report]
>>16821053
>slightly taller but slightly less powerful
does this imply worse mass ratio? how much payload capacity left with rtls first stage?
Anonymous No.16821063 [Report] >>16821318
>>16821035
How much money do these niggers earn from our posts?
Anonymous No.16821065 [Report]
>another Falcon 9 just failed
Shitty ass rocket "human rated" my ass
Anonymous No.16821066 [Report]
yep another f9 s2 failure.
Anonymous No.16821071 [Report]
>>16821053
>On 11 September 2024, the Zhuque-3 VTVL-1 test stage completed another successful vertical-takeoff-vertical-landing test at its Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center. The test flight lasted about 200 seconds and achieved a maximum height in excess of 10 kilometres. The flight also featured a mid-air engine cutoff test at about 113 seconds after liftoff and an engine reignition test about 40 seconds later when the test stage was at a height of about 4,640 metres; this engine cutoff and reignition sequence during a VTVL attempt represented a first for any Chinese rocket manufacturing entities. During the period when its engine was not in active operation, the test stage employed a cold gas attitude control reaction system in addition to four grid fins to control its gliding descent. The test stage completed its landing sequence at a concrete pad located about 3.2 kilometres away from its launch point; the precise landing spot was 1.7 metres away from the nominal center of the landing pad.
More serious than BONG.
Anonymous No.16821072 [Report] >>16821078 >>16821080
AHHHAHAHAHA DOOMERS BTFO
>https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1980012611736420483
>Two sources indicate the Starlink satellites were successfully deployed.
Anonymous No.16821074 [Report]
!
https://x.com/transtage05/status/1980012491028480345
Anonymous No.16821076 [Report]
Well it was getting a bit boring
Anonymous No.16821077 [Report] >>16821118
https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1980012105945231849
Anonymous No.16821078 [Report]
>>16821072
There was two back to back launches, there might be some confusion here
If S2 loses telemtry it should automatically terminate after a timeout
Anonymous No.16821079 [Report]
at least its only a s2 problem
Anonymous No.16821080 [Report] >>16821095
>>16821072
Anonymous No.16821083 [Report]
It appears to have shutoff early, S2 was only a couple seconds from SECO
Anonymous No.16821084 [Report] >>16821087 >>16821098
Here's a thought: maybe S2s of ALL ROCKETS have some inherent problems but most don't fly that often. I mean you're coasting around and relighting engines in the vacuum of space. It's hard.
Anonymous No.16821086 [Report] >>16821088
AHAHAH COMMIES KYS
Anonymous No.16821087 [Report]
>>16821084
How can igniting your engines in a vacuum be any more difficult than when surrounded by cool air?
Anonymous No.16821088 [Report]
>>16821086
THIS IS A COVERUP
THE SPACE ENGINEER SAID IT AND HE NEVER GET ITS WRONG
Anonymous No.16821089 [Report] >>16821091
>>16821035
rules #1 and #2 faggots
Anonymous No.16821090 [Report] >>16821116
I guess the track nerds will tell us if S2 is deorbited with a burn or not.
Anonymous No.16821091 [Report]
>>16821089
this isn’t /sci/ even though we are technically on /sci/
Anonymous No.16821092 [Report]
>>16821053
I guess I'll have to update my 'rest of the world combined' posts...
Anonymous No.16821094 [Report]
>>16821046
They can make up the difference by squeezing real hard
Anonymous No.16821095 [Report]
>>16821080
Redudancy? In MY SpaceX?
Anonymous No.16821098 [Report]
>>16821084
This isn't 1950 anon
Anonymous No.16821099 [Report]
>>16821053
Why does his head have a counterweight?
Anonymous No.16821102 [Report] >>16821116
STAGE 2 FAILURE COVERUP
STAGE 2 FAILURE COVERUP
HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
Anonymous No.16821104 [Report]
>>16821053
Ha ha ha, hear that Jeffley? You about to get CHINKED.
Anonymous No.16821105 [Report] >>16821106 >>16821114
Deployed does not mean orbital insertion. It's as if they used a burn duration for a lower inclination.
Anonymous No.16821106 [Report] >>16821114
>>16821105
Nah it diverged from the gray path on the stream which means either failure or loss of telemetry
Anonymous No.16821112 [Report]
>>16821005
in Soviet Russia, Robot is you!
Anonymous No.16821114 [Report]
>>16821105
>>16821106
cope and seethe
Anonymous No.16821116 [Report]
>>16821102
>>16821090
>something from space just struck a united airlines flight
we have our answer
Anonymous No.16821118 [Report]
>>16821077
/sfg/ - /S2 Failing General/
Anonymous No.16821119 [Report] >>16821123
My sources just told me that Columbia just suffered some sort of debris strike on the leading edge of orbiter's left wing during ascent and they have NOT ruled out the recent starlink failure.
Anonymous No.16821120 [Report] >>16821121 >>16821122 >>16821124 >>16821127 >>16821129
What is S2? I'm out of the loop.
Anonymous No.16821121 [Report] >>16821125
>>16821120
Sex 2. See this post explanation >>16821011
Anonymous No.16821122 [Report]
>>16821120
sneed
Anonymous No.16821123 [Report] >>16821135
>>16821119
Not to worry. We have done inspections and can assure you the vehicle will perform nominally during the entirety of its reentry phase. Please proceed with the mission as normal.
Anonymous No.16821124 [Report]
>>16821120
Splatoon 2
Anonymous No.16821125 [Report]
>>16821121
Why do I keep swallowing words when posting? It's so embarrassing...
Anonymous No.16821127 [Report]
>>16821120
discord room for those who got banned from L2. 90% /sfg/ users
Anonymous No.16821129 [Report]
>>16821120
Saturn II, secret rocket launched after Saturn IB and before Saturn III.
Anonymous No.16821135 [Report] >>16821137 >>16821143
>>16821123
>We have done inspections
Reminder that they had access to (more powerful) telescopes that could have had a better look, but didn't want to because what the fuck could they have done in that situation?
Anonymous No.16821137 [Report]
>>16821135
>what the fuck could they have done in that situation?
a million things. this is retconned justification for murderous negligence and extremely cowardly
Anonymous No.16821139 [Report]
>you can have 100 launches per year but only 5 of them can be FH
Why are bureaucrats such control freaks? Just say they can have up to 100 per year knowing full well the vast majority will be F9
>but what if too many FH-
STOP. You are imagining problems that have never manifested.
Anonymous No.16821140 [Report]
>>16820909
Why don't they just make the whole thing out of weld?
Anonymous No.16821142 [Report] >>16821230
>>16820741
The constellation of The Stick. The constellation of The Rock. The constellation of The Other Rock...
Anonymous No.16821143 [Report]
>>16821135
>what could they have done
Atlantis rescue mission Apollo tier kino
>b-but there's no way atlantis could be ready in time
That's the thing, you don't wait until it's ready. You just GO.
Anonymous No.16821148 [Report]
"We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of country throughout Australia and recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_AhTvYcSYM

