Search Results
7/2/2025, 5:16:50 PM
>>509312074
One is the source of Being and all lesser beings, but One isn't Being itself nor does it have being. In that sense One is ineffable or "empty", because it's well and truly simple and without parts. The Platonic notion of One lines up perfectly with Buddhism's Sunyata or Emptiness, they simply use opposite words to describe the same reality. It's everything and it's nothing because it creates being without being being. It's everywhere yet also nowhere because it transcends locations altogether. When you really understand what One is, both descriptors are equally acceptable because neither one is able to fully describe it and can only amount to approximations.
One is the source of Being and all lesser beings, but One isn't Being itself nor does it have being. In that sense One is ineffable or "empty", because it's well and truly simple and without parts. The Platonic notion of One lines up perfectly with Buddhism's Sunyata or Emptiness, they simply use opposite words to describe the same reality. It's everything and it's nothing because it creates being without being being. It's everywhere yet also nowhere because it transcends locations altogether. When you really understand what One is, both descriptors are equally acceptable because neither one is able to fully describe it and can only amount to approximations.
7/2/2025, 5:16:50 PM
>>22891315
One is the source of Being and all lesser beings, but One isn't Being itself nor does it have being. In that sense One is ineffable or "empty", because it's well and truly simple and without parts. The Platonic notion of One lines up perfectly with Buddhism's Sunyata or Emptiness, they simply use opposite words to describe the same reality. It's everything and it's nothing because it creates being without being being. It's everywhere yet also nowhere because it transcends locations altogether. When you really understand what One is, both descriptors are equally acceptable because neither one is able to fully describe it and can only amount to approximations.
One is the source of Being and all lesser beings, but One isn't Being itself nor does it have being. In that sense One is ineffable or "empty", because it's well and truly simple and without parts. The Platonic notion of One lines up perfectly with Buddhism's Sunyata or Emptiness, they simply use opposite words to describe the same reality. It's everything and it's nothing because it creates being without being being. It's everywhere yet also nowhere because it transcends locations altogether. When you really understand what One is, both descriptors are equally acceptable because neither one is able to fully describe it and can only amount to approximations.
Page 1