>>511030898
men aren't born wimpy, they're made that way

>>510056428
>keep sub 8 men from rising up
The incel revolution is (largely) a myth. There's never been a revolution whose casus belli is "chad is hoarding all the women" and there never will be. What WhatifAltHist and his ilk failed to understand when they read /pol/ discussions on this topic was that we were discussing indirect effects, not betas killing chad in the streets out of some Elliot Rodger wet dream.

By believing in this scenario you fall into an indefensible position where you will get clowned on because the most likely man to be a virgin is also the most likely not to rebel thanks to high inhibition and risk aversion. However, this is because both the proponent and the detractor of the theory fail to understand second order effects. When your most low time preference citizens aren't forming stable families and therefore participating, you have removed the stable core of steady contributors which power a civilization. This means your entire civil defense, infrastructure, maintenance, and child rearing mostly falls on the shoulders of impulsive high time preference r-strategists looking out for themselves, whether that be through atomized lifestyles or subsidizing their reproductively unfit promiscuous lifestyles. Africanization is the eventual result of a civilization where this occurs.

The retreat of men into low subsistence lifestyles of porn and video games will just lead to a long slow decline. Up until an external crisis tests the system's resilience, at which point the entire thing goes down via cascading catastrophic failures. This, of course, eventually resets civilization back to circumstances which favor low time preference K-strategists, who rebuild civilization, at which the cycle begins again.

>>510012796
>It's getting harder to accept the country I was born in is never coming back.

It will come back when little pussy boi bitches like you die out. Not everyone is a frazzled weakling sell out like you.