If the Abbos had ever figured out how to make Pottery, we'd be on Mars by now.
Anonymous No.16821149 [Report] >>16821155 >>16821156 >>16821163
those little starlinks didn't make it...
Anonymous No.16821155 [Report]
>>16821149
And now Enron Husk is lying about it to prevent his long overdue imprisonment
Anonymous No.16821156 [Report] >>16821158
>>16821149
it's still a success because they got lots of data
Anonymous No.16821158 [Report]
>>16821156
lol
Anonymous No.16821162 [Report] >>16821167 >>16821178 >>16821186 >>16821257
>Can't listen to voice mail, because they may hear a person who died talking.
Anonymous No.16821163 [Report]
>>16821149
>those little starlinks
Starlink plush when?
Anonymous No.16821164 [Report] >>16821171 >>16821176 >>16821180 >>16821187
>46 (FOURTY SIX) missions/flybys to venus
>not 1 (ONE) true colour full disk photo of the planet
>not 1 (ONE) true colour photo of the atmospheric limb
Anonymous No.16821167 [Report] >>16821213
>>16821162
They're all like 90% white
Anonymous No.16821170 [Report]
>>16820974
I somehow stopped noticing that she has only one eye. When she had two eyes for an ep she looked the same
Anonymous No.16821171 [Report]
>>16821164
Everything flying by Venus does it on the outside of its orbit
None of those spacescraft can point their cameras anywhere near Venus for fear of burning their cameras out with sun glare
Anonymous No.16821176 [Report] >>16821179 >>16821189
>>16821164
wanna hear a blacker pill? it's been 68 years since humanity first achieved orbit and there's only been 1 (ONE) single artificial gravity test with a tether: Gemini 11 in 1966, producing a total of... 0.00015 g, that's it, never again.
Anonymous No.16821177 [Report]
Murriyang, for the 64-metre Parkes radio telescope - In the Wiradjuri Dreaming, Biyaami (Baiame) is a prominent creator spirit and is represented in the sky by the stars which also portray the Orion constellation. Murriyang represents the 'Skyworld' where Biyaami lives. There are many Sticks there.

Giyalung Miil, for the 12-metre ASKAP testing antenna - Meaning 'The Stick' this telescope was commissioned in 2008.

Giyalung Guluman, for the 18-metre decommissioned antenna - Meaning 'The Other Stick' this antenna had the ability to move along a railway track while observing, and when linked to the main 64-metre antenna became pivotal in early work that determined the size and brightness of radio sources
Anonymous No.16821178 [Report]
>>16821162
I didn't know redditors were considered indigenous
Anonymous No.16821179 [Report]
>>16821176
sticc
Anonymous No.16821180 [Report]
>>16821164
Venus Express has all its data publicly archived. You may be able to construct something from it.
https://archives.esac.esa.int/psa/ftp/VENUS-EXPRESS/VMC/VEX-V-VMC-3-RDR-EXT1-V3.0/DATA/
Anonymous No.16821186 [Report]
>>16821162
>indigenous
I thought aboriginals look different, my bad.
Anonymous No.16821187 [Report] >>16821199
>>16821164
Here you go
https://youtu.be/XYtPqgMo5Q4
Anonymous No.16821189 [Report] >>16822038 >>16822041
>>16821176
another pill negra: as of 2025, 0 (ZERO) cats have ever made it to orbit, and only 1 achieved a suborbital flight, Félicette from France.
Anonymous No.16821198 [Report] >>16821214
>Numerous monkeys of several species were flown by the U.S. in the 1950s and 1960s. The death rate among these monkeys was very high: about two-thirds of all monkeys launched in the 1940s and 1950s died on missions or soon after landing.

Makes those 1960s Monkey in a Space Suit comedies somewhat less amusing.
Anonymous No.16821199 [Report]
>>16821187
cum ball
Anonymous No.16821201 [Report] >>16821211 >>16821248 >>16821291
>uranus and neptune are the same colo-ACKKKK!!!
Wikitroons BTFO

They need to replace the Io image, the Venus image, and the FAKE AS FUCK Neptune image
Anonymous No.16821203 [Report]
>On 15 March 2009, during the countdown of the STS-119, a free-tailed bat was seen clinging to the fuel tank. NASA observers believed the bat would fly off once the Shuttle started to launch, but it did not. Upon analyzing the images, a wildlife expert who provided support to the center said it likely had a broken left wing and some problem with its right shoulder or wrist. The animal most likely perished quickly during Discovery's climb into orbit.

