>>715338871
>Stats became meaningless outside of hitting equip breakpoints in DS3 onward because the only use for them is damage.
False
>You can't meaningfully invest into defenses anymore, so there's not really point to trying.
False
>The sole exception is health
False
>and even then most people massively overinvest because nobody wants to do the autism math to find out where it's actually giving one additional hit or not.
Also hilariously false
0/4
Dark Souls 3 was the first game where From actually created a resistance stats that works and is worth investing into

>>714564562
>Putting Havel in Dark Souls 2
Retard

>>714054952
>Armor actually protects you
>poise exists
Dann Dark Souls is so good
How'd they fumble 2 so much?

>>714003358
Elden Ring
>>714003701
Also this, if your game is boring as shit and people drop it you technically filtered them

For a long time I thought Dragon's Dogma had an awful defense/damage calculation formula
Then I checked how Dark Souls 2 works
Holy shit, that's bad