>>715157840
Even that’s not much of a reassurance given the news story about how pretty much all 3rd-party games were underperforming and/or outright bombing on the switch. Even when the switch 2 only had one big game people would rather pay $10 for better graphics on BotW than play 3rd party. Combined with weaker hardware and having to do all that work to optimize, at that point why even bother with a switch 2 port?

>>714386137
Supposedly it was because they wanted to have as much units as they could for launch, so most would-be devkits were for the consumer. If so there’s good intention there, but if picrel is anything to go by it may backfire

>>713450449
>Wii U ports
Finally get to play the games on a non-gimped system
>barely-changed sequel to a Wii U game that came out 1.5 years prior (Splatoon 2)
See first point
>and fucking Arms
At least it was something new and creative. On the other hand switch 2 is giving us crippleball. At least ARMS looked fun
>And in terms of 3rd party support Switch 1 was abysmal to begin with. Literally worse than Wii U
Of course, everyone expected that cause the wii u bombed. Switch 2 on the other hand has no excuse given everyone wanted to jump on the switch, yet I don’t see anyone willing to hop onto the switch 2, and with picrel I don’t see why would they