...or perished not so quickly.
Anonymous No.16821206 [Report]
>>16820758
>who's laughing now?
me
I'm laughing
Anonymous No.16821210 [Report]
>>16820866
we're going to need a bigger cock grinder
Anonymous No.16821211 [Report]
>>16821201
same color
Anonymous No.16821213 [Report]
>>16821167
It's about a feeling of identity
Anonymous No.16821214 [Report] >>16821215
>>16821198
Yeah in the fucking 50s on sounding rockets
By the 60s they had very high survival rates
Anonymous No.16821215 [Report] >>16821225
>>16821214
>Defending NASA Monkey Murder
Anonymous No.16821225 [Report] >>16821299
>>16821215
They're monkeys dude, their lives were spent collecting valuable data. They aren't people.
Anonymous No.16821230 [Report]
>>16821142
the Dreamtime dust cloud
the constellation of Centrelink
the Petrol Way...
Anonymous No.16821247 [Report]
>>16819402
thanks
i thought i hated jpl enough
Anonymous No.16821248 [Report]
>>16821201
isnt uranus brighter because its closer? uranus has a big aura in that pic indicating it has a higher relative exposure to neptune
Anonymous No.16821256 [Report]
so F9 was fine after all?
Anonymous No.16821257 [Report] >>16821261
>>16821162
Is this like where in America where white people claim being from <insert tribe here> because of the free gibs?
Anonymous No.16821260 [Report] >>16821283
>AI will take us to Mars
Anonymous No.16821261 [Report]
>>16821257
yeah abos get tons of free shit
funnily enough, the fake abos get so much that real abos get left out kekw
Anonymous No.16821263 [Report] >>16821306
what is the point of posting that here, seriously
Anonymous No.16821283 [Report] >>16821305
>>16821260
I dont think the bike lady is gonna show up...
Anonymous No.16821289 [Report]
What happened to Starlink 11-19?
Things are not adding up. When are we getting TLEs of the satellites?
Anonymous No.16821291 [Report]
>>16821201
I dunno man, I think Neptune might just be darker
Anonymous No.16821299 [Report]
>>16821225
t. director of the Artemis project
Anonymous No.16821303 [Report] >>16821310
how come rocket lab is worth more than all of these combined (32B), has space™ really grown that much?
Anonymous No.16821305 [Report]
>>16821283
Anonymous No.16821306 [Report] >>16821309
>>16821263
Generals are social media vacant lots. Random visitors dump their e-trash in them.
Anonymous No.16821309 [Report] >>16821324 >>16821340 >>16821341
>>16821306
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980081711338643806
Anonymous No.16821310 [Report]
>>16821303
bought by retail cattle. it's priced unreasonably
Anonymous No.16821318 [Report]
>>16821063
you cant make money on twitter anymore. it hasnt been a thing for months.
Anonymous No.16821324 [Report] >>16821330
>>16821309
>90% of the world's payload mass
Elon 'order of magnitude' Musk does it again
Anonymous No.16821330 [Report] >>16821339
>>16821324
And in three or four years it'll probably be 99%
Anonymous No.16821337 [Report] >>16821343
>>16820644
Please read the sign.
Anonymous No.16821339 [Report] >>16821353
>>16821330
I thought that, too, but I don't know how China will respond. Though, I'm still sure that figure will remain in the range of [90%, 95%]. The remaining will be the chinks, and the rest of world a rounding error.
Anonymous No.16821340 [Report] >>16821348 >>16821356 >>16821704
>>16821309
Let me preface this by saying I'm a 1 (cybertruck owner, muskrat through and through):
SpaceX is not a space "exploration" company, let alone a space program. it's a space-based isp, com satellite manufacturer, and launch services provider. Where anywhere do they explore space? What interplanetary orbiters or probes have they built and operated? What lunar expeditions have they spearheaded? They won't get out of bed unless there's a NASA contract for it, and then happily reneg on their obligations (dragon xl, falcon heavy extended fairing, falcon vertical launch integration facility, HLS, etc etc). They even pitched Starship for the CLD program and lost, so now Starship station is dead. It's frankly embarrassing that SpaceX hasn't done anything fun since the FH demo with the roadster to Mars orbit*
*Solar orbit intersecting the orbit of Mars
It's tiresome
Anonymous No.16821341 [Report] >>16821342 >>16821350 >>16821354
>>16821309
why is the chart animated?!
Anonymous No.16821342 [Report]
>>16821341
bumpy trail
Anonymous No.16821343 [Report]
>>16821337
dyson spheres are retarded. civilizations progress towards greater energy density. no need to strip mercury when there is abundant free energy in the vacuum
Anonymous No.16821344 [Report]
>>16820753
I mean, if you think about it, gas station pumps have the male side of the fuel pump assembly. Why go against a proven design?
Anonymous No.16821348 [Report] >>16821358
>>16821340
it's literally Space Exploration Technologies
they make manned spacecraft
they're planning to send humans to Mars
they're going to send the largest mission by far to the Moon
what are your standards for space exploration?
I guess no one has explored space according to you
Anonymous No.16821350 [Report]
>>16821341
Id rather it be a couple pie charts
Anonymous No.16821353 [Report] >>16821357
>>16821339
I don't think they can bring the capacity online fast enough to break out of that 1% if Starship gets going at an appreciable cadence in a few years. Maybe after a decade or so. Keep in mind they're still doing Grasshopper-tier testing for reuse, so a true F9 clone is still a good way off.
I honestly think China's best bet at the moment would be a zero-reuse Starship-sized rocket that simply leaned on economies of scale. I bet you could get something in that size category built shockingly cheap per unit, especially if they went with fewer/larger/simpler engines.
Anonymous No.16821354 [Report]
>>16821341
Anonymous No.16821356 [Report] >>16821360 >>16821361
>>16821340
>SpaceX is not a space "exploration" company
True, in the conventional sense. So far, SpaceX's philosophy has been, 'build the path so that others can get in', i.e. get to Mars asap, let the rest of the world hitch a ride and land their shit on red soil, while you are only the transportation company. Same logic with deep-space probes. After all, they are a company, they have to earn money somehow to be able to operate. Now, if you are 1 then you should know that Musk will accomplish his lifelong goal of colonizing that barren rock no matter what. So, if/when our society doesn't give two shits about this endeavor (cause, you know, urfers are like that), specially during the early stages, he'll go 'fine, I'll do it myself'.
Anonymous No.16821357 [Report]
>>16821353
you can. v3 starship fully expended can do <1000$ easily
Anonymous No.16821358 [Report] >>16821624
>>16821348
>it's in the name
>they're planning
>they're going to
That's my point. They've explored fuck all yet they've existed for 23 years. Not even a crumb owned by them was sent to the Moon, Mars, or anywhere to explore anything. The closest to exploring they've done is launch that private mission into polar orbit so a few monkeys can "explore" by looking out the window for a few days. I'm sure SpaceX will get around to it like you say, it's just for their entire existence they haven't done that. They cannot use capital or ability as an excuse for at least the last decade.
Anonymous No.16821360 [Report]
>>16821356
I agree. Just wish he would do Mars greenhouse on a Falcon in the meantime.
Anonymous No.16821361 [Report] >>16821362
>>16821356
Moreover, they are running on a different paradigm compared to what the rest of the industry has been doing for the past 60 years. It's not just launching some probes here and there on decades-long missions, it's the idea of thousands, eventually millions of people working and living out there in space. If you enable such a scenario, then who knows what kind of capabilities we'll achieve as a species. Suddenly mega-engineering projects are possible, and we'll be able to launch lots of mass in all directions, exploring every corner of this solar system. In the long term, this vision is more efficient than just launching probes right now for the sake of it, even though we all love interplanetary missions here.
Anonymous No.16821362 [Report]
>>16821361
pretty much this
musk is targeting space elevator tier price per kg. we are talking as low as 25$/kg if they can launch v4 for 5m a pop
Anonymous No.16821368 [Report] >>16821369 >>16821381 >>16821500 >>16822016
>>16820133
As soon as SpaceX attempts private Mars expeditions on their own dime, the value of the company tanks as private investors will all sell. This is even more true if Starlink gets spun out and goes public like has been teased over the past 5 years. There is no medium term ROI, and it's dubious there is any long term either. They obviously won't fund it by themselves, barring heavy sponsorship from wealthy patrons, orgs, or nation states.
Anonymous No.16821369 [Report] >>16821374
>>16821368
they just need to get cost per launch down. we could potentially see a mars mission at, or less than the cost of one expended starship today
Anonymous No.16821374 [Report]
>>16821369
Well we're currently at an advertised $100k/kg to Moon/Mars. That's better than no price because there is no existing service lol
Anonymous No.16821381 [Report] >>16821431 >>16821794
>>16821368
Starlink IPO was only ever on the table as an option for a huge cash infusion to keep Spacex going for about another decade. The feasibility of the service wasn't really established yet and in that kind of situation spinning the company off to fend for itself while taking a huge pile of money was a very sensible option. It's unnecessary and stupid now, because Starlink on its current trajectory can absolutely bankroll Mars.
Anonymous No.16821387 [Report] >>16821389
>>16821377
retard
Anonymous No.16821389 [Report]
>>16821387
I mathed wrong shut up
Anonymous No.16821397 [Report] >>16821400 >>16821423
>just put motors and electronics in the CRYOGENIC tank bro
>don't worry about the stress concentration on the inside wall of the tank
>btw we are putting all the weight of the booster in these voids
fucking insanity
Anonymous No.16821400 [Report]
>>16821397
they have to shave off weight otherwise they will never get to that 100T number
Anonymous No.16821423 [Report]
>>16821397
qrd
Anonymous No.16821431 [Report] >>16821432
>>16821381
According to Musk, it will IPO in 2025 or later
https://spacenews.com/elon-musk-reportedly-extends-timeline-for-potential-starlink-ipo/
Anonymous No.16821432 [Report] >>16821456
>>16821431
The article is from 2022, retard
Anonymous No.16821437 [Report] >>16821438 >>16821457
elon is going to use his immense wealth to set up a foundation before he dies. all the money will go to institutions on mars.
Anonymous No.16821438 [Report]
>>16821437
Yes
Anonymous No.16821445 [Report] >>16821485
Maybe the first planet outside of our solar system that we land on will be intergalactic.
Anonymous No.16821456 [Report]
>>16821432
Good job, detective
Anonymous No.16821457 [Report] >>16821467 >>16821563
>>16821437
So he's going to die (all Tesla/SpaceX investors will immediately dump their stock now that the king is dead) which triggers and automatic dump of Elons SpaceX stock (price drops even further) and somehow SpaceX will be able to function after they have no capital and no Elon pushing them harder. SpaceX dies when Elon dies. Boeing 2.0
Anonymous No.16821467 [Report]
>>16821457
he can start it long before he dies like bill gates did
Anonymous No.16821470 [Report] >>16821471 >>16821477 >>16821519
zamn...
Anonymous No.16821471 [Report] >>16821477 >>16821519
>>16821470
Anonymous No.16821477 [Report] >>16821482
>>16821470
>>16821471
Mr. President, I implore you to invoke the DPA and fire every single Boeing and Lockheed C-suite executive on national security grounds.
Anonymous No.16821478 [Report]
Did you know that Elon Musk slept together with his father in the same bed until he was 12?
Anonymous No.16821480 [Report]
askers?
Anonymous No.16821482 [Report] >>16821484
>>16821477
If you want to invoke DPA, you should use it to fire all the Indians from Microsoft for the sheer disastrous incompetence and absolute disloyalty to the American people that they've infected a critical national security asset (Microsoft) with.
Anonymous No.16821484 [Report] >>16821486
>>16821482
Sun microsystems was the original sinner here, they literally invented the java jeet. Microsoft just copied them and any serious mission critical systems will run hardened Linux.
Anonymous No.16821485 [Report]
>>16821445
Unlikely and that's pathetic if it turned out to be the case.
Anonymous No.16821486 [Report]
>>16821484
They're still using those retards to run datacenters for the government. The Jeets need to go.
Anonymous No.16821500 [Report]
>>16821368
Starship is absolutely not fragile. That chunky bitch can handle situations that melts everything lesser.
Anonymous No.16821519 [Report] >>16821554
>>16821470
>>16821471
>remove the biggest player in the market but keep other launches constant over decades
Don't think that's how it works
Anonymous No.16821554 [Report]
>>16821519
thats how it was before SpaceX came to the scene basically
Anonymous No.16821563 [Report] >>16821573 >>16821706
>>16821457
>SpaceX investors will immediately dump their stock
I don't doubt Musk dying would be a problem but Spacex is not publicly traded.
Anonymous No.16821566 [Report]
>>16819309
you're either a kid or too dumb irl
any competent engineer with half the wits to tackle technical problems has been and should be interested in how different teams do engineering
Anonymous No.16821573 [Report]
>>16821563
>Anon insists SpaceX doesn't have stockholders who are investors just because it isn't traded on the open market

