>>938051247
Retard. Read this before you post retarded shit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_box_paradox

2/3

>>938020381
>The way the question is worded would leave any reasonable person to believe you flip 2 coins in succession. We know the first one is heads
Bit that's where you're wrong, dumbass. the question never states the first coin is heads. If it did, then the answer would be 1/2. But it doesn't, so either coin could be heads, and the answer is 1/3.

Pic Related: (You)

>>937982603
>The first can't be heads.
Yes it can

1/3