Hint: Those investors who have given SpaceX billions received something in return.
Anonymous No.16821584 [Report]
>>16819309
I'm interested in chinese space activity.
Anonymous No.16821608 [Report] >>16821629
>>16819399
I've always wanted to ride the trans siberian railway but being able to just drive from my home to anywhere in eurasia would be fantastic.
Anonymous No.16821616 [Report] >>16821620
there better be something hype today
Anonymous No.16821620 [Report]
>>16821616
grokipedia 0.1 is dropping today
Anonymous No.16821624 [Report] >>16821649
>>16821358
Thing about SpaceX is, it only exists for the purpose of going to Mars. At first Musk just wanted to send some little greenhouse there, but then during that episode where he tried buying a rocket, he realized how expensive they are. Then he's like fuck it, let's make our own rocket for cheaper, and then it's ballooned into what it is now. But all of it is still just a side hustle for funding the actual goal, so that Musk can fly off to die on Mars or whatever weird shit he wants to do. Starlink funds Starship R&D, and then Starship starts flying bigger Starlinks, so that they can afford to lug shit to Mars. I don't think he cares about space exploration, unless it involves walking around on another planet
Anonymous No.16821629 [Report]
>>16821608
It's a 70 mile long undersea tunnel. There's zero chance you'd be able to drive through it.
Anonymous No.16821643 [Report]
Anonymous No.16821646 [Report] >>16821654 >>16821749
For beltalowda tho
Anonymous No.16821648 [Report]
https://x.com/ApoStructura/status/1980231834639401030
>SpaceX has launched more since the first Falcon 1 in 2006 than the rest of the US (including NASA) has since 1997.
>Starship is so ambitious that it’s easy to forget how much Falcon 9 has achieved. 130+ launches this year alone.
Anonymous No.16821649 [Report] >>16821655
>>16821624
How often do "mission" companies stick to their mission? (instead of giving up and focusing on profit)
Anonymous No.16821654 [Report] >>16821691
>>16821646
cringe name (and worldbuilding) desu
Anonymous No.16821655 [Report]
>>16821649
Musk gets most of his money from Tesla, he doesn't need spacex at all. Same about Blue Origin for Bezos actually.
The problem can start only if Musk dies or if tesla goes bankrupt.
Anonymous No.16821663 [Report] >>16821673
That time musk called the president a pedo and then threatened to take spacex offline
Anonymous No.16821665 [Report]
Anonymous No.16821670 [Report] >>16821689 >>16821755
Anonymous No.16821673 [Report] >>16821681
>>16821663
thats not what happened
Anonymous No.16821681 [Report]
>>16821673
In 2025 it counts as true, it doesn't need to be 100% true but need to have some truth behind it.
Anonymous No.16821689 [Report] >>16821698 >>16821783
>>16821670
they should be focused on building starship v6
Anonymous No.16821691 [Report]
>>16821654
Pinche sabaka inyalowda
Anonymous No.16821698 [Report]
>>16821689
they haven't stolen those plans yet
Anonymous No.16821701 [Report] >>16821703 >>16821709 >>16821714 >>16821719 >>16821751 >>16821754
https://x.com/SecDuffyNASA/status/1980257227760955637
Anonymous No.16821703 [Report] >>16821707 >>16821708 >>16821719 >>16821727 >>16821754
>>16821701
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1980268686805020893
Anonymous No.16821704 [Report]
>>16821340
gotta start somewhere. seems like they are building a solid launch platform and using it to then create businesses that will fund the exploration to come. dont really see the problem. even their contracts with nasa for HLS etc are all aimed in the same direction.
Anonymous No.16821706 [Report]
>>16821563
Private investors can dump private stock
Anonymous No.16821707 [Report] >>16821712
>>16821703
why do think we wont get people on the moon? we're very close.
Anonymous No.16821708 [Report] >>16821727
>>16821703
It's obvious that they want to pocket some money.
Anonymous No.16821709 [Report]
>>16821701
It's kinda funny that the owner of the company making the moon lander probably doesn't really even care about the moon. People freaking out that they need to beat China to the moon, meanwhile the lander company is trying to get to Mars
Anonymous No.16821712 [Report]
>>16821707
Because that's not the mission objective: >>16820669
Anonymous No.16821713 [Report]
need more money for dem programmes
Anonymous No.16821714 [Report]
>>16821701
Why not land on Phobos instead?
Anonymous No.16821716 [Report]
She's right you know
Anonymous No.16821718 [Report] >>16821737
>>16820775
>>16820778
I've asked several times if Starshield piggybacks off of Starlink. Never got a good answer, assuming yes for sure.
Anonymous No.16821719 [Report] >>16821727 >>16821728 >>16821753
>>16821701
>>16821703
Im not sure if NASA has the authoritative power to DEMAND a contract change, but I could maybe see a situation where it’s 2028/2029 and HLS is close but still nowhere near ready yet–and China is deemed too close to a 2030/2031 landing. They could just ask SX to do a one-off lander for Artemis III.
Two year deadline, put a dragon capsule pressure vessel atop a LM-like hypergolic landing bus. Just needs to get two astros on the lunar surface for a day or less. It would be shitty but it could be done. $1 billion contract, NASA is here to help any way we can. This is a national priority plz get it done elon, we have all NASA facilities ready at your disposal to get this through the door
Anonymous No.16821720 [Report] >>16821729 >>16821747
https://x.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1980261998475743537
>Static fire of Zhuque-3 Y1 done
>Orbital launch and first stage recovery coming up soon
Anonymous No.16821721 [Report] >>16821729
Anonymous No.16821722 [Report]
Anonymous No.16821725 [Report] >>16821750 >>16821766
https://x.com/AusSpaceAgency/status/1980153185525547438
>The Australian Space Agency is working alongside local authorities in relation to the suspected space debris discovered in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The debris is likely a propellant tank or pressure vessel from a space launch vehicle.

https://x.com/Marco_Langbroek/status/1979931238623318418
>An object resembling space debris, specifically a COPV (Composite-Overwrapped Pressure Vessel) was recovered in Australia yesterday. I think it is likely from a Chinese Jielong-3 upper stage, nr 61237, 2024-173L. The ground-track passes close to the findspot.
Anonymous No.16821726 [Report] >>16821744 >>16821757 >>16821767
When I said BO would land on the moon before SpaceX you all laughed. Gradually it's becoming more obvious.
Anonymous No.16821727 [Report] >>16821732 >>16821733 >>16821743
>>16821703
>>16821708
>>16821719
It seems NASA’s internal estimates point at a “nu LM” costing in the range of $20 billion (lol) just for low lunar orbit (even higher for NRHO capabilities which it would need because Orion is only going to NRHO), and that would be a 2-yr cost plus contract so bet on it being way more
Anonymous No.16821728 [Report]
>>16821719
Not happening. Elon doesn't allow distractions
Anonymous No.16821729 [Report] >>16821731
>>16821720
>>16821721
isn't this thing methalox? why is the plume so orange?
Anonymous No.16821731 [Report]
>>16821729
Super Heavy is just as orange on the pad.
It's the water suppression droplets in the plume
Anonymous No.16821732 [Report]
>>16821727
>low lunar orbit
Please bro. Anyone have an estimate for many refuelings this would cut for HLS? I guess it's substantial
Anonymous No.16821733 [Report] >>16821735
>>16821727
Where you hearing this?
Anonymous No.16821735 [Report] >>16821738
>>16821733
https://x.com/robotbeat/status/1980272344397422803
Anonymous No.16821737 [Report]
>>16821718
they are separate satellites, probably based on the starlink bus and so on
and they are owned and operated by the US government I'm pretty sure
SpaceX designs, builds and launches them but after that I don't think they have much to do with them (other than probably support if its needed I guess)
Anonymous No.16821738 [Report] >>16821739
>>16821735
Heres the pdf she's getting it from.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170008820/downloads/20170008820.pdf
Anonymous No.16821739 [Report]
>>16821738
>2017
Anonymous No.16821740 [Report] >>16821764
https://x.com/SecDuffyNASA/status/1980243865400701369
Anonymous No.16821743 [Report] >>16821746
>>16821727
I am strawmanning a bit here but it makes me angry that there are no doubt Senators out there who unironically think this whole SpaceX and Blue Origin lunar landing thing is a distraction, and that the real answer is some lucrative $50 billion contract spread across all 50 states for a fuckass pod that will be no better than China’s Lanyue lander. And they don’t even care if China gets there first. This line of thinking is treason
Anonymous No.16821744 [Report] >>16821757
>>16821726
I'll believe it when BOner does in-space refueling of a non-mockup lander
Anonymous No.16821746 [Report]
>>16821743
It's literally all boomers. Even Zubrin himself can't help but advocate against Starship HLS
Anonymous No.16821747 [Report]
>>16821720
the way the camera moved at the beginning
Anonymous No.16821749 [Report]
>>16821646
the end of this scene is the best part
Anonymous No.16821750 [Report]
>>16821725
so its war then?
Anonymous No.16821751 [Report]
>>16821701
>other great American companies
Anonymous No.16821752 [Report]
so we're just going to use HLS to go from LEO to the moon right?
Anonymous No.16821753 [Report]
>>16821719
>This is a national priority plz get it done elon
This would sound so embarrassing lol. Supposedly a race between two superpowers, but then the whole thing hinges on one company that is trying to colonize another planet and the moon is just a distraction for them
Anonymous No.16821754 [Report] >>16821761 >>16821803
>>16821701
>>16821703
>compete for contract
>lose because you suck
>sue
>win
Why even bother with the competition then? What next, is Alpaca gonna come back to life as a surprise third option off the top rope, holding a folding chair?
Anonymous No.16821755 [Report] >>16821758 >>16821786 >>16821787
>>16821670
Is it time for the Chinese State to admit private industry > state owned enterprise?
Anonymous No.16821757 [Report] >>16821770
>>16821726
>>16821744
Getting New Glenn flight rate up will be the bottleneck
Anonymous No.16821758 [Report]
>>16821755
Deng Xiaoping calling, he says he already did that. They won’t explicitly admit it, but yes
Anonymous No.16821759 [Report] >>16821760 >>16821763
https://x.com/SecDuffyNASA/status/1980283706444316998
Anonymous No.16821760 [Report]
>>16821759
>""focuses""
>first time in more than 50 years
I guess that's one way to put it
Anonymous No.16821761 [Report] >>16821769
>>16821754
Why does it matter? It's about who can do it first.
Should the taxpayer be spending on losers?
Anonymous No.16821762 [Report] >>16821768
Will this NASA strategy be funded by Congress?
Anonymous No.16821763 [Report]
>>16821759
Where is this country called "Bitcoin"?
Anonymous No.16821764 [Report]
>>16821740
very based. may the winners win
Anonymous No.16821766 [Report]
>>16821725
>not posting the video
Anonymous No.16821767 [Report]
>>16821726
I'm still laughing. I look forward to more chuckles at your expense in the future.
Anonymous No.16821768 [Report] >>16821779
>>16821762
I mean it might be coming from congress itself, senators etc wanting to protect jobs in their districts so the same old
the last grift hurrah before Starship goes online and demolishes everything
Anonymous No.16821769 [Report] >>16821774
>>16821761
>Why does it matter?
I don't support corporate welfare.
>Should the taxpayer be spending on losers?
No, so why does Blue Origin get to make a HLS at our expense?
>It's about who can do it first.
Buy a lander off the chinks, then.
Anonymous No.16821770 [Report] >>16821772
>>16821757
Literally the only milestone they're close to reaching
Anonymous No.16821771 [Report] >>16821777
One good thing with this "opening Artemis 3 for competition"-thing might be that Musk starts pushing SpaceX harder, so we get to see more launches earlier
Anonymous No.16821772 [Report] >>16821775
>>16821770
>the only milestone they're close to reaching
They have launched once???
Anonymous No.16821774 [Report] >>16821781 >>16821785 >>16821842
>>16821769
Blue Origin has been contracted for HLS already. This is just seeing if they can make it for Artemis 3
Anonymous No.16821775 [Report]
>>16821772
Exactly.
Anonymous No.16821777 [Report] >>16821778
>>16821771
It's strictly good. This is real competition not competing about who can make the best plan but who can actually execute
Anonymous No.16821778 [Report]
>>16821777
its unknown what this actually is yet
Anonymous No.16821779 [Report]
>>16821768
Cool, sacex vs BO vs China spacerace will be kino
Anonymous No.16821781 [Report]
>>16821774
They should open it up to Boeing. And free my nigga Doug Loverro from prison!
Anonymous No.16821783 [Report]
>>16821689
The BF-20 engine is not ready yet
Anonymous No.16821785 [Report] >>16821790 >>16821836
>>16821774
>Blue Origin has been contracted for HLS already.
Yeah, and that's stupid since they couldn't win the contract when competing. They don't deserve to be contracted for HLS, as their bid was shit. Not quite as shit as Dynetics of course, but close.
"Redundancy" is a lie and everybody knows it.
Anonymous No.16821786 [Report]
>>16821755
SOEs and private industry are complementary. There is no reason for CASC to focus on reusables when there are 10 other companies doing it. CASC should focus on doing what the other companies aren't, i.e., they should focus on ramping up production of medium/large rocket designs that are already mature and flying, as well as develop moon rockets. CASC can work on reusables to the extent it does not interfere with the expendables and moon rockets.
Anonymous No.16821787 [Report] >>16821797 >>16821798
>>16821755
SOEs and private industry are complementary. There is no reason for CASC to focus on reusables when there are 10+ other companies doing it. CASC should focus on doing what the other companies aren't, i.e., they should focus on ramping up production of medium/large rocket designs that are already mature and flying, as well as develop moon rockets. CASC can work on reusables to the extent it does not interfere with the mature rockets and moon rockets. Still, the LM12A and LM10A are not far away.
Anonymous No.16821790 [Report] >>16821795 >>16821799 >>16821950
>>16821785
You need to fund two providers because otherwise you're going to have a monopoly and the taxpayer is going to get fleeced on future moon mission contracts
Anonymous No.16821794 [Report] >>16821800
>>16821381
It makes no sense to spin off Starlink without also spinning off the launcher on which it depends for its competitive advantage
Anonymous No.16821795 [Report] >>16821801
>>16821790
Your alternative to fleecing the taxpayer involves throwing away money on non-viable pork projects
Anonymous No.16821797 [Report] >>16821804 >>16821816
>>16821787
Except they've made some questionable choices developing a bunch of medium lift rockets when they should just be doing things that private industry won't do (large rockets, novel propulsion and materials etc).
Anonymous No.16821798 [Report] >>16821805
>>16821787
yeah, like NASA should be focusing on nuclear or some other stuff instead of SLS
maybe Starship shocks the system enough to do that
Anonymous No.16821799 [Report] >>16821806
>>16821790
how convenient, weird that this logic wasn't used when ULA was the sole provider
Anonymous No.16821800 [Report] >>16821808 >>16821833
>>16821794
starlink competitive advantage is that it actually exists
if/when a competitor shows up, maybe other things can be discussed
Anonymous No.16821801 [Report] >>16821803 >>16821826
>>16821795
What's non-viable or porkish about BO's HLS? It was the second best offer that American industry could muster.

There's likely going to be a lot of manned moon landings in the 30s and 40s in order to one-up whatever the Chinese do, so it's going to very important that there will be competition for those contracts
Anonymous No.16821803 [Report] >>16821813
>>16821801
>What's non-viable or porkish about BO's HLS?
see chart
>>16821754
Anonymous No.16821804 [Report]
>>16821797
What China's private industry won't do is scale up production of medium/large rockets based on mature tech in the near term, and that is because China's private industry does not yet have any mature medium/large rocket tech to scale up production of.

CASC has the YF-100-based lineup.
Anonymous No.16821805 [Report] >>16821812
>>16821798
NASA is a contracting agency. I agree that they should not be micromanaging their contractors as was the case with SLS, but they absolutely should be contracting.
Anonymous No.16821806 [Report]
>>16821799
Indeed. The ULA monopoly was a disaster for the US; luckily it didn't last.
Anonymous No.16821808 [Report]
>>16821800
Any investor who can pony up the money buy Starlink can be expected to have the mental capacity of considering the future further than just a few years out
Anonymous No.16821812 [Report] >>16821815
>>16821805
should they?
they should do novel research and buy services
Anonymous No.16821813 [Report]
>>16821803
I don't see what's nonviable or porkish in that chart, except the bit about the "currently impossible" communications links which I don't know the details of.

Besides, that was the 2021 contracting round in which all three bidders participated. BO significantly changed things for the 2023 contracting round.
Anonymous No.16821815 [Report]
>>16821812
>buy services
The contract should be structured in whatever form makes the most sense for the specific task at hand, whether that means buying services or buying hardware
Anonymous No.16821816 [Report]
>>16821797
If not for those medium lift rockets, China would right now not have any rockets suitable for an initial Qianfan/Guowang deployment
Anonymous No.16821826 [Report] >>16821827 >>16821834 >>16821845
>>16821801
>put one (1) rocket into orbit
>fail your recovery attempt
>congratulations, you're now qualified to put humans on the moon
are you retarded?
Anonymous No.16821827 [Report] >>16821831 >>16821855
>>16821826
but enough about the Saturn V
Anonymous No.16821831 [Report] >>16821884
>>16821827
There was a recovery attempt for the Saturn V?
Anonymous No.16821833 [Report]
>>16821800
Starlink wouldn't exist without Falcon 9
Anonymous No.16821834 [Report]
>>16821826
As of 2023, BO had done a lot of late-stage testing of advanced rocket engines and launched reusable glorified sounding rockets; they were not engineering noobs.
Anonymous No.16821836 [Report] >>16821838
>>16821785
Anonymous No.16821838 [Report]
>>16821836
Brutal
Anonymous No.16821841 [Report] >>16821846 >>16821852 >>16821973
So we can expect SLS and Orion’s roles to also be opened to competition. R- right??
Anonymous No.16821842 [Report] >>16821845
>>16821774
Even entertaining the idea that they might be able to is laughable
Anonymous No.16821845 [Report] >>16821847 >>16821862 >>16821953
>>16821842
>>16821826
you're seething. blue is gonna deliver.
Anonymous No.16821846 [Report]
>>16821841
Pork must flow
Anonymous No.16821847 [Report]
>>16821845
The only thing bezos has learned to deliver over the last 20 years is amazon parcels
Anonymous No.16821852 [Report] >>16821965 >>16821973
>>16821841
SLS Orion can't make it to LLO so yes?
Anonymous No.16821853 [Report] >>16821856 >>16821857 >>16821859
Jeff lost
Anonymous No.16821855 [Report]
>>16821827
Apollo 4 recovered the command module
Anonymous No.16821856 [Report] >>16821863
>>16821853
pretty cool rocket. landspace is the best of the chinese startups
Anonymous No.16821857 [Report] >>16821861 >>16821865 >>16821869 >>16821999
>>16821853
>Landspace
Well, which is it? Land? Or space?
Anonymous No.16821859 [Report] >>16821866 >>16821868 >>16821869 >>16821872 >>16821873
>>16821853
why do chinamen write ontheir rockets in english?
Anonymous No.16821861 [Report] >>16821956
>>16821857
It’s both—and it’s objectively a WAY better name than “blue origin”
Anonymous No.16821862 [Report]
>>16821845
>1 partial failure orbital launch in 25 years
how many centuries do they need to get to the moon?
Anonymous No.16821863 [Report]
>>16821856
They were founded relatively early (in 2015), and they're relatively well funded
Anonymous No.16821865 [Report] >>16821867
>>16821857
Technically, it's "Blue Arrow Aerospace Technology Co.," but I think whoever is in charge of transliterating the names of Chinese spaceflight companies isn't literate in either Chinese or English, or just hates the people they work for.
Anonymous No.16821866 [Report]
>>16821859
Total Anglo Domination

From the seas to the heavens
Anonymous No.16821867 [Report] >>16821871
>>16821865
blue arrow is completely different company.
Anonymous No.16821868 [Report]
>>16821859
No, but that is actually a good question. Even the nips do it. Why? For Japan I kinda get it but since when did China care about western outreach? Surely it would make more of an impact if they showed off their shiny new resuable rocket with Chinese text.
Anonymous No.16821869 [Report] >>16821957 >>16822021
>>16821857
>>16821859
"Land" is just a transliteration of 蓝 (lan, blue). The Chinese name is blue arrow/rocket aeronautics space technology
Anonymous No.16821871 [Report] >>16821886
>>16821867
>蓝箭航天空间科技股份有限公司
>Blue Arrow Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd.
Anonymous No.16821872 [Report] >>16821876 >>16821886
>>16821859
Obviously, they will write the company's English name "LANDSPACE" in big Latin letters so that potential international customers who watch the launch footage will know who to call if they want to place an order. The rocket name is written in Chinese characters (朱雀) and pinyin (ZQ-3) in smaller letters
Anonymous No.16821873 [Report] >>16821876
>>16821859
It’s the de-facto language for global capitalist business shit, plus their history of places like hong kong speaking it fluently. It’s become the second language of China and most business men speak it as part of higher education. Even with their quasi-isolation and firewall, English still brings opportunity and is used both formally and informally for logos and advertising simply because it’s just what you do in China with big business. Anglos won.
Anonymous No.16821876 [Report]
>>16821873
>>16821872
Also, educated people in China, especially those in technical fields, and rich people who can afford to frequently travel overseas speak English. It's a prestige language and associated with education.
Anonymous No.16821884 [Report]
>>16821831
they used to fish some stages out of the ocean. thats how they got the video footage of state separation
Anonymous No.16821885 [Report]
it's quiet today... nothing major going on
Anonymous No.16821886 [Report] >>16821897
>>16821871
>>16821872
but there's no land in space...
Anonymous No.16821894 [Report] >>16821896 >>16821903 >>16821911 >>16821935 >>16821959
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980318686725677162
>Blue Origin has never delivered a payload to orbit, let alone the Moon
Anonymous No.16821895 [Report]
I will commission the first orbital amusement park. It will be called Spaceland
Anonymous No.16821896 [Report]
>>16821894
Blue Origin has won $7 billion dollar in contract from NASA/DoD without having delivered a single payload to orbit.
'
Mainly due to affirmative action.
Anonymous No.16821897 [Report]
>>16821886
asked and answered
move on
Anonymous No.16821899 [Report] >>16821941
>competition opens up
>oldspace forces itself in greedy and hungry for that cost+ money
>Congress money and NASA resources/time/development divided between SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Oldspace Co.
>ends up with China beating the US back to the moon due to their singular path and focus

would be poetic, would be disastrous
Anonymous No.16821901 [Report] >>16821982
https://x.com/planet4589/status/1980274429553971283
Anonymous No.16821903 [Report] >>16821908
>>16821894
>first time Elon has replied to or mentioned ANYTHING about HLS/Artemis adjacent in months

maybe this is actually a pressure campaign on SpaceX instead
Anonymous No.16821904 [Report] >>16821909 >>16821934 >>16822008
https://x.com/robert_savitsky/status/1980322303570513920
>One of Zenit's old service towers was demolished at Baikonur. Both launch pads belong to Kazakhstan, one of them (in the background) is being upgraded for the Soyuz-5 rocket. As there's no use to it, second tower will likely get demolished too.

>These service towers are sometimes called "Skvorechnik" (birdhouse) for their looks. They were built during USSR times for a planned Zarya spacecraft, which was supposed to fly on Zenit to replace existing Soyuz spacecraft, which is why these towers have never been actually used.
Anonymous No.16821907 [Report]
>Here's how Dynetics Alpaca can still win the moon race
Anonymous No.16821908 [Report] >>16821910
>>16821903
I think this was either kicked off by Jared being back in the running for NASA admin and Duffy feeling that he had to make some big PR move to try and save his uncareer, or by the talk of moving Orion to a commercial launch provider, which would have all of the oldspace primes invested in SLS running for some kind of cover to reinforce their contract finances.
Anonymous No.16821909 [Report]
>>16821904
Anonymous No.16821910 [Report] >>16821960
>>16821908
Duffy really wants to be the NASA admin for some reason even though he has the secretary of transportation seat
Anonymous No.16821911 [Report] >>16821917 >>16821920
>>16821894
Did Blue not deliver a blue ring pathfinder to orbit on the first flight? What is musk going on about here
Anonymous No.16821912 [Report] >>16821915
Musk Moon pivot is coming, I can feel it
Anonymous No.16821915 [Report] >>16821919
>>16821912
Either that or he will have another melty and pull out of HLS entirely, hellbent on putting a Starship on mars before any artemis III shit gets done
Anonymous No.16821917 [Report] >>16821918 >>16821920
>>16821911
maybe he thinks the whole mission failed (not just the booster landing) and just hasn't really paid that much attention to it
Anonymous No.16821918 [Report]
>>16821917
He also said his Tesla is “in orbit around Mars”
Anonymous No.16821919 [Report] >>16821928
>>16821915
Maybe that would be for the best, SpaceX fully devotes all their resources, time and money on Mars EDL, while Blue Origin does it for the moon, the pressure is off SpaceX and onto Blue Origin cause no one is racing SpaceX to Mars
Anonymous No.16821920 [Report] >>16821925
>>16821911
>>16821917
no it stayed attached to the second stage so he's correct
Anonymous No.16821922 [Report]
EDS sufferers OUT
Anonymous No.16821925 [Report] >>16821927
>>16821920
hmm, I do remember that there might have been some problems but the wikipedia page doesn't mention that lol
Anonymous No.16821927 [Report]
>>16821925
Grokipedia will deliver tthe correct true version
Anonymous No.16821928 [Report] >>16821930
>>16821919
thats not possible, Musk has to dunk on Bezos
Anonymous No.16821930 [Report] >>16821932
>>16821928
landing your rocket on Mars is a pretty big dunk
Anonymous No.16821931 [Report] >>16821996
Guys, will SSTO spaceplanes ever be a thing? I ran the numbers, you need to accelerate it to Mach 8-10 before using rocket mode to have any decent payload capacity. to orbit. But the plane will experience 3500C of heating...
Anonymous No.16821932 [Report]
>>16821930
no it has to be full on 100% dunking at all times
Anonymous No.16821934 [Report]
>>16821904
Last proof of the Zarya program....
Anonymous No.16821935 [Report] >>16821938
>>16821894
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980327792635179229
>(Useful payload)
Anonymous No.16821936 [Report] >>16821943
didn't BO boast at some point that they have an extensive list of subcontractors all over the place? something akin to >>16820669
Anonymous No.16821938 [Report] >>16821940 >>16822009
>>16821935
Did richfags shitpost about each other like this in the past as well?
>sir, you have received a telegram
>it says you are a sodomite and charlatan
Anonymous No.16821940 [Report]
>>16821938
Imagine if twitter existed during WW2
Anonymous No.16821941 [Report]
>>16821899
dont forget the lawsuits/years of delays of EIS/political restrictions on the company because they're going "too fast"
Anonymous No.16821943 [Report]
>>16821936
BO has several hundred suppliers for avionics, propellant tanks and other subsystems. The extreme vertical integration is pretty unique to SpaceX.
Anonymous No.16821945 [Report] >>16821988 >>16822013
I have to say I'm mildly surprised Ariane 6 has had one of the smoother beginning of career between the various new LV of the past couple years, they're about to demonstrate the "operational" launch campaign duration of 1 month between launcher delivery at Kourou and launch, and seem on good track to have 2 launches before the end of the year, "beating" H3/Vulcan/NG/Starship this year in succesful launches.
Anonymous No.16821950 [Report]
>>16821790
So now the government is forced to get fleeced twice
Anonymous No.16821951 [Report]
Some of the responses to the Duffy clips are funny. The same people who posted "we just lost the moon" type shit when Isaacman's nomination was pulled, are now saying "but we shouldn't return to the moon to just plant flags!".

Either you want to beat the Chinese, or you don't.
Anonymous No.16821953 [Report]
>>16821845
You jack off to anime you fucking anime pedo. I know you're the discord tranny
Anonymous No.16821954 [Report]
It would be pretty funny if SpaceX just protests and no bids and scraps HLS entirely and moves to Mars landing launch instead.
Anonymous No.16821956 [Report] >>16821964
>>16821861
They're both shit
Anonymous No.16821957 [Report] >>16821958 >>16822010
>>16821869
In Chinese it actually called "Blue Niggers Tongue My Anys"
Anonymous No.16821958 [Report]
>>16821957
>blue niggers
Anonymous No.16821959 [Report] >>16821961 >>16821971 >>16822004
>>16821894
Any word on when Starship will deliver a payload to orbit? Musk should really shut his gay mouth
Anonymous No.16821960 [Report] >>16821970
>>16821910
Resume padding.
Anonymous No.16821961 [Report] >>16821963
>>16821959
did you forget about the banana
Anonymous No.16821963 [Report]
>>16821961
That useful banana was delivered to the bottom of the Indian Ocean
Anonymous No.16821964 [Report]
>>16821956
Yeah I agree actually
Anonymous No.16821965 [Report] >>16821973
>>16821852
That's why they added gay-teway in the halo cope orbit, because SLS was too weak reach LLO with a lander.
Anonymous No.16821970 [Report]
>>16821960
very gay
Anonymous No.16821971 [Report]
>>16821959
Starship is the second generation orbital rocket from SX. BO is older than SX, yet is still trying to get their own first F9-1/2 orbital rocket working.
Anonymous No.16821972 [Report] >>16821976
Bill Nelson never shit on spacex. Bridenstine did. And now Duffy is, too. Do with this information what you will!
Anonymous No.16821973 [Report]
>>16821841
>>16821852
>>16821965
Irony is that Congress wanted the Orion modification because they wanted to deny Falcon Heavy the mission directive. So they made Orion heavier, which "fixed" the issue of Falcon Heavy/Dragon competing in the moon mission category. But that added weight made it not possible to do anything else on the moon.
Anonymous No.16821976 [Report]
>>16821972
Ballast Bill shit on Boeing, expressed short-term need but long-term doubt on SLS (of which he is arguably the architect for), and defended Elon. Patriot.
Anonymous No.16821978 [Report] >>16821979 >>16822002 >>16822003 >>16822017
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980335879945351303
Anonymous No.16821979 [Report]
>>16821978
Based
Anonymous No.16821981 [Report] >>16822020
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980338780226855218
Anonymous No.16821982 [Report]
>>16821901
faggots BTFO
Anonymous No.16821983 [Report] >>16821985 >>16821987
Can the missions even be done without gateway? I think they should worry about it first than the lander.
Anonymous No.16821985 [Report] >>16821989
>>16821983
Not really, if you accept that Orion is currently the only way to get astronauts to and from the Moon in general.
If you can find a way to offload Orion to New Glenn or FH then maybe, but you’d have to find a way to get a big TLI stage that can take it to LLO
Anonymous No.16821987 [Report] >>16821991 >>16821998 >>16822024
>>16821983
huh? of course they can
Artemis 3 is going to be done without gateway for instance
Artemis 4 is the first time gateway is involved in any way
Anonymous No.16821988 [Report]
>>16821945
"smoother" if you ignore the, what, two years gap from A5?
Anonymous No.16821989 [Report] >>16821998 >>16822007
>>16821985
Orion =/= Gateway
they are completely separate things
you could use Orion and dock with Starship (or another lander) always, ignoring gateway altogether
Anonymous No.16821991 [Report] >>16821994 >>16821995 >>16822025
>>16821987
Why does the gateway exist again?
Anonymous No.16821994 [Report]
>>16821991
The same reason SLS and Orion exist and have done fuckall for 20 years while people still get paychecks and pension
Anonymous No.16821995 [Report]
>>16821991
its a jobs program, just like SLS and Orion
Anonymous No.16821996 [Report]
>>16821931
No, except in the far future, as a joke
Anonymous No.16821998 [Report]
>>16821989
yeah my bad, presumably you can still do SLS-Orion and rendezvous with a lander in NRHO. And as >>16821987 said I guess this is the Sharty3 architecture
Anonymous No.16821999 [Report]
>>16821857
>Are you a company of land, or are you a company of space?
Anonymous No.16822000 [Report]
>>16820374
>>actually we do here is evidence, proof and records
flatten the curve, brother
Anonymous No.16822002 [Report]
>>16821978
>Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole moon mission. Mark my words.
I can believe it.
Anonymous No.16822003 [Report] >>16822006 >>16822012 >>16822030
>>16821978
>Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mision
How long it takes until Starship is crew rated?
Anonymous No.16822004 [Report]
>>16821959
He's talking about the company blue origin.
Spacex delivered a lot.
Anonymous No.16822006 [Report]
>>16822003
two more weeks
Anonymous No.16822007 [Report]
>>16821989
That would be pretty funny if after insisting on Orion, they end up using it to rendezvous with HLS in LEO. But at least it would solve the heat shield problem.
Anonymous No.16822008 [Report]
>>16821904
and thats how it will stay for the next 60 years, just like everything else out in that litterbox of a desert.
Anonymous No.16822009 [Report]
>>16821938
Why not? People were always people. See: https://youtu.be/x359GgVRWaE
Anonymous No.16822010 [Report]
>>16821957
你写错了,你才是蓝色的黑鬼!来舔吧!
Anonymous No.16822011 [Report] >>16822014 >>16822015 >>16822019 >>16822028 >>16822032
It looks like this thread will be the 4th in the row that reaches image limit and over 1000 posts. Why it is like that?
Anonymous No.16822012 [Report]
>>16822003
NASA isn’t going to be ready to even entertain that idea any time soon. But if and when Starship gets like 100 starlink launches and upper stage catches under its belt, it will start to be an unavoidable option for manned launches.
Of course this isn’t going to happen until after Artemis 3. Plus they will still need to convince NASA they can do it with interplanetary reentry not just LEO reentry.
Anonymous No.16822013 [Report]
>>16821945
Eurokings win again
Anonymous No.16822014 [Report]
>>16822011
most active thread on /sci/
Anonymous No.16822015 [Report]
>>16822011
Starship launch, unfolding HLS drama, news cycle is heavy rn on the aerospace side of things
Anonymous No.16822016 [Report]
>>16821368
>This is even more true if Starlink gets spun out and goes public like has been teased over the past 5 years
retard
Anonymous No.16822017 [Report]
>>16821978
I always believed this
Anonymous No.16822019 [Report]
>>16822011
bountiful grokslop harvest this year
Anonymous No.16822020 [Report]
>>16821981
Remind me which country has plans to do long-term stays again?
Anonymous No.16822021 [Report]
>>16821869
>"Land" is just a transliteration of 蓝 (lan, blue)
That's quite strange
Using a completely different word for the translated name just because it sounds right
Anonymous No.16822022 [Report] >>16822035
https://www.reuters.com/science/us-seek-rival-bids-artemis-3-spacex-lags-nasa-chief-says-2025-10-20/

Wait this is actually happening and not just a suggestion Duffy made like Dewman did about Falcon Heavy Orion to scare Boeing?
Anonymous No.16822023 [Report]
>>16820695
>by what? a robot and a dog? you can say people you know
A vampire
:^}
Anonymous No.16822024 [Report]
>>16821987
Anyone else think the Frankensteinification of oldspace and newspace in Artemis is really cursed? Why are we using that orange shittle derived piece of shit alongside the glorious fully reusable chrome rocket of the future? It's just not "aesthetic" like the whole Saturn-Apollo stack was.
Anonymous No.16822025 [Report] >>16822029 >>16822036
>>16821991
It's a cope station in a cope orbit because SLS is too weak to take both a crew capsule and a lander to LEO, Apollo-style.
It would have been such a kino flex to have gateway mogged by HLS.
Anonymous No.16822028 [Report]
>>16822011
we gaaan
Anonymous No.16822029 [Report]
>>16822025
>newspace
|
>oldspace
Anonymous No.16822030 [Report] >>16822031 >>16822034
>>16822003
Crew F9 to LEO, dock with HLS, transfer crew.
Do the reverse when HLS returns to LEO. But they'll probably end up using Orion to save face.
Anonymous No.16822031 [Report]
>>16822030
Pretty sure mission profile exists for that, only problem is that you need like double the refuelings for two way trip.
Anonymous No.16822032 [Report]
>>16822011
/sci/ is a slow board, takes forever to get to page 10
One of them was stickied by mods, that returns it back to page 1, and curses it to hit image limit immediately or soon after the sticky ends.
Also sometimes jannies nuke a dozen or two /sci/ threads, which bumps /sfg/ back by a page or two, sometimes after it's already on page 10.
Anonymous No.16822033 [Report] >>16822040 >>16822042
Before we stage, what was your favourite post of this thread and what post you disliked the most?
Anonymous No.16822034 [Report]
>>16822030
>HLS returns to LEO
uhhhhh
Anonymous No.16822035 [Report]
>>16822022
>Bezos and Blue Origin CEO Dave Limp reportedly spoke with Trump over the summer when the Republican president was feuding with Musk, who backed Trump in the 2024 election and went on to lead the broad effort to cut the federal government known as DOGE.
Anonymous No.16822036 [Report]
>>16822025
its going to be comical seeing orion docking with starship HLS
Anonymous No.16822038 [Report]
>>16821189
That's because cats are retarded
Anonymous No.16822040 [Report]
>>16822033
I just liked this post >>16822039
Anonymous No.16822041 [Report]
>>16821189
>Félicette from France
That's this cat, right? Looks like someone took the "assume a spherical cow" meme too seriously.
Anonymous No.16822042 [Report]
>>16822033
>most liked
>>16822044
>disliked
>>